<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2147-5881</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Pamukkale University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Engineering</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Mühendislik</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>A mathematical model proposal for maintenance strategies optimization of the most critical electrical equipment groups of hydroelectric power plants</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Hidroelektrik santralların en kritik elektriksel ekipman gruplarının bakım stratejilerinin optimizasyonu için matematiksel bir model önerisi</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Özcan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Evrencan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Danışan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Tuğba</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Eren</surname>
                                    <given-names>Tamer</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20190828">
                    <day>08</day>
                    <month>28</month>
                    <year>2019</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>25</volume>
                                        <issue>4</issue>
                                        <fpage>498</fpage>
                                        <lpage>506</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20180712">
                        <day>07</day>
                        <month>12</month>
                        <year>2018</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2013, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>Maintenanceis a process that makes a high-level contribution to the sustainability goal ofthe manufacturing facilities defined as uninterrupted, high-quality level,economic, efficient, reliable and environmentally friendly production. Theforemost stage of this important process is the maintenance planning and thefirst and indispensable phase of this stage is the maintenance strategyselection. When considering the maintenance processes which cause thesignificant costs due to production downtime, material, time and laborrequirements, assignment of the suitable maintenance strategies especially forthe critical equipment has great importance in terms of avoiding theunnecessary costs for the generation facility. Furthermore, maintenancestrategy optimization directly effects the goal of sustainable production inthe manufacturing facilities by providing to increase the faultless operatingtime of equipment and contribute to realize the reliable and high-qualitymanufacturing. In addition to these, this problem becomes more and moreimportant in the electricity generation plants which are in the group ofcontinuous production facilities, when the effects of energy on the society areconsidered. In this context in this study, among the electrical equipment whichare the most problematic group, the most critical ones in terms of the powerplant are determined by the AHP-TOPSIS combination in one of the big-scalehydroelectric power plants realize the 20% of Turkey’s electricity generation.Then, the most appropriate strategy combination from corrective, periodic,predictive and revision maintenance strategies is obtained by using theproposed integer programming model for these equipment groups. The use of thiscombination has resulted in an 80% improvement in generation downtimes andassociated costs.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Bakım,üretim tesislerinin kesintisiz, kalite düzeyi yüksek, ekonomik, verimli,güvenilir ve çevreye duyarlı üretim yapması olarak tanımlanan sürdürülebilirlikhedefine üst düzeyde katkı sağlayan bir prosestir. Bu önemli prosesin en önemliaşamalarının başında bakım planlaması gelmektedir ve bu fazın ilk vevazgeçilmez aşaması ise bakım strateji seçimidir. Bakım proseslerinin üretimduruşu, malzeme, zaman ve iş gücü gereksinimi nedeniyle önemli maliyetlerdoğurması düşünüldüğünde, özellikle kritik ekipmanlara uygun bakımstratejilerinin atanması, üretim tesisinin gereksiz maliyetlerden kaçınmasıaçısından büyük önem arz etmektedir.&amp;nbsp;Ayrıca, ekipmanın arızasız çalışma süresinin artırılması ile güvenilirve kalite düzeyi yüksek üretimin gerçekleştirilmesine sağladığı katkı ile debakım strateji optimizasyonu, üretim tesislerinde sürdürülebilir üretimhedefine direkt olarak etki etmektedir. Bunların yanı sıra, sürekli üretimtesisleri grubunda yer alan elektrik üretim santrallarında, enerjinin toplumüzerindeki etkileri de düşünüldüğünde bu problem çok daha önemli bir halalmaktadır. Bu bağlamda bu çalışmada, Türkiye enerji üretiminin %20’sinigerçekleştiren hidroelektrik santrallardan büyük ölçekli bir tanesinde, enproblemli ekipman grubu olan elektriksel ekipmanlar arasından santral açısındanen kritik olanlar AHP-TOPSIS kombinasyonu ile belirlenmiştir. Ardından, buekipman grupları için tamir, periyodik, kestirimci ve revizyon bakımstratejilerinden en uygun kombinasyon önerilen tam sayılı programlama modeli ileelde edilmiştir. Bu kombinasyonun kullanımı ile üretim duruşları ve bunlarınberaberinde getirdiği maliyetlerde %80 oranında bir iyileşme sağlanmıştır.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Bakım strateji optimizasyonu</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Hidroelektrik santrallar</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Tam sayılı programlama</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  AHP</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  TOPSIS</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Maintenance strategy optimization</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Hydroelectric power plants</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Integer programming</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  AHP</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  TOPSIS</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bevilacqua M, Braglia M. “The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection”. Reliability Engineering &amp; System Safety, 70(1), 71-83, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shafiee, M. “Maintenance strategy selection problem: an MCDM overview”. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21(4), 378-402, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mobley RK. An Introduction to Predictive Maintenance. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yıldız C, Şekkeli M. “Türkiye gün öncesi elektrik piyasasında rüzgar enerjisi ve pompaj depolamalı hidroelektrik santral için optimum teklif oluşturulması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(5), 361-366, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Uyan M. “Güneş enerjisi santrali kurulabilecek alanların AHP yöntemi kullanılarak CBS destekli haritalanması”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(4), 343-351, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik (13.11.2018).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Enerji Atlası. http://www.enerjiatlasi.com/elektrik-uretimi/ (13.11.2018).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özcan EC. Bakım Yönetim Sistemi: Kurulum ve İşletme Esasları. Ankara, Türkiye, Elektrik Üretim AŞ. Yayınları, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ding SH, Kamaruddin S. “Maintenance policy optimization-literature review and directions”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(5-8), 1263-1283, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M. “A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem”. Reliability Engineering &amp; System Safety, 91(7), 839-848, 2006.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özcan EC, Ünlüsoy S, Eren T. “A combined goal programming–AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1410-1423, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nguyen TAT, Chou SY. “Maintenance strategy selection for improving cost-effectiveness of offshore wind systems”. Energy Conversion and Management, 157, 86-95, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Braglia M, Castellano D, Frosolini M. “An integer linear programming approach to maintenance strategies selection”. International Journal of Quality &amp; Reliability Management, 30(9), 991-1016, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kirubakaran B, Ilangkumaran M. “Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS”. Annals of Operations Research, 245(1-2), 285-313, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Seiti H, Tagipour R, Hafezalkotob A, Asgari F. “Maintenance strategy selection with risky evaluations using RAHP”. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(5-6), 257-274, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Carnero MC, Gómez A. “Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems”. Energy, 129, 255-272, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Panchal D, Chatterjee P, Shukla RK, Choudhury T, Tamosaitiene J. “Integrated fuzzy AHP-CODAS framework for maintenance decision in urea fertilizer industry”. Economic Computation &amp; Economic Cybernetics Studies &amp; Research, 51(3), 179-196, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nazeri A, Naderikia R. “A new fuzzy approach to identify the critical risk factors in maintenance management.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(9-12), 3749-3783,2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">George-Williams H, Patelli E. “Maintenance strategy optimization for complex power systems susceptible to maintenance delays and operational dynamics”. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 66(4), 1309-1330, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Krishnasamy L, Khan F, Haddara M. “Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generating plant”. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18(2), 69-81, 2005.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shagluf A, Parkinson S, Longstaff AP, Fletcher S. “Adaptive decision support for suggesting a machine tool maintenance strategy: from reactive to preventative”. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 24(3), 376-399,2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Heo JH, Park GP, Yoon YT, Park JK, Lee SS. “Optimal maintenance strategies for transmission systems using the genetic algorithm”. Transmission and Distribution Conference Proceedings, New Orleans, USA, 19-22 April 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Labib AW. “A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS”. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10(3), 191-202, 2004.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baidya R, Dey PK, Ghosh SK, Petridis K. “Strategic maintenance technique selection using combined quality function deployment, the analytic hierarchy process and the benefit of doubt approach”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(1-4), 31-44, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dedopoulos IT, Shah N. “Preventive maintenance policy optimization for multipurpose plant equipment”. Computers &amp; Chemical Engineering, 19, 693-698, 1995.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Goel HD, Grievink J, Weijnen MP. “Integrated optimal reliable design, production, and maintenance planning for multipurpose process plants”. Computers &amp; Chemical Engineering, 27(11), 1543-1555, 2003.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Löfsten H. “Management of industrial maintenance–economic evaluation of maintenance policies”. International Journal of Operations &amp; Production Management, 19(7), 716-737, 1999.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shahin A, Pourjavad E, Shirouyehzad H. “Selecting optimum maintenance strategy by analytic network process with a case study in the mining industry”. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 10(4), 464-483, 2012.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Görener A. “Maintenance strategy selection by using WSA and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy decision environment”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 31(2), 159-177, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vahdani B, Hadipour H, Sadaghiani JS, Amiri M. “Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets”. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 47(9-12), 1231-1239, 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Thor J, Ding SH, Kamaruddin S. “Comparison of multi criteria decision making methods from the maintenance alternative selection perspective”. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 2(6), 27-34, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sankpal P, Andrew A, Kumanan S. “Maintenance strategies selection using fuzzy FMEA and integer programming”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Production and Industrial Engineering, 503-509, 23-24 January 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Emovon I, Norman RA, Murphy AJ. “Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems”. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29(3), 519-531, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. “Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry”. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(4), 375-386, 2008.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. “Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach”. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 1009-1022, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ioannis D, Nikitas N. “Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process &amp; TOPSIS methodology on ships’ maintenance strategies”. In Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars, 4(1), 21-28, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wang JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JH. “Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263-2278, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kubler S, Robert J, Derigent W, Voisin A, Le Traon Y. “A state-of the-art survey &amp; testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications”. Expert Systems with Applications, 65, 398-422, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vaidya OS, Kumar S. “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications”. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29, 2006.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P, Bansal RC. “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Velasquez M, Hester PT. “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods”. International Journal of Operation Research,10(2), 56–66, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Saaty T. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. USA, McGraw-Hill, 1980.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Behzadian M, Otaghsara SK, Yazdani M, Ignatius J. “A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications”. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069, 2012.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1981.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zyoud SH, Fuchs-Hanusch D. “A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques”. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158-181,2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arıbaş M, Özcan U. “Akademik araştırma projelerinin AHP ve TOPSIS yöntemleri kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 19(2), 163-173, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jünger M, Liebling TM, Naddef D, Nemhauser GL, Pulleyblank WR, Reinelt G, Wolsey LA. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008: From the Early Years to the State-of-the-Art. Berlin, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Taha HA. Integer Programming: Theory, Applications and Computations. USA, Academic Press, 2014.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yatırımlar Dergisi. http://www.yatirimlar.com/haber-2018_Yilinda_Turkiye_Ortalama_Elektrik_Toptan_Satis_Fiyati_171_KrskWh_olarak_belirlendi-241241.htm (13.11.2018).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
