Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 149 - 150, 30.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602

Abstract

References

  • Akkaya, G. C. (2004). Finansal Rasyolar Yardimiyla Havayollari İşletmelerinin Performansinin Değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 15-30.
  • Alan, Y., & Lapré, M. A. (2018). Investigating operational predictors of future financial distress in the US airline industry. Production and Operations Management, 27(4), 734-755.
  • Bakır, M., Akan, Ş., & Özdemir, E. (2021). Regional aircraft selection with fuzzy piprecia and fuzzy marcos: a case study of the Turkish airline industry. Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 423-445.
  • Dağlı, D. (2021). Havayolu işletmelerinin Covid-19 öncesi ve Covid-19 sürecindeki finansal performanslarının Topsis yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 2242-2255.
  • Ellibeş, E., & Candan, G. (2021). Financial Performance Evaluation of Airline Companies with Fuzzy AHP and Grey Relational Analysis Methods. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, (34), 37-56.
  • Feng, C. M., & Wang, R. T. (2000). Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 133-142.
  • Kiraci, K., & Yaşar, M. (2020). The determinants of airline operational performance: an empirical study on major world airlines. Sosyoekonomi, 28(43), 107-117.
  • Nasir, A. M., Ahmed, A., & Barkat, W. (2017). Operational performance and financial performance of Malaysia Airlines. Paradigms, 11(1), 1e-1e.
  • Ömürbek, V., & Kınay, B. (2013). Financial performance assessment with TOPSIS method in airline transport sector. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(3), 343-363.
  • Perçin, S., & Aldalou, E. (2018). Financial performance evaluation of Turkish airline companies using integrated fuzzy AHP fuzzy TOPSIS model. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 583-598.
  • Teker, S., Teker, D., & Güner, A. (2016). Financial performance of top 20 airlines. Procedía-Social and behavioral sciences, 235, 603-610.
  • Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., & Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3396-3406.
  • Wang, Y. J. (2008). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1837-1845

PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS

Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 149 - 150, 30.07.2022
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602

Abstract

Purpose- Airline industry is very important for modern society and has a crucial role for globalization and business development by connecting regions, promoting global trade and tourism and hence enabling economic and social development. Over the last two decades, the troubled airlines were oftenly on news delebrating financial difficulties, layouts and distrupted sceduled flights. Covid-19 also has a crucial impact on the deterioration of the industry due to quarantinas and break downs for travel and business. This empricial research intends to analyse and rank the financial performance of the top 11 airlines in the Word for the periods of 2019-2020-2021 (Covid era) and also group and rank these airlines as US Airlines, European Airlines and Chinese Airlines.
Methodology- This study employs TOPSIS method. 11 biggest airline companies are selected by the total revenue generated in 2021. A total of 18 financial indicators are used to measure the profitability, liquidity, financial structure and operational efficiency for the period of 2019-2021. Utilizing a TOPSIS analysis, the performance scores of these airline companies are calculated and a ranking is determined according to these scores.
Findings- United Airlines, Delta Airlines and Southwest Airlines are the top performers in 2019. These airlines have a big drop in 2020 and their performance ranks are 8, 10 and 7, respectively. The best performer in 2020 is the Turkish Airlines. Also, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines show a fast recovery in 2021 by ranking 2 and 1, respectively. When performance ranking is applied for the groups of companies (namely; USA based, Europe based and China based companies), the USA based group is the best performer in 2019, the worst performer in 2020 and the second best performer in 2021. Meanwhile, China based group are the best performer in 2020 and 2021.
Conclusion- This study shows that the Covid era has affected profitability and operational efficiency of airline companies significantly. As a result of the study, it is observed that China based airline companies managed the Covid era better than the USA based and European based airline companies.

References

  • Akkaya, G. C. (2004). Finansal Rasyolar Yardimiyla Havayollari İşletmelerinin Performansinin Değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 15-30.
  • Alan, Y., & Lapré, M. A. (2018). Investigating operational predictors of future financial distress in the US airline industry. Production and Operations Management, 27(4), 734-755.
  • Bakır, M., Akan, Ş., & Özdemir, E. (2021). Regional aircraft selection with fuzzy piprecia and fuzzy marcos: a case study of the Turkish airline industry. Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 423-445.
  • Dağlı, D. (2021). Havayolu işletmelerinin Covid-19 öncesi ve Covid-19 sürecindeki finansal performanslarının Topsis yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 2242-2255.
  • Ellibeş, E., & Candan, G. (2021). Financial Performance Evaluation of Airline Companies with Fuzzy AHP and Grey Relational Analysis Methods. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, (34), 37-56.
  • Feng, C. M., & Wang, R. T. (2000). Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management, 6(3), 133-142.
  • Kiraci, K., & Yaşar, M. (2020). The determinants of airline operational performance: an empirical study on major world airlines. Sosyoekonomi, 28(43), 107-117.
  • Nasir, A. M., Ahmed, A., & Barkat, W. (2017). Operational performance and financial performance of Malaysia Airlines. Paradigms, 11(1), 1e-1e.
  • Ömürbek, V., & Kınay, B. (2013). Financial performance assessment with TOPSIS method in airline transport sector. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(3), 343-363.
  • Perçin, S., & Aldalou, E. (2018). Financial performance evaluation of Turkish airline companies using integrated fuzzy AHP fuzzy TOPSIS model. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 583-598.
  • Teker, S., Teker, D., & Güner, A. (2016). Financial performance of top 20 airlines. Procedía-Social and behavioral sciences, 235, 603-610.
  • Torlak, G., Sevkli, M., Sanal, M., & Zaim, S. (2011). Analyzing business competition by using fuzzy TOPSIS method: An example of Turkish domestic airline industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3396-3406.
  • Wang, Y. J. (2008). Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1837-1845
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dilek Teker This is me 0000-0002-3893-4015

Suat Teker This is me 0000-0002-7981-3121

Ezgi Polat This is me 0000-0003-4315-8062

Publication Date July 30, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Teker, D., Teker, S., & Polat, E. (2022). PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS. PressAcademia Procedia, 15(1), 149-150. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602
AMA Teker D, Teker S, Polat E. PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS. PAP. July 2022;15(1):149-150. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602
Chicago Teker, Dilek, Suat Teker, and Ezgi Polat. “PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS”. PressAcademia Procedia 15, no. 1 (July 2022): 149-50. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602.
EndNote Teker D, Teker S, Polat E (July 1, 2022) PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS. PressAcademia Procedia 15 1 149–150.
IEEE D. Teker, S. Teker, and E. Polat, “PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS”, PAP, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 149–150, 2022, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602.
ISNAD Teker, Dilek et al. “PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS”. PressAcademia Procedia 15/1 (July 2022), 149-150. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602.
JAMA Teker D, Teker S, Polat E. PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS. PAP. 2022;15:149–150.
MLA Teker, Dilek et al. “PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, pp. 149-50, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2022.1602.
Vancouver Teker D, Teker S, Polat E. PERFORMANCE OF AIRLINES: TOPSIS ANALYSIS. PAP. 2022;15(1):149-50.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.