The Proficiency and Opinions of the Pre-service Primary Teachers in Performing Hands-on Science Experiments

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 5, 262 - 287, 01.09.2022

İdris Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.114.9.5

Abstract

It is a challenge to carry out science lessons with experiments both in the conditions that emerged with the COVID-19 pandemic and in schools where there is a shortage of laboratories and materials. This study aims to examine the proficiency and opinions of pre-service primary teachers (PPTs) pertaining to performing hands-on science experiments with simple tools. This case study was carried out with 47 PPTs selected according to the convenient sampling method. Data sources included video recordings of the experiments performed by the PPTs over ten weeks and an open-ended questionnaire. The videos were analyzed with the analytical rubric and presented with descriptive statistics. The open-ended questions were analyzed with content analysis. Results showed that PPTs are sufficient for choosing suitable simple tools for experiments and for applying the experiments gradually, extensively, and correctly, while they need to develop in explaining the concepts and information correctly. In addition, the majority of the PPTs stated that they did not have any difficulties whilst performing the experiments, they could perform science experiments with simple tools, the experiments would reflect positively on the learning outcomes of the students, and they could conduct science lessons with experiments using simple tools and alternative materials, even if there is no laboratory in the school. Future studies should focus on increasing the proficiency of PPTs to give scientific explanations for experiments.

Keywords

proficiency, pre-service primary teachers, science experiments, science teaching, simple tools

References

• Agranovich, S., & Assaraf, O.B. (2013). What makes children like learning science? An examination of the attitudes of primary school students towards science lessons. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 55-69.
• Agustin, M., Nurdiansyah, D., Suryana, S.I., & Sobari, T. (2021). Teacher’s strategy in developing environmental care through simple science experiment towards elementary students. Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 133-145.
• Ahmad, C.N.C., Shaharim, S.A., & Abdullah, M.F.N.L. (2017). Teacher-student interactions, learning commitment, learning environment and their relationship with student learning comfort. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 57-72.
• Akıncı, B., Uzun, N., & Kışoğlu, M. (2015). The problems experienced by science teachers in their profession and difficulties they are confronted with in science teaching. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1189-1215.
• Aktas, I. (2020). The relationship between knowledge of, attitudes toward and acceptance of genetically modified organisms of pre-service elementary school teachers. Trakya Journal of Education, 10(3), 933-949.
• Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre‑service teachers in a TPACK‑practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3495-3528.
• Anılan, B., Berber, A., & Suder, N. (2020). Teacher candidate and student opinions about experimental applications by hands-on learning. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(1), 52-71.
• Basey, M.J., & Francıs, D.C. (2011). Design of inquiry-oriented science labs: Impacts on students’ attitudes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(3), 241-255.
• Bolat, M., Türk, C., Sözen, M., & Turna, Ö. (2012). A laboratory activity by simple tool and instruments appropriate constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(3), 281-287.
• Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A., Altaş, R., & Şen, R. (2020). Investigation of teachers' views about experimenting in science course during distance education. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 49(1), 371-394.
• Bostan-Sarıoğlan, A. (2015). Middle school students’ opinions about use of laboratories on science course. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(4), 333-340.
• Boy, B., Bucher, H.J., & Christ, K. (2020). Audio-visual science communication on TV and YouTube. How recipients understand and evaluate science videos. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 608620. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.608620
• Bozkurt, E., & Sarıkoç, A. (2008). Can the virtual laboratory replace the traditional laboratory in physics education? Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 89-100.
• Chin, C., & Chia, L. (2006). Problem-based learning: Using ill-structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67.
• CoHE [Council of Higher Education] (2018). Primary School Teacher Undergraduate Curriculum. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Sinif_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi09042019.pdf
• Coştu, B., Ayas, A., Çalık, M., Ünal, S., & Karataş, F.Ö. (2005). Determining preservice science teachers’ competences in preparing solutions and in use of laboratory tools. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 65-72.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
• Cullin, M., Hailu, G., Kupilik, M., & Petersen, T. (2017). The effect of an open-ended design experience on student achievement in an engineering laboratory course. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(4), 102-116.
• Çeken, R. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde balonlu araba etkinliği. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 1-5.
• Çelik, H., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2016). Science prospective teachers' self-efficacy and views on the use of information technologies in the teaching of physics concepts. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 182-208.
• Çil, S., & Çalışoğlu, M. (2020). The opinions of primary school teachers about the use of the experimental method in the “properties of matter” unit of the science course. Journal of Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University Social Sciences Institute, 6(2), 451-473.
• Dindar, H., & Yaman, S. (2003). The using condition of educational tools by science teachers in first grade of primary schools. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 13, 167-176.
• Ekici, M. (2015). Science teachers' opinions and utilization levels about the virtual laboratory. Unpublished Master Thesis, Adıyaman University Institute of Sciences. Adıyaman.
• Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2019). Experimentation in biology lessons: Guided discovery through incremental scaffolds. International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 759-781.
• Gumala, Y., Nurkaeti, N., Aryanto, S., Syaodih, E., & Samsudin, A. (2020). The influence of using kit of science for kids to elementary school students’ concept mastery. Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 74–82.
• Güneş, H., Şener, N.D, Topal, N., & Can, N. (2013). Teacher and student assessments regarding to use of science and technology laboratory. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 1-11.
• Harris, K. L., & Farrell, K. (2007). The science shortfall: An analysis of the shortage of suitably qualified science teachers in Australian schools and the policy implications for universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 159-171.
• Haury, D.L., & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
• Hawkins, I., & Phelps, A. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: Which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 516-523.
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V.N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
• Howit, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in a holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 41-58.
• Hussain, M., & Akhtar, M. (2013). Impact of hands-on activities on students’ achievement in science: An experimental evidence from Pakistan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research 16(5), 626-632.
• İnel-Ekici, D. (2015). Design applications of experiment about different science issues with preservice primary teachers. The Journal of International Social Research, 8(39), 665-674.
• Kaleli-Yılmaz, G. (2019). Özel Durum Çalışması Yöntemi. (içinde) Haluk Özmen & Orhan Karamustafaoğlu (Ed.). Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntemleri içinde (s. 293-316). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Kang, S.M., Lee, H., Kim, Y.S., & Kim, K. (2008). The perception of in-service and pre-service science teachers of the training program, and the practical use of advanced science laboratory equipment. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 880-889.
• Karamustafaoğlu, S., Coştu, B., & Ayas, A. (2005). Basit araç-gereçlerle periyodik cetvel öğretiminin etkililiği. Journal of Turkısh Scıence Educatıon, 2(1), 19-31.
• Karasu-Avcı, E., & Ketenoğlu-Kayabaşı, Z.E. (2018). Opinions of classroom teachers’ methods and techniques used in their lessons: A phenomenological research. Hacettepe University Journal Journal of Education, 34(4), 926-942.
• Kim, M., & Tan, A.L. (2010). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry‐based practical work: Stories from elementary pre‐service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465-486.
• Klemm, E.B., & Plourde, L.A. (2003). Examining the multi-sensory characteristics of hands-on science activities. The Annual Meeting of the Association for The Education of Teachers of Science, Sn.Louise (January 29-February 2, 2003)
• Kocakülah, A., & Savaş, E. (2011). Prospective primary science teachers’ views about the process of designing and practising experiments. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Faculty of Education, 30(1), 1-28.
• Koç, A., & Böyük, U. (2012). Basit malzemelerle yapılan deneylerin fene yönelik tutuma etkisi. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(4), 102-118.
• Kwok, P.W. (2015). Science laboratory learning environments in junior secondary schools. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 16(1), 1-28.
• Lang, Q.C., Wong, A.F., & Fraser, B.J. (2005). Student perceptions of chemistry laboratory learning environments, student-teacher interactions and attitudes in secondary school gifted education classes in Singapore. Research in Science Education, 35(2-3), 299-321.
• Leung, C.B. (2008). Preschoolers’ acquisition of scientific vocabulary through repeated read-aloud events, retellings, and hands-on science activities. Reading Psychology, 29, 65-193.
• Ministry of National Education in Turkey [MoNE] (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] in the Turkish language). (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Talim Terbiye Kurulu.
• Morcillo, J.M., Czurda, K., & Robertson-von Trotha, C. Y. (2016). Typologies of the popular science web video. Journal of Science Communication 15(04), A02. 1-32.
• Ornstein, A. (2006). The frequency of hands-on experimentation and students’ attitudes towards science: A statistically significant relation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(3), 285-297.
• Önder, F., & Sılay, İ. (2016). The effect of enriched e-book supported laboratory activities on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer supported education. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(3). 945-960.
• Önen, F., & Çömek, A. (2011). The views of prospective teachers on hands on science experiments. The Western Anatolia Journal of educational Science, 1(3), 45-71.
• Özdener, N. (2005). Deneysel öğretim yöntemlerinde benzetişim (simulation) kullanımı. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 93-98.
• Öztürk, G. (2007). The effect of students’ experimental studies using hands-on materials on their attitudes to science and their learning of the concept of force-energy. Unpublished Master Thesis. Marmara University Institute of Education Sciences, İstanbul.
• Palmer, D. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353.
• Pınar, M.A., & Dönel-Akgül, G. (2020). The opinions of secondary school students about giving science courses with distance education during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(2), 461-486.
• Prıeto-Blázquez, J., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., & Guerrero-Roldã, A. E. (2009). A virtual laboratory structure for developing programming labs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 4(1) 47-52.
• Ruby, A. (2001). Hands-on science and student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, dissertation
• Soğukpınar, R., & Gündoğdu, K. (2020). Students' and teachers' views on science lesson and laboratory practices: A Case Study. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 275-294.
• Sontay, G., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2018). Teachers' opinions about a ‘liquid pressure’ related experimental activity carried out with simple tools. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 5(1), 220-246.
• Stepenuck, S. (2002). Material safety data sheets. NEACT Journal, 21(1), 28-32.
• Szott, A. (2014). Open-ended laboratory investigations in a high school physics course: The difficulties and rewards of implementing inquiry-based learning in a physics lab. The Physics Teacher, 52(1), 17-21.
• Tekin, S. (2008). Development of chemistry laboratory’s effectiveness trough action research approach. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(2), 567-576.
• Trna, J., Trnová, E, Novák, P. (2010). Improvement of Science and Technology Literacy by Means of ICT-based Collaborative Action Research Including Hands-on Experiments. In HSci2010. Bridging the science and society gap. Rethymno: University of Crete, pp. 326-332.
• Trundle, K.C., & Bell, R.L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi- experimental study. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1078-1088.
• Uluçınar, Ş., Doğan, A., & Kaya, N.O. (2008). Views of elementary teachers on science teaching and laboratory. Kastamonu Education Journal, 16(2), 485-494.
• URL1: Experiment process rubric. Retrieved from https://peertje.daanberg.net/drivers/intel/download.intel.com/education/Common/pk/Resources/AP/plans/accidents/Accidents_experimentprocess_rubric.pdf
• Uzal, G., Erdem, A., Önen, F., & Gürdal, A. (2010). The evaluation of teachers’ opinions about hands-on science experiments and the performed in-service training. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 64-84.
• Ünal, M., & Aral, N. (2014). An investigation on the effects of experiment-based education program on six years olds' problem-solving skills. Education and Science, 39(176), 279-291.
• Vasiliadou, R. (2020). Virtual laboratories during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Biochemistry Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 482–483.
• Wardani, T.B., & Winarno, N. (2017). Using inquiry-based laboratory activities in lights and optics topic to improve students' understanding about nature of science (NOS). Journal of Science Learning, 1(1), 28-35.
• Weld, J.D., & French, D.P. (2001) An undergraduate science laboratory field experience for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(2), 133-142.
• Yazıcı, M., & Kurt, A. (2018). Investigation of the effect of using the laboratory in secondary school science teaching to the academic achievements of the students in line with the opinions of teachers and students. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(25), 295-320.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Yılmaz, Ö., & Özkan, B. (2014). Examination of computer education and instructional technology student’s opinions on distance education. Journal of Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education, 11(1), 85-94.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Yüzüak, A.V., Yüzüak, B., & Arslan, T. (2020). Elementary science teacher candidates’ views about easily available materials. ESTUDAM Journal of Education, 5(2), 24-36.
• Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423-447.