Advances in Artificial Intelligence in Education: Leading Contributors, Current Hot Topics, and Emerging Trends

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue, 95 - 113, 31.12.2024

Ezgi Doğan , Ferhan Şahin

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.96.11.6

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a burgeoning field in education, characterized by rapid growth and diverse research interests. This study employs bibliometric analysis to explore the landscape of AI research in education, focusing on studies indexed in the Web of Science (WOS) database. A comprehensive search identified 1383 articles published between 1981 and 2024, which were analysed using the Bibliometrix R package. The analysis encompassed performance analysis, science mapping, and network analysis, yielding visualizations such as annual scientific production trends, most cited documents, and thematic maps. Key findings reveal a substantial increase in AI research from 2022 onwards, underscoring a shift towards longitudinal studies to track AI's evolution and impacts in educational contexts. Ethical considerations, data privacy, and societal implications emerged as critical areas requiring further investigation. While early studies focused on intelligent tutoring systems, contemporary research highlights topics like ChatGPT, machine learning, and higher education. The interdisciplinary nature of AI in education is evident through its publication in journals spanning educational technology and related fields. Future research directions emphasize the need for comprehensive studies addressing ethical frameworks and guidelines for responsible AI integration in education. Bridging technological advancements with pedagogical strategies is essential for developing integrative models that enhance personalized learning and educational outcomes. Ongoing bibliometric analyses will play a pivotal role in identifying emerging trends and guiding future research endeavours in AI and education.

Keywords

artificial intelligence, bibliometrics, education, network analysis, performance analysis, science mapping

Ethical Statement

This study does not contain any studies with human participants and/or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

• Amarathunga, B. (2024). ChatGPT in education: unveiling frontiers and future directions through systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, 13(5), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2024-0101
• Andersen, N. (2021). Mapping the expatriate literature: A bibliometric review of the field from 1998 to 2017 and identification of current research fronts. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(22), 4687-4724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1661267
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
• Bower, M., Torrington, J., Lai, J. W., Petocz, P., & Alfano, M. (2024). How should we change teaching and assessment in response to increasingly powerful generative Artificial Intelligence? Outcomes of the ChatGPT teacher survey. Education and Information Technologies, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12405-0
• Briner, R. B., and Denyer, D. (2012). “Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool,” in Handbook of evidence-based management: companies, classrooms and research, ed. D. M. Rousseau (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
• Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
• Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89-101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858
• Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3443-3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
• Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence,4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
• Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
• Chou, C. Y., Chan, T. W., & Lin, C. J. (2003). Redefining the learning companion: the past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40(3), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00130-6
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
• Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
• Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
• Delgado, H. O. K., de Azevedo Fay, A., Sebastiany, M. J., & Silva, A. D. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence adaptive learning tools: the teaching of English in focus. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 11(2), e38749. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2020.2.38749
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Emin, C., Kayri, M., & Doğan, E. (2024). Examining the Influence of Narcissism and Some Demographic Variables on Online Shopping Addiction via the Exhaustive CHAID Method. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01273-5
• Faria, L., Silva, A., Vale, Z., & Marques, A. (2009). Training control centers' operators in incident diagnosis and power restoration using intelligent tutoring systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.16
• Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
• Fyfe, P. (2023). How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing. AI & Society, 38(4), 1395–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z
• García, P., Amandi, A., Schiaffino, S., & Campo, M. (2007). Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Computers & Education, 49(3), 794-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.017
• Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330
• Guo, S., Zheng, Y., & Zhai, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013–2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12491-8
• Halff, H. M. (1986). Instructional applications of artificial intelligence. Educational Leadership, 43(6), 24-31.
• Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). " I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05856. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856
• Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010051
• Hwang, G. J. (2003). A conceptual map model for developing intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education, 40(3), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00121-5
• Jeon, J. (2024). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners’ experiences and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1-2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241
• Johnson, W. B., Neste, L. O., & Duncan, P. C. (1989, November). An authoring environment for intelligent tutoring systems. In Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 761-765). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1989.71396
• Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
• Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026
• Lameras, P., & Sylvester A. (2022). Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Information 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014
• Li, L., Ma, Z., Fan, L., Lee, S., Yu, H., & Hemphill, L. (2023). ChatGPT in education: A discourse analysis of worries and concerns on social media. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12256-9
• Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
• Lin, Y. & Yu, Z. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2022-0165
• Liu, S., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Peng, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Automated detection of emotional and cognitive engagement in MOOC discussions to predict learning achievement. Computers & Education, 181, 104461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104461
• Loeckx, J. (2016). Blurring boundaries in education: Context and impact of MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 92-121. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2395
• Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076
• Mao, G., Hu, H., Liu, X., Crittenden, J., & Huang, N. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of industrial wastewater treatments from 1998 to 2019. Environmental Pollution, 275, 115785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115785
• McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002). What is bibliometrics and why should you care?. In Proceedings. IEEE international professional communication conference (pp. 108-114). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094
• Mitnik, R., Recabarren, M., Nussbaum, M., & Soto, A. (2009). Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience. Computers & Education, 53(2), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.010
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Profesional De La Información, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
• OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
• Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134
• Qian, K., & Zhong, Z. (2023). Research frontiers of electroporation-based applications in cancer treatment: A bibliometric analysis. Biomedical Engineering/Biomedizinische Technik, 68(5), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2023-0113
• Qu, J., Zhao, Y., & Xie, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2864
• Qu, J., Zhao, Y., & Xie, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2864
• Scharth, M. (2022). The ChatGPT chatbot is blowing people away with its writing skills. The University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2022/12/08/the-chatgpt-chatbot-is-blowing-people-away-with-its-writing-skil.html
• Seldon, A., & Abidoye, O. (2018). The Fourth Education Revolution: Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate or Infantilise Humanity. The University of Buckingham Press.
• Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
• Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A Systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001
• Transformer, G. G. P., Thunström, A. O., & Steingrimsson, S. (2022). Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input?. https://hal.science/hal-03701250/
• Tsai, S. C., Chen, C. H., Shiao, Y. T., Ciou, J. S., & Wu, T. N. (2020). Precision education with statistical learning and deep learning: a case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00186-2
• UNESCO. (2019). Preliminary Study on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
• Vázquez-Cano, E., Mengual-Andrés, S., & López-Meneses, E. (2021). Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8
• Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
• Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
• Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
• Xu, L. D., Lu, Y., & Li, L. (2021). Embedding blockchain technology into IoT for security: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(13), 10452–10473. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3060508
• Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943-13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
• Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
• Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., ... & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629