Investigation of the Effect of Window and Shading Elements on Building Energy Needs

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 40 - 46, 21.12.2022

Betül Bektaş Ekici Gökçenur Orhan Elif Nur Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.5152/Planarch.2022.221325

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of window form and outer shading elements on building
heating, cooling, and lighting loads. The energy loads of the shading element scenarios created
at different angles (0°, 30°, 60°) of the states of a building sample with different window ratios
(1/2, 1/1, and 2/1) were calculated. In addition, in order to determine the effect of shading element
length on energy loads, shading element scenarios for 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.00 m were diversified.
The calculations were carried out with Design Builder software, and it was accepted that
the sample building was in Elazığ province. As a result, by increasing the length of the shading
element from 0 to 1.00 m, it was observed that solar gains in buildings with 1/2, 1/1, and 2/1 window
ratios decreased by 5.2%-19.3%, 7.8%-28.7%, and 11.5%-38.8%, respectively. Depending on this
situation, while building heating loads increase, since solar gains are significantly prevented, the
greatest benefit in reducing building cooling loads is obtained in buildings with 2/1 window ratios.
However, since the level of sunlight utilization decreases with the increase in the length of the
shading element, the need for lighting energy increases at rates ranging from 0.03% to 20.26%
on average for different scenarios. The amount of increase is more pronounced, especially after
0.40 m length.

Keywords

Window, shading device, shading, energy saving, Design Builder

References

• Akyıldız, N. A. (2020). Evaluation of sustainable traditional buildings in the context of energy efficiency and conservation. International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah IJRG, 8(4), 200–215.
• Amasyali, K., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2018). A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1192–1205. [CrossRef]
• Bektaş Ekici, B., Akyıldız, N.A. (2021). Effect of Green Wall Systems on Building Heating and Cooling. In M. Dal (Ed.). Architectural Sciences and Technology (no. May, pp. 269–287). Livre de Lion.
• Cao, X., Dai, X., & Liu, J. (2016). Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade. Energy and Buildings, 128, 198–213.
• Ceylan, Ö. (2019). Gelişmiş Cephe Sistemlerinde Güneş Kontrolü: Ankara’daki Bir Ofis Binasında Performans Analizi Özge Ceylan (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Mimarlık Ana Bilim Dalı Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Changelog - Meteonorm (en) (n.d.). Retrieved from https ://me teono rm.com/en/ chang elog.
• Chi, F., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Li, G., & Peng, C. (2020). An investigation of optimal window-to-wall ratio based on changes in building orientations for traditional dwellings. Solar Energy, 195, 64–81. de Almeida Rocha, A. P., Reynoso-Meza, G., Oliveira, R. C. L. F., & Mendes, N. (2020). A pixel counting based method for designing shading devices in buildings considering energy efficiency, daylight use and fading protection. Applied Energy, 262, 114497.
• Feng, F., Kunwar, N., Cetin, K., & O’Neill, Z. (2021). A critical review of fenestration/window system design methods for high performance buildings. Energy and Buildings, 248, 111184.
• Ghosh, A., & Neogi, S. (2018). Effect of fenestration geometrical factors on building energy consumption and performance evaluation of a new external solar shading device in warm and humid climatic condition. Solar Energy, 169, 94–104.
• Lai, K., Wang, W., & Giles, H. (2017). Solar shading performance of window with constant and dynamic shading function in different climate zones. Solar Energy, 147, 113–125.
• Li, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Wu, X. (2021). Optimizing energy efficiency and thermal comfort in building green retrofit. Energy, 237, 121509.
• Mangkuto, R. A., Rohmah, M., & Asri, A. D. (2016). Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: A case study of buildings in the tropics. Applied Energy, 164, 211–219.
• Monteiro, H., Freire, F., & Soares, N. (2021). Life cycle assessment of a south European house addressing building design options for orientation, window sizing and building shape. Journal of Building Engineering, 39, 102276.
• Ossen, D. R., Hamdan Ahmad, M., & Madros, N. H. (2005). Optimum overhang geometry for building energy saving in tropical climates. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 4(2), 563–570.
• Raimundo, A. M., Saraiva, N. B., & Oliveira, A. V. M. (2020). Thermal insulation cost optimality of opaque constructive solutions of buildings under Portuguese temperate climate. Building and Environment, 182, 107107.
• Sameti, M., & Jokar, M. A. (2017). Numerical modelling and optimization of the finite-length overhang for passive solar space heating. Intelligent Buildings International, 9(4), 204–221.
• Yazdani, H., & Baneshi, M. (2021). Building energy comparison for dynamic cool roofs and green roofs under various climates. Solar Energy, 230, 764–778.
• Zhao, J., & Du, Y. (2020). Multi-objective optimization design for windows and shading configuration considering energy consumption and thermal comfort: A case study for office building in different climatic regions of China. Solar Energy, 206, 997–1017.