A Qualitative Study on the Determination of Balancing Factors in the Relationship between Products, Consumers and Package Schema on the Basis of Balance Theory

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 457 - 494, 30.05.2024

Abdullah Alkan İbrahim Taylan Dörtyol Merve Nalbant

Abstract

The focus of the present study centers on the mismatch between a product and its packaging. The research delves into the reasons behind consumers' choice to purchase a product despite a disparity between the product and its packaging. Qualitative methods were employed for this investigation, with data collected through in-depth interviews. Twenty participants were interviewed, and the data from 13 participants underwent thorough analysis. The findings, interpreted through the lens of balance theory (Heider, 1946), shed light on the factors influencing consumers when faced with the decision to buy a product packaged in a manner that doesn't align with their expectations. The results illuminated the primary determinant in the purchase of mismatched packaging: "advice." According to the perspective of balance theory, consumers experience tension when acquiring a product with incompatible packaging. To mitigate this tension, consumers employ "balancing factors." These factors include, but are not limited to, "advice," "brand," "curiosity," "promotion," "trial desire," "addiction," "difference," "past experience," "need," "time pressure," and "obligation." The study revealed that these balancing factors play a crucial role in consumers' decisions to purchase products with incompatible packaging. The intricate interplay between these factors showcases the complexity of consumer behavior in such circumstances.

Keywords

Balance Theory, Product-Packaging Compatibility, Sensory Marketing, Marketing Theory

Denge Teorisi Perspektifinden Paket Şematiği, Ürün ve Tüketici Arasındaki İlişkide Dengeleyici Unsurların Belirlenmesi Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ürün ile ambalaj arasındaki uyumsuzluk durumlarına odaklanmaktadır. Araştırmada, ürün - ambalaj uyumsuzluğu halinde tüketicinin söz konusu uyumsuzluğa rağmen ürünü satın almasının ardındaki sebepler araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada nitel yöntemler kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri derinlemesine mülakat yöntemiyle toplanmıştır. Toplam 20 katılımcıyla görüşülmüş ve 13 katılımcının verileri analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinden elde edilen bulgular denge teorisi bağlamında yorumlanmıştır (Heider, 1946). Sonuçlar, ürün ile ambalajın uyumsuz olduğu koşullarda ürünün neden satın alındığına dair faktörler ortaya çıkarmıştır. Söz konusu satın alımda en önemli faktörün “tavsiye” olduğu belirlenmiştir. Denge teorisi temelinde elde edilen sonuçlar, tüketicilerin uyumsuz bir paket satın aldıklarında gerilime maruz kaldıklarını göstermiştir. Bununla beraber, tüketicilerin bu gerilimi azaltmak için “dengeleyici faktörler” kullandıkları tespit edilmiştir. Tespit edilen dengeleyici faktörler ise; “tavsiye”, “marka”, “merak”, “tutundurma”, “deneme arzusu”, “bağımlılık”, “farklılık”, “geçmiş deneyim”, “ihtiyaç”, “zaman baskısı” ve “mecburiyet” olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

Denge Teorisi, Ürün-Ambalaj Uyumu, Duyusal Pazarlama, Pazarlama Teorisi

References

• Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2008). A balance theory approach to group problem solving. Social Networks, 30(1), 83-99.
• Alvarez, B. A., & Casielles, R. V. (2005). Consumer evaluations of sales promotion: the effect on brand choice. european Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 54-70.
• Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 100-112.
• Ares, G., & Deliza, R. (2010). Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 21(8), 930-937.
• Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295.
• Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.
• Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1996). Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 121-137.
• Becker, L., van Rompay, T. J., Schifferstein, H. N., & Galetzka, M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 17-23.
• Bezaz, N. (2014). The impact of packaging colour on children’s brand name memorization (No. hal-02170974).
• Bone, P. F., & Corey, R. J. (2000). Packaging ethics: Perceptual differences among packaging professionals, brand managers and ethically-interested consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 199-213.
• Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.
• Butkevičienė, V., Stravinskienė, J., & Rūtelionienė, A. (2008). Impact of consumer package communication on consumer decision making process. Engineering Economics, 56(1), 57-65.
• Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(3), 241-254.
• Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). “Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples”. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.
• Cardello, A. V. (1994). Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. Measurement of Food Preferences (pp. 253-297). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277.
• Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491.
• De Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578-596.
• Deliza, R., Macfie, H. A. L., & Hedderley, D. (2003). Use of computer‐generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 18(6), 465-486.
• Dichter, E. (1957). The package and the label. Packaging Carton Research Council, London.
• East, R., Hammond, K., & Lomax, W. (2008). Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 215-224. Eldesouky, A., Mesías, F. J., Elghannam, A., Gaspar, P., & Escribano, M. (2016). Are packaging and presentation format key attributes for cheese consumers?. International Dairy Journal, 61, 245-249.
• Engel, J. F., Kegerreis, R. J., & Blackwell, R. D. (1969). Word-of-mouth communication by the innovator. Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 15-19.
• Fenko, A., Lotterman, H., & Galetzka, M. (2016). What’s in a name? The effects of sound symbolism and package shape on consumer responses to food products. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 100-108.
• Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373.
• Fournier, S. (2013). “Consumers and Their Brands : Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research”. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–353.
• Garber Jr, L. L., Hyatt, E. M., & Starr Jr, R. G. (2000). The effects of food color on perceived flavor. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(4), 59-72.
• Hajli, N., Lin, X., Featherman, M., & Wang, Y. (2014). Social word of mouth: How trust develops in the market. International Journal of Market Research, 56(5), 673-689.
• Halstead, D. (2002). Negative word of mouth: substitute for or supplement to consumer complaints?. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 15, 1-12.
• Han, J., Seo, Y. & Ko, E. (2017). “Staging luxury experiences for understanding sustainable fashion consumption: A balance theory application”. Journal of Business Research, 74, 162–167.
• Harith, Z. T., Ting, C. H., & Zakaria, N. N. A. (2014). Coffee packaging: Consumer perception on appearance, branding and pricing. International Food Research Journal, 21(3), 849-853.
• Hawkes, C. (2009). Sales promotions and food consumption. Nutrition Reviews, 67(6), 333-342.
• Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107-112.
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Psychology Press.
• Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462.
• Hill, K. M., Fombelle, P. W., & Sirianni, N. J. (2016). Shopping under the influence of curiosity: How retailers use mystery to drive purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1028-1034.
• Horowitz, M. W., Lyons, J., & Perlmutter, H. V. (1951). Induction of forces in discussion groups. Human Relations, 4(1), 57-76.
• Ismail, A. R., & Spinelli, G. (2012). Effects of brand love, personality and image on word of mouth. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 386-398.
• Jacoby, J., & Kyner, D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 1-9.
• Jordan, N. (1953). Behavioral forces that are a function of attitudes and of cognitive organization. Human Relations, 6(3), 273-287.
• Jung, L. H., & Soo, K. M. (2012). The effect of brand experience on brand relationship quality. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 16(1), 87.
• Kauppinen‐Räisänen, H. (2014). Strategic use of colour in brand packaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 27(8), 663-676.
• Keller, E. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: Creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 448-452.
• Kitapci, O., Akdogan, C., & Dortyol, İ. T. (2014). The impact of service quality dimensions on patient satisfaction, repurchase intentions and word-of-mouth communication in the public healthcare industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 161-169.
• Kotler, P. & Gertner, D. (2002). “Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective”. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249–261.
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of Marketing (ed.). New Jersey.
• Kotler, P., Wong, V., Saunders, J., & Armstrong, G. (2005). Principles of Marketing, Fourth European Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
• Krishna, A., Cian, L., & Aydınoğlu, N. Z. (2017). Sensory aspects of package design. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 43-54.
• Kubacki, K. ve Siemieniako, D. (ed.). (2017).Formative Research in Social Marketing. Springer, Singapore.
• Kuvykaite, R., Dovaliene, A., & Navickiene, L. (2009). Impact of package elements on consumer’s purchase decision. Economics and Management, 14, 441-447.
• Lin, L. Y., & Lu, C. Y. (2010). The influence of corporate image, relationship marketing, and trust on purchase intention: the moderating effects of word‐of‐mouth. Tourism Review, 65(3), 16-34.
• Low, G. S., & Mohr, J. J. (2000). Advertising vs sales promotion: a brand management perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(6), 389-414.
• Macdonald, E. K., & Sharp, B. M. (2000). Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 5-15.
• Mead, J. A., & Richerson, R. (2018). Package color saturation and food healthfulness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 82, 10-18.
• Mizutani, N., Okamoto, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Kusakabe, Y., Dan, I., & Yamanaka, T. (2010). Package images modulate flavor perception for orange juice. Food Quality and Preference, 21(7), 867-872.
• Moldovan, S., Goldenberg, J., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2011). The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word-of-mouth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 109-119.
• Molet, M., Craddock, P. & Grassart, A. (2015). “An application of Heider’s P-O-X balance model to change evaluative conditioning effects”. Learning and Motivation, 51, 43–49.
• Morrin, M. & Krishna, A. (2008). “Does Touch Affect Taste ? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues”. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 807–818.
• Morse, J. M. (2007). “Ethics in action: Ethical principles for doing qualitative health research”. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1003-1005.
• Morse, J. M., & Coulehan, J. (2015). “Maintaining confidentiality in qualitative publications”. Qualitative Health Research, 25(2), 151-152.
• Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60(6), 393.
• Ngo, M. K., Velasco, C., Salgado, A., Boehm, E., O’Neill, D., & Spence, C. (2013). Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 361-369.
• O’Callaghan, K. A., & Kerry, J. P. (2016). Consumer attitudes towards the application of smart packaging technologies to cheese products. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 9, 1-9.
• Oladumiye, E. B. (2018). Graphic Design Theory Research and Application in Packaging Technology. Art and Design Review, 6(1), 29-42.
• Özer, Ö., Ozer, O., & Phillips, R. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of pricing management. Oxford University Press.
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). “Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research”. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Piqueras‐Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2012). The influence of the color of the cup on consumers' perception of a hot beverage. Journal of Sensory Studies, 27(5), 324-331.
• Pires, C., & Agante, L. (2011). Encouraging children to eat more healthily: The influence of packaging. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(3), 161-168.
• Pitta, D. A., & Katsanis, L. P. (1995). Understanding brand equity for successful brand extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(4), 51-64.
• Posner, G. “Sometimes buying a car means burying the past”, Newyork Times, 04.11.1998.
• Raghubir, P., & Krishna, A. (1999). Vital dimensions in volume perception: Can the eye fool the stomach?. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(3), 313-326.
• Ranaweera, C., & Prabhu, J. (2003). On the relative importance of customer satisfaction and trust as determinants of customer retention and positive word of mouth. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 12(1), 82-90.
• Rebollar, R., Lidón, I., Gil, I., Martín, J., Fernández, M. J., & Riveres, C. E. (2016). The influence the serving suggestion displayed on soft cheese packaging has on consumer expectations and willingness to buy. Food Quality and Preference, 52, 188-194.
• Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 68-78.
• Rubio, N., Oubiña, J., & Villaseñor, N. (2014). Brand awareness–Brand quality inference and consumer’s risk perception in store brands of food products. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 289-298.
• Rundh, B. (2005). The multi‐faceted dimension of packaging. British Food Journal, 107(9), 670-684.
• Sahin, A., Zehir, C., & Kitapçı, H. (2011). The effects of brand experiences, trust and satisfaction on building brand loyalty; an empirical research on global brands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1288-1301.
• Scheffels, J., & Lund, I. (2017). Cute as candy: a qualitative study of perceptions of snus branding and package design among youth in Norway. BMJ Open, 7(4), e012837.
• Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2007). The importance of packaging attributes: a conjoint analysis approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1495-1517.
• Simmonds, G., & Spence, C. (2017). Thinking inside the box: How seeing products on, or through, the packaging influences consumer perceptions and purchase behaviour. Food Quality and Preference, 62, 340-351.
• Smith, P. R., & Taylor, J. (2004). Marketing Communications: An Integrated Approach. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1988). Cognitive response to advertising and trial: Belief strength, belief confidence and product curiosity. Journal of Advertising, 17(3), 3-14.
• Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. (2017). Consumer response to packaging design: The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 286-298.
• Sümer, S. I., & Zeliha, E. S. E. R. (2006). Pazarlama Karması Elemanlarının Evrimi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 165-186.
• Sütütemiz, N., Çiftyildiz, S. S., & Konuk, F. A. (2009). Paketlenmiş Süt İçin Ambalaj Özelliklerinin Algılanan Önemi ve Satın Alma Davranışına Etkisi: İstanbul İli Örneği, Akademik Gıda, 7(6), 18-28.
• Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 344-364.
• Tığlı, M., & Pirtini, S. (2003). Satış Özendirmede Etkili Bir Araç Olarak Insert ve Hiper/Süpermarket Müşterileri Üzerinde Bir Uygulama.
• Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(1), 62-76.
• Underwood, R. L., & Klein, N. M. (2002). Packaging as brand communication: effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(4), 58-68.
• Underwood, R. L., Klein, N. M., & Burke, R. R. (2001). Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(7), 403-422.
• Van Dijk, E., & Zeelenberg, M. (2007). When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 656-662.
• Van Ooijen, I., Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W., & Smit, E. G. (2016). Atypical food packaging affects the persuasive impact of product claims. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 33-40.
• Van Ooijen, I., Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W., & Smit, E. G. (2017). Signalling product healthiness through symbolic package cues: Effects of package shape and goal congruence on consumer behaviour. Appetite, 109, 73-82.
• VanHurley, V. L. (2007). The influence of packaging color on consumer purchase intent: The influence of color at the point of purchase. Michigan State University. Mass Media.
• Vazquez, D., Bruce, M., & Studd, R. (2003). A case study exploring the packaging design management process within a UK food retailer. British Food Journal, 105(9), 602-617.
• Villanueva, J., Yoo, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2008). The impact of marketing-induced versus word-of-mouth customer acquisition on customer equity growth. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 48-59.
• Wangenheim, F. V., & Bayón, T. (2007). The chain from customer satisfaction via word-of-mouth referrals to new customer acquisition. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(2), 233-249.
• Wei, S. T., Ou, L. C., Luo, M. R., & Hutchings, J. B. (2014). Package design: Colour harmony and consumer expectations. International Journal of Design, 8(1), 109-126.
• Woodside, A. G. & Chebat, J.-C. (2001). “Updating Heider’s balance theory in consumer behavior: A Jewish couple buys a German car and additional buying-consuming transformation stories”. Psychology and Marketing, 18(5), 475–495.
• Yang, A., & Bentley, J. (2017). A balance theory approach to stakeholder network and apology strategy. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 267-277.
• Yap, J., & Harrigan, N. (2015). Why does everybody hate me? Balance, status, and homophily: The triumvirate of signed tie formation. Social Networks, 40, 103-122.
• Zellner, D. A., & Durlach, P. (2002). What is refreshing? An investigation of the color and other sensory attributes of refreshing foods and beverages. Appetite, 39(2), 185-186.