EN
REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE
Abstract
François Georgeon’s interview with Fuat Dündar, published in the April 2009 issue of L’Histoire, has been criticized with this article standing as a reply and being written by Prof. Dr. Norman Stone and Maxime Gauin. In the article, while the lies laid by omission and the inaccuracies of Dündar are being mentioned, it is also expressed that data lacking accuracy and being proven as erroneous a long time ago has been used to support his thesis. As a result of the evaluations made within this framework, it has been concluded that Dündar’s method is rather polemical than scientific.
Keywords
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
May 1, 2009
Submission Date
-
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2009 Number: 19
APA
REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE. (2009). Review of Armenian Studies, 19, 1-16. https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN
AMA
1.REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE. RAS. 2009;(19):1-16. https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN
Chicago
“REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE”. 2009. Review of Armenian Studies, nos. 19: 1-16. https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN.
EndNote
(May 1, 2009) REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE. Review of Armenian Studies 19 1–16.
IEEE
[1]“REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE”, RAS, no. 19, pp. 1–16, May 2009, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN
ISNAD
“REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE”. Review of Armenian Studies. 19 (May 1, 2009): 1-16. https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN.
JAMA
1.REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE. RAS. 2009;:1–16.
MLA
“REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE”. Review of Armenian Studies, no. 19, May 2009, pp. 1-16, https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN.
Vancouver
1.REPLY TO L’HISTOIRE. RAS [Internet]. 2009 May 1;(19):1-16. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA22DM26LN