<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>saujs</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Sakarya University Journal of Science</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2147-835X</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Sakarya University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16984/saufenbilder.1824971</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Reinforced Concrete Buildings</subject>
                                                            <subject>Numerical Modelization in Civil Engineering</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Betonarme Yapılar</subject>
                                                            <subject>İnşaat Mühendisliğinde Sayısal Modelleme</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>The Effect of Different Slab Types on Seismic Performance in Reinforced Concrete Structures: A Comparison of Beam-Slab and Ribbed Slab Systems</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-0431</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Öztürk</surname>
                                    <given-names>Mehdi</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ISTANBUL AREL UNIVERSITY</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5408-1146</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Ay</surname>
                                    <given-names>Emre</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ISTANBUL AREL UNIVERSITY</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                                                <issue>Advanced Online Publication</issue>
                                        <fpage>232</fpage>
                                        <lpage>244</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20251116">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>16</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20260123">
                        <day>01</day>
                        <month>23</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1997, Sakarya University Journal of Science</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1997</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Sakarya University Journal of Science</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Due to Türkiye’s location in an active seismic zone, the safe design of load-bearing systems in reinforced concrete buildings is essential. Under seismic effects, factors such as plan aspect ratio, slab type, and soil class directly influence the structural behavior, including building stiffness, diaphragm action, and lateral load transfer. In this study, a total of 12 reinforced concrete building models were analyzed using the STA4CAD software in accordance with the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018), considering three key parameters: slab system (beam-slab and two-way ribbed slab), plan aspect ratio (1 and 4), and soil class (ZB, ZC, ZD). The models were evaluated in terms of natural periods, modal mass participation ratios, base shear forces, inter-story drifts, and second-order effects. Additionally, concrete, formwork, and reinforcement quantities were compared. The results indicated that as the soil class deteriorates, the demand for shear walls increases, which in turn shortens the natural periods by increasing stiffness. It was found that ribbed slab systems exhibit lower lateral stiffness and result in greater displacements and longer periods compared to beam-slab systems. Moreover, buildings with ribbed slabs required approximately 18–22% more reinforcement. Increasing the plan aspect ratio to 4 significantly increased the displacement in the weak direction and the need for shear walls. The findings highlight that slab type, soil class, and plan geometry collectively play a decisive role in seismic performance.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Plan aspect ratio</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ribbed slab</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Inter-story drift</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Seismic performance</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Soil class</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and A. İçen, “A comprehensive case study on structural behavior before and after soil improvement,” Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1273–1292, 2025, doi: 10.17780/ksujes.1653400</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli, “Rijit bodrum perdelerinin TBDY 2018 ile tasarlanan az katlı yapılardaki etkisi üzerine bir inceleme,” Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 712–720, 2022, doi: 10.29137/umagd.1092841</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and M. Akgül, “TBDY 2018 ile tasarlanan kompozit binaların ana ve artçı depremlerde davranışı,” Uluslararası Mühendislik Araştırma ve Geliştirme Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 416–428, 2023, doi: 10.29137/umagd.1241090</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli, “Performance evaluation of steel–concrete composite structures designed in poorly graded soils,” Revista de la Construcción, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 259–276, 2023, doi: 10.7764/RDLC.22.2.259</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and M. Akgül, “Comparative analysis of composite buildings produced in national and international standards,” Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 183–199, 2023, doi: 10.30855/gmbd.0705063</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and E. M. Güneyisi, “Seismic performance evaluation of regular and irregular composite moment resisting frames,” Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 17, no. 7, Art. no. e301, 2020, doi: 10.1590/1679-78255969</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and E. M. Güneyisi, “Assessment of seismic behavior factor of code-designed steel–concrete composite buildings,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 46, pp. 4271–4292, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13369-020-04913-9</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Etli and E. M. Güneyisi, “Effect of using eccentric braces with different link lengths on the seismic demand of CFST column–composite beam frames subjected to near-field and far-field earthquakes,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 47, pp. 1599–1627, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40996-022-00994-8</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. K. Sadh and U. Pendharkar, “Influence of aspect ratio and plan configurations on seismic performance of multistoreyed regular R.C.C. buildings: An evaluation by response spectrum analysis,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 293–299, Jan. 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">S. Chennashree and C. K. Sushma, “Seismic performance of RCC high rise structure for different aspect ratio,” International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 8, Aug. 2022.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. D. Malekar, D. P. Telang, and L. N. Vairagade, “Seismic performance of RC structures for various zones considering different classes of building,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 6, Mar. 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">P. Dixit and Pradeep, “Analyzing the impact of the aspect ratio of a building on concrete use in its structure,” in Proc. fib International Conference on Concrete Sustainability, vol. 33, pp. 133–139, 2022, doi: 10.14311/APP.2022.33.0133</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">M. Öztürk and M. A. Karan, “Impact of near-fault seismic inputs on building performance: A case study informed by the 2023 Maraş earthquakes,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 18, Art. no. 10142, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app151810142</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. T. Jereen, S. Anand, and B. M. Issac, “Seismic evaluation of buildings with plan irregularity,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 857, pp. 225–230, 2016, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.857.225</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">M. B. Shelke and D. P. Joshi, “Effect of wind and earthquake force on different aspect ratio of building,” International Journal of Engineering Research &amp; Technology (IJERT), vol. 8, no. 6, Jun. 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. Zakaria, M. S. R. Krishna, and S. V. Surendhar, “Comparative study of the seismic performance of RCC building with ribbed slab and grid slab,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 8, no. 6S3, pp. 139–144, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">E. Çelebi and O. Kırtel, “Seismic performance of RC framed buildings with ribbed slabs at the affected region by 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 3623–3646, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10518-025-02191-0</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">G. B. Sakcalı, H. Tekeli, and F. Demir, “The effects of shear wall amount on building performance in RC buildings,” Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2017, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.296998</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. O. Günel, “Influence of the shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete buildings,” M.S. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Türkiye, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ö. E. Dorum, “Farklı deprem bölgeleri ve farklı zemin sınıflarının kaba yapı maliyetine etkisi,” Selçuk Üniversitesi Teknik Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Teknik-Online Dergi, vol. 5, no. 1, 2006.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ö. Uludağ, “Betonarme binalarda döşeme tipinin yapı maliyetine ve deprem davranışına etkilerinin incelenmesi,” M.S. thesis, Karabuk University, Karabük, Türkiye, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. B. Azizi, “Structural behavior and cost comparison of various slab types in reinforced concrete tall buildings,” M.S. thesis, Atılım University, Ankara, Türkiye, 2020.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">AFAD, “Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (TBDY-2018),” Ministry of Interior, Ankara, Türkiye, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">D. Domínguez, F. López-Almansa, and A. Benavent-Climent, “Would RC wide-beam buildings in Spain have survived Lorca earthquake (11-05-2011),” Engineering Structures, vol. 108, pp. 134–154, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.020</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">C. Dönmez, “Türkiye’deki asmolen yapıların deprem yeterliliği konusunda bir irdeleme,” in Proc. 2. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, Hatay, Türkiye, 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">O. Lalaj, O. Çevik, and A. H. Kayhan, “Seismic demand on 4-story limited ductility class frames designed according to TBEC2018,” in Proc. 5th International Conference on Earthquake and Seismology (ICEES), Ankara, Türkiye, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">F. Gómez-Martínez, A. Alonso-Durá, F. De Luca, and G. M. Verderame, “Ductility of wide beam RC frames as lateral resisting system,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1545–1569, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9891-x</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">H. Dinçer, “Çift doğrultulu dişli döşemeye sahip betonarme binaların şekildeğiştirme bazlı doğrusal olmayan davranışında perde kullanımının etkisi,” M.S. thesis, Dumlupinar University, Kütahya, Türkiye, 2022.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">K. Turker and I. Gungor, “Seismic performance of low and medium-rise RC buildings with wide-beam and ribbed-slab,” Earthquakes and Structures, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 383–393, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">A. U. R. Mohammad and D. Bharathi, “Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings,” International Journal &amp; Magazine of Engineering, Technology, Management and Research, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1424–1433, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Turkish Standards Institute, “TS 500: Betonarme yapıların tasarım ve yapım kuralları,” Ankara, Türkiye, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
