FARKLI DOMATES TOHUMLARININ ÇİMLENMESİ ÜZERİNE TUZ STRESİNİN ETKİSİ

Year 2008, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 174 - 182, 01.12.2008

Mahmut Doğan

Abstract

Özet: Çalışmamızda 22 yerli (Lycopersicum esculentum), 3 adet yabani (Lycopersicum
peruvianum, L. pennellii, L. hirsitum) olmak üzere toplam 25 çeşit domates tohumu
deney materyali olarak kullanılmıştır. Tohumlar +25 ºC'ta 0, 50, 75, 100, 125 ve 150
mM tuz (NaCl) stresi altında 15 gün çimlenmeye bırakılarak fizyolojik özellikler
bakımından bir sınıflandırmaya tabi tutulmuştur. Tohumlar tuz toleransına en duyarlı
olabilecekleri çimlenme devresinde, çimlenme yüzdesi esas alınarak incelenmiştir.
Tolerans sınırları içersinde tuzluluğun çimlenme yüzdesine ne şekilde etki ettiği
araştırılarak elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirilmiştir. Literatürden tuza dayanıklı olduğu
bilinen yabani genotiplere en çok benzerlik gösteren yerli türler dayanıklı, en çok
farklılık gösteren türler ise hassas olarak belirlenmiştir. Domates çeşitlerinde
maksimum tuz konsantrasyonu toleranslı geneotiplerde 125–150 mM NaCl ortamında,
hassas genotiplerde ise 50-75 mM NaCl ortamda belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar kelimeler: Tuz stresi, domates, çimlenme
THE EFFECTS OF SALT STRESS ON THE GERMINATION OF THE DIFFERENT
TOMATO SEEDS
Abstract: In this study, we will investigate salt stress on fertilization of tomato seeds.
Twenty two genotypes of domestic tomato seeds (Lycopersicum esculentum) and three
genotypes of wild type tomato seeds (Lycopersicum peruvianum, Lycopersicum penellii,
Lycopersicum hirsitum) will be used. The seeds will be seeded in various conditions
such as +25 oC, and irrigated by water containing 0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 mM salt
and will be observe during 15 days period. At the end of the study, we will determine
the effects of salt stress by fertilization ratios of the seeds under the stress conditions.
By the study, we will classify the domestic tomato genotypes as sensitive or resistant to
the stress factors by compared the three wild type tomato seeds fertilization ratios as a
reference values. By the way, we will determined the most resistant domestic tomato
genotype to salt stress for future tomato grow in our region that the soil being salt by
irrigation with water. Maximum salt concentration in varieties of tomato is determined
at tolerable genotypes at the situation of 125-150mM salt (NaCl) however it is
determined at sensitive genotypes at the situation of 50-75mM NaCl.
Key words: Salt stress, tomato, fertilization

Keywords

Tuz stresi, domates, çimlenme

References

• ABBAS MA, YOUNIS ME, SHUKRY WM, 1991. Plant growth, metabolism and adaptation in relation to stress condition, XIV effect of salinity on the internal solute concentrations in Phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Plant Physiology, 138, 722-727.
• ALFOCEA FP, ESTAN MT, CARO M, BOLARIN MC, 1993. Response of tomato cultivars to salinity. Plant and Soil, 150, 203-211.
• ALIAN A, ALTMAN A, HEUER B, 2000. Genotypic difference in salinity and water stress tolerance of fresh market tomato cultivars. Plant Science, 152, 59-65.
• AL-KARAKI GN, 2000. Growth water use efficiency and sodium and potassium acquisition by tomato cultivars grown under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 23(1), 1-8.
• ASHRAF M,1994. Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 13(1), 17-42.
• ASHRAF M, MCNEILLY T, BRADSHAW AD, 1996. The potential for evaluation of salt (NaCl) tolerance of seven grass species. New Phytologist, 103, 299-309.
• AWANK YB, ATHERTON JG, TAYLOR AJ, 1993. Salinity effects on strawberry plants grown rock wool, growth and leaf relations. Journal of Horticultural Science, 68, 783-790.
• BABOURINA O, LEONOVA T, SHABALA S, 2000. Effect of sudden salt stress on ion fluxes in intact wheat suspension cell. Annals of Botany, 85, 759-767.
• BEWLEY JD, BLACK M, 1994. Seeds Physiology of Development and Germination. Second edition, Plenum Press, New York and London, pp.306-447.
• BOZCUK S, 1989. Bazı kültür bitkileri tohumlarının çimlenmesinde tuz ve kinetin etkileşimi. Turkish Journal of Botany, 14, 139-149.
• BOZCUK S, 1991. Bazı kültür bitkilerinde tuzluluğun çimlenme üzerine etkisi ve tuz toleransı sınırlarının saptanması, Turkish Journal of Biology, 15(2), 144-151.
• BELKHODJA R, MORALES F, ABADIA A, GOMEZ-APARISI J, ABADIA J, 1994. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Physiology, 104, 667-673.
• CANO EA, PEREZ-ALFOCEA F, MORENO V, BOLARIN MC, 1996. Responses to NaCl stress of cultivated and wild tomato species and their hybrids in callus cultures. Pland Cell Reports, 15, 791-794.
• CARO M, CRUZ V, CUARTERO J, ESTAN MT, BOLARIN MC, 1991. Salinity tolerance of normal-fruited and cherry tomato cultivars. Plant and Soil 136, 249- 255.
• CUARTERO J, YEO AR, FLOWERS T, 1992. Selection of donors for salt-tolerance in tomato using physiological traits. New Phytology, 121, 63-69.
• CUARTERO J, FERNANDEZ-MUNOZ R, 1999. Tomato and salinity. Science Horticulture, 78, 83-125.
• ÇİÇEK N, 1999. İki mısır (Zea mays L.) çeşidinin gelişiminde tuzluluğun bazı fizyolojik aktiviteler ve fotosistem II üzerine etkileri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 94 s.
• DEMİR İ, DEMİR K, 1992. Farklı tuz konsantrasyonlarının beş değişik fasulye çeşidinde çimlenme, çıkış ve fide gelişimi üzerine etkileri, GAP 1. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, Şanlıurfa, 335-342.
• FRANCO JA, ESTEBAN C, RODRIGUEZ C, 1993. Effect of salinity on various growth stages of muskmelon cv. Revigal. Journal of Horticulture Science, 68, 899-904.
• GANIEVAR, ALLAHVERDIEV S, BAYRAMOVA S, NAFISI S, 1997. Effect of polystimuline-K on maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings pigment apparatus formation on the sodium chloride salinity. Turkish Journal of Botany, 21, 253-257.
• GOSSETT DR, MILLHOLLON EP, LUCAS MC, 1994a. Antioxidant response to NaCl stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Science, 34, 706-714.
• GOSSETT DR, MILLHOLLON EP, LUCAS MC, BANKS SW, MARNEY MM, 1994b. The effects of NaCl on antioxidant activities in callus tissue of salt- sensitive cotton cultivars (Gosspium hirsitum L.). Plant Cell Reports, 13, 498- 503.
• HAMADA EAM, HAMOUD MA, EL-SAYED MA, KIRKWOOD RC, EL-SAYED, H, 1992. Studies on the adaptation of selected species of the family Gramineae A. Juss. to salinization. Feddes Repertorium, 103(1-2), 87-98.
• HERNANDEZ JA, CORPAS FJ, GOMEZ M, DEL RIO LA, SEVILLA F, 1993. Salt- induced oxidative stress mediated by activated oxygen species in pea leaf mitocondria. Physiology Plant, 89, 103-110.
• HERNANDEZ JA, OLMOS E, CORPAS FJ, SEVILLA F, DEL RIO IA, 1995. Salt- induced oxidative stress in chloroplasts of pea plants. Plant Science, 105, 151- 167.
• LEVITT J, 1972. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Academic Press, New York, pp. 345.
• LEVITT J, 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Vol. II. 2nd edition, Academic Press, New York, pp. 607.
• LUNA C, GONZALEZ C, TRIPPI V, 1994. Oxidative damage caused by an excess of copper in oat leaves. Plant Cell Physiology, 5, 11-15.
• MER RK, PRAJITH PK, PANDYA DH, PANDEY AN, 2000. Effects of salts on germination of seeds and growth of young plants of Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Cicer arietinum ve Brassica. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science, 185, 209-217.
• ÖZDEMİR S, 1995. Tuzluluk stresinin bitkilere etkileri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 69-82.
• PEREZ-AFLOCEA F, ESTAN MT, CARO M, GUERRIER G, 1996. Osmotic adjustment in Lycopersicon esculentum and Lycopersicon pennellii under sodium chloride and polyethylene glycol 6000 iso-osmotic stress. Physiology Plant, 87, 493-498.
• RAINS DW, 1991. Salinity and alkalinity as issue in world agriculture. In: CHOUKRALLAH R (Eds.) Plant Salinity Research. New Challenges, pp. 19- 31.
• RUSH MA, RIOS S, OLMOS E, SANTA-CRUZ A, BOLARIN CM, 2000. Long-term culture modifies the salt responses of callus lines of salt-tolerant and salt- sensitive tomato species. Journal Plant Physiology, 157, 413-420.
• SALAMA S, TRIVEDI S, BUSHEVA M, ARAFA AA, GARAB G, ERDEI L, 1994. Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, cation accumulation, chloroplast structure and function in wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144, 241-247.
• SHALABY EE, EPSTEIN E, QUALSET CO, 1993. Variation in salt tolerance among some wheat and Triticale genotypes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 171, 298-304.
• SHARMA PK, HALL DO, 1992. Changes in carotenoid composition and photosynthesis in sorgum under highlight and salt stresses, Journal Plant Physiology, 140, 661-666.
• SİVRİTEPE N, 1995. Asmalarda tuza dayanıklılık testleri ve tuza dayanımda etkili bazı faktörler üzerinde araştırmalar, Doktora Tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, 176 s.
• SRIVASTAVA LM, 2002. Plant Growth and Development, Hormones and Environment. Academic Press, California, 660-665 s.
• SÖNMEZ B, 1990. Tuzlu ve sodyumlu topraklar, T.O.K.B. Köy Hizmetleri Şanlıurfa Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, 62, 60 s.
• TABAN S, KATKAT AV, 2000. Effect of salt stress on growth and mineral elements concentrations in shoots and roots of maize plants. Tarım Bilimleri dergisi 6(2), 119-122.
• TAIZ L, ZEIGER E, 2002. Plant Physiology Third edition, Sinauer Associates, USA, 878 p.
• TALEISNIK E, TAL M, SHANNON MC, 1983. The response to NaCl of excised fully differentiated and differentiating tissues of the cultivated tomato L. esculentum and its wild relative L. peruvianum and Solanum penellii. Physiology Plant, 59, 659-663.
• TIPIRDAMAZ R, ELLİALTIOĞLU Ş, 1994. Domates genotiplerinde tuza dayanıklılığın belirlenmesinde değişik tekniklerin kullanımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fak Yayınları, Yayın No: 1358, Bilimsel Araştırma ve İnceleme 752, 21s.