<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>sdlr</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">2146-7129</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2980-2989</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Süleyman Demirel University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52273/sduhfd..1014684</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Law in Context</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Hukuk</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>ALMAN ÖĞRETİSİNDE İLERİ SÜRÜLEN GÖRÜŞLER IŞIĞINDA TÜRK HUKUKUNDA YAĞMA SUÇUNUN İHMALÎ HAREKETLERLE İŞLENİP İŞLENEMEYECEĞİ MESELESİ</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>IN THE LIGHT OF THE OPINIONS PUT FORWARD IN THE GERMAN DOCTRINE, THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE CRIME OF ROBBERY IN TURKISH LAW CAN BE COMMITTED BY NEGLIGENT ACTS</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0160-1997</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Koç</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ziya</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>T. C. ADALET BAKANLIĞI</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20211229">
                    <day>12</day>
                    <month>29</month>
                    <year>2021</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>11</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>577</fpage>
                                        <lpage>612</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20211025">
                        <day>10</day>
                        <month>25</month>
                        <year>2021</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20211116">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>16</month>
                        <year>2021</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2011, Süleyman Demirel Law Review</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2011</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Süleyman Demirel Law Review</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Yağma suçu, TCK’nın 148. maddesinde düzenlenmiştir. Yağma, doktrinde kabul edildiği üzere, icrai hareketle işlenebilen bir suç tipidir. Suçun kanuni tanımında yer alan tehdit etmek veya cebir kullanmak şeklindeki zorlama hareketleri aktif bir hareketin varlığını gerektirmektedir. Alman hukukunda yağmanın ihmali hareketle işlenmesi kimi yazarlara göre mümkündür. Hukukumuz bakımından, doktrinde ve uygulamada buna verilen cevap olumsuzdur. İhmali suçlar, gerçek ve gerçek olmayan ihmali suçlar şeklinde ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Gerçek olmayan ihmali suçlar, esasen, icrai hareketle işlenebilen suçlardır. Bir suçun, ihmali hareketle işlenebilmesi için kanunda buna ilişkin özel bir düzenlemenin bulunması gerekir. Alman hukukundan farklı olarak, hukukumuzda bu yönde bir genel hükme yer verilmemiştir. Dolayısıyla, kanunilik ilkesi gereğince, gerçek olmayan ihmali suç sebebiyle cezalandırma için bunu düzenleyen bir özel norm bulunmalıdır. Keza yağma, bir sırf hareket suçu olması nedeniyle, ancak icrai hareketle işlenebilir. Fakat bu suça, genel hükümler uyarınca ihmali hareketle katılmak mümkündür.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>The crime of robbery is regulated in Article 148 of the Turkish Penal Code. Robbery, as accepted in the doctrine, is a type of crime that can be committed by active action. Coercive acts in the form of threats or use of force, which are included in the legal definition of the crime, require the existence of an active act. According to some authors, it is possible to commit robbery by negligence in German law. In terms of our law, the dominant view is that the crime of robbery cannot be committed through negligence.Negligence crimes are divided into two as real and unreal negligence crimes. Unreal negligence crimes are essentially offenses that can be committed by active action. In order for an act to be punished by negligence, there must be a special provision in the law regarding this.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Yağma</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  cebir</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  tehdit</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  zorlama</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  ihmal</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Robbery</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Force</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Threat</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Coercion</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Negligence</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akbulut Berrin, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 6. Baskı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artuk M. Emin vd., Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 13. Baskı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artuk M. Emin, Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler, 18. Baskı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bartsch Tillmann vd, “Referendarexamensklausur: Die Wahrheit liegt (nicht nur) auf dem Platz”, Zeitschrift für das Juristische Studium, 2015, S. 4, ss. 417-430.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bayraktar Köksal vd., Özel Ceza Hukuku, Cilt: IV, Malvarlığına Karşı Suçlar, 1. Baskı, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bosch Nikolaus, Schönke-Schröder Strafgesetzbuch, 30. Auflage, C. H. Beck, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Centel Nur vd., Kişilere Karşı İşlenen Suçlar, Cilt: I, 4. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Çakmut Özlem Yenerer, “Cebir Suçu (TCK m. 108)”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2013,C. VIII, S. 2, ss. 221-228.
Demirbaş Timur, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 16. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Eisele Jörg, Strafrecht-Besonderer Teil II, Kohlhammer, Stutgart, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Eser Albin, “Zum Verhältnis von Gewaltanwendung und Wegnahme beim Raub”, Neue Juristische Wochenshcrifft, 1965, C. 18, S. 9, ss. 377-380.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gökcen Ahmet vd., Malvarlığına Karşı Suçlar, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hakeri Hakan, Ceza Hukukunda İhmal Kavramı ve İhmalî Suçların Çeşitleri, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2003.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hakeri Hakan, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 22. Baskı, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Harro Otto, “BGH, 15. 10. 2003 — 2 StR 283/03. Verknüpfung von Gewalt und Wegnahme beim Raub”, Juristen Zeitung, 2004, C. 59, S.7, ss. 362-365.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Harro Otto, Grundkurs Strafrecht Die einzelnen Delikte, 7. Bası, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2005.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Heghmanns Michael, Strafrecht für alle Semester Besonderer Teil, Springer, Heidelberg, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hoffmann-Holland Klaus, Strafrecht Besonderer Teil, Tübingen 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jäger Christian, Examens-Repetitorium Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 9. Baskı, CF Müller, Heidelberg, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kindhäuser Urs vd, Strafgesetzbuch, 5. Auflage, C. H. Beck, München, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koca Mahmut, Yağma Cürümleri, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2003.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koca Mahmut - Üzülmez İlhan, Türk Ceza Hukuku, Özel Hükümler, 6. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koca Mahmut - Üzülmez İlhan, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 14. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Korkmaz Elif Şule, Yağma Suçu, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kühl Kristian-Martin Heger, Strafgesetzbuch, 29. Baskı, C. H. Beck, München, 2018.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Küper Wilfried, “Zur Problematik der sukzessiven Mittäterschaft — Zugleich Anmerkung zum Urteil des BGH vom 16. 12. 1980, JZ 1981, 596”, Juristen Zeitung, 1981, C. 36, S. 17, ss. 568-574.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lorenz Henning, “Die Fortwirkungs-Rechtsprechung des BGH – Raub mit Drohung durch Unterlassen?”, HHRS, 2017, C. 18, S. 7, ss. 309-319.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mitsch Wolfgang, Strafrecht Besonderer Teil 2, Springer, Heidelberg, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özbek Veli Özer vd., Türk Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler, 16. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özbek Veli Özer, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 12. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özen Mustafa, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler Dersleri, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özgenç İzzet, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 17. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rengier Rudolf, Strafrecht Besonderer Teil I, 22. Baskı, C. H. Beck, München, 2020.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sander Günther, Münchener Kommentar zum StGB, 4. Auflage, C. H. Beck, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schünemann Bernd, “Raub und Erpressung (3. Teil)”, JA, 1980, ss. 486-493.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Taş Burak, “Senedin Yağması Suçu”, NKÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2021, S. 1, ss. 231-264.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tezcan Durmuş vd, Teorik ve Pratik Özel Ceza Hukuku, 19. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vogel Joachim, Strafgesetzbuch Leipziger Kommentar, 12. Auflage, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Walter Tonio, “Raubgewalt durch Unterlassen?”, NStZ, 2005, Heft. 5, ss. 240-243.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yenisey Feridun- Plagemann Gottfried, Alman Ceza Kanunu Strafgesetzbuch (StGB), 2. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
