Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sınıf II Aktivatör İle Tedavi Edilmiş Bireylerde Havayolu Değişikliklerinin İncelenmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 8 - 12, 01.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.297801

Abstract

Amaç: Bu
çalışmanın amacı fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi gören bireylerde Andresen
aktivatörünün
  havayolu üzerine etkisini
kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirmektir.




















Gereç ve Yöntemler:Çalışmaya
büyümesi devam eden  iskeletsel Sınıf II
maloklüzyona sahip aktivatör ile tedavi edilen 19 birey tedavi grubu, sabit
fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi öncesi ortodontik tedavisi yapılacak ve
gözlenmekte olan 19 adet iskeletsel Sınıf II birey kontrol grubu olarak
katılmıştır. Bu hastalardan elde edilen lateral sefalometrik filmler üzerinde
ölçümler gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Normal dağılım gösteren verilerin
karşılaştırılmasında bağımsız örnek t testi ile eşli örnek t testi kullanıldı.
Normal dağılım göstermeyen verilerin karşılaştırılmasında ise Mann Whitney U
testi kullanıdı.  Anlamlılık düzeyi
p<0,05 olarak alındı.
















Sonuçlar:Aktivatör
kullanımı ile üst ve alt havayolunda tedavi öncesi ile tedavi sonrası arasında
anlamlı artış bulunmasına rağmen, kontrol grubu ile aralarında anlamlı
farklılık bulunmamıştır.




















Anahtar Kelimeler:Aktivatör,
Sınıf II maloklüzyon, Ortodonti, Havayolu
















References

  • Bishara SE, Ziaja RR, 1989. Fuctional appliances: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 95, 250-258.
  • Dahlberg G, 1940. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications.
  • Figueroa AA, Glupker TJ, Fitz MG, BeGole EA, 1991. Mandible, tongue, and airway in Pierre Robin Sequence: A longitudinal cephalometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, 425-434.
  • Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK, 2014. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod, 23,15-68. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0068-3.
  • Graber TM, 1997. Functional analysis. In: Graber T M, Rakosi T, Petrovic A G Dentofacial Orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. St.Louis:Mosby Year Book-Inc.
  • Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA, 2008. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod, 30, 598–605.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H, 2005. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 29,225–230.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H, 2006. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliance in the treatment of class II malocclusion - a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, 594–602.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, 2010. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV (MPA-IV) in the correction of class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 80,485–491.
  • Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK, 2013. Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod, 83, 728–734.
  • Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J, 2011. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle class II on the depth of the posterior airway space. J Orofacial Orthop, 72,301–320.
  • Lee RT, Barnes E, Dibiase A, Govender R, Qureshi U, 2014. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the twin-block and Dynamax appliances. Eur J Orthod,36(5), 512-521.
  • Lin Y, Lin HC, Tsai HH, 2011. Changes in the pharyngeal airway and position of the hyoid bone after treatment with a modified bionator in growing patients with retrognathia. J Exp Clin Med, 3,93–98.
  • Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A 2012. A comparison of twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance - a cephalometric study. Int J Orthod Milwaukee, 23, 49–58.
  • Ozbek MM, Memikoglu UT, Gogen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E, 1998. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod, 68,327–336.
  • Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A, 2011. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil, 38,588–594.
  • Sahoo NK, Jayan B, Ramakrishna N, Chopra SS, Kochar G 2012. Evaluation of upper airway dimensional changes and hyoid position following mandibular advancement in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. J Craniofac Surg, 23:e623–627.
  • Sari Z, Uysal T, Karaman AI, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Demir A, 2003. Orthodontic malocclusions and evaluation of treatment alternatives: an epidemiologic study. Turkish J Orthod, 16, 119–126.
  • Schutz TCB, Dominguez GC, Hallinan MP, Cunha TCA, Tufik S, 2011. Class II correction improves nocturnal breathing in adolescents. Angle Orthod, 81, 222-228.
  • Rizk S, Kulbersh VP, Al-Qawasmi R, 2016. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of Class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance. Angle Orthod,86(6),955-961.
  • Yassaei S, Bahrololoomi Z, Sorush M. Changes of tongue position and oropharynx following treatment with functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007; 31:287–290.
Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 8 - 12, 01.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.297801

Abstract

References

  • Bishara SE, Ziaja RR, 1989. Fuctional appliances: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 95, 250-258.
  • Dahlberg G, 1940. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications.
  • Figueroa AA, Glupker TJ, Fitz MG, BeGole EA, 1991. Mandible, tongue, and airway in Pierre Robin Sequence: A longitudinal cephalometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, 425-434.
  • Ghodke S, Utreja AK, Singh SP, Jena AK, 2014. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects. Prog Orthod, 23,15-68. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0068-3.
  • Graber TM, 1997. Functional analysis. In: Graber T M, Rakosi T, Petrovic A G Dentofacial Orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. St.Louis:Mosby Year Book-Inc.
  • Hänggi MP, Teuscher UM, Roos M, Peltomäki TA, 2008. Long-term changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following activator-headgear and fixed appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod, 30, 598–605.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H, 2005. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 29,225–230.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H, 2006. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliance in the treatment of class II malocclusion - a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, 594–602.
  • Jena AK, Duggal R, 2010. Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV (MPA-IV) in the correction of class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod, 80,485–491.
  • Jena AK, Singh SP, Utreja AK, 2013. Effectiveness of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the improvement of pharyngeal airway passage dimensions in class II malocclusion subjects with a retrognathic mandible. Angle Orthod, 83, 728–734.
  • Kinzinger G, Czapka K, Ludwig B, Glasl B, Gross U, Lisson J, 2011. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle class II on the depth of the posterior airway space. J Orofacial Orthop, 72,301–320.
  • Lee RT, Barnes E, Dibiase A, Govender R, Qureshi U, 2014. An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the twin-block and Dynamax appliances. Eur J Orthod,36(5), 512-521.
  • Lin Y, Lin HC, Tsai HH, 2011. Changes in the pharyngeal airway and position of the hyoid bone after treatment with a modified bionator in growing patients with retrognathia. J Exp Clin Med, 3,93–98.
  • Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A 2012. A comparison of twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance - a cephalometric study. Int J Orthod Milwaukee, 23, 49–58.
  • Ozbek MM, Memikoglu UT, Gogen H, Lowe AA, Baspinar E, 1998. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal class II cases. Angle Orthod, 68,327–336.
  • Restrepo C, Santamaría A, Peláez S, Tapias A, 2011. Oropharyngeal airway dimensions after treatment with functional appliances in class II retrognathic children. J Oral Rehabil, 38,588–594.
  • Sahoo NK, Jayan B, Ramakrishna N, Chopra SS, Kochar G 2012. Evaluation of upper airway dimensional changes and hyoid position following mandibular advancement in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. J Craniofac Surg, 23:e623–627.
  • Sari Z, Uysal T, Karaman AI, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Demir A, 2003. Orthodontic malocclusions and evaluation of treatment alternatives: an epidemiologic study. Turkish J Orthod, 16, 119–126.
  • Schutz TCB, Dominguez GC, Hallinan MP, Cunha TCA, Tufik S, 2011. Class II correction improves nocturnal breathing in adolescents. Angle Orthod, 81, 222-228.
  • Rizk S, Kulbersh VP, Al-Qawasmi R, 2016. Changes in the oropharyngeal airway of Class II patients treated with the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance. Angle Orthod,86(6),955-961.
  • Yassaei S, Bahrololoomi Z, Sorush M. Changes of tongue position and oropharynx following treatment with functional appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007; 31:287–290.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Dentistry
Journal Section Research
Authors

Gülşilay Sayar

Delal Dara Kılınç

Publication Date April 1, 2018
Submission Date March 14, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Sayar G, Kılınç DD. Sınıf II Aktivatör İle Tedavi Edilmiş Bireylerde Havayolu Değişikliklerinin İncelenmesi. Selcuk Dent J. 2018;5(1):8-12.