KAMU-ÖZEL ORTAKLIKLARININ BİR YÖNETİŞİM BİÇİMİ OLARAK YAYGINLAŞMASI: KURUMSALCI BİR YAKLAŞIM

Year 2005, Volume: 8 Issue: 1-2, 311 - 336, 06.05.2014

Muhittin Acar Hüseyin Özgür

Abstract

Bu makale, kamu-özel ortaklıklarını (KÖO) bir yönetsel/yapısal yenilik olarak nitelemekte ve bu yeniliğin ABD'de kentsel ve bölgesel gelişme alanındaki yayılıp-yaygınlaşmasını incelemektedir. Çalışmada ilk olarak, KÖO'nın yaygın kullanımı hususunda özet bazı bilgiler verilmektedir. Ardından, kurumsalcı yaklaşımlara dair literatür gözden geçirilmekte ve kurumsalcı kuramlardan türetilen bir çerçevenin KÖO'nın Amerikan şehirlerinde yayılıp-yaygınlaşmasının gerisindeki nedenleri yakalama hususunda nasıl uygun düştüğü ve işe yaradığı tartışılmaktadır. Yazı, kısa bir değerlendirme ile sona ermektedir.

Keywords

Sektörlerarası işbirliği ve ortaklıklar, kamu-özel ortaklıkları, yeni yönetişim biçimleri, yönetsel yeniliklerin yayılıp-yaygınlaşması, kentsel ve bölgesel gelişme/kalkınma.

References

• Barbour, George P., “Portland, Oregon: A balance of interest in public- private cooperation”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public—private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 210-241.
• Bendick, Marc, Jr., “Privatization of public services: Recent experience", in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.)ı Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 153-171.
• Bendick, Marc Jr., & Rasmussen, David W., “Enterprise zones and inner city economic revitalization", in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 97—129. 33]
• Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergı'si/ Muhittin ACAR & Hüsey/h ÖZGÜR
• Brandl, John, & Brooks Ronnie, “Public-private cooperation for urban revitalization: The Minneapolis and Saint Paul experience”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 163—199.
• Brooks, Harvey, “Seeking equity and efŞciency: Public and private roles”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 3-29.
• Colman, William G., State and local government and public- private partnerships—A policy issue handbook, New York: Greenwood Press, 1989.
• Committee for Economic Development, (CED), Public-private partnerships—An opportunity for urban communities, New York, 1982.
• Cummings, Scott, Koebel, C. Theodore, & Whitt, J. Allen, “Public-private partnerships and public enterprise”, Urban Resources, 1988, 5, 35—36, 47-48.
• Davis, Perry, “Why partnerships now?”, National Civic Review, 1987, 32-33.
• De Neufville, Judith I & Barton, Stephen E., “Myths and the deŞnition of policy problems—An exploration of home ownership and public—private partnerships”, Policy Sciences, 1987, 20, 181- 206.
• DiMaggio, Paul J., & Powell, Walter W., “Introduction”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 1—38. '
• DiMaggio, Paul, J. & Powell, Walter, W. “The iron cage revisited:
• ' Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in
• organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 1983, 48 (April),147—160.
• The Diffusion Of Public-Private Partnerships As A New Farm Of Ga vernance: An Institutional Perspective I
• business enterprise’, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, &
• Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public-private partnership—
• New opportunities for meeting social needs,
• Cambridge, MA: Baliinger Publishing Company, 1984, 285- 302.
• Du Pont, Pierre S., “State government and community partnerships", Journal ofCommunityActian, 1982, 1 (4) 15-16.
• Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A., “Public-private partnership: An overview”, in Fosler, R. Scott & Berger, Renee A. (eds.), Public-private partnerships—Seven case studies, Lexington: MA, Lexington Books, 1982, 1-15.
• Fox, Siegrun F. “Who opposes public/private Şnancial partnerships for urban renewal? A case study”, Journal of Urban AŞ'airs, Winter 1985, 7 (1) 27—40.
• Galaskiewicz, Joseph, “Making corporate actors accountable: Institution- building in Minneapolis-St. Paul”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 293-310.
• Gunyou, John, “Financial analysis for public-private partnerships”, in Weiss, Barbara (ed.), Public-private partnerships— Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C., 1985, 3-35.
• Guskind, Robert, “The giveaway game continues”, Planning, February 1990, 4-8.
• Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Working partners 1984— Reports of successful local community development public/private partnerships, Washington, D. C: U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 1984.
• Sosyal Bli/m/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Dergisi/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
• Jepperson, Ronald L., “Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism”, in Powell, Walter W., & DiMaggio, Paul J., (eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, 143— 163. '
• Judd, Dennis R. & Ready, Randy L., “Entrepreneurial cities and the new politics of economic development”, in Peterson, George E., & Lewis, Carol W., Reagan and the cities, The Urban Institute Press: Washington, D. C., 1986, 209-247.
• Knoke, David, “The Spread of municipal reform: temporal, spatial, and social dynamics”, American Journal of Sociology, 1982, (87) 1314-1339
• Langton, Stuart, “Public-private partnerships: Hope or Hoax?”, National Civic Review, May 1983, 256-261.
• Levine, Marc V., “The politics of partnership: Urban development since 1945", in Squires, Gregory D. (ed.), Unequal partnerships— The political economy of urban redevelopment in Postwar America, New York: Rutgers University Press, 1989, * 12-34.
• Lewis, Norman, Inner city regeneration: The demise of regional and local government, Open University Press, 1992.
• Lyall, Katharine, “A bycle built—for—two: Public-private partnership in Bal— timore”, National Civic Review, November 1983, 531—571.
• Meyer, John W., Scott, W. Richard, & Deal, Terrence, E. “Institutional and technical resources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations", in John W. Meyer, & W. Richard Scott (eds.) Organizational environments, 1983, Beverly‘Hills: Sage, 45—67.
• Meyer, John W. & Rowan, Brian, “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83 (2) 340-362.
• The D/Ş'usion Of Pub/ic—Private Pa/tnersh/ps As A New Form Of Governance: An Inst/tuŞona/ Perspective
• Moore, Chris, Richardson, J. J., & Moon, Jeremy, “New partnerships in local economic development—A case -study of local entrepreneurship”, Local Government Studies, September/October 1985, 19-33.
• Norris, William J., “A new role for corporations”, in Brooks, Harvey, Liebman, Lance, & Schelling, Corinne S., (eds.), Public- private partnership—New opportunities for meeting social needs, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1984, 243-262.
• Oliver, Christine, “Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy ofManagementReview, 1991,16 (1) 145-179.
• Petersen, “Introduction” in Weiss, Barbara (ed.) Public-private partnerships—Financing a common wealth, Government Finance Center: Washington, D. C. 1985, ix—xii.
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey, “A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations", in Mark S. Mizruchi and Michael Schwartz (eds.), Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, New York: Cambridge UP, 1987, pp. 25-55.
• Pfeffer, Jeffrey, & Salancik, Gerald, R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
• Ritti, R. Richard, & Silver, Jonathan H. “Early processes of institutionalization: The dramaturgy of exchange in interorganizational relations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 25—42.
• Scott, W. Richard, “The adolescence of institutional theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1987, 32, 493—511. '
• StanŞeld, Rochelle L. “Reagan urban policy—Count us out of public- private partnerships”, National Journal, 7/3/1982, 1172— , 1175.
• Sosya/ Bilim/er Meslek Yüksek Okulu Derg/si/ Muhittin AC4R & Hüseyin ÖZGÜR
• Stephenson, Max 0. Jr., “Whither the public—private partnership—A critical overview”, Urban Affairs Quarterly, September 1991, 109-127. '
• Suchman, Mark, C. “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20, (3) 571-610.
• Sweat, Dan E., & Anthony, Jacquelyn A., “The role of corporations in urban revitalization—The experience of the Atlanta Project”, National Civic Review, Summer-Fall 1995, 239-247.
• Tolbert, Pamela S., & Zucker, Lynne G., “Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935", Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 22—39.