Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 64 - 73, 28.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.21657/soilst.1601773

Abstract

References

  • Al-Ghobari, H., Dewidar, A., & Alataway, A. (2020). Estimation of Surface Water Runoff for a Semi-Arid Area Using RS and GIS-Based SCS-CN Method. Water, 12(7), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071924
  • Beven, K.J., (2001). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons, LTD. England. ISBN: 978-0-470-71459-1.
  • Caletka, M., Šulc Michalková, M., Karásek, P., & Fučík, P. (2020). Improvement of SCS-CN Initial Abstraction Coefficient in the Czech Republic: A Study of Five Catchments. Water, 12(7), 1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071964
  • Das, S., & Paul, P.K., (2006). Selection of site for small hydel using GIS in the Himalayan region of India. Journal of Spatial Hydrology 6(1), 17.
  • Edelman, D. J. (2021). Managing the Urban Environment of Istanbul, Turkey. Current Urban Studies, 09(01), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2021.91007
  • Fan, F., Deng, Y., Hu., X., & Weng, Q., (2013). Estimating Composite Curve Number Using an Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 5(3), 1425-1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5031425
  • Halley, M.C., White, S.O., & Watkins, E.W., (2000). ArcView GIS extension for estimating curve numbers, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California.
  • Hawkins, R.H., Jiang, R., Woodward, D.E., Hjelmfelt, A.T., & Van Mullem, J.A, (2002). Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio. Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada. 42 (3): 629–643. https://doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04481.x
  • Johnson, R.R., (1998). An investigation of curve number applicability to the watersheds in excess of 2500 cectares (250 km2), Jornal of Environmental Hydrology, 6(7).
  • Kumar, A., Kanga, S., Taloor, A.K., Singh, S.K., & Durin, B., (2021). Surface runoff estimation of Sind river basin using integrated SCS-CN and GIS techniques. HydroResearch 4, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2021.08.001
  • Kumar, T., & Jhariya, D. C. (2017). Identification of rainwater harvesting sites using SCS-CN methodology, remote sensing and Geographical Information System techniques. Geocarto International, 32(12), 1367-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1213772
  • Lian, H., Yen, H., Huang, J.-C., Feng, Q., Qin, L., Bashir, M. A., Wu, S., Zhu, A.-X., Luo, J., Di, H., Lei, Q., & Liu, H. (2020). CN-China: Revised runoff curve number by using rainfall-runoff events data in China. Water Research, 177, 115767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115767
  • McCuen, R. H. (1982). A Guide to Hydrologic Analysis Using SCS Methods., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. ISBN: 9780133702057
  • Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, (2014). Kırklareli Province 1/25.000 Scale Environmental Plan Revision Report. (In Turkish).
  • Mishra, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (1999). Another Look at SCS-CN Method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4(3), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(1999)4:3(257)
  • Muthu, A. C. L. & Santhi, M. H. (2015). Estimation of Surface Runoff Potential using SCS-270 CN Method Integrated with GIS. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8-28, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i28/83324
  • Özer, Z., (1990). Hydrological and Hydraulic Principles in Projecting Water Structures (Technical guide), Ankara. (in Turkish).
  • Pettyjohn, W. A. and & Henning, R. (1979). Preliminary estimate of ground-water recharge rates, related streamflow and water quality in Ohio: Ohio State University Water Resources Center Project Completion Report Number 552, p. 323.
  • Raju, R. S., Raju G, S., & M, R. (2018). Estimation of Rainfall Runoff using SCS-CN Method with RS and GIS Techniques for Mandavi Basin in YSR Kadapa District of Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrospatial Analysis, 2(1), 1-15. 282 https://doi.org/10.21523/gcj3.18020101
  • Rao, K. N. (2020). Analysis of surface runoff potential in ungauged basin using basin parameters and SCS-CN method. Applied Water Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1129-z
  • Analysis of surface runoff potential in ungauged basin using basin parameters and SCS CN method. Applied Water Science, 10(47). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1129-z
  • Rawat, K. S., & Singh, S. K. (2017). Estimation of Surface Runoff from Semi-arid Ungauged Agricultural Watershed Using SCS-CN Method and Earth Observation Data Sets. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 1(4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-291 017-0016-4
  • Satheeshkumar, S., Venkateswaran, S., & Kannan, R. (2017). Rainfall-runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0301-4
  • Shadeed, S., & Almasri, M. , (2010). , Application of GIS-based SCS-CN method in West Bank catchments, Palestine. Water Science and Engineering, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.01.001
  • Shi, W., & Wang, N., (2020), An Improved SCS-CN Method Incorporating Slope, Soil Moisture, and Storm Duration Factors for Runoff Prediction. Water, 12(5), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051335 Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1972). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 762 p.
  • Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Tech. Release, 55, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., Washington D.C.
  • Soulis, K. X., (2021). Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Method Current Applications, Remaining Challenges, and Future Perspectives. MDPI. ISBN978-3 0365-0820-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-0821-4
  • Soulis, K. X., Valiantzas, J. D., Dercas, N., & Londra, P. A. (2009). Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(5), 605-615. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-605-2009
  • Taher, T. M. (2015). Integration of GIS Database and SCS-CN Method to Estimate Runoff Volume of Wadis of Intermittent Flow. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40(3), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1541-5
  • Walega, A., Amatya, D. M., Caldwell, P., Marion, D., & Panda, S. (2020). Assessment of storm direct runoff and peak flow rates using improved SCS-CN models for selected forested watersheds in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27, 100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100645
  • Xiao, B., Wang, Q., Fan, J., Han, F., & Dai, Q. (2011). Application of the SCS-CN Model to Runoff Estimation in a Small Watershed with High Spatial Heterogeneity. Pedosphere, 21(6), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(11)60177-x

Determination of the direct runoff using the soil conservation service curve number method and its applicability to Lüleburgaz Sub-Basin (Thrace Region)

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 64 - 73, 28.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.21657/soilst.1601773

Abstract

Lüleburgaz Sub-basin, located within the Ergene Basin in the Thrace Region which is designated by the State Hydraulic Works. The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Method was used to determine the runoff for the basin. In basins where flow values are not recorded for a long period, the SCS-CN is frequently used to obtain the flow indirectly. For this investigation, the land cover data was sourced from the Corine Cover Database, while the hydrological soil groups were acquired from the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics. Daily precipitation data were obtained from Lüleburgaz Meteorological Station for the years 2013-2017. All values were entered as data into the geographic information system-based software and analyzed with raster calculation. The SCS-CN method was employed to calculate the average runoff value for the basin, yielding a result of 157.6x106 m³/year. Meanwhile, at the Lüleburgaz flow observation station, the average runoff was recorded as 135.8x106 m³/year in between 2013 and 2017. It was determined that the runoff measured by the SCS-CN method was merely 1.16 times greater than the runoff recorded at the flow observation station. This shows that the SCS-CN method may be suitable for use in basins with similar characteristics where there is no flow observation station.

References

  • Al-Ghobari, H., Dewidar, A., & Alataway, A. (2020). Estimation of Surface Water Runoff for a Semi-Arid Area Using RS and GIS-Based SCS-CN Method. Water, 12(7), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071924
  • Beven, K.J., (2001). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons, LTD. England. ISBN: 978-0-470-71459-1.
  • Caletka, M., Šulc Michalková, M., Karásek, P., & Fučík, P. (2020). Improvement of SCS-CN Initial Abstraction Coefficient in the Czech Republic: A Study of Five Catchments. Water, 12(7), 1964. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071964
  • Das, S., & Paul, P.K., (2006). Selection of site for small hydel using GIS in the Himalayan region of India. Journal of Spatial Hydrology 6(1), 17.
  • Edelman, D. J. (2021). Managing the Urban Environment of Istanbul, Turkey. Current Urban Studies, 09(01), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2021.91007
  • Fan, F., Deng, Y., Hu., X., & Weng, Q., (2013). Estimating Composite Curve Number Using an Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, 5(3), 1425-1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5031425
  • Halley, M.C., White, S.O., & Watkins, E.W., (2000). ArcView GIS extension for estimating curve numbers, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, California.
  • Hawkins, R.H., Jiang, R., Woodward, D.E., Hjelmfelt, A.T., & Van Mullem, J.A, (2002). Runoff Curve Number Method: Examination of the Initial Abstraction Ratio. Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada. 42 (3): 629–643. https://doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04481.x
  • Johnson, R.R., (1998). An investigation of curve number applicability to the watersheds in excess of 2500 cectares (250 km2), Jornal of Environmental Hydrology, 6(7).
  • Kumar, A., Kanga, S., Taloor, A.K., Singh, S.K., & Durin, B., (2021). Surface runoff estimation of Sind river basin using integrated SCS-CN and GIS techniques. HydroResearch 4, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2021.08.001
  • Kumar, T., & Jhariya, D. C. (2017). Identification of rainwater harvesting sites using SCS-CN methodology, remote sensing and Geographical Information System techniques. Geocarto International, 32(12), 1367-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1213772
  • Lian, H., Yen, H., Huang, J.-C., Feng, Q., Qin, L., Bashir, M. A., Wu, S., Zhu, A.-X., Luo, J., Di, H., Lei, Q., & Liu, H. (2020). CN-China: Revised runoff curve number by using rainfall-runoff events data in China. Water Research, 177, 115767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115767
  • McCuen, R. H. (1982). A Guide to Hydrologic Analysis Using SCS Methods., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. ISBN: 9780133702057
  • Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, (2014). Kırklareli Province 1/25.000 Scale Environmental Plan Revision Report. (In Turkish).
  • Mishra, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (1999). Another Look at SCS-CN Method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4(3), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(1999)4:3(257)
  • Muthu, A. C. L. & Santhi, M. H. (2015). Estimation of Surface Runoff Potential using SCS-270 CN Method Integrated with GIS. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8-28, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i28/83324
  • Özer, Z., (1990). Hydrological and Hydraulic Principles in Projecting Water Structures (Technical guide), Ankara. (in Turkish).
  • Pettyjohn, W. A. and & Henning, R. (1979). Preliminary estimate of ground-water recharge rates, related streamflow and water quality in Ohio: Ohio State University Water Resources Center Project Completion Report Number 552, p. 323.
  • Raju, R. S., Raju G, S., & M, R. (2018). Estimation of Rainfall Runoff using SCS-CN Method with RS and GIS Techniques for Mandavi Basin in YSR Kadapa District of Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrospatial Analysis, 2(1), 1-15. 282 https://doi.org/10.21523/gcj3.18020101
  • Rao, K. N. (2020). Analysis of surface runoff potential in ungauged basin using basin parameters and SCS-CN method. Applied Water Science, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1129-z
  • Analysis of surface runoff potential in ungauged basin using basin parameters and SCS CN method. Applied Water Science, 10(47). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1129-z
  • Rawat, K. S., & Singh, S. K. (2017). Estimation of Surface Runoff from Semi-arid Ungauged Agricultural Watershed Using SCS-CN Method and Earth Observation Data Sets. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 1(4), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-291 017-0016-4
  • Satheeshkumar, S., Venkateswaran, S., & Kannan, R. (2017). Rainfall-runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0301-4
  • Shadeed, S., & Almasri, M. , (2010). , Application of GIS-based SCS-CN method in West Bank catchments, Palestine. Water Science and Engineering, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.01.001
  • Shi, W., & Wang, N., (2020), An Improved SCS-CN Method Incorporating Slope, Soil Moisture, and Storm Duration Factors for Runoff Prediction. Water, 12(5), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051335 Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1972). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 762 p.
  • Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Tech. Release, 55, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., Washington D.C.
  • Soulis, K. X., (2021). Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Method Current Applications, Remaining Challenges, and Future Perspectives. MDPI. ISBN978-3 0365-0820-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-0821-4
  • Soulis, K. X., Valiantzas, J. D., Dercas, N., & Londra, P. A. (2009). Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(5), 605-615. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-605-2009
  • Taher, T. M. (2015). Integration of GIS Database and SCS-CN Method to Estimate Runoff Volume of Wadis of Intermittent Flow. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40(3), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1541-5
  • Walega, A., Amatya, D. M., Caldwell, P., Marion, D., & Panda, S. (2020). Assessment of storm direct runoff and peak flow rates using improved SCS-CN models for selected forested watersheds in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27, 100645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100645
  • Xiao, B., Wang, Q., Fan, J., Han, F., & Dai, Q. (2011). Application of the SCS-CN Model to Runoff Estimation in a Small Watershed with High Spatial Heterogeneity. Pedosphere, 21(6), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(11)60177-x
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural Engineering (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Murat Beren 0000-0003-1482-0563

Hakan Hoşgörmez This is me 0000-0001-6002-9049

Publication Date December 28, 2024
Submission Date May 3, 2024
Acceptance Date September 11, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Beren, M., & Hoşgörmez, H. (2024). Determination of the direct runoff using the soil conservation service curve number method and its applicability to Lüleburgaz Sub-Basin (Thrace Region). Soil Studies, 13(2), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.21657/soilst.1601773