<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="reviewer-report"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>jos</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Sosyoloji Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1300-5642</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2687-5276</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Ege University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Sociology</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Sosyoloji</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>THE CRISIS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE MODERN SOCIETY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE WORKS OF MARX, DURKHEIM AND WEBER</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Modern Toplumda Bireyin Krizi: Marx, Durkheim ve Weber’in Eserlerinin Bir İncelemesi</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0326-2124</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Keskin Korumaz</surname>
                                    <given-names>Esra</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20191129">
                    <day>11</day>
                    <month>29</month>
                    <year>2019</year>
                </pub-date>
                                                    <issue>40</issue>
                                        <fpage>265</fpage>
                                        <lpage>280</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20190707">
                        <day>07</day>
                        <month>07</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1987, Sosyoloji Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1987</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Sosyoloji Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>With the onset of capitalist economy and industrialization, one can argue that a new era has begun with its peculiar characteristics and huge impact on the all spheres of life. As the individual is increasingly exposed to constant changes taking place in the modern society, he becomes astounded by the ceaseless movement in it and he goes through an individual crisis in that society where traditional ways of living, thought and conceptualizing do not work anymore. This paper aims to provide a definition of modern society at first and then to touch upon the works of prominent scholars in social theory such as Marx, Durkheim and Weber in order to find out how the concept of individual crisis is elaborated on in these works.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Kapitalist ekonomi ve sanayileşmenin hızla ortaya çıkmasıyla, kendine has özellikleri olan ve hayatın tüm alanlarını etkileyen yeni bir çağ başlamış oldu. Birey, modern toplumdaki durmaksızın devam eden yeniliklere daha fazla maruz kaldıkça, toplumdaki hareketin ivmesinden başı döndü ve geleneksel yaşam tarzı, düşünce ve değerlerin artık işlemediği bu durumda bir kriz içine girdi. Bu makale, öncelikle modern toplumun tanımını vermeyi ve daha sonra Marx, Durkheim ve Weber gibi önemli düşünürlerin eserlerinde bireylerin deneyimlediği bu krizin nasıl ele alındığını göstermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, yabancılaşma, anomi ve rasyonelleşme gibi önemli kavramlar incelenecek, birbirleri ile olan benzerlikleri ve farklılıkları ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Alienation</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Rationalization</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Anomie</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Modern Society</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Social Theory</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>Yabancılaşma</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Rasyonelleşme</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Anomi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Modern Toplum</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sosyal Teori</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">AİKEN, H. D. (1956). The Age Of İdeology. New York: New American Library.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BAUDELAİRE, C. (1964). The Painter Of Modern Life. The Painter Of Modern Life And Other Essays, 2.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BELLAH, R.N. (1959). Durkheim And History. American Sociological Review, (24), 447-60.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BOTTOMORE, T. (1981). A Marxist consideration of Durkheim. Social Forces, 59(4), 902-17.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">CARROLL, A. J. (2011). Disenchantment, Rationality And The Modernity Of Max Weber. Forum Philosophicum, 16(1), 117-37.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">COHEN, G.A. (1978). Karl Marx’s theory of history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FRİSBY, D. (1985). Fragments Of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">GİDDENS, A. (1971). Capitalism And Modern Social Theory: An Analysis Of The Writings Of Marx, Durkheim And Max Weber. London: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">GREİSMAN, H.C. (1976). Disenchantment Of The W orld: Romanticism, Aesthetics And Sociological Theory. The British Journal Of Sociology, 27(4), 495-507.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">HİRSCHMAN, A.O. (1982). Rival İnterpretations Of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, Or Feeble?. Journal Of Economic Literature, 20(2), 146384.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ISRAEL, J. (1971). Alienation From Marx To Modern Society. Boston: Allyn &amp; Bacon.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">KAHLER, E. (1957). The Tower And The Abyss. New York: Braziller, p.43.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MARX, K., &amp; Engels, F. (1967). The Communist Manifesto. 1848. Trans. Samuel Moore. London: Penguin.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MARX, K. (2005). Early Writings. Penguin UK.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NİETZSCHE, F. (2003). Beyond good and evil. Penguin.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NİSBET, R. (1953). The Quest For Community. New York: Oxford, p.15.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">PALUMBO, A., &amp; Scott, A. (2005). Classical Social Theory I: Marx and Durkheim. In A. Harrington, Modern Social Theory (pp. 40-62). Oxford University Press: Oxford.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">RİTZER, G. (2010). Sociological theory. McGraw Hill: New York.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1920). The Social Contract: &amp; Discourses (No. 660). JM Dent &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">SCRİBNER, R.W . (1993). The Reformation: Popular Magic, And The Disenchantment Of The World. The Journal Of Interdisciplinary History, 23(3), 475-94.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">TİRYAKİAN, E.A. (1975). Neither Marx Nor Durkheim... Perhaps Weber. American Journal Of Sociology, 81(1), 1-33.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">WEGNER, E.L. (1975). The Concept Of Alienation: A Critique And Some Suggestions For A Context Specific Approach. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(2), 171-93.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ZEİTLİN, I. M. (1968). Ideology And The Development Of Sociological Theory. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
