Investigation of Momentum and Contrarian Anomalies in the Islamic Stocks: Empirical Evidence from Turkey

Year 2021, , 251 - 270, 30.07.2021

Oktay Özkan , Recep Çakar

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.03.13

Abstract

This paper investigates momentum and contrarian anomalies in Islamic stocks in Turkey. For this purpose, the wild bootstrap automatic variance ratio test was carried out using weekly prices of 10 Islamic stocks in Turkey. The analysis results showed that there are both momentum and contrarian anomalies in Islamic stocks in Turkey. It was also found that the contrarian anomaly occurs more than the momentum anomaly in the Turkish Islamic stocks, and the performance of both momentum and contrarian strategies show periodic changes. Finally, it can be concluded that abnormal returns can be obtained using the contrarian strategy for AKSUE, ALBRK, BIMAS, KONYA, the momentum strategy for BANVT, CEMTS, LOGO, and both strategies for ISDMR.

Keywords

Islamic Stock, Momentum and Contrarian Anomalies, Wild Bootstrap Automatic Variance Ratio Test, Efficient Markets Hypothesis, Rolling Windows, Behavioural Finance

İslâmi Hisse Senetlerinde Momentum ve Zıtlık Anomalilerinin Araştırılması: Türkiye’den Ampirik Kanıtlar

Abstract

Bu çalışma Türkiye’deki İslâmi hisse senetlerinde momentum ve zıtlık anomalilerini araştırmaktadır. Bu amaç için, Türkiye’deki 10 İslâmi hisse senedinin haftalık fiyatları kullanılarak doğal bootstrap otomatik varyans rasyo testi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları Türkiye’deki İslâmi hisse senetlerinde hem momentum hem de zıtlık anomalilerinin olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca zıtlık anomalinin Türk İslâmi hisse senetlerinde momentum anomalisinden daha fazla görüldüğü ve hem momentum hem de zıtlık stratejilerinin performansının periyodik değişiklikler gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Son olarak, AKSUE, ALBRK, BIMAS, KONYA için zıtlık stratejisi, BANVT, CEMTS, LOGO için momentum stratejisi ve ISDMR için her iki strateji kullanılarak anormal getirilerin elde edilebileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

İslâmi Hisse Senedi, Momentum ve Zıtlık Anomalileri, Doğal Bootstrap Otomatik Varyans Rasyo Testi, Etkin Piyasalar Hipotezi, Hareketli Pencereler, Davranışsal Finans

References

• Andrews, D.W.K. (1991), “Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation”, Econometrica, 58, 817-858.
• Ansari, V.A. & S. Khan (2012), “Momentum anomaly: evidence from India”, Managerial Finance, 38(2), 206-223.
• Bachelier, L. (1964), “The Theory of Speculation”, (Çev. J. Boness), içinde: P.H. Cootner (ed.), The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 17-78.
• Balı, S. (2011), Zıtlık ve Momentum Stratejileri-Teori ve Uygulama (2. Baskı), İstanbul: Çatı Kitapları.
• Banz, R.W. (1981), “The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
• Barak, O. (2008), “İMKB’de Aşırı Reaksiyon Anomalisi ve Davranışsal Finans Modelleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 207-229.
• Barber, B.M. & T. Odean (2001), “Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.
• Basu, S. (1977), “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price‐Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis”, The Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663-682.
• Charles, A. & O. Darné & J.H. Kim (2011), “Small sample properties of alternative tests for martingale difference hypothesis”, Economics Letters, 110, 151-154.
• Charles, A. & O. Darné & J.H. Kim (2012), “Exchange-rate return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from major foreign exchange rates”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 1607-1626.
• Charles, A. & O. Darné & J.H. Kim (2015), “Will precious metals shine? A market efficiency perspective”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 284-291.
• Choi, I. (1999), “Testing the random walk hypothesis for real exchange rates”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 293-308.
• Cooper, M.J. & H. Gulen & M.J. Schill (2008), “Asset Growth and the Cross-section of Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1609-1651.
• DeBondt, W. & R. Thaler (1985), “Does the Stock Market Overreact?”, Journal of Finance, 40, 793-808.
• Demireli, E. (2008), “Etkin Pazar Kuramından Sapmalar: Finansal Anomalileri Etkileyen Makro Ekonomik Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 8(1), 215-241.
• Dyakova A. & G. Smith (2013), “The evolution of stock market predictability in Bulgaria”, Applied Financial Economics, 23(9), 805-816.
• Ejaz, A. & P. Polak (2015), “Short term momentum effect: a case of Middle East stock markets”, Business: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 104-112.
• Fama, E.F. (1970), “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Works”, Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
• Farooqi, J. & T. Ngo & D. Huerta-Sanchez & H. Chen (2015), “Momentum Strategies in Shari’ah-Compliant Stocks: The Role of Debt”, The Journal of Investing, 24(2), 90-111.
• Fettahoğlu, S. (2009), “Pay Senedi Fiyatlarının Tahmin Edilebilirliği: Kaos Kuramı Yaklaşımı”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (43), 237-243.
• Gaunt, C. (2000), “Overreaction in the Australian equity market: 1974-1997”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 8(3-4), 375-398.
• Hon, M.T. & I. Tonks (2002), “Momentum in the UK Stock Market”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 13(1), 43-70.
• Jegadeesh, N. & S. Titman (1993), “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency”, The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
• Kaldırım, Y. (2017), “Momentum Anomalisi: BİST 100 Endeksine Yönelik Araştırma”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Temmuz(Özel Sayı), 81-91.
• Karan, M.B. (2001), Yatırım Analizi ve Portföy Yönetimi, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Katılım Endeksi, (2021), <https://www.katilimendeksi.org/subpage/17/endeks_kurallari>, 27.04.2021.
• Kaya, S. & K. Dede & E. Karabulut (2019), “Katılım Bankacılığında Kullanılan Sermaye Piyasası Ürün ve Uygulamaları”, içinde: Ş. Görmüş & A. Albayrak & A. Yabanlı (eds.), Yaşayan ve Gelişen Katılım Bankacılığı, İstanbul: TKBB Yayınları, 268-295.
• Kendal, M.G. (1953), “The Analysis of Economic Time-Series-Part I: Prices”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 116(1), 11-34.
• Khuntia, S. & J.K. Pattanayak & G.S. Hiremath (2018), “Is The Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency Adaptive? The Empirical Evidence From India”, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 19(4), 261-285.
• Kim, J.H. & A. Shamsuddin & K-P. Lim (2011), “Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 18, 868-879.
• Kim, J.H. (2006), “Wild bootstrapping variance ratio tests”, Economics Letters, 92, 38-43.
• Kim, J.H. (2009), “Automatic variance ratio test under conditional heteroskedasticity”, Finance Research Letters, 3, 179-185.
• Lazar, D. & A. Todea & D. Filip (2012), “Martingale Difference Hypothesis and Financial Crisis: Empirical Evidence from European Emerging Foreign Exchange Markets”, Economic Systems, 36, 338-350.
• Li, B. & M.S. Ee & M. Rashid (2016), “Is momentum trading profitable from Shari'ah compliant stocks?”, Review of Financial Economics, 31, 56-63.
• Lim, K.P. & W. Luo & J.H. Kim (2013), “Are US stock index returns predictable? Evidence from automatic autocorrelation-based tests”, Applied Economics, 45(8), 953-962.
• Lo, A.W. & A.C. MacKinlay (1988), “Stock market prices do not follow random walk: Evidence from a simple specification test”, The Review of Financial Studies, 1, 41-66.
• Mammen, E. (1993), “Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models”, The Annals of Statistics, 21, 255-285.
• Nanda, N. (2019), Abnormal Return Momentum Dan Kontarıan Pada Saham Syarıah Dı Jakarta Islâmıc Indeks (Doctoral Dissertation), Universitas Andalas.
• Narayan, P.K. & D.H.B. Phan (2017), “Momentum strategies for Islâmic stocks”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 42, 96-112.
• Öndeş, T. & S. Balı (2010), “Zıtlık ve Momentum Stratejilerinin Hibrid Bir şekilde İMKB’de Kullanımı Üzerine”, ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD), 1(2), 93-110.
• Rafik, A. & S.P. Marizka (2017), “Concurrent Momentum and Contrarian Strategies: Evidence from Indonesia”, Indonesian Capital Market Review, 9(2), 63-74.
• Rahman, L. & D. Lee & A. Shamsuddin (2017), “Time-varying return predictability in South Asian equity markets”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 48, 179-200.
• Salisu, A.A. & T.F. Oloko & O.J. Oyewole (2016), “Testing for martingale difference hypothesis with structural breaks: Evidence from AsiaePacific foreign exchange markets”, Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(4), 210-218.
• State of the Global Islâmic Economy Report 2019/20 (2020), <https://cdn.salaamgateway.com/special-coverage/sgie19-20/full-report.pdf>, 13.04.2021.
• T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Finans Ofisi, (2021), Finansal Stratejiler, <https://cbfo.gov.tr/ifm-hakkinda/>, 13.04.2021.
• Tee, L.T. & S.R. Kew & S.W. Low (2019), “Do momentum strategies perform better for Islâmic stocks than for conventional stocks across market states?”, Economic Annals, 64(221), 107-129.
• Turaboğlu, T. & T. Topaloğlu (2017), “Bir Etkin Piyasa Hipotezi Kavramı Olarak Anomaliler: Borsa İstanbul (BİST) Üzerinden Aylara İlişkin Anomalilere Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(1), 216-230.
• Yiğiter, Ş. & K. Ilgın (2015), “BIST-100 Endeksinde Ocak Ayı Anomalisinin Güç Oranı Yöntemiyle Test Edilmesi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 171-187.
• Yücel, T. & F.D. Taşkın (2007), “Aşırı tepki hipotezi ve İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası’ndan Kanıtlar”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 22(260), 26-37.