BibTex RIS Cite

21. Yüzyılda Öğretmen Yetiştirme Eğitim Programının Boyutları

Year 2010, Issue: 24, 361 - 371, 01.08.2010

Abstract

Bu çalışma iki problem üzerine temellendirilmiştir Birincisi 21. yüzyılın toplumunun özellikleri ve öne çıkan yeni anlayışlar ve sorunlar doğrultusunda 21. yüzyılın öğretmeninde bulunmasıgereken niteliklerin ortaya konulmasıve ikincisi, bu öne çıkan yeni anlayışve sorunlar çerçevesinde öğretmen eğitimi programlarının boyutlarının neler olmasıgerektiği üzerine bir denemede bulunulmasıdır. Araştırma kuramsal temelli bir çalışmadır. Araştırmada derleme tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, araştırma problemine yönelik analiz edilerek, buradan 21. yüzyılın öne çıkan anlayış, eğilim ve sorunları, öğretmenlerin hizmet öncesi ve hizmet içi eğitiminde temele alınmasıgereken yeni kavramlar ve ilkeler ve öğretmenlerin değişen rollerine ilişkin anlayışların neler olduğuna dönük sonuçlara gidilmiştir. Araştırma sonucu elde edilen bulgular aşağıda verilmiştir: 1. 21. yüzyılda öğretmenlik mesleği bir ihtisas mesleği olarak kabul görecektir. 2. Öğretmen yetiştirme eğitimi uluslararasıdüzeyde verilmelidir. 3. Öğretmenler kültürlerarasıeğitim ve demokratik bir toplum inşa etme anlayışında yetiştirilmelidir. 4. Öğrenme-öğretme süreçlerinde en merkezi materyal, öğretmenin kendisidir anlayışıöne çıkmaktadır. 5. Öğretmen yetiştirme eğitim programlarının hazırlanmasında toplumun tüm kesimlerinin katılımlarısağlanmalıdır. 6. Öğretmenlerin mesleki eğitimleri okul merkezli ve sürekli olmalıve bunun öğretmenlerce yaşam tarzıolarak algılamasısağlanmalıdır. 7. Öğretmen bir aktör gibi çok boyutlu ve her duruma uygun pozisyon alabilen yeterlikte yetiştirmelidir. 8. Öğretmen insan ve toplumla ilgili her konuda bir fikir ve duruşu olan bir nitelikte yetiştirilmelidir.

References

  • Black, P. (1998). Ideology, evidence and the raising of standards. (Editör: J. Dillon ve M. Maguire). Becoming a Teacher, 53-64. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bredeson, P. V. (2002). The architecture of professional development: materials, messages and meaning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 661-675.
  • Cogan, J. J. ve Pederson, P, V. (2001). The development of civic values: case study of the United States of America. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 61-76.
  • Cogan, J. J. ve Morris, P. (2001). The development of civics values: an overview. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 1- 9.
  • Collwill, J. ve Gallagher, C. (2007). Developing a curriculum for the twenty-first century: the experiences of England and Northern Ireland. Prospects, 37, 411-425.
  • CSCENPA (Curriculum Standing Committee of National Education Professional Associations). (2007). Developing a Twenty-first Century School Curriculum for all Australian Students. http://www.arteducation.org.au/news/CSCNEPA_2, Erişim Tarihi: 27.12.2009.
  • Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 677-692.
  • Dillon, J. ve Maguire, M. (1998). Becoming a Teacher. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Fullinwider, R. (2001). Multicultural education and cosmopolitan citizenship. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 331-343.
  • Furlong, J. ve Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring Student Teachers. London: Routledge.
  • Hamilton, M. L. ve Pinnegar, S. (2000). On the threshold of a new century: trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in the teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, (3), 234-240.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1999). South and South-East Asia course on curriculum development. Educational Innovation and Information, 99.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1998). Curriculum development. Educational Innovation and Information, 97.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1997a). Teachers in the change process. Educational Innovation and Information, 93.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1997b). What education for what citizenship. Educational Innovation and Information, 90
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1996). The Role of Teachers. Educational Innovation and Information, 88.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1994). Research on comparative education. Educational Innovation and Information, 80.
  • Imants, J. (2002). Restructuring schools as a context for teacher learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 715-732.
  • Lappan, G. ve Le, Y. (2002). Reflections and recommendations. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 227-232.
  • Morris, P. ve Cogan, J. (2001). A comparative overview: civic education across six societies. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 109-129.
  • Nieto, S. (2000). “Placing equity front and center: some thoughts on transforming teacher education on a new Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, (3),180-187.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Designing Tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pettersson, T., Postholm, M. B., Flem, A. ve Gudmundsdottir, S. (2004). The classroom as a stage and teacher’s role. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 589-605.
  • Spiecker, B. ve Steutel, J. (2001). “Multiculturalism, pillarization and liberal civic education in the Netherlands. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 293-304.
  • Vanderberghe, R. (2002). Teachers professional development as the core of school improvement. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 653-659.
  • Verloop, N., Driel, J. V. ve Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
  • Wiske, M. S., Sick, M. ve Wirsig, S. (2001). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 483-501.

Dimensions of Teacher Training Curricula in The 21st Century

Year 2010, Issue: 24, 361 - 371, 01.08.2010

Abstract

Teacher training continued as having rigid boundaries and stages in the 19th century. At the same time, teaching was regarded as a low-status profession. Teachers were trained within their profession and schools in this period. This type of training was carried out with trainee teachers working in primary schools. The aim was to train teachers as modest, earnest, observant of customs, obedient to moral norms and unquestioning individuals. However, it was realized that teachers having intended qualifications could not be trained by means of these methods. New emerging demands in 1980s caused a consensus on a set of tenets about what type of issues should be placed in teacher training programs. In this framework, new understanding aroused that teachers should be equipped with the knowledge of child development, learning theories and teaching methods, sociology and psychology and has competencies in subject matter knowledge and teaching methods. Besides these, the dimension of social justice and reconstruction of society was added to the conventional role of teachers in 1980s. It was understood that if it was aimed to obtain success in educational reforms and development of schools, at the same time, it was necessary to improve pre-service and in-service teacher training in 1990s. Teacher training was based on the * Yrd. Doç. Dr., Sakarya Üniversitesi ** Öğr. Gör., Sakarya Üniversitesi cooperation model between higher education and schools in 2000s. In this period, the fundamental concept which came into prominence was concerned with teachers who had these features: possess comprehensive knowledge and competent in implementation, questioning, visionary, has the ability to digress from ordinary rules in the classroom and providing students with the freedom of saying their opinions. . In the 21st century, however, the understanding which stresses the fact that teachers should be involved in tasks such as educational reforms, renovation, and development and be part of these processes became prominent. In today’s perception is shifted towards the view that rather than taking and implementing the content, curriculum and methods as they are, teachers are expected to form every situation related to their own materials, methods, in-class activities and instruction Nunan, 2004: 133 . Towards the end of the 20st century, all developed, developing and underdeveloped countries were in search of finding different and effective ways to prepare their citizens for the life in the 21st century by training their citizens and obtain success in education at both international and local levels. In this context, four dimensions about redesigning and modernizing educational content come to forefront: 1- Learning for knowledge. 2- Learning for doing/performing. 3- Learning for existing. 4- Learning to live together. The most critical dimension is “learning to live together”. Learning to live together is the prerequisite for achieving the other three factors. The tenets which define these dimensions are 1- Constructing awareness for citizenship. 2- Make disadvantaged groups advantageous. For this reason, teachers’ participation into every kind of educational reform applications maintained and it is necessary to train teachers as competent in the 21st century understanding and tendencies. From this aspect, it obvious that there is a need for all countries to renewing, modernizing and altering their teacher training program in accordance with the demands of the 21st century. Factors such as disappearance of personal, social and geographical boundaries, contemporary understandings and the necessity of implementing these resulted in multidimensional and multicultural perception of citizenship. This new understanding as well as tendencies renders renewing teacher training and in-service training programs compulsory. Characteristic of the 21st century society is to have a philosophy of life which is differentiating in terms of culture and perception and gradually globalizing. Values and issues such as increasing diversity in culture and language, international dialogue, having access to information instantly, socio-economic inequality and inability of wide range of people to benefit from democratic rights are becoming eminent in the 21st century. In this context, since teachers are the first group that changes influence, it is essential to prepare teachers for the 2st century and its requirements. Qualified teacher training is fundamental in maintaining teacher participation effectively and voluntarily in reform movements to be held in education. Teacher is the most essential and significant component of every kind of renovation to be made in education. Teachers should have active participation in every type of educational reforms. In this framework, the study is based on two problems. One is to put forward the qualifications of the 21st century teacher in accordance with features of the 21st century society and new foremost understandings and issues. The second, in this context of new understandings and issues, it is tried to determine dimensions of teacher training programs in the 21st century. Research is a theoretical study. Compilation method was utilized in this study. Data were obtained by means of studies about the research problem in related literature and conducted within the last ten years. Then, collected data were analyzed based on research problems. On the basis of these analyses, tendency and issues, new concepts required to form the basis of pre- and in-service training of teachers and tenets and understandings about teachers in the 21st century were inferred. The study gave way to the following results: 1- Teacher training programs should be conducted on an international basis. 2- The 21st century teacher should be trained as having multicultural understanding and competency. 3- Teachers should be trained with the perception of building a cross-cultural education and democratic society. 4- Vital component of societal development and change, the teacher should be trained as a human who is responsive to all problems around him/her, generate solutions and has a standpoint. 5The perception that teachers act according to pre-determined rules in teaching processes is replaced by the understanding that today teachers carry out teaching by relating it to other fields which they find relevant. 6- Teachers should be trained in multiple dimensions like an actor and take appropriate positions in accordance with every situation. 7- The view that teachers are equipped with knowledge superseded by the perception that teachers should act in accordance with and appropriate to situation, develop an approach suitable for this situation and that they should be competent in relating this approach to the approaches out forward by scientists. 8- Application of teachers’ professional development should be regarded as a continuous and an incessant process which is open to alteration and improvement. 9- Teachers should be made to believe that they perceive professional training as a life style. 10- The 21st century schools should be organized as learning communities. 11- In order to achieve success in education reforms, teachers’ voluntary participation in reform process should be maintained. 12- Teaching profession will be accepted as an expertise in the 21st century. 13- The idea that views teachers themselves are the most pivotal material is getting prominent in learning-teaching processes. 14- In preparing teacher training programs, participation of almost all sections of society should be involved. 15- Professional training of teachers should be school based and an ongoing process. Teachers should be made to believe this perception as a life style. 16- Teachers should be trained in a way that has an opinion and stance towards every issue related to human and society. These results lead to the conception that teaching profession of the 21st century should be an expertise and teacher should be an expert. Teacher of the 21st century has awareness regarding demands of the new century, prepares him/herself for this, and is keen on change and development. In this context, it is apparent that all countries have to renew their educational system and teacher training programs in accordance with necessities of the 21st century

References

  • Black, P. (1998). Ideology, evidence and the raising of standards. (Editör: J. Dillon ve M. Maguire). Becoming a Teacher, 53-64. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bredeson, P. V. (2002). The architecture of professional development: materials, messages and meaning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 661-675.
  • Cogan, J. J. ve Pederson, P, V. (2001). The development of civic values: case study of the United States of America. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 61-76.
  • Cogan, J. J. ve Morris, P. (2001). The development of civics values: an overview. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 1- 9.
  • Collwill, J. ve Gallagher, C. (2007). Developing a curriculum for the twenty-first century: the experiences of England and Northern Ireland. Prospects, 37, 411-425.
  • CSCENPA (Curriculum Standing Committee of National Education Professional Associations). (2007). Developing a Twenty-first Century School Curriculum for all Australian Students. http://www.arteducation.org.au/news/CSCNEPA_2, Erişim Tarihi: 27.12.2009.
  • Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 677-692.
  • Dillon, J. ve Maguire, M. (1998). Becoming a Teacher. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Fullinwider, R. (2001). Multicultural education and cosmopolitan citizenship. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 331-343.
  • Furlong, J. ve Maynard, T. (1995). Mentoring Student Teachers. London: Routledge.
  • Hamilton, M. L. ve Pinnegar, S. (2000). On the threshold of a new century: trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in the teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, (3), 234-240.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1999). South and South-East Asia course on curriculum development. Educational Innovation and Information, 99.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1998). Curriculum development. Educational Innovation and Information, 97.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1997a). Teachers in the change process. Educational Innovation and Information, 93.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1997b). What education for what citizenship. Educational Innovation and Information, 90
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1996). The Role of Teachers. Educational Innovation and Information, 88.
  • IBE (International Bureau of Education). (1994). Research on comparative education. Educational Innovation and Information, 80.
  • Imants, J. (2002). Restructuring schools as a context for teacher learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 715-732.
  • Lappan, G. ve Le, Y. (2002). Reflections and recommendations. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 227-232.
  • Morris, P. ve Cogan, J. (2001). A comparative overview: civic education across six societies. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 109-129.
  • Nieto, S. (2000). “Placing equity front and center: some thoughts on transforming teacher education on a new Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, (3),180-187.
  • Nunan, D. (1999). Designing Tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pettersson, T., Postholm, M. B., Flem, A. ve Gudmundsdottir, S. (2004). The classroom as a stage and teacher’s role. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 589-605.
  • Spiecker, B. ve Steutel, J. (2001). “Multiculturalism, pillarization and liberal civic education in the Netherlands. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 293-304.
  • Vanderberghe, R. (2002). Teachers professional development as the core of school improvement. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 653-659.
  • Verloop, N., Driel, J. V. ve Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441-461.
  • Wiske, M. S., Sick, M. ve Wirsig, S. (2001). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 483-501.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ömer Faruk Tutkun This is me

Yasemin Aksoyalp This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 24

Cite

APA Tutkun, Ö. F., & Aksoyalp, Y. (2010). 21. Yüzyılda Öğretmen Yetiştirme Eğitim Programının Boyutları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(24), 361-371.

24108 28027 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License