Neoseiulus cinctutus (Livshitz & Kuznetsov, 1972)’un Türkiye için ilk kaydı ile Türkiye’de Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) cinsi türlerinin tanı anahtarı

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 73 - 81, 24.06.2019

İsmail Döker

https://doi.org/10.31019/tbmd.540500

Cited By: 2

Öz

Neoseiulus cinctutus (Livshitz & Kuznetsov) (Acari:
Phytoseiidae) Türkiye faunası için ilk kez kayıt edilmektedir. Bu türün yeniden
tanımlaması ve çizimleri, Denizli, Buldan’dan Verbascum sp. (Scrophulariaceae) bitkisinden toplanan dişi bireyler
üzerinden verilmiştir. Ayrıca Türkiye’de bulunan Neoseiulus Hughes türlerinin teşhis anahtarı oluşturulmuştur. Bu
tür, daha önce Türkiye faunası için bilinen N.
marginatus (Wainstein) ve N. neomarginatus
Stathakis, Kapaxidi & Papadoulis türlerine morfolojik olarak benzemekte
olup, N. cinctutus’un chelicera hareketli parcasinda diş bulunmazken, diğer iki
türde de bir diş bulunmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phytoseiidae, Neoseiulus, yeni kayit, fauna

Neoseiulus cinctutus (Livshitz & Kuznetsov)’un Türkiye için ilk kaydı ile Türkiye’de Neoseiulus Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae) cinsi türlerinin tanı anahtarı

Öz

Neoseiulus cinctutus (Livshitz & Kuznetsov) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is reported for the first time for the Turkish fauna. This species is re-described and illustrated based on female specimens collected from Verbascum sp. (Scrophulariaceae) in Buldan municipality, Denizli Province. In addition, an identification key for species of the genus Neoseiulus Hughes found in Turkey is provided. This species is morphologically close to N. marginatus (Wainstein) and N. neomarginatus Stathakis, Kapaxidi & Papadoulis, known from the Turkish fauna. However, it is different by having a smooth movable digit as opposed to one tooth on the latter two species.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Phytoseiidae, Neoseiulus, new record, fauna, Turkey

Kaynakça

• Athias–Henriot, C. 1977. Nouvelles notes sur la Amblyseiini. III. Sur la genre Cydnodromus: redefinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 22: 61–73.
• Beard, J.J. (2001) A review of Australian Neoseiulus Hughes and Typhlodromips De Leon (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Amblyseiinae). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 15: 73–158.
• Beaulieu, F. & J. Beard 2018. Acarine biocontrol agents Neoseiulus californicus sensu Athias-Henriot (1977) and N. barkeri Hughes (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) redescribed, their synonymies assessed, and the identity of N. californicus (McGregor) clarified based on examination of types. Zootaxa, 4500: 451–507.
• Beglyarov, G.A. 1981. Keys to the determination of phytoseiid mites of the USSR. Information Bulletin International Organization for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, East Palaearctic Section, Leningrad, Russia, 2, 97 pp. [in Russian].
• Chant, D.A. & J.A. McMurtry 2007. Illustrated keys and diognoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House, West Bloomfield, 219 pp.
• Chant, D.A. & J.A. McMurtry, 2003. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part I. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology, 29: 3–46.
• Çakmak, İ. & S. Çobanoğlu 2006. Amblyseius californicus (McGregor, 1954) (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a new record for the Turkish fauna. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 30: 55–58.
• Çobanoğlu, S. (2002) Amblyeius astutus (Beglarov, 1960) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), a new record for the predatory mite fauna of Turkey. Türkiye Entomologji Dergisi, 26: 115–120.
• Çobanoğlu, S. (2004) Phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) of Thrace, Turkey. Israel Journal of Entomology, 34: 83–107.
• Demite, P.R., G.J. de Moraes, J.A. McMurtry, H.A. Denmark & R.C Castilho (2019) Phytoseiidae Database. Available from: www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae (accessed February 12, 2019).
• Dosse, G. (1958) Uber einige neue Raubmilbenarten (Acar.: Phytoseiidae). Pflanzenschutz Berichte, 21: 44–61.
• Döker, İ., C. Kazak & K. Karut 2016a. Contributions to the Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) fauna of Turkey: morphological variations, twelve new records, re-description of some species and a revised key to the Turkish species. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 21: 505–527.
• Döker İ., C. Kazak & K. Karut 2016b. Functional response and fecundity of a native Neoseiulus californicus population to Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae) at extreme humidity conditions", Systematic & Applied Acarology, 21: 1463–1472.
• Döker, İ., C. Kazak & K. Karut 2015. A new species and two new records of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Turkey. Zootaxa, 3918: 439–445.
• Döker, İ., Th.I. Stathakis, C. Kazak, K. Karut & G.Th. Papadoulis 2014. Four new records and two new species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Turkey, with a key to the Turkish species. Zootaxa, 3827: 331–342.
• Düzgünes, Z. & S. Kılıç. 1983. Determination of Phytoseiidae species in important apple growing areas of Turkey and studies on the effectiveness of the most important of them on Tetranychus viennensis Zacher. Doga Bilim Dergisi, 7: 193–205 (in Turkish with English summary).
• Evans, G.O. 1952. A new typhlodromid mite predaceous on Tetranychus bimaculatus Harvey in Indonesia. Annual Magazine of Natural History, 5: 413–416.
• Faraji, F., S. Çobanoğlu & I. Çakmak 2011. A checklist and a key for the Phytoseiidae species of Turkey with two new species records (Acari: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Acarology, 37: 221–243.
• Garman, P. 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin, New Haven, USA, 520: 1–27.
• Hughes, A.M. 1948. The mites associated with stored food products. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, H. M. Stationary Office, London, 168 pp.
• Karg, W. 1993. Acari (Acarina), Milben Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta) Cohors Gamasina Leach. Raubmilbe. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands: 59, Second Edition, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany, 523 pp.
• Kasap, I. & S. Çobanoğlu 2009. Phytoseiid mites of Hakkâri province, with Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) tamaricis Kolodochka, 1982 (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a new record for the predatory mite fauna of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 33: 301–308.
• Knapp, M., Y. van Houtenvonne, E. van Baal, T. Groot 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current stat us and future prospects. Acarologia 58: 72–82.
• Li, Y.Y., M.X Liu, H.W. Zhou, C.B. Tian, G.H. Zhang, Y.Q. Liu, H. Liu & J.J. Wang 2017. Evaluation of Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for control of Eotetranychus kankitus (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 110: 903–914.
• Lindquist, E.E. & G.O. Evans 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 47: 1–64.
• Livshitz, I.Z. & Kuznetsov, N.N. (1972) Phytoseiid mites from Crimea (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae). In: Pests and diseases of fruit and ornamental plants. Proceedings of The All-Union V. I. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Science, The State Nikita Botanical Gardens, Yalta, Ukraine, 61, 13–64 [in Russian].
• McGregor, E.A. 1954. Two new mites in the genus Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Southern California Academy of Science Bulletin, 53: 89–92.
• McMurtry, J.A. & B.A. Croft 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 42: 291–321.
• McMutry, J.A., G.J. de Moraes & N. Famah-Sourassou 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic & Applied Acarology, 18: 297–320.
• Moraes, G.J. de, J.A. McMurtry & H.A. Denmark 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. EMBRAPA-DDT, Brasilia, Brazil, 353 pp.
• Moraes, G.J. de, J.A. McMurtry, H.A. Denmark & C.B. Campos 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa, 434:1–494.
• Oudemans, A.C. 1930. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. CII. Entomologische Berichten, 8: 69–74.
• Özman, S.K. & S. Çobanoğlu, 2001. Current status of hazelnut mites in Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, 56: 479–487.
• Papadoulis, G.Th. 1993. Studies on morphology and systematics of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Greece. Agricultural University of Athens, Ph.D. Thesis, 462 pp
• Papadoulis, G.Th. & N.G. Emmanouel 1991. The genus Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Greece, with the description of a new species. Entomologia Hellenica, 9: 35–62.
• Papadoulis, G.Th., N.G. Emmanouel & E.V. Kapaxidi 2009. Phytoseiidae of Greece and Cyprus (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House. 200 pp.
• Rowell, H.L., D.A. Chant & R.I.C. Hansell 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). The Canadian Entomologist, 110: 859–876.
• Stathakis, Th.I 2011. Mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) on native plants in Crete Island. Agricultural University of Athens, MSc. Thesis, 138 pp. (in Greek).
• Swirski, E. & S. Ragusa 1977. Some predacious mites of Greece, with a description of one new species (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Phytoparasitica, 5: 75–84.
• Wainstein, B.A. (1977) Family Phytoseiidae Berlese, 1916. In: Ghilarov, B.M. (Ed.), Determination of mites inhabiting soil (Mesostigmata), Ed. Nauka, Leningrad, Russia, p. 226–244.
• Zhang, Z.Q. (2003) Mites of Greenhouses Identification, Biology and Control. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 244 pp.