Research Article
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Cite

Year 2019, Volume 43, Issue 1, 90 - 101, 11.01.2019

Abstract

References

  • APHA (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
  • Beltrami ME, Ciutti F, Cappelletti C, Losch B, Alber R, Ector L (2012). Diatoms from Alto Adige/Sudtirol (Northern Italy): characterization of assemblages and their application for biological quality assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 695: 153-170.
  • Bennion H, Kelly MG, Juggins S, Yallop ML, Burgess A, Jamieson BJ, Krokowski J (2014). Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshw Sci 33: 639-654.
  • Biggs BJF, Stevenson RJ, Lowe RL (1998). A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Arch Hydrobiol 143: 21-56.
  • Binder N (2001). Wege zur Anwendung numerischer Methoden für die Indikationsbewertung von Algenarten für das Fließgewässermonitoring. Innsbruck, Austria: Institut für Botanik, Arbeitsgruppe Hydrobotanik (in German).
  • Çelekli A, Öztürk B (2014). Determination of ecological status and ecological preferences of phytoplankton using multivariate approach in a Mediterranean reservoir. Hydrobiologia 740: 115-135.
  • CEN (2003). Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the Routine Sampling and Pretreatment of Benthic Diatoms from Rivers. European Standard EN 13946. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
  • CEN (2004). Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters. European Standard EN 14407. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
  • Cron N, Quick I, Vollmer S (2015). Quantitative evaluation of hydromorphological changes in navigable waterways as contribution to sustainable management. In: Hipel KW, Fang L, Cullmann J, Bristow M, editors. Conflict Resolution in Water Resources and Environmental Management. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, pp. 245-262.
  • Davies SP, Jackson SK (2006). The Biological Condition Gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16: 1251-1266.
  • Delgado C, Pardo I (2014). Comparison of benthic diatoms from Mediterranean and Atlantic Spanish streams: community changes in relation to environmental factors. Aquat Bot 120: 304-314.
  • Della Bella V, Pace G, Barile M, Zedde A, Puccinelli C, Ciadamidaro S, Danieli PP, Andreani P, Aulicino FA, Belfiore C et al. (2012). Benthic diatom assemblages and their response to human stress in small-sized volcanic-siliceous streams of central Italy (Mediterranean eco-region). Hydrobiologia 695: 207-222.
  • Della Bella V, Puccinelli C, Marcheggiani S, Mancini L (2007). Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of central Italy. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 43: 89-99.
  • Dell’Uomo A (2004). L’indice diatomico di eutrofizzazione/ polluzione (EPI-D) nel monitoraggio delle azque correnti, line guida. Camerino, Italy: Dipartimento di Botanica ed Ecologia, Universita di Camerino (in Italian).
  • EC (2009). Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium.
  • Izagirre O, Elosegi A (2005). Environmental control of seasonal and inter-annual variations of periphytic biomass in a North Iberian stream. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 41: 35-46.
  • Karr JR (1981). Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27.
  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1999). Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
  • Kelly M, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Pritchard S, Jamieson J, Rippey B (2008). Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw Biol 53: 403-422.
  • Kelly M, Urbanic G, Acs E, Bertrin V, Burgess A, Denys L (2014). Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes using littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia 734: 125-141.
  • Kelly MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Laugaste R, Hürlimann J, Jarlman A et al. (1998). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Appl Phycol 10: 215- 224.
  • Kolkwitz R, Marson M (1908). Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien. Ber Dtsch bot Ges 26: 505-519 (in German).
  • Krammer K (2000). The Genus Pinnularia . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 1. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Krammer K (2002). The Genus Cymbella . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 3. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991a). Bacillariophyceae. 3 Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991b). Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema . In: Ettl H, Gartner G, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999a). Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999b). Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg (in German).
  • Lange-Bertalot H (2001). Navicula Sensu Stricto, 10 Genera Separated from Navicula Sensu Lato Frustulia . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 2. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Lotter AF, Pienitz R, Schmidt R (1999). Diatoms as indicators of environmental change near arctic and alpine tree line. In: Stoermer EF, Smol J, editors. The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205-226.
  • Moss B (2008). The kingdom of the shore: achievement of good ecological potential in reservoirs. Freshwater Reviews 1: 29-42.
  • Mustapha MK (2008). Assessment of the water quality of Oyun Reservoir, Offa, Nigeria, using selected physico-chemical parameters. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc 8: 309-319.
  • Oliveira MA, Torgan LC, Lobo EA, Scharzbold A (2001). Association of periphytic diatom species of artificial substrate in lotic environments in the Arroio Sampaio basin, RS, Brazil: relationships with abiotic variables. Braz J Biol 61: 523-540.
  • Pan Y, Stevenson RJ (1996). Gradient analysis of diatom assemblages in western Kentucky wetlands. J Phycol 32: 222-232.
  • Pongpan L, Yawadee P (2014). Evaluation of the trophic benthic diatom index in some main rivers of Thailand. Advances in Environmental Biology 8: 248-254.
  • Potapova M, Charles DF (2003). Distribution of benthic diatoms in US rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshw Biol 48: 1311-1328.
  • Potapova M, Charles DF, Ponader KC, Winter DM (2004). Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices: comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia 517: 25-41.
  • Rimet F, Goma J, Cambra J, Bertuzzi E, Cantonati M, Cappelletti C, Ciutti F, Cordonier A, Coste M, Delmas F et al. (2011). Benthic diatoms in western European streams with altitudes above 800 m: characterization of the main assemblages and correspondence with ecoregions. Diatom Res 22: 147-188.
  • Rocha RDR (1992). Inflation and stabilization in Yugoslavia. Contemp Econ Policy 10: 21-38.
  • Round FE (1991). Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. J Appl Phycol 3: 129-145.
  • Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P (2003). Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological Studies 110: 91-115.
  • Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P, Van Dam H, Ortler K, Binder N, Pall K (1999). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation (sowie geochemische Präferenzen, taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen). Vienna, Austria: Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium f.Land-u. Forstwirtschaft (in German). Soininen J (2007). Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms - a review. Diatom Res 22: 473-90.
  • Solak CN, Barinova S, Ács É, Dayıoğlu H (2012a). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent Creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turk J Bot 36: 191-203.
  • Solak CN, Ector L, Wojtal AZ, Ács É, Morales EA (2012b). A review of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 141: 431-462.
  • Stevenson RJ (1997). Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. J N Am Benthol Soc 16: 248-262.
  • Taylor J, Prygiel J, Vosloo A, de La Rey P, Van Rensburg L (2007). Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592: 455-464.
  • Yasuno M, Fukushima S, Sugaya Y (1994). Monitoring of benthic flora and fauna in channels draining a sewage plant. In: Jeffrey DW, Madden B, editors. Bioindicators and Environmental Management. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 1-12.
  • Zelinka M, Marvan P (1961). Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Arch Hydrobiol 57: 389-407 (in German)

Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment

Year 2019, Volume 43, Issue 1, 90 - 101, 11.01.2019

Abstract

  This study, the first such attempt in Turkey, aimed to investigate the distribution of diatom species related to the variation of total phosphorus (TP) in eight basins to determine trophic weight and indicator values of diatom species and to develop the Trophic Index-Turkey (TIT) for assessing the ecological status of freshwaters. The distribution of the diatom species in 225 running water bodies from 8 basins of Turkey was determined in 2014 (summer and fall) and 2015 (spring and summer) in association with TP variation. Trophic values for 219 species were determined during this study and many of these are presented for the first time. Optima and tolerance TP values were calculated for each species in the different aquatic ecosystems using weighted average regression. Diatom species such as Clevamphora ovalis, Caloneis amphisbaena, Gyrosigma acuminatum, Navicula tripunctata, and Nitzschia umbonata showed high trophic weight values, while Achnanthidium minutissimum, Cymbella excisa, Didymosphenia geminata, Hannaea arcus, and Meridion circulare had low trophic weight values. These findings provide supplementary information about the biotic integrity of the water bodies and could be used to develop the TIT for the bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems, especially running water bodies.

References

  • APHA (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association.
  • Beltrami ME, Ciutti F, Cappelletti C, Losch B, Alber R, Ector L (2012). Diatoms from Alto Adige/Sudtirol (Northern Italy): characterization of assemblages and their application for biological quality assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 695: 153-170.
  • Bennion H, Kelly MG, Juggins S, Yallop ML, Burgess A, Jamieson BJ, Krokowski J (2014). Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshw Sci 33: 639-654.
  • Biggs BJF, Stevenson RJ, Lowe RL (1998). A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Arch Hydrobiol 143: 21-56.
  • Binder N (2001). Wege zur Anwendung numerischer Methoden für die Indikationsbewertung von Algenarten für das Fließgewässermonitoring. Innsbruck, Austria: Institut für Botanik, Arbeitsgruppe Hydrobotanik (in German).
  • Çelekli A, Öztürk B (2014). Determination of ecological status and ecological preferences of phytoplankton using multivariate approach in a Mediterranean reservoir. Hydrobiologia 740: 115-135.
  • CEN (2003). Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the Routine Sampling and Pretreatment of Benthic Diatoms from Rivers. European Standard EN 13946. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
  • CEN (2004). Water Quality - Guidance Standard for the Identification, Enumeration and Interpretation of Benthic Diatom Samples from Running Waters. European Standard EN 14407. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
  • Cron N, Quick I, Vollmer S (2015). Quantitative evaluation of hydromorphological changes in navigable waterways as contribution to sustainable management. In: Hipel KW, Fang L, Cullmann J, Bristow M, editors. Conflict Resolution in Water Resources and Environmental Management. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, pp. 245-262.
  • Davies SP, Jackson SK (2006). The Biological Condition Gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16: 1251-1266.
  • Delgado C, Pardo I (2014). Comparison of benthic diatoms from Mediterranean and Atlantic Spanish streams: community changes in relation to environmental factors. Aquat Bot 120: 304-314.
  • Della Bella V, Pace G, Barile M, Zedde A, Puccinelli C, Ciadamidaro S, Danieli PP, Andreani P, Aulicino FA, Belfiore C et al. (2012). Benthic diatom assemblages and their response to human stress in small-sized volcanic-siliceous streams of central Italy (Mediterranean eco-region). Hydrobiologia 695: 207-222.
  • Della Bella V, Puccinelli C, Marcheggiani S, Mancini L (2007). Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of central Italy. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 43: 89-99.
  • Dell’Uomo A (2004). L’indice diatomico di eutrofizzazione/ polluzione (EPI-D) nel monitoraggio delle azque correnti, line guida. Camerino, Italy: Dipartimento di Botanica ed Ecologia, Universita di Camerino (in Italian).
  • EC (2009). Water Framework Directive Intercalibration Technical Report. Part 2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium.
  • Izagirre O, Elosegi A (2005). Environmental control of seasonal and inter-annual variations of periphytic biomass in a North Iberian stream. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim 41: 35-46.
  • Karr JR (1981). Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27.
  • Karr JR, Chu EW (1999). Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
  • Kelly M, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Pritchard S, Jamieson J, Rippey B (2008). Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw Biol 53: 403-422.
  • Kelly M, Urbanic G, Acs E, Bertrin V, Burgess A, Denys L (2014). Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes using littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia 734: 125-141.
  • Kelly MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Laugaste R, Hürlimann J, Jarlman A et al. (1998). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Appl Phycol 10: 215- 224.
  • Kolkwitz R, Marson M (1908). Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien. Ber Dtsch bot Ges 26: 505-519 (in German).
  • Krammer K (2000). The Genus Pinnularia . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 1. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Krammer K (2002). The Genus Cymbella . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 3. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991a). Bacillariophyceae. 3 Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1991b). Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema . In: Ettl H, Gartner G, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Stuttgart, Germany: Fischer Verlag (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999a). Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg (in German).
  • Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1999b). Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2. Berlin, Germany: Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg (in German).
  • Lange-Bertalot H (2001). Navicula Sensu Stricto, 10 Genera Separated from Navicula Sensu Lato Frustulia . Diatoms of Europe, Vol. 2. Ruggel, Liechtenstein: Gantner Verlag.
  • Lotter AF, Pienitz R, Schmidt R (1999). Diatoms as indicators of environmental change near arctic and alpine tree line. In: Stoermer EF, Smol J, editors. The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205-226.
  • Moss B (2008). The kingdom of the shore: achievement of good ecological potential in reservoirs. Freshwater Reviews 1: 29-42.
  • Mustapha MK (2008). Assessment of the water quality of Oyun Reservoir, Offa, Nigeria, using selected physico-chemical parameters. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc 8: 309-319.
  • Oliveira MA, Torgan LC, Lobo EA, Scharzbold A (2001). Association of periphytic diatom species of artificial substrate in lotic environments in the Arroio Sampaio basin, RS, Brazil: relationships with abiotic variables. Braz J Biol 61: 523-540.
  • Pan Y, Stevenson RJ (1996). Gradient analysis of diatom assemblages in western Kentucky wetlands. J Phycol 32: 222-232.
  • Pongpan L, Yawadee P (2014). Evaluation of the trophic benthic diatom index in some main rivers of Thailand. Advances in Environmental Biology 8: 248-254.
  • Potapova M, Charles DF (2003). Distribution of benthic diatoms in US rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshw Biol 48: 1311-1328.
  • Potapova M, Charles DF, Ponader KC, Winter DM (2004). Quantifying species indicator values for trophic diatom indices: comparison of approaches. Hydrobiologia 517: 25-41.
  • Rimet F, Goma J, Cambra J, Bertuzzi E, Cantonati M, Cappelletti C, Ciutti F, Cordonier A, Coste M, Delmas F et al. (2011). Benthic diatoms in western European streams with altitudes above 800 m: characterization of the main assemblages and correspondence with ecoregions. Diatom Res 22: 147-188.
  • Rocha RDR (1992). Inflation and stabilization in Yugoslavia. Contemp Econ Policy 10: 21-38.
  • Round FE (1991). Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. J Appl Phycol 3: 129-145.
  • Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P (2003). Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological Studies 110: 91-115.
  • Rott E, Pipp E, Pfister P, Van Dam H, Ortler K, Binder N, Pall K (1999). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in österreichischen Fliessgewässern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation (sowie geochemische Präferenzen, taxonomische und toxikologische Anmerkungen). Vienna, Austria: Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium f.Land-u. Forstwirtschaft (in German). Soininen J (2007). Environmental and spatial control of freshwater diatoms - a review. Diatom Res 22: 473-90.
  • Solak CN, Barinova S, Ács É, Dayıoğlu H (2012a). Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent Creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey. Turk J Bot 36: 191-203.
  • Solak CN, Ector L, Wojtal AZ, Ács É, Morales EA (2012b). A review of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkish inland waters. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 141: 431-462.
  • Stevenson RJ (1997). Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. J N Am Benthol Soc 16: 248-262.
  • Taylor J, Prygiel J, Vosloo A, de La Rey P, Van Rensburg L (2007). Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592: 455-464.
  • Yasuno M, Fukushima S, Sugaya Y (1994). Monitoring of benthic flora and fauna in channels draining a sewage plant. In: Jeffrey DW, Madden B, editors. Bioindicators and Environmental Management. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, pp. 1-12.
  • Zelinka M, Marvan P (1961). Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Arch Hydrobiol 57: 389-407 (in German)

Cite

Bibtex @research article { tbtkbotany512265, journal = {Turkish Journal of Botany}, issn = {1300-008X}, eissn = {1303-6106}, address = {}, publisher = {TUBITAK}, year = {2019}, volume = {43}, pages = {90 - 101}, doi = {}, title = {Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment}, key = {cite}, author = {Çelekli, Abuzer and Toudjanı, Assane Anabi and Gümüş, Emine Yonca and Kayhan, Seda and Lekesiz, Hacı Ömer and Çetın, Tolga} }
APA Çelekli, A. , Toudjanı, A. A. , Gümüş, E. Y. , Kayhan, S. , Lekesiz, H. Ö. & Çetın, T. (2019). Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment . Turkish Journal of Botany , 43 (1) , 90-101 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tbtkbotany/issue/42507/512265
MLA Çelekli, A. , Toudjanı, A. A. , Gümüş, E. Y. , Kayhan, S. , Lekesiz, H. Ö. , Çetın, T. "Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment" . Turkish Journal of Botany 43 (2019 ): 90-101 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tbtkbotany/issue/42507/512265>
Chicago Çelekli, A. , Toudjanı, A. A. , Gümüş, E. Y. , Kayhan, S. , Lekesiz, H. Ö. , Çetın, T. "Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment". Turkish Journal of Botany 43 (2019 ): 90-101
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment AU - Abuzer Çelekli , Assane Anabi Toudjanı , Emine Yonca Gümüş , Seda Kayhan , Hacı Ömer Lekesiz , Tolga Çetın Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - DO - T2 - Turkish Journal of Botany JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 90 EP - 101 VL - 43 IS - 1 SN - 1300-008X-1303-6106 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Journal of Botany Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment %A Abuzer Çelekli , Assane Anabi Toudjanı , Emine Yonca Gümüş , Seda Kayhan , Hacı Ömer Lekesiz , Tolga Çetın %T Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment %D 2019 %J Turkish Journal of Botany %P 1300-008X-1303-6106 %V 43 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Çelekli, Abuzer , Toudjanı, Assane Anabi , Gümüş, Emine Yonca , Kayhan, Seda , Lekesiz, Hacı Ömer , Çetın, Tolga . "Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment". Turkish Journal of Botany 43 / 1 (January 2019): 90-101 .
AMA Çelekli A. , Toudjanı A. A. , Gümüş E. Y. , Kayhan S. , Lekesiz H. Ö. , Çetın T. Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2019; 43(1): 90-101.
Vancouver Çelekli A. , Toudjanı A. A. , Gümüş E. Y. , Kayhan S. , Lekesiz H. Ö. , Çetın T. Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment. Turkish Journal of Botany. 2019; 43(1): 90-101.
IEEE A. Çelekli , A. A. Toudjanı , E. Y. Gümüş , S. Kayhan , H. Ö. Lekesiz and T. Çetın , "Determination of trophic weight and indicator values of diatoms in Turkish running waters for water quality assessment", Turkish Journal of Botany, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 90-101, Jan. 2019