Abstract
Amaç: Çocuk aile ilişkisi, ebeveynlik becerisinin çocuğun davranışlarına yansıması ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Çocukta fiziksel ceza uygulamalarında görülen uluslararası varyasyonlar ahlaki gerekçelere dayandırılabilmektedir. Çalışmada çocuğa yönelik fiziksel ceza uygulamalarının sıklığı ile ailelerin fiziksel cezaya bakış açısının fiziksel ceza ve diğer ceza uygulamaları ile ilişkisi ortaya konmak amaçlanmaktadır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ankara’da referans bir devlet hastanesi ile referans bir üniversite hastanesi olmak üzere toplam 502 ebeveyn ile görüşme yapılmıştır. Fiziksel ceza uygulamaları, bakış açısı, normlar ve tutumlar sorulmuştur. Çalışmada örnek seçilmemiş, belirlenen zaman diliminde çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden kişilerle yüz yüze veri toplama tekniği kullanılarak görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın gücü 76 olarak hesaplanmıştır. İstatistiksel analizler SPSS 21.0 İstatistik Paket Programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Ki-kare ve frekans dağılımları ortalama (standart sapma) şeklinde sunulmuştur. Çalışmada anlamlılık değeri p < 0.05 kabul edilmiştir.Bulgular: Üniversite hastanesine başvuran ebeveynlerin %52.2’si; devlet hastanesine başvuranların ise %55.1’i çocuklarına fiziksel şiddet uyguladığını belirtmiştir. Ailenin bilinçsizliğinin, öğrenim düzeyinin ve kültürel yapısının fiziksel ceza uygulamaları ile ilişkili olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0.001). Ailenin psikolojik durumu, gelenek/görenekleri ile sigara, alkol ya da madde bağımlılığı fiziksel ceza uygulamada önemli özelliklerdir (p<0.05).Sonuç: Çocuğa yönelik fiziksel ceza uygulamaları sıklığının her iki hastaneye başvuran ebeveynlerde de yadsınamayacak düzeyde olduğu saptanmıştır. Araştırma yapılan örnekler arasında fiziksel cezaya bakış açısı arasında fark olması ailelerin özellikleri ile ilişkili bulunmuştur.
Keywords
References
- Pinheiro PS. Report of the independent expert for the United Nations study on violence against children. In: World Report On Child Injury Prevention XVI, 2006; http://www.violencestudy.org/ IMG/pdf/English-2-2.pdf
- Convention on the Rights of the Child, UNICEF. http://www.unicef. org/crc/files/Rights_overview.pdf
- Çocuk Haklarına Dar Sözleşme. Resmi Gazete, 27 Ocak 1995. Sayı:22184, Sayfa:4.
- Straus MA, Donnelly M. Theoretical approaches to corporal punishment. In: Corporal Punishment in Theoretical Perspective, Donnelly M, Straus MA (eds). New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press 2005;3-7.
- Taylor CA, Hamvas L, Rice J, Newman DL, DeJong W. Perceived social norms, expectations and attitudes toward corporal punishment among an urban community sample of parents. J Urban Health 2011;88:254-69.
- Gershoff ET. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2002;128:539-79.
- Durrant JE, Ensom R. Physical punishment of children: Lessons from 20 years of research. CMAJ 2012;184:1373-7.
- Afifi TO, Mota NP, Dasiewicz P, MacMillan HL, Sareen J. Physical punishment and mental disorders: Results from a nationally representative US sample. Pediatrics 2012;130:184-92.
- Taylor CA, Manganello JA, Lee SJ, Rice JC. Mothers’ spanking of 3-year-old children and subsequent risk of children’s aggressive behavior. Pediatrics 2010;125:1057-65.
Abstract
Objective: The child-parent relationship is associated with parenting behavior. The international variation in corporal punishment (CP) may be attributable to cultural differences in the acceptance of moral justifications. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of corporal punishment and to determine the relationship between the parents’ point of view regarding CP and their punishment practices. Material and Methods: A referee state hospital and a referee university hospital in Ankara district were chosen to conduct face-to-face interviews with 502 parents. CP practices, perspectives, norms and attitudes were asked. A sample was not chosen for the study and parents accepting to be involved were administered the questionnaire. The power of the study was calculated as 0.76. Chi-square tests and means were calculated using SPSS 21.0 and a p value of 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.Results: The rates of CP practice were 52.2% at the university and 55.1% at the government hospital. Lack of information, the education level and the cultural status of the family were related to CP practices (p<0.001). The psychological condition, traditions and customs, together with cigarette, alcohol and substance use at the family level were other factors related to CP practices.conclusion: Parental use of CP was at high levels in those attending either hospital. The CP practice differences between the sample groups were related to family characteristics
Keywords
References
- Pinheiro PS. Report of the independent expert for the United Nations study on violence against children. In: World Report On Child Injury Prevention XVI, 2006; http://www.violencestudy.org/ IMG/pdf/English-2-2.pdf
- Convention on the Rights of the Child, UNICEF. http://www.unicef. org/crc/files/Rights_overview.pdf
- Çocuk Haklarına Dar Sözleşme. Resmi Gazete, 27 Ocak 1995. Sayı:22184, Sayfa:4.
- Straus MA, Donnelly M. Theoretical approaches to corporal punishment. In: Corporal Punishment in Theoretical Perspective, Donnelly M, Straus MA (eds). New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press 2005;3-7.
- Taylor CA, Hamvas L, Rice J, Newman DL, DeJong W. Perceived social norms, expectations and attitudes toward corporal punishment among an urban community sample of parents. J Urban Health 2011;88:254-69.
- Gershoff ET. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2002;128:539-79.
- Durrant JE, Ensom R. Physical punishment of children: Lessons from 20 years of research. CMAJ 2012;184:1373-7.
- Afifi TO, Mota NP, Dasiewicz P, MacMillan HL, Sareen J. Physical punishment and mental disorders: Results from a nationally representative US sample. Pediatrics 2012;130:184-92.
- Taylor CA, Manganello JA, Lee SJ, Rice JC. Mothers’ spanking of 3-year-old children and subsequent risk of children’s aggressive behavior. Pediatrics 2010;125:1057-65.
Details
| Other ID | JA87KP25UH |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2017 |
| Submission Date | June 1, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 11 Issue: 2 |
The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.
Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication, with at least 6 original articles in each issue, taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.
The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.