Some Micro Nutrients in Husk and Grain of Oat Genotypes

Year 2023, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 1 - 8, 27.09.2023

Leyla İdikut , Songül Çiftçi , Gülay Zulkadir , Ziya Dumlupınar , Ali Özkan , Meryem Delal Yaman

https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1177873

Abstract

Oat is one of the important cereal crops due to its high nutritional content and versatile usage in human diet and animal feed. Therefore, it was aimed to examine some nutritional values of grain and husk and, some quality traits of five commercial oat varieties and six advanced oat lines under Kahramanmaraş conditions in 2016-2017 cropping year. According to the results, thousand seeds (grain + husk) weight was found as 26.170 to 45.510 g, test weight (grain + husk) was 47.8 to 54.3 kg, protein ratio of grain was 13.97 to 16.55%, groat percentage was 66.31 to 73.33%, husk ratio was 26.67 to 33.68%, iron content of grain was 22.75 to 39.44 mg kg⁻¹, iron content of husk was 54.06 to 90.27 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content in grain was 28.09 to 66.21 mg kg⁻¹, zinc content of husk was 14.04 to 36.59 mg kg⁻¹, calcium content in grain was 83.30 to 191.50 mg kg⁻¹, the calcium content of husk was 313.7 to 442.30 mg kg⁻¹.

Keywords

Oats, seed, husk, grain characters, elements

References

• [1] Yalcin TG. Determination of phytic acid and mineral contents of oat breeding samples. Hacettepe University, Food Engineering Department. The Degree of Master of Science. Ankara, 2018.
• [2] Yaver E, Ertas N. Composition oats, grain endustry uses and effects on human health. Journal of Food and Feed Science-Techonology, 2013; 13: 41–50.
• [3] Menon R, Gonzalez T, Ferruzzi M, Jackson E, Winderl D, Watson J. Oats-from farm to fork, advances in food and nutrition research. 1st ed. Elsevier Inc. (pp. 77:1-55), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2015.12.001.
• [4] Sari N, Imamoglu A, Yildiz O. Determination of advanced oat lines for Menemen ecological conditions. Journal of Anatolia Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 2011; 21(1): 16-25.
• [5] Decker EA, Rose DJ, Stewart D. Processing of oats and the impact of processing operations on nutrition and health benefits. British Journal of Nutrition, 2014; 112: S58–S64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711451400227X.
• [6] Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2010; 41: 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa. 2009.12.004
• [7] Barbieri V, Lassinantti Gualtieri M, Siligardi C. Wheat husk: a renewable resource for bio-based building materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2020; 251: 118909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118909. [8] Lehtinen P, Kaukovirta-Norja A. Oat lipids, enzymes and quality. In: Lehtinen P, Francis H, Wood Peter J. (eds). OATS: Chemistry and Technology, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1094/9781891127649.009.
• [9] Makinen OE, Sozer N, Ercili-Cura D, Poutanen K. Protein from oat: Structure, processes, functionality and nutrition. Sustainable protein sources, 2017; 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00006-8.
• [10] Coskun G, Bahar B. Cereals and Pseudo-cereals in terms of chemical composition. Turkish Journal of Science and Health, 2020; 1(1): 52-60.
• [11] Youssef MKE, Nassar AG, EL–Fishawy FA, Mostafa MA. Assessment of proximate chemical composition and nutritional status of wheat biscuits fortified with oat powder. Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016; 47(5): 83–94.
• [12] Ma BL, Zheng Z, Pageau D, Vera C, Fregeau-Reid J, Xue A, Yan W. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, yield and agronomic traits of oat cultivars as affected by fertilizer N rates under diverse environments. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017; 108: 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9848-8.
• [13] FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Accessed May 12, 2023.
• [14] Peterson DM, Wesenberg DM, Burrup DE, Eriickson CA. Relationships among agronomic traits and grain composition in oat genotypes grown in different environments. Crop Science, 2005; 45(4): 1249-1255. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0063.
• [15] Anonymous. Meteorology provincial directorate climate data, Kahramanmaraş. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=K.MARAS. 2017a. Accessed June 6, 2018.
• [16] Anonymous. Soil analysis, KSU Agriculture Faculty Soil Laboratory Data. 2017b.
• [17] SAS9.3. SAS/STAT. SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, NC, USA. 2013.
• [18] Sahin M, Gocmen Akcacik A, Aydogan S, Hamzaoglu S, Ceri S, Demir B. Determination of some physical properties and nutrient components in oat (Avena sativa spp.) grains. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Animal Research, 2017; 6(1): 23-28.
• [19] Kahraman T, Avci R, Ozturk I, Tulek A. Determination of oat genotypes suitable for Thrace-Marmara region. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Research, 2012; 5 (2): 24-28. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.359381.
• [20] Dumlupinar Z. Agricultural and molecular characterization of oat lines from different gene banks. Result report, Tubitak Tovag 112 O 138 S, 85, 2015.
• [21] Kahraman T, Kurt C, Seis Subası A, Ozderen T, Yildiz O, Buyukkileci C, et al. Determination of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes suitable for human nutrition in the Thrace-Marmara region. Field Research Institute Journal, 2017; 26: 105−111. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.359164.
• [22] Mut Z, Erbas Kose OD, Akay H. Chemical quality properties of different oats (Avena sativa L.) varieties. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017; 27(3): 347-356. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.290920.
• [23] Erbas OD. Determination of agricultural and some quality characteristics of oat (Avena Sativa L.) genotypes. Bozok University Institute of Science, Field Crops Master's Thesis. Yozgat, 2012.
• [24] Sahin A. Effect of sulfur doses and application time on oat grass yield and quality of oats (Avena Sativa L.). Yozgat Bozok University, Institute of Science, Field Crops Department. Master's Thesis. Yozgat, 2019.
• [25] Sari N, Imamoglu A, Pelit S, Yildiz O, Buyukkileci C. The Determination of suitable oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes in Cost Line Aegean Region. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 2016; 25: 158-164.
• [26] Topkara A. Determination of yield, yield components and quality characteristics of oat varieties and genotypes in Ordu province ecological conditions. Ordu University Institute of Science. Intermediate Master Thesis. Ordu, 2019.
• [27] Alemayehu GF, Forsido SF, Tola YB, Teshager MA, Assegie AA, Amare E. Proximate, mineral and anti-nutrient compositions of oat grains (Avena sativa) cultivated in Ethiopia: implications for nutrition and mineral bioavailability. Heliyon, 2021; 7: e07722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07722.
• [28] Kendal E, Sayar MS. The stability of some spring triticale genotypes using biplot analysis. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 2016; 26(3):754-765.
• [29] Kendal E, Sayar MS, Tekdal S, Aktaş H, Karaman M. Assessment of the impact of ecological factors on yield and quality parameters in triticale using GGE biplot and AMMI analysis. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2016; 48(5): 1903-1913.
• [30] Ragaee S, Abdel-Aal ESM, Noaman M. Antioxidant activity and nutrient composition of selected cereals for food use. Food Chemistry, 2006; 98: 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.04.039.
• [31] Bedoic R, Cosic B, Duic N. Technical potential and geographic distribution of agricultural residues, co-products and by-products in the European Union. Science of the Total Environment, 2019; 686: 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.219
• [32] Li H, Qiu J, Liu C, Ren C, Li Z. Milling characteristics and distribution of phytic acid, minerals, and some nutrients in oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Cereal Science, 2014; 60 (3): 549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2014.08.004.
• [33] Singh R, De S, Belkheir A. Avena sativa (Oat), a potential neutraceutical and therapeutic agent: An overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2013; 53(2): 126-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.526725.
• [34] Loskutov IG, Khlestkina EK. Wheat, barley, and oat breeding for health benefit components in grain. Plants, 2021; 10 (1): 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010086.
• [35] Yilmaz O, Koyuncu O. Investigation of Mineral Matter Content of Husks Separated From Oat Varieties Cultivated in Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 2021; 14(3): 210-215.
• [36] Saleh ASM, Zhang Q, Chen J, Shen Q. Millet grains: Nutritional quality, processing, and potential health benefits. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2013; 12: 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12012.
• [37] Shahidi F, Chandrasekara A. Millet grain phenolics and their role in disease risk reduction and health promotion: A review. Journal of Functional Foods, 2013; 5: 570-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2013.02.004.
• [38] Demirci M. Food Chemistry Book. Food Technology Association. ISBN 975-97146-2-0; 2016.
• [39] Sevgican F. Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Publications. No: 524. Textbook. Bornova / İzmir, 1996.
• [40] Erbas Kose OD, Mut Z. Mineral content of some local and foreign barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. KSU Agriculture and Nature Journal, 2019; 22 (5): 671-677. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.523982
• [41] Ozcan M, Bagci A, Dursun N, Gezgin S, Hamurcu M, Dumlupinar Z, et al. Macro and micro element contents of several oat (Avena sativa L.) genotype and variety grains. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2017; 36(3): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2017.28065.
• [42] WHO. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition, second ed. World Health Organization, 2005. Retrieved from. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10 665/42716.