Evaluation of Sugar, HMF, pH, and Acidity Content in Some Popular Soft Drinks Sold in Turkey

Year 2023, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 11 - 18, 28.12.2023

Ramazan Gün İnan Dursun

https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1315015

Abstract

It is well-known that high consumptions of sugary drinks cause negative effects on human health. This study aims to determine sugar, HMF, pH, and titratable acidity values of soft drinks (n = 25) sold in Turkey. All the samples were purchased from chain supermarkets in city of Bingöl, Turkey. HPLC-RID and HPLC-DAD methods were used to determine sugar profile (glucose, fructose, sucrose, and maltose) and HMF content of the samples, respectively. Results showed that total sugar and HMF contents of the samples were found to be ranged from 0.23 to 13.85 % and from 0.65 to 27.76 mg/L respectively. In 9 out of 25 samples HMF were not detected. Furthermore, pH and acidity values of the samples were found to be varied from 1.96 to 6.34 and from 0.73 to 22.07 mEq/L, respectively. The samples were classified based on their total sugar content (from sugar free to very high sugar) and pH erosive capacity (from minimally erosive to extremely erosive). Most of the samples (15 out of 25 sample) were classified in the high sugar content soft drinks (>8g/100ml) and 14 out of 25 samples were found to be considered as extremely erosive (pH<3).

Keywords

Soft drinks, Sugars, Erosive effect, HMF, Public health, Tax on sugar

Supporting Institution

Bingöl University

Thanks

This work supported by Bingöl University Central Laboratory Application and Research Center. The authors also would like to thank Bingöl University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BÜBAP) (Project Number: PİKOM-Arı.2018.008) for equipment (HPLC) support.

References

• World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization; 2015.
• HM Revenue & Customs. The soft drinks industry levy regulations; 2018 [cited 2023 May 14] Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2018/41/pdfs/uksi_20180041_en.pdf
• Sousa A, Sych J, Rohrmann S, Faeh D. The Importance of Sweet Beverage Definitions When Targeting Health Policies—The Case of Switzerland. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1976.
• Official gazette. 26/05/2022 tarihli ve 5416 sayılı karar; 2022 [cited 2023 May 11] Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/05/20220527-9.pdf
• McEwan JA, Colwill JS. The sensory assessment of the thirst-quenching characteristics of drinks. Food Quality and Preference. 1996; 7(2):101-11.
• Bandy LK, Scarborough P, Harrington RA, Rayner M, Jebb SA. Reductions in sugar sales from soft drinks in the UK from 2015 to 2018. BMC medicine. 2020;18(1):1-0.
• TUIK. [cited 2023 May 7] Availabe from: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=45500
• Statista. Non-Alcoholic Drinks –Turkey. 2021. [cited 2023 May 11]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/non-alcoholic-drinks/turkey#sales-channels
• von Fraunhofer JA, Rogers MM. Dissolution of dental enamel in soft drinks. General dentistry. 2004;52(4):308-12.
• Ivanišová E, Meňhartová K, Terentjeva M, Harangozo Ľ, Kántor A, Kačániová M. The evaluation of chemical, antioxidant, antimicrobial and sensory properties of kombucha tea beverage. Journal of food science and technology. 2020;57:1840-6.
• Ribeiro KC, Coutinho NM, Silveira MR, Rocha RS, Arruda HS, Pastore GM, Neto RP, Tavares MI, Pimentel TC, Silva PH, Freitas MQ. Impact of cold plasma on the techno-functional and sensory properties of whey dairy beverage added with xylooligosaccharide. Food Research International. 2021;142:110232.
• Rada-Mendoza M, Villamiel M, Ramírez A, Usuriaga Y, Montilla A. Quality indicators in lactose hydrolyzed milks and soy beverages from Colombia. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2021; 12:1-9.
• Bonwick GA, Birch CS. European regulation of process contaminants in food. In: Mitigating Contamination from Food Processing. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK. 2019. pp. 1–16.
• Adu JK, Orman E, Amengor CD, Peprah P, Danso N, Azumah JA. Assessment of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural levels in carbonated soft drinks and milk products on the markets in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana. Scientific African. 2022; 1;17:e01346.
• Mtaoua H, Sánchez‐Vega R, Ferchichi A, Martín‐Belloso O. Impact of high‐intensity pulsed electric fields or thermal treatment on the quality attributes of date juice through storage. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2017; 41(4):e13052.
• TS 13359. Determination of Fructose,glucose,saccharose,turanose and Maltose of Honey by High Performance Liquid Chramatography. Turkish Standard Institute. 2008. Ankara.
• International Honey Commission (IHC). Harmonised Methods of the International Honey Commission. 2009. Available from: https://www.ihc-platform.net/ihcmethods2009.pdf.
• TS 1125 ISO 750. The titretable acidity analysis of fruits and vegetables. Turkish Standard Institute. 2002. Ankara.
• Huizinga O, Hubert M. The content of caloric and non-caloric sweeteners in soft drinks in Germany. Obesity Medicine. 2017; 1;6:11-4.
• Silva PD, Cruz R, Casal S. Sugars and artificial sweeteners in soft drinks: a decade of evolution in Portugal. Food Control. 2021;120:107481.
• OE. Orçamento do Estado para. 2017. In Da República (Ed.), Di´ario da República 2016; Vol. 42, pp. 4875–5107.
• European Union (EU). Council. Council Directive 2001/11 O/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2002; L10, 47-52.
• Murkovic M, Bornik MA. Formation of 5‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐furfural (HMF) and 5‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐furoic acid during roasting of coffee. Molecular nutrition & food research. 2007;51(4):390-4.
• Ros-Polski V, Popović V, Koutchma T. Effect of ultraviolet-C light treatment on Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) content in high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and model syrups. Journal of food engineering. 2016;179:78-87.
• Czerwonka M, Opiłka J, Tokarz A. Evaluation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural content in non-alcoholic drinks. European Food Research and Technology. 2018 Jan;244:11-8.
• Tyl C, Sadler GD. pH and titratable acidity. Food analysis. 2017; 389-406.
• Jain P, Nihill P, Sobkowski J, Agustin MZ. Commercial soft drinks: pH and in vitro dissolution of enamel. General dentistry. 2007; 1;55(2):150-4.
• Reddy A, Norris DF, Momeni SS, Waldo B, Ruby JD. The pH of beverages in the United States. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2016; 1;147(4):255-63.
• Bamise CT, Ogunbodede EO, Olusile AO, Esan TA. Erosive potential of soft drinks in Nigeria. World Journal of Medical Sciences. 2007; 2 (2): 115-119.
• Frederick V, Obed H. Knowledge, practice and perception of taking soft drinks with food and the metabolic effect on high school students in Ghana. Endocrinol Metab. 2017;1(1):103-19.
• Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LP, Rodrigues C, Pandey A. New perspectives for citric acid production and application. Food Technology and Biotechnology. 2006; 44(2):141-9.
• Larsen MJ, Nyvad B. Enamel erosion by some soft drinks and orange juices relative to their pH, buffering effect and contents of calcium phosphate. Caries research. 1999; 33(1):81-7.
• Khoda MO, Heravi F, Shafaee H, Mollahassani H. The effect of different soft drinks on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2012; 9(2):145.
• Poggio C, Lombardini M, Colombo M, Bianchi S. Impact of two toothpastes on repairing enamel erosion produced by a soft drink: an AFM in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 2010; 1;38(11):868-74.