THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A FLUIDIZED BED COAL COMBUSTOR STEAM PLANT IN TEXTILE INDUSTRY

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 6 - Special Issue 6: Istanbul International Conference on Progress Applied Science (ICPAS2017), 1607 - 1614, 04.10.2017

A. Tantekin

https://doi.org/10.18186/journal-of-thermal-engineering.353690

Cited By: 3

Abstract

The
examinations of first and second laws of thermodynamics are performed on a 6.5
MW power plant, established in Adana, Turkey. The equipment for the
investigated plant can be aligned as a fluidized bed coal combustor (FBCC), a
heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), an economizer (ECO), fans, pumps, a
cyclone and a chimney. Whole parts of equipment are investigated separately and
energetic and exergetic inspections are enforced for whole parts of the plant.
The maximum exergy destruction rates in the plant are obtained for the FBCC,
HRSG and ECO with 95%, 3% and 1% of the whole system, respectively. Higher
excess air in the system induces heat losses, especially in the FBCC component
by virtue of the rising in mass flow rate of the flue gas. This situation can
be considered as one of the primary reasons of irreversibility. Additionally,
higher excess air induces the decrement of combustion efficiency in FBCC.
Therefore, this value and adverse effects on combustion efficiency can be
decreased by reducing the flow rate of air.

Keywords

Fluidized Bed, Exergy, Thermodynamic Analysis

References

• [1] Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. and Moran, M. (1995) ‘Thermal Design & Optimization’, A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
• [2] Dincer, I. and Rosen, M.A. (2007) ‘Exergy, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development’, Elsevier.
• [3] Kotas, T.J. (1995) ‘The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis’, Krieger Publishing Company, London.
• [4] Kuzgunkaya, E.H. and Hepbasli, A. (2007) ‘Exergetic performance assessment of a ground-source heat pump drying system’, Int. J. Energy Res., Vol. 31, pp.760–777.
• [5] Lee, U., Park, K., Jeong, Y.S., Lee, S. and Han, C. (2014) ‘Design and analysis of a combined Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery of a coal power plant using LNG cryogenic exergy’, Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 53, pp.9812–9824.
• [6] Ozdil, N.F.T., Segmen, M.R. and Tantekin, A. (2015) ‘Thermodynamic analysis of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based on industrial data’, Appl. Therm. Eng., Vol. 91, pp.43–52.
• [7] Ozdil, N.F.T. and Segmen, M.R. (2016) ‘Investigation of the effect of the water phase in the evaporator inlet on economic performance for an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) based on industrial data’, Appl. Therm. Eng., Vol. 100, pp.1042–1051.
• [8] Ozdil, N.F.T. and Tantekin, A. (2016) ‘Exergy and exergoeconomic assessments of an electricity production system in a running wastewater treatment plant’, Renew. Energy., Vol. 97, pp.390–398.
• [9] Ozdil, N.F.T. and Pekdur, A. (2016) ‘Energy and exergy assessment of a cogeneration system in food industry: a case study’, Int. J. Exergy, Vol. 20, pp.254–268.
• [10] Ozdil, N.F.T., Tantekin, A and Erbay, Z. (2016) ‘Energy and exergy analyses of a fluidized bed coal combustor steam plant in textile industry’, Fuel, Vol. 183, pp.441–448.
• [11] Callak M., Balkan F. and Hepbasli A. (2015) ‘Avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions of a fluidized bed coal combustor and a heat recovery steam generator’, Energy Convers Manage, Vol. 98, pp.54-58.