LIGHT INTERCEPTION, RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY AND BIOMASS ACCUMULATION RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT UNDER DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONS

Year 2017, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 134 - 142, 15.05.2017

Muhammad Saqib Randhawa Muhammad Maqsood Muhammad Asif Shehzad Muhammad Umer Chattha Muhammad Bilal Chattha Fahim Nawaz Sanaullah Yasın Tasawer Abbas Muhammad Mohsin Nawaz Rana Dildar Khan Usman Zulfıqar

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.312370

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In order to alleviate the drought adversities on maize (Zea mays L.)biomass accumulation and radiation use
efficiency (RUE), a field study was conducted under drought stress levels of D1 = well-watered, D2 = drought
stress at blister stage, D3 = drought stress at blister and dough stages; and integrated nutrition levels, N0 =
control, N1 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1
, N2 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1
, N3 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg
ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1
, N4 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1
, N5 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1
, N6 =
NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1
. Drought stress caused a significant decline in growth traits,
interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), RUE and finally biomass production. The highest
leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, interception of PAR and dry matter
accumulation was recorded in plants applied with NPK (250-120-125 kg ha-1
) in combination with FYM (15 t
ha-1
), whereas only NPK application did not significantly improve light interception and dry biomass
production. Fraction of intercepted (Fi) radiation was significantly improved by integrated nutrient
management under well-watered as well as drought stress conditions. A substantial decrease in total dry
matter and grain yield basis RUE was recorded from higher to lower plant nutrition rates, as the highest value
of RUE was found with treated plants of 250-120-125 kg NPK ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1
. Thus, our study
demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through
improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.

Keywords

Drought, radiation use efficiency, intercepted PAR, dry matter, NPK

LIGHT INTERCEPTION, RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY AND BIOMASS ACCUMULATION RESPONSE OF MAIZE TO INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT UNDER DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONS

Abstract

In order to alleviate the drought adversities on maize (Zea mays L.)biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency (RUE), a field study was conducted under drought stress levels of D1 = well-watered, D2 = drought stress at blister stage, D3 = drought stress at blister and dough stages; and integrated nutrition levels, N0 = control, N1 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1, N2 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1, N3 = NPK, 125-60-62 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1, N4 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1, N5 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 10 t ha-1, N6 = NPK, 250-120-125 kg ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1. Drought stress caused a significant decline in growth traits, interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), RUE and finally biomass production. The highest leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate, net assimilation rate, interception of PAR and dry matter accumulation was recorded in plants applied with NPK (250-120-125 kg ha-1) in combination with FYM (15 t ha-1), whereas only NPK application did not significantly improve light interception and dry biomass production. Fraction of intercepted (Fi) radiation was significantly improved by integrated nutrient management under well-watered as well as drought stress conditions. A substantial decrease in total dry matter and grain yield basis RUE was recorded from higher to lower plant nutrition rates, as the highest value of RUE was found with treated plants of 250-120-125 kg NPK ha-1 + FYM at 15 t ha-1. Thus, our study demonstrates that supplemental NPK with FYM is an effective strategy to boost the drought tolerance through improved RUE and biomass accumulation in maize.

Keywords

Drought, radiation use efficiency, intercepted PAR, dry matter, NPK

References

• Akmal, M., Hameed-ur-rehman, Farhatullah, M. Asim and H. Akbar. 2010. Response of maize varieties to nitrogen application for leaf area profile, crop growth, yield and yield components. Pak. J. Bot. 42: 1941-1947.
• Ali, K., M. Arif, S. Shah, Z. Hussain, A. Ali, S. Munir and H. Sher. 2015. Effect of organic and inorganic nutrients sources on phenology and growth of wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 47: 2215-2222.
• Azam, M., A. Hussain, S.A. Wajid and M. Maqsood. 2002. Effect of sowing date, irrigation and plant densities on radiation interception and its utilization efficiency in lentils. Int. J. Agric. & Biol. 04: 217-219.
• Bat-Oyun, T., M. Shinoda and M. Tsubo. 2011. Effects of water and temperature stresses on radiation use efficiency in a semiarid grassland. J. Plant Interact. 7:214-224.
• Beadle, C.L. 1987. Plant growth analysis. In techniques in bio-productivity and photosynthesis. 2nd ed. Edited by Coomlos, J.D.O. Hall, S.P. Long and J.M.O. Scurlock. Pergamon press, Oxford, New York. PP. 21-23.
• Crecchio, C., M. Curci., R. Mininni., P. Ricciuti and P. Ruggiero, 2001. Short term effects of municipal solid waste compost amendments on soil carbon and nitrogen content, some enzyme activities and genetic diversity. Biol. Fert. Soils. 34: 311-318.
• Farooq, M., A. Wahid, N. Kobayashi, D. Fujita and S.M.A. Basra. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29: 185-212.
• Gustav, O.A., I. Pereyra, V. Luciano, L. Leandra and L.A.N. Aguirrezabal. 2008. Genetic variability for leaf growth rate and duration under water deficit in sunflower: analysis of responses at cell, organ, and plant level. J. Exp. Bot. 59: 2221-2232.
• Hamzei, J. and J. Soltani. 2012. Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: Effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric. Ecosys and Environ. 155: 153-160.
• Hayatu, M., S.Y. Muhammad and U.A. Habibu. 2014. Effect of water stress on the leaf relative water content and yield of some cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L) Walp.) genotype. Int. J. Sci. & Technol. Res. 3: 148-152.
• Hussein, M.M., M.M. Shaaban., A.M. El-Saady and A.A. El-Sayed. 2011. Growth and photosynthetic pigments of fodder beet plants as affected by water regime and boron foliar fertilization. Nature Sci. 9: 72-79.
• Ibrahim, L., M.F. Proe and A.D. Cameron. 1997. Main effects of nitrogen supply and drought stress upon whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1413-1419.
• Jones, H.G. 1992. Plants and microclimate; a quantitative approach to environmental Physiology (2nd Edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
• Khalili, I., N. Akbari and M.R. Chaichi. 2008. Limited irrigation and phosphorus fertilizer effects on yield and yield components of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.var. Kimia). Amer. Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 3: 697-702.
• Khan, A., M.T. Jan, K.B. Marwat and M. Arif. 2009. Organic and inorganic nitrogen treatments effects on plant and yield attributes of maize in a different tillage systems. Pak. J. Bot. 41: 99-108.
• Lindquist, J.L., T.J. Arkebauer, D.T. Walters, K.G. Gassman and A. Dobermann. 2005. Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agron. J. 97: 72-78.
• Liu, T., F. Song, S. Liu and X. Zhu. 2012. Light interception and radiation use efficiency response to narrow-wide row planting patterns in maize. AJCS. 6: 506-513.
• M’hamed, H.C., M. Rezig and M.B. Naceur. 2014. Deficit irrigation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf): Effects on total dry matter production, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different nitrogen rates. Sustain. Agric. Res. 4: 26-40.
• Maqsood, M, M.A. Shehzad, Y. Ramzan and A. Sattar. 2014. Effect of nitrogen nutrition on growth, yield and radiation use efficiency of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 51: 441-448.
• Monteith, J.L. and J.F. Elston. 1983. Performance and productivity of foliage in the field. In: The Growth and Functioning of Leaves (Eds.): J.E. Dale and F.L. Milthorpe. Camb. Univ. Press, Butterworths, London, pp. 499-518.
• Omidi, A.H, K. Hamid, M. Philippe and S. Frederick. 2012. Effect of cultivar and water regime on yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turk. J. Field Crops. 17: 10-15.
• Quanqi, L., C. Yuhai, L. Mengyu, Z. Xunbo, Y. Songlie and D. Baodi. 2008. Effects of irrigation and planting patterns on radiation use efficiency and yield of winter wheat in North China. Agric. Water Manage. 95: 469-476.
• Randhawa, M.S., M. Maqsood, S.A. Wajid and M. Anwar-ul-Haq. 2012. Effect of integrated plant nutrition and irrigation scheduling on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 49: 267-273.
• Scott, G.D., J.E. Erickson and E.L. Kruger. 2003. Foliar morphology and canopy nitrogen as predictors of light-use efficiency in terrestrial vegetation. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 115: 163-171.
• Sinclair, T.R. and T. Horie. 1989. Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation use efficiency: A review. Crop Sci. 29: 90-98.
• Sohu, I., A.W. Gandahi, G.R. Bhutto, M.S. Sarki and R. Gandahi. 2015. Growth and yield maximization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) through integrated nutrient management applied to rice-chickpea cropping system. Sarhad J. Agric. 31: 131-138.
• Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Deckey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics, A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co.Ink. New York: 400-428.
• Szeicz, G. 1974. Solar radiation for plant growth. J. Appl. Ecol. 11: 617-36.
• Taiz L. and E. Zeiger. 2006. Plant Physiology, 4th Ed., Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, Massachusetts. Tewolde, H. and C.J. Fernandez. 1997. Vegetative and reproductive dry weight inhibition in nitrogen and phosphorus-deficient Pima cotton. J. Plant Nutr. 20: 219-232.
• Uikey, V., H. Verma and D. Nawange. 2015. Influence of organic, chemical and biofertilizer on growth and yield of pea. Agric. Sci. Digest. 35: 237-240.
• Zahoor, A., M. Riaz, S. Ahmad, H. Ali, M.B. Khan, K. Javed, M.A. Anjum, M. Zia-ul-Haq and M.A. Khan. 2010. Ontogeny growth and radiation use efficiency of Helianthus annuus L., as affected by hybrids, nitrogenous regimes and planting geometry under irrigated arid conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 42: 3197-3207.