Year 2021, Volume 26 , Issue 1, Pages 79 - 87 2021-06-29

DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON

Halil BAKAL [1] , Halis ARIOGLU [2]


The objective of this study was to determine the agronomic and quality traits of peanut varieties having different pod characteristics at different harvesting times in the main crop growing season. This study was conducted in the experimental area of the Cukurova University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Field Crops as a main crop in 2015 and 2016. The experimental design was a split plots with three replications. Five peanut varieties, Halisbey, NC-7, G.Green, Florispan and G.Red, belonging to four different market types, were used as plant material. Based on two year average, the differences between the varieties were significant for the investigated traits harvested at different times in the main crop growing season. The results indicated that the means of pod number and pod weight per plant, 100 seed weight, shelling percentage, pod and kernel (seed) yield per hectare, oil percentage and crude oil yield per hectare were increased except protein content of seed when the harvesting was delayed.
Agronomic Traits, Harvesting Time, Main Crop, Peanut, Pod Characteristics
  • Abouziena, H.F., S.D. Sharma and M. Singh. 2013. Impact of adjuvants on bentazon efficacy on selected broadleaf weeds. Crop Prot. 28: 1081-1085.
  • Anonymous, 2018. FAO Production Year Book (www.fao.org). (Accessed May 20, 2018)
  • Arioglu H., L. Gulluoglu and H. Bakal. 2017. The effect of harvesting times on yield and some agronomic characteristics of peanut varieties grown in main cropped condition in Mediterranean Region (Turkey). Second International Balkan Agriculture Congress, Congress Book, p.180-187, Tekirdag, Turkey
  • Arioglu, H. 2014. The oil seed crops growing and breeding. The publication of university of Cukurova, Faculty of Agriculture, No:A-70, 204 p. Adana-Turkey
  • Arioglu, H., H. Bakal, L. Gulluoglu, B. Onat and C. Kurt. 2018. The effect of harvesting dates on some agronomic and quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties grown as a main crop in Mediterranean Regıon (Turkey). Turk J Field Crops. 23(1): 27-37.
  • Arioglu, H., N. Isler. 1990. A study on some Runner and Virginia peanut (Arachis hypogae L.) varieties that will be grown as main crops in the Cukurova region. C.U.A.F. Journal 5(3): 121-136.
  • Arslan, M., I. Uremis, S. Calıskan and N. Isler. 2005. Determination of early peanut varieties that can be grworn as double crop in eastern Mediterranean conditions. Turkey VI. Field Crops Congress 5-9 Sep. 2005, Antalya, 2: 1141-1145.
  • Asibuo, J.Y., R. Akromah, H.K. Adu-Dapaah and O.S. Kantanka. 2008. Evaluation of nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) from Ghana. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition And Development 8: 133-149.
  • Caliskan, S., M.E. Caliskan, E. Erturk and H. Arioglu. 2008b. Growth and development of Virginia type groundnut cultivars under Mediterranean conditions. Acta Agric. Scan. B: Plant Soil Sci. 58: 105-113.
  • Caliskan, S., M.E. Caliskan, M. Arslan and H. Arioglu. 2008a. Effects of sowing date and growth duration on growth and yield of groundnut in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. Field Crops Res. 105: 131-140.
  • Canavar, O. and M.A. Kaynak. 2008. Effect of different planting dates on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 32: 521-528.
  • Canavar, O. and M.A. Kaynak. 2010. Growing degree day and sunshine radiation effects on peanut pod yield and growth. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(15): 2234-2241.
  • Canavar, O. and. M.A. Kaynak. 2013. Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogea L.) at Different Harvest Times. Int. J. of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4:3791-3803.
  • Chamberlin, K.D., N.A. Barkley, B.L. Tillman, J.W. Dillwith, R. Madden, M.E. Payton and R.S. Bennett. 2014. A comparison of methods used to determine the oleic/linoleic acid ratio in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agricultural Science 5(3):227-237.
  • Chowdhury, F.N., D. Hossain, M. Hosen and S. Rahman. 2015. Comparative study on chemical composition of five varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.). World J. of Agricultural Science. 11(5)247-254.
  • Court W.A., R.C. Roy and J.G. Hendel. 1984. Effect of harvest date on agronomic and chemical characteristics of Ontario peanuts. Canadian J. Plant Science. 64:521-528.
  • Duncan, W.G., D.E. McCloud, R.L. McGraw and K.J. Boote. 1978. Physiological aspects of peanut yield improvement. Crop Science 18:1015-1020.
  • Gulluoglu L., H. Bakal, B. Onat, C. Kurt and H. Arioglu. 2017. Comparison of agronomic and quality characteristics of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties grown as main and double crop in Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(2): 166-177, DOI:10.17557/TJFC.356208.
  • Gulluoglu, L. 2011. Effects of regulator applications on pod yield and some agronomic characters of peanut in Mediterranean region. Turkish J. Field Crops. 16(2):210-214.
  • Gulluoglu, L., H. Bakal, B. Onat, C. Kurt and H. Arioglu. 2016. The effect of harvesting date on some agronomic and quality characteristics of peanut grown in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Turk J Field Crops. 21(2): 224-232.
  • Halder, D. and R.K. Panda. 2014. Determination of appropriate planting dates and phosphorus fertilization strategy for peanut in eastern India. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 9: 2475-2487.
  • Hassan, F., A. Manaf and M. Ejaz. 2005. Determinants of oil and fatty acid accumulation in peanut. Int. J. of Agriculture and Biology. 7(6): 895-899.
  • Hatipoglu, H., H. Arslan, M. Karakus and S. Abrak. 2017. Determination of Some Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes Suitable for Harran Plain Second Crop Conditions. Uludag University Agr. Journal. 31(1): 61-67.
  • Ishag, H.M. 2000. Phenotypic and yield response of irrigated groundnut cultivars in a hot environment. Exp. Agric. 36: 303-312.
  • Jordan D. L., S. Danésha, L. Carley, D. Cecil, B. S. Turner, R .L. Brandenburg and G. B. Michael. 2008. Peanut response to planting date and potential of canopy reflectance as an indicator of pod maturation. Agron. Journal. 100:376-380.
  • Kaba, J.S., K. Ofori and F.K. Kumaga. 2014. Inter-relationships of yield and components of yield at different stages of maturity in three groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.) Varieties. International J. of Life Science Research. 2(1):43- 48.
  • Ketring, D. L., W. R. Jordan, O.D. Smith and C.E. Simpson. 1982. Genetic variability on root and shoot growth characteristics of peanut. Peanut Sci. 9:68-72.
  • Knauft, A., A.J. Norden and D.W. Gorbet. 1986. The effect of three digging dates on oil quality, yield, and grade of five peanut genotypes grown without leaf spot control. Peanut Science 13: 86-89.
  • Kumar, A., M. Kumar and P. Virender. 2017. Effect of sowing time on growth, phenology and yield attribute of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Allahabad. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 6(4):2357-2365.
  • Liao, B. and C. Holbrook. 2007. Groundnut. Singh, R.J. (Ed.), Genetic Researches, Chrosome Engineering, and Crop Improvement (51-87), CRC Pres, Vol. 4, New York, USA.
  • Lim, E.S. and O. Hamdan. 1984. The reproductive character of four varieties of groundnuts (Arachis hypogea L.). Pertanica 7:25-31.
  • Lu, K.C., M.S. Yeh, K.H. Yang and H.S. Lu. 1997. Effects of genotype, population density and harvest date on yield and quality of peanut. J. of Agric. Res. China. 46(2):116-131.
  • Meena V.S., S.K. Meena, J.P.Verma, R.S. Meena and B.N. Ghosh. 2015. The needs of nutrient use efficiency for sustainable agriculture. J Cleaner Prod. 102:562–563.
  • Mixon, A.C and W.D. Branch. 1985. Agronomic performance of a spanish and runner cultivar harvested at six different digging intervals. Peanut Science 12:50-54.
  • Mortley, D.G., C.K. Bonsi, W.A. Hill and C.E. Morris. 2004. Temperature influences yield, reproductive growth, harvest index, and oil content of hydroponically grown `Georgia Red' Peanut. Plants Horticultural Science 39: 975–978.
  • Park, C.K. and J.H. Oh. 1992. Effect of cultural practice and harvest time on yield components of peanut. Korean J. Crop Science. 37(4): 347-354.
  • Rahmianna, A.A., A. Taufiq and E. Yusnawan. 2009. Pod yield and kernel quality of peanut grown under two different irrigations and two harvest times. Indonesian J. of Agriculture. 2(2): 103-109.
  • Sarkees, N.A. 2015. Effect of sowing dates on development, seed yield and quality of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Jordan J. of Agricultural Sciences. 11(2): 367-380.
  • Sattayarak, S. 1997. Effects of harvesting dates on different characters and seed quality of peanut grown in Southern Thailand. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/.do?recordID= TH2000000950
  • Sharma, P., V. Sardana and S.S. Kandhola. 2013. Effect of sowing dates and harvesting dates on germination and seeding vigor of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars. Research J. of Seed Science. DOI: 10.3923/rjss: 1-15.
  • Sogut, T., F. Ozturk and S. Kızıl. 2016. Effect of sowing time on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars: I. yield, yield components, oil and protein content. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy. 59: 415-420.
  • Timmannavar, M., P.N. Umapathy, M. Shekhargouda, B.M. Kurdikeri and A.S. Channveerswami. 2003. Influence of harvesting stages on seed yield and quality in confectioner groundnut varieties. Seed Research 31: 13-17.
  • Wang, Z. and Z. Xu. 2013. Effect of peanut Hull biochar on amelioration of typical orchard acidic soil in Northern China. Periodical Ocean Univ. China 43 (8) 86-91.
  • Williams, E. and. J.S. Drexler. 1981. A Nondestructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Sci. 8: 134-141.
  • Williams, J.H . 2000. The implications and applications of resource capture concepts to crop improvement by plant breeding. Agric. For. Meteorol. 104: 49-58.
  • Wright, F.S. and D.M. Porter. 1991. Early Leaf Spot of Peanuts: Effect of Conservation Tillage Practices on Disease Development. Peanut Science 8:72-75.
  • Young, J. H., N.K. Person, J.O. Donald and W.D. Mayfield. 1982. Harvesting, Curing and Energy Utilization, pp.458-485. In H.E. Pattee and C. T. Young (eds). Peanut Science and Technology. Amer. Peanut Res. Educ. Society Inc., Yoakum. TX, USA.
  • Zuza, E. A. Jnr, I.V.M. Muitia, R.L. Amane and A.M. Mondjana. 2017. Effect of harvesting time on groundnut yield and yield components in Northern Mozambique. Journal of Postharvest Technology 5 (2): 55-63.
Primary Language en
Subjects Science
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Halil BAKAL (Primary Author)
Institution: CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS
Country: Turkey


Author: Halis ARIOGLU
Institution: CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF FIELD CROPS
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : June 29, 2021

Bibtex @research article { tjfc943931, journal = {Turkish Journal Of Field Crops}, issn = {1301-1111}, address = {}, publisher = {Society of Fields Crop Science}, year = {2021}, volume = {26}, pages = {79 - 87}, doi = {10.17557/tjfc.943931}, title = {DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON}, key = {cite}, author = {Bakal, Halil and Arıoglu, Halis} }
APA Bakal, H , Arıoglu, H . (2021). DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON . Turkish Journal Of Field Crops , 26 (1) , 79-87 . DOI: 10.17557/tjfc.943931
MLA Bakal, H , Arıoglu, H . "DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON" . Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 26 (2021 ): 79-87 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tjfc/issue/63156/943931>
Chicago Bakal, H , Arıoglu, H . "DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON". Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 26 (2021 ): 79-87
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON AU - Halil Bakal , Halis Arıoglu Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.17557/tjfc.943931 DO - 10.17557/tjfc.943931 T2 - Turkish Journal Of Field Crops JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 79 EP - 87 VL - 26 IS - 1 SN - 1301-1111- M3 - doi: 10.17557/tjfc.943931 UR - https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.943931 Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Turkish Journal Of Field Crops DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON %A Halil Bakal , Halis Arıoglu %T DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON %D 2021 %J Turkish Journal Of Field Crops %P 1301-1111- %V 26 %N 1 %R doi: 10.17557/tjfc.943931 %U 10.17557/tjfc.943931
ISNAD Bakal, Halil , Arıoglu, Halis . "DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON". Turkish Journal Of Field Crops 26 / 1 (June 2021): 79-87 . https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.943931
AMA Bakal H , Arıoglu H . DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops. 2021; 26(1): 79-87.
Vancouver Bakal H , Arıoglu H . DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops. 2021; 26(1): 79-87.
IEEE H. Bakal and H. Arıoglu , "DETERMINATION OF SOME AGRONOMIC AND QUALITY TRAITS OF PEANUT VARIETIES WITH DIFFERENT POD CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT HARVESTING TIMES IN MAIN CROP GROWING SEASON", Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 79-87, Jun. 2021, doi:10.17557/tjfc.943931