PES PLANUSU OLAN BİREYLERDE AYAK FONKSİYONU İLE YAŞAM KALİTESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 9 - 17, 05.05.2023

Ayşe Karagözoğlu Dikici Fatma Gül Yazıcıoğlu

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı pes planusu olan yetişkin bireylerde ayak fonksiyonu ile yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir.
Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya 44 pes planusu olan birey katıldı. Katılımcıların yaş, boy ve ağırlıkları kaydedildikten sonra ağırlıklı ve ağırlıksız naviküler yükseklik ölçüldü. Ayak fonksiyonlarını değerlendirmek için Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi, yaşam kalitesini değerlendirmek için Nottingham Sağlık Profili kullanıldı. Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi ile Nottingham Sağlık Profili puanları arasındaki ilişkiyi hesaplamak için Spearman korelasyon analizi kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 30,79±9,95 yıl idi. Sağ ayak için ağırlıklı ve ağırlıksız naviküler yükseklik farkı 0,99±0,14 cm olarak, sol ayak için 1,02±0,13 cm olarak bulundu. Nottingham Sağlık Profili toplam puanı 123,36±94,48 olarak, sağ Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi toplam puanı 20,13±17,4 olarak, sol Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi toplam puanı 19,62±17,34 olarak hesaplandı. Nottingham Sağlık Profili toplam puanı ile sağ Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi toplam puanı (r=0,600; p<0,001) ve sol Ayak Fonksiyon İndeksi toplam puanı (r=0,574; p<0,001) arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulundu.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, pes planusu olan yetişkin bireylerde ayak fonksiyonları ile yaşam kalitesinin birbiriyle ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir.
Aim: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between foot function and quality of life in adults with pes planus.
Method: Forty-four individuals with pes planus participated in this cross-sectional study. After recording the age, height and weight of the participants, weighted and unweighted navicular height was measured. The Foot Function Index was used to assess foot functions, and the Nottingham Health Profile was used to assess quality of life. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the relationship between Foot Function Index and Nottingham Health Profile.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 30.79±9.95 years. The difference in weighted and unweighted navicular height for the right foot was 0.99±0.14 cm, and 1.02±0.13 cm for the left foot. The Nottingham Health Profile total score was 123.36±94.48, the right Foot Function Index total score was 20.13±17.4, and the left Foot Function Index total score was 19.62±17.34. A statistically significant correlation was found between the Nottingham Health Profile total score and the right Foot Function Index total score (r=0.600; p<0.001) and the left Foot Function Index total score (r=0.574; p<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study show that foot functions and quality of life are correlated in adults with pes planus.

Keywords

pes planus, yaşam kalitesi, ayak fonksiyonu

References

• 1. Pinney SJ, Lin SS. Current concept review: acquired adult flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(1):66-75.
• 2. Smyth NA, Aiyer AA, Kaplan JR, Carmody CA, Kadakia AR. Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(4):433-9.
• 3. Jung D-Y, Koh E-K, Kwon O-Y. Effect of foot orthoses and short-foot exercise on the cross-sectional area of the abductor hallucis muscle in subjects with pes planus: a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24(4):225-31.
• 4. Prachgosin T, Chong DY, Leelasamran W, Smithmaitrie P, Chatpun S. Medial longitudinal arch biomechanics evaluation during gait in subjects with flexible flatfoot. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(4):121-30.
• 5. Stolzman S, Irby MB, Callahan AB, Skelton JA. Pes planus and paediatric obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Obes. 2015;5(2):52-9.
• 6. Chuckpaiwong B, Nunley JA, Mall NA, Queen RM. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running. Gait Posture. 2008;28(3):405-11.
• 7. Aminian G, Safaeepour Z, Farhoodi M, Pezeshk AF, Saeedi H, Majddoleslam B. The effect of prefabricated and proprioceptive foot orthoses on plantar pressure distribution in patients with flexible flatfoot during walking. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(3):227-32.
• 8. Dabholkar T, Agarwal A. Quality of life in adult population with flat feet. Int J Health Sci Res. 2020;10(2).
• 9. López López D, Bouza Prego M, Requeijo Constenla A, Saleta Canosa JL, Casasnovas AB, Tajes FA. The impact of foot arch height on quality of life in 6-12 year olds. Colomb Med. 2014;45(4):168-72.
• 10. Pita-Fernandez S, Gonzalez-Martin C, Alonso-Tajes F, Seoane-Pillado T, Pertega-Diaz S, Perez-Garcia S, et al. Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):22-27.
• 11. Morrison S, Durward B, Watt G, Donaldson M. Literature review evaluating the role of the navicular in the clinical and scientific examination of the foot. Br J Pod. 2004;7(4):110-4.
• 12. Vauhnik R, Turk Z, Pilih IA, Mičetić-Turk D. Intra-rater reliability of using the navicular drop test for measuring foot pronation. Hrvatski Sportskomedicinski Vjesnik. 2006;21(1):8-11.
• 13. Yalıman A, Şen Eİ, Eskiyurt N, Budiman-Mak E. Ayak fonksiyon indeksi’nin plantar fasiitli hastalarda Türkçe’ye çeviri ve adaptasyonu. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;60:212-22.
• 14. Kücükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(1):31-8.
• 15. Başaran S, Güzel R, Sarpel T. Yaşam kalitesi ve sağlık sonuçlarını değerlendirme ölçütleri, Romatizma. 2005; 20(1):55-63.
• 16. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory 3E: Tata McGraw-hill education. 1994.
• 17. Deland JT. Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(7):399-406.
• 18. Gross KD, Felson DT, Niu J, Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, et al. Association of flat feet with knee pain and cartilage damage in older adults. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(7):937-44.
• 19. Otsuka R, Yatsuya H, Miura Y, Murata C, Tamakoshi K, Oshiro K, et al. Association of flatfoot with pain, fatigue and obesity in Japanese over sixties. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Public Health. 2003;50(10):988-98.
• 20. Katsambas A, Abeck D, Haneke E, Van De Kerkhof P, Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, et al. The effects of foot disease on quality of life: results of the Achilles Project. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19(2):191-5.
• 21. López-López D, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Palomo-López P, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Brandariz-Pereira JM, et al. Evaluation of foot health related quality of life in individuals with foot problems by gender: a cross-sectional comparative analysis study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e023980.
• 22. Jasrin CJ, Mayasari W, Rakhmilla LE. Relationship between physical activity and age on flatfoot in children. Althea Medical Journal. 2016;3(3):396-400.
• 23. Martinelli N, Bianchi A, Martinkevich P, Sartorelli E, Romeo G, Bonifacini C, et al. Return to sport activities after subtalar arthroereisis for correction of pediatric flexible flatfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2018;27(1):82-87.
• 24. Shibuya N, Jupiter DC, Ciliberti LJ, VanBuren V, La Fontaine J. Characteristics of adult flatfoot in the United States. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(4):363-8.
• 25. López-López D, Vilar-Fernández JM, Barros-García G, Losa-Iglesias ME, Palomo-López P, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Foot arch height and quality of life in adults: A strobe observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018, 15(7), 1555.