tojdac

The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication

2146-5193

Deniz YENGİN

AN ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE TRAINING IN UNDERGRADUATE ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5235-6832

Bostancıoğlu

Esra

Gemci

Kevser Kesim

04 01 2019

9 2 145 158 01 10 2019 03 25 2019

2011

The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication

The scope of the architectural profession, one of the oldest professions in human history, has changedwith the advent of technology. Likewise, architectural education also changes and improves all thetime. Accrediting bodies evaluate architectural education and improve them through competenceactivities. In this study, the requirements identified by National Architectural Accrediting Board(NAAB), an international accreditation body, and the national accreditation body ArchitectureAccreditation Board (MIAK) have been reviewed, upon which it has been found out that professionalpractice has an important share in architectural education but has not been the subject of currentresearch. Therefore, the study aims to assess the situation in Turkey in terms of undergraduatearchitectural education with respect to professional practice and identify the weaknesses thereof, hencecontributing to architectural education. In this context, the professional practice requirements amongthe NAAB and MIAK requirements have been reviewed and the areas that need to be covered in termsof professional practice within undergraduate architecture programmes have been identified. Theprofessional practice courses in undergraduate architecture programmes and the course contents havebeen analysed to demonstrate the current situation of professional practice training in undergraduatearchitecture programmes in Turkey. The data for the analysis of courses and course contents have beengathered from the webpages of universities. Content analysis method has been used in assessingcourse contents.

Professional Practice Content Analysis Architecture Undergraduate Programs Compulsory Courses.

Akca, Y. Berivan Ozbudak, Aydin, Derya Cakir, Halifeoglu,Fatma Meral.(2018) “Mimarlık Mesleğine Ulaşılabilirlikte Farklı Bir Arayış Denemesi: Dicle Üniversitesi Örneği (Alternative Approaches to Pursuing Architecture as a Profession: Dicle University Sample)”, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(67), 1147-1158. Allen, B. S. (2012). “The Future That Is Now: Architectural education in North America 1900-2010”. In. J. Ockman (Ed.), Architecture School: Three centuries of educating architects in North America (pp. 203-229). MIT Press & ACSA, Cambridge. Benner, J., McArthur, J.J. (2018) “Lessons Learned from a Multi-year Initiative to Integrate Data- Driven Design Using BIM into Undergraduate Architectural Education”, Proceedings of the 35th CIB W78 2018 Conference: IT in Design, Construction, and Management, Advances in Informatics and Computing in Civil and Construction Engineering, 857-864. Cavanagh, S. (1997) “Content Analysis:Concepts, Methods and Applications”, Nurse Researcher, 4, 5-16. Cole, F.L. (1988) “Content Analysis: Process and Application”, Clinical Nurse Specialist, 2(1), 53- 57. Ergul, H. (2015). “Mimarlığın İhmal Edilen Sosyal ve Toplumsal Yönü”, Akademik Platform, ISITES 2015, Valencia-Spain. Esen, Ece, Elibol, Gulcin Cankız, Koca, Duygu (2018) “Basic Design Education and Bauhaus”, The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication–TOJDAC, 8(1), 37-44. DOI: 10.7456/10801100/004. Foque, Richard. (2009). “Mimarlık Eğitiminde Yetkinliklere Dayalı Müfredat Programı Tasarımı için Bir Strateji” (N. Çağlar, Çev.). İç. N. Çağlar (Ed.), TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Dosya 15: Mimari Tasarım Eğitimi, (s. 11-14). Graneheim, U.H., Lindgren, B. & Lundman, B. (2017). “Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper”, Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34. Harrington, H., Hoffherr, G. & Reid, R.Jr. (1998). The Creativity Toolkit, McGraw-Hill, New York. Jonge, D., Scherer, M.J. & Rodger, S. (2007). “Assistive Technology in the Workplace-Chapter 3- Consumer-Centered Process for Technology Acquisition and Use”, Elsevier, Inc. All, ISBN-978-0- 323-04130-0. Nalcakan, Hande & Polatoglu, Cigdem, (2008). “Türkiye’deki ve Dünyadaki Mimarlık Eğitiminin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi ile Küreselleşmenin Mimarlık Eğitimine Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Education of Architectural in World and Turkey with Comparison Analyses and the Effect of the Globalisation to the Architectural Education)”, Megaron YTÜ Arc. Fac. E-Journal, 3(1), 79-103. Riggs, L.S. (1988) “Educating Construction Managers”, Journal of Management İn Engineering, ASCE, 114(2), 279-285. Rodriguez, Caroline, Hudson, Roland & Niblock, Chantelle (2018). “Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio and live projects”, British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 337-353, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12535. Safari, Hossein & Baghaei, Abdollah (2018) “Factors Affecting Creativity in Architectural Education Process Based on Computer Aided Design”, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 100-106. Uysal, V. Safak & Topaloglu, Fulden (2017) “Bridging the Gap: A Manual Primer into Design Computing in the Context of Basic Design Education”, The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36 (1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12048 Architecture Accreditation Board (MIAK) web site, http://www.miak.org/, accessed on October, 2018. Council of Higher Education web site, http://www.yok.gov.tr/, accessed on September 2017. National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) web site, https://www.naab.org/, accessed on October, 2018.