<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>tojde</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1302-6488</issn>
                                                                                                        <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Anadolu University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id/>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Classroom Measurement Practices</subject>
                                                            <subject>Measurement and Evaluation in Education (Other)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Sınıfiçi Ölçme Uygulamaları</subject>
                                                            <subject>Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme (Diğer)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>FROM ENTHUSIASM TO INITIAL INTEGRATION: EDUCATORS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PROMPT-DESIGN SKILLS IN USING CHATGPT FOR TEACHING</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-3537</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Kurniawan</surname>
                                    <given-names>Bakhrul Rizky</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-6096</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Sumardani</surname>
                                    <given-names>Dadan</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4559-0641</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Sui</surname>
                                    <given-names>Chi-Jung</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Research Center for Testing and Assessment, National Academy for Educational Research</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-2004</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Chang</surname>
                                    <given-names>Chun-Yen</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20260401">
                    <day>04</day>
                    <month>01</month>
                    <year>2026</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>27</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>71</fpage>
                                        <lpage>90</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20250816">
                        <day>08</day>
                        <month>16</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20251006">
                        <day>10</day>
                        <month>06</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2000, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2000</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into education presents significant opportunities to foster interactive and student-centered learning. This study surveyed 61 educators during an online AI workshop to examine their baseline prompt-design skills, explore their perceptions of student use of ChatGPT, and identify associated challenges and strategic opportunities. Importantly, the six-element prompt design framework was deliberately shared only after data collection, ensuring that the study captured prompt-design abilities at a true baseline without prior intervention, which constitutes a novel contribution of this research. Findings reveal that although most educators expressed enthusiasm for ChatGPT’s potential, there was notable variability in their ability to design effective prompts. Specifically, over 77% of the initial prompts were vague and lacked essential elements such as context, role, or format, indicating a substantial gap in prompt-engineering competence. Some respondents faced difficulties in crafting contextual and specific prompts, while others demonstrated creative uses of ChatGPT to inspire classroom activities and support student discussions. Additionally, ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, overreliance, and the reliability of ChatGPT-generated answers, emerged as critical issues. The study highlights the urgent need for targeted digital literacy training, prompt-design strategies, and institutional policies that promote the ethical and pedagogically sound use of ChatGPT in both physical and online classrooms. These findings provide a unique and timely foundation for guiding AI adoption in education by underscoring the necessity of equipping educators with tailored digital literacy training and clear ethical guidelines, which are critical for fostering innovative, responsible, and context-sensitive teaching practices.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>ChatGPT</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  digital literacy</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  AI-based education</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  educator skills</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  prompt design</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                    <funding-group specific-use="FundRef">
                    <award-group>
                                                    <funding-source>
                                <named-content content-type="funder_name">Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences” of National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) and the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan</named-content>
                            </funding-source>
                                                                            <award-id>Higher Education Sprout Project</award-id>
                                            </award-group>
                </funding-group>
                                </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversationalAI. College of Business Faculty Publications, University of Rhode Island. https://digitalcommons.
uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bicalho, R. N. de M., Coll, C., Engel, A., &amp; Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2023). Integration of ICTs in teaching practices: Propositions to the SAMR model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10169-x</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chan, C. (2024). Holistic competencies and AI in education: A synergistic pathway. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10191</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chounta, I.-A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., &amp; Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring Teachers’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as a Tool to Support their Practice in Estonian K-12 Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Elbanna, S., &amp; Armstrong, L. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: Adapting for the future. Management &amp; Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03-2023-0016</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
