BibTex RIS Cite

The Utilization Of Web-Based Technology As Predictor Of 
Faculty Insights Of Support For The Implementation Of Elearning

Year 2011, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 54 - 61, 01.03.2011

Abstract

This study investigates the level of implementation of web-based instructional technology (WBIT) by the in-teaching faculties of English Language departments as factor related to faculty perception of institutional mechanisms and its partial significance as condition supporting the implementation of e-learning in university education. Using a sample of 160 in-teaching faculties at selected Islamic Azad Universities (IAU) across Iran, faculty perceptions of support mechanisms were examined. The findings of the present study reveal that factors such as stages of apprehension about using WBIT and levels of use offer a justification of the perception variations. Making a profile of faculty WBIT utilization is predicted to provide insight for the development of strategies and administrative practices vital for eLearning to succeed in university education.

References

  • Albury. R, On being head –Reflections on learning an educational innovation involving computer technology. In Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of ASCILITE, Melbourne, pages 23–29, 2001.
  • Annand. D, Re-organizing Universities for the Information Age. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3):1–9, 2007.
  • Associates. A, A Survey of Traditional and Distance Learning Higher Education Members. National Education Association June 2000, 2000.
  • Compeau. D and Higgins. C, Computer Self Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(1):9, 1995.
  • Ely. D. P, Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal on Research on Computing in Education, page 298 ˝U 305, 1990.
  • Ensminger. D. C, Surry. D.W, Porter. B.E, and Wright. D, Factors Contributing to the Successful Implementation of Technology Innovations. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 7:61–72, 2004.
  • Evans. R, The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real-life Problems of Innovation. Jossey-Bass, 1996. Geijsel. F, Sleegers. P, van den Berg. R, and Kelchtermans. G, Conditions Fostering the Implementation of Large-Scale Innovation Programs in Schools: Teachers‘ Perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1):130, 2001.
  • Gmelch. W. H, Where have all the leaders gone? ERIC, ED 462381, 2004.
  • Granger. CA, Morbey. ML, Lotherington. H, Owston. RD and Wideman. H, Factors contributing to teachers‘ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4):480–488, 2002.
  • Groves. M. M and Zemel. P.C, Instructional Technology Adoption in Higher Education: An Action Research Case Study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1):57–65, 2000.
  • Hall. G, Hord. S, Stiegelbauer. S and Dirksen. D, Measuring implementation in schools: Using the tools of the concerns-based adoption model, p. 79, 2006.
  • Lee. J, Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Instructional Support for Distance Education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1):27–46, 2002.
  • Quinn. L. O and Michael. C, Factors that Deter Faculty from Participating in Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4), 2002.
  • Owen. P. S and Demb. A, Change Dynamics and Leadership in Technology Implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 75(6):636–667, 2004.
  • Rockwell. S. K, Schauer. J, Fritz. S.M and Marx. D.B, Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4), 1999.
  • Rockwood. T. H, Sangster. R.L and Dillman. D.O.N.A, The Effect of Response Categories on Questionnaire Answers: Context and Mode Effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(1):118, 1997.
  • Roepke. R, Agarwal. R, and Ferratt. T.W, Aligning THE IT Human Resource WITH Business Vision: The Leadership Initiative. MIS Quarterly, 24(2):327– 353, 2000.
  • Romm. C and Pliskin. N, The role of charismatic leadership in diffusion and implementation of e-mail. Development, 18(3):3, 1999.
  • Sherry. L, Billig. S, Tavalin. F, and Gibson. D, New insights on technology adoption in schools. THE Journal, 27(7):43–46, 2000.
  • Newman. M and Gammill. T, Factors associated with faculty use of web-based instruction in higher education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(4):60 ˝U 71, 2005.
  • Vodanovich. S. J and Piotrowski. C, Faculty attitudes toward web-based instruction may not be enough: Limited use and obstacles to implementation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(3):309–318, 2005.
Year 2011, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 54 - 61, 01.03.2011

Abstract

References

  • Albury. R, On being head –Reflections on learning an educational innovation involving computer technology. In Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of ASCILITE, Melbourne, pages 23–29, 2001.
  • Annand. D, Re-organizing Universities for the Information Age. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3):1–9, 2007.
  • Associates. A, A Survey of Traditional and Distance Learning Higher Education Members. National Education Association June 2000, 2000.
  • Compeau. D and Higgins. C, Computer Self Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(1):9, 1995.
  • Ely. D. P, Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal on Research on Computing in Education, page 298 ˝U 305, 1990.
  • Ensminger. D. C, Surry. D.W, Porter. B.E, and Wright. D, Factors Contributing to the Successful Implementation of Technology Innovations. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 7:61–72, 2004.
  • Evans. R, The Human Side of School Change: Reform, Resistance, and the Real-life Problems of Innovation. Jossey-Bass, 1996. Geijsel. F, Sleegers. P, van den Berg. R, and Kelchtermans. G, Conditions Fostering the Implementation of Large-Scale Innovation Programs in Schools: Teachers‘ Perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1):130, 2001.
  • Gmelch. W. H, Where have all the leaders gone? ERIC, ED 462381, 2004.
  • Granger. CA, Morbey. ML, Lotherington. H, Owston. RD and Wideman. H, Factors contributing to teachers‘ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4):480–488, 2002.
  • Groves. M. M and Zemel. P.C, Instructional Technology Adoption in Higher Education: An Action Research Case Study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1):57–65, 2000.
  • Hall. G, Hord. S, Stiegelbauer. S and Dirksen. D, Measuring implementation in schools: Using the tools of the concerns-based adoption model, p. 79, 2006.
  • Lee. J, Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Instructional Support for Distance Education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1):27–46, 2002.
  • Quinn. L. O and Michael. C, Factors that Deter Faculty from Participating in Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4), 2002.
  • Owen. P. S and Demb. A, Change Dynamics and Leadership in Technology Implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 75(6):636–667, 2004.
  • Rockwell. S. K, Schauer. J, Fritz. S.M and Marx. D.B, Incentives and obstacles influencing higher education faculty and administrators to teach via distance. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4), 1999.
  • Rockwood. T. H, Sangster. R.L and Dillman. D.O.N.A, The Effect of Response Categories on Questionnaire Answers: Context and Mode Effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 26(1):118, 1997.
  • Roepke. R, Agarwal. R, and Ferratt. T.W, Aligning THE IT Human Resource WITH Business Vision: The Leadership Initiative. MIS Quarterly, 24(2):327– 353, 2000.
  • Romm. C and Pliskin. N, The role of charismatic leadership in diffusion and implementation of e-mail. Development, 18(3):3, 1999.
  • Sherry. L, Billig. S, Tavalin. F, and Gibson. D, New insights on technology adoption in schools. THE Journal, 27(7):43–46, 2000.
  • Newman. M and Gammill. T, Factors associated with faculty use of web-based instruction in higher education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(4):60 ˝U 71, 2005.
  • Vodanovich. S. J and Piotrowski. C, Faculty attitudes toward web-based instruction may not be enough: Limited use and obstacles to implementation. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(3):309–318, 2005.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hamed Ghaem This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2011
Submission Date February 27, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2011 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ghaem, H. (2011). The Utilization Of Web-Based Technology As Predictor Of 
Faculty Insights Of Support For The Implementation Of Elearning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 54-61.