RETHINKING SOCIAL WORK UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE-SKILL-VALUE-BASIS OF SOCIAL WORK

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 87 - 98, 19.12.2018

Talip Yiğit

Abstract

Many of the studies on social work
education approaches social work education as a whole with field practice. On
the one hand, such kind of approach signifies which knowledge-skill-value basis
social work education needs to be structured, on the other hand it describes the
process how these basis can be transferred to social work practices. The aim of
the social work education is to respond to today's individual and community
needs and besides to think about how this process can be improved. It is the
focus of this review work to educate social worker with different pedagogical
approaches. Therefore, the aim of this study is to discuss how
knowledge-skill-value basis of social work can be applied as a pedagogical tool
in social work education. Based on this, in this study it is primarily dwelled
on the general features of social work education. These discussions are dealt
within the context of five components of the learning process; the purpose and
scope of social work education, the student dimension, the instructive (facilitator)
dimension, the student-teacher interaction in the learning process and learning
environment.

Keywords

Social work, social work education, knowledge, skill

References

• REFERENCES
• Aktaş, M.A. (2011). 50. Yılında Türkiye'de Sosyal Hizmet Eğitimi: Sorunlar, Öncelikler ve Hedefler, Sosyal Hizmet Sempozyumu, s. 73-76.
• Alptekin, K. (2016). Başlangıçtan Bugüne ve Yarına Sosyal Hizmet Eğitimi, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Banerjee, M. M. (2005). ‘Applying Rawlsian Social Justice to Welfare Reform: An Unexpected Finding for Social Work’, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 32(3): 35-57.
• Beverley, A. ve Worsley, A. (2007). Learning and Teaching Social Work Practice, New York: Palgrave.
• CCETSW (1996). Assuring Quality for the Diploma in Social Work-1. Rules and Requirements for the DipSW, General Social Care Council.
• CSWE (Counsil of Social Work Education) (2015). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards, Counsil of Social Work Education, Commission on Accreditation Commission on Educational Policy.
• Duyan, V. (2010). Sosyal Hizmet: Temelleri, Yaklaşımları ve Müdahale Yöntemleri, Ankara: Aydınlar Matbaası.
• Gray, M. ve Lovat, T. (2008). ‘Practical Mysticism, Habermas, and Social Work Praxis’, Journal of Social Work, 8: 149.
• Gregory, M. Ve Holloway, M. (2005). 'The Debate as a Pedagogic Tool in Social Policy for Social Work Students', Social Work Education, 24(6): 617-637.
• Gibb, S. (2002). Learning and Development: Processes, Practices and Perspectives at Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Guzzetta, C. (1998). 'The Economy's Global: Can Social work Education be Global?', Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 14(1): 23- 33.
• Harvey, D., Groux, A. H., Apple, M., Freire, P. ve McLaren, P. (2009). Eleştirel Pedagoji Söyleşileri, İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
• Higham, P. (2006). Social Work-Introducing Prefessional Practice, London: Sage Publication.
• IASSW (International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2001). İnternational definition of social work, http://www.iassw-aiets.org, 18.10.2010.
• IFSW (International Federation of Social Workers) (2001). İnternational definition of social work, http://ifsw.org, 18.10.2010.
• IASSW (International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2004). Ethics in Social Work: Statements of Principles. http://www.iassw-aiets.org, 23.06.2017
• IFSW (International Federation of Social Workers and International Association of Schools of Social Work) (2004). Ethics in Social Work: Statement and Principles, www.ifsw.org/en/p38000324.html, 22.11.2017.
• Johansson, I., Sewpaul, v., Horverak, S., Schjelderup, L., Omre, C. Ve Bornholdt, L. (2008). “Innovations in Social Welfare: Empowerment and Globalisation in a Nordic Social Work Education Context”, International Journal of Social Welfare, 17: 260–268.
• Johnson, L. C. (1998).Social Work Practice: A Generalist Approach, USA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Karabekir, H. (2010). Yetiştirme Yurtları Örneğinde Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanlarının Sosyal Hizmet Değerlerini Mesleki Uygulamalarına Aktarışı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal Hizmet Bölümü Y.L. tezi, Ankara.
• Kongar, E. (1972). Sosyal Çalışmaya Giriş, Ankara: SBD. Yayınları.
• Lay, K. ve McGuire, L. (2010). 'Building a Lens for Critical Reflection and Reflexivity in Social Work Education', Social Work Education, 29(5): 539- 550.Payne, M. (1997). Modern Social Work Theory, Campling: MacMillan Press.
• Payne, M. ve Askeland, G. A. (2008). Globalisation and International Social Work: Post-Modern Change and Challenge, England: Asgate.
• Scrade, M. (2004). Beyond Traditional Pedagogy: A Critical Approach to Student Meaning Making, A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate School, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
• Thompson, N. (2005). Sosyal Hizmeti Anlamak, New York: Palgrave.
• Yiğit, T. (2017). ‘‘Türkiye’de Sosyal Hizmet Eğitim/Öğretiminde Kalite Güvence Sistemi Ve Akreditasyon Standartlarına İlişkin Bir Model Çerçeve Önerisi,’’ Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Dergisi, Cilt 28, Sayı 1, Nisan 2017, s.151-168.