The Role of 21st century Learner Skills of Physical Education and Sports Teachers and Teacher Candidates on Teacher Skills

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 395 - 402, 15.09.2019

Ziya Bahadır , Zehra Certel , Ramazan Topuz

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.593785

Cited By: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In this study, the comparison of 21st century
learner and teacher skills of physical education and sports teachers and
teacher candidates and the role of 21st century learner skills on 21st century
teacher skills were examined. Research is in relational scanning model. The
sample of the study consists of 171 physical education and sports teachers
working in Kayseri province and 184 students who are physical education and
sports education students of Erciyes University Faculty of Sport Sciences. In
this research, 21st learner skills use scale developed by Göksün (10) and 21^st
century teacher skills use scale developed by  Göksün (10) were used as the data collection tool. T-test and multiple
regression analysis were used for data analysis. According to the findings,
there was no significant differences in 21st century learner skills of teacher
and teacher candidates, but significant differences were found in 21st century
teacher skills. While the 21st century teachers' skills are predicted by
innovative, cooperation and flexibility skills, the prospective teachers are
predicted by cognitive skills. 

Keywords

21st century learner skills, 21st century teacher skills, physical education and sports teacher and candidate

References

• 1. AASL (American Association of School Librarians), Standards for the 21st century learner, 2007. (Akt; Derya Orhan Göksun, 2016) 2. Adıgüzel, A. ve Yüksel, İ. (2012). Öğretmenlerin öğretim teknolojileri entegrasyon becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi: Yeni pedagojik yaklaşımlar için nitel bir gereksinim analizi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(1), 265-286. 3. Ananiadou, K. and M. Claro (2009), “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154OECD 4. Bass R., (2000). Technology, evaluation, and the visibility of teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 83, 47. 5. Billing, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher education, 53(4), 483-516. 6. Brun, M. ve Hinostroza, J. E. (2014). Learning to become a teacher in the 21st century: ICT integration in initial teacher education in Chile. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 222-238. 7. Bunker, D. H. (2012). Teachers’ orientation to teaching and their perceived readiness for 21st century learners. Yayınlamamış doktora tezi. The University of Texas at Arlington. 8. Çoklar, A.N. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartları ile ilgili özyeterliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. 9. Gökçe, E. (2000). Yirmibirinci yüzyılın öğretmeni. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 270, 21- 26. 10. Göksün, D.O. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının 21.yy. öğrenen becerileri ve 21. yy. öğreten becerileri arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, Türkiye. 11. Göksün, D. O. ve Kurt, A. A. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının 21. yüzyıl. Öğrenen becerileri kullanımları ve 21. yüzyıl. öğreten becerileri kullanımları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 107-130. 12. Harris, J., Mishra, P. ve Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. 13. İşigüzel, B. (2014). Almanca öğretmen adaylarının teknopedagojik eğitime yönelik yeterlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Journal of International Social Research, 7(34), 768-778. 14. Mazman, S. G. ve Koçak Usluel, Y. (2011). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin öğrenme- öğretme süreçlerine entegrasyonu: Modeller ve göstergeler. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 1(1), 62-79. 15. Melvin, L. (2011). How to keep good teachers and principals: practical solutions to today's classroom problems. R&L Education. 16. Karadeniz, Ş. ve Vatanartıran, S. (2015). Primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 14(3), 1017-1028. 17. Karagözoğlu, G. (2005). Eğitim Sistemimizde Reform Çalışmalarına Genel Bakış, Yeni İlköğretim Programlarını Değerlendirme Sempozyumunda sunulmuş bildiri, 14-16 Kasım, Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi. 18. Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C. ve Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140. 19. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., Groff, J. ve Haas, J. (2009). Using the technology of today in the classroom today: The instructional power of digital games, social networking, simulations and how teachers can leverage them. The Education Arcade, 1-20. 20. Koehler, M. J. ve Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. Akt. Ceylan, 2015) 21. MEB (2018). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri MEB yayınları. 22. MEB (2018a). Beden Eğitimi öğretmeni Özel Alan yeterlikleri. MEB yayınları. 23. OECD (The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012). Connected minds: Technology and today’s learners, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing. 29 24. Pedro, F. (2006). The new mıllennıum learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. 25 Nisan 2019 tarihinde http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/38358359.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir. 25. Sanders, W. L. ve Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. 26. Şahin, M. C. (2010). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin yeni binyılın öğrencileri (OECD-New millenium learners) ölçütlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlamamış doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. 27. Şimşek, Ö., Demir, S., Bağçeci, B. ve Kinay, İ. (2013). Öğretim elemanlarının teknopedagojik eğitim yeterliliklerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 14(1), 1-23. 28. Tabachnick, B. G. And Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Pearson 29. Thomas, K. S. (2014). The effectiveness of select upward bound programs in meeting the needs of 21st century learners in preparation for college readiness. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Department of Educational Leadership, Atlanta. Georgia. 30. Trilling, B. ve Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times: learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons. 31. Türk Sanayicileri İşadamları Derneği (TÜSİAD). (2012). 21. Yüzyıl Becerileri ve Eğitimin Niteliği Toplantı Dizisi. 26 Haziran, Sabancı Center, İstanbul.26.04.2019 tarihinde https://tusiad.org/tr/component/k2/item/5700-tusiad-21-yuzyil-becerileri-ve-egitimin-niteligi-konulu-toplanti-dizisinin-ilkini-gerceklestirdi adresinden edinilmiştir. 32. Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need-and what we can do about it. Basic Books.AASL standartları. 33. Williams, C., Gannon, S. ve Sawyer, W. (2013). A genealogy of the ‘future’: Antipodean trajectories and travels of the ‘21st century learner’. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 792-806. 34. Woods-Groves, S. (2015). The human behavior rating scale–brief: A tool to measure 21st century skills of K-12 learners. Psychological Reports: Measure & Statistics, 116(3), 769-796. 35. Yangın, B. (2005). İlköğretim Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzunun Değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 5 (2), 477-516. 36. Young, J. S. (2012). Linking learning: Connecting traditional and media literacies in 21st century learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(1), 70-81.