COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUMBER CORRECT AND ITEM PATTERN SCORING METHODS FOR WAEC AND NECO CHEMISTRY ITEMS AMONG SENIOR SECONDARY STUDENTS IN OSUN STATE- NIGERIA

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 32 - 39, 01.01.2022

Temitope Babatimehin Adamu Chidubem Deborah Adeoye Oluseyi Peter

Abstract

The study determined the unidimensionality using Item Response Theory (IRT) also compared the number correct and item pattern scoring methods of Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) examinee estimated scores from WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State, Nigeria. This is with the view of providing empirical explanation on the appropriateness of decisions made statistically from examinee scores using classical test and item response theory approaches. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. A sample of 1,105 students was randomly selected from a population of 36,182 students who sat for the 2017/2018 SSCE chemistry paper 1 in Osun State. An adopted version of June/July 2015 NECO (Type 1) and May/June 2015 WAEC (Type 2) SSCE Chemistry (Objective) Paper 1 titled Chemistry Achievement Test (CAT) were utilized for data collection. Data collected were analyzed using STEU implemented in DIMTEST mean, standard deviation, paired sampled t-test, MIRT and equate IRT packages of R language. The results showed that the traits measured by the two groups of items were significantly different from one another (multidimensionality). Also, results showed that IRT (item pattern) scoring method has significant effect on the examinees scores in WCI (t = 13.06, p < 0.05) and NCI (t = 7.667, p < 0.05) than CTT (number correct) scoring method. In conclusion, the study established that there is no statistical equivalence between IRT (item pattern) and CTT (number correct) scoring method on WAEC and NECO chemistry items in Osun State, Nigeria.

Keywords

Comparative analysis, Item response theory, Classical test theory, number correct and item pattern scoring methods

References

• Adegoke, B. A. (2014). Effect of item-pattern scoring method on Senior Secondary School Students’ Ability Scores in Physics Achievement Test, West African Journal of Education, 24, 181-190.
• Afolabi, E. R. I. (2012). Tests and Measurement: A tale bearer or true witness? An inaugural lecture series 253. Obafemi Awolowo University press limited Ile-Ife, Nigeria
• Ahmed, M.F. (2014). Difficulty Index of Mathematics Multiple-Choice Items of West African Examinations Council and National Examinations Council Senior Secondary School Certificate Examinations from 2006 – 2010 Journal of ATIP, 13, 25 – 31
• Faleye, B. A. and Dibu-Ojerinde, O. O. (2005). Some Outstanding Issues in Assessment for Learning. Paper Presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment. (IAEA), Hilton Hotel, Abuja (Nigeria). Fan, X. (1998). Item response theory and classical test theory: an empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58 (3), 1-17.
• Kolawole, E. B. (2011). Principle of Tests Construction and Administration. 2nd Revised Edition. Lagos: Bolabay Publications (Nig). Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, Keith Morrison 2007. Research Methods in Education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
• Peter K. (2012). A Study of the Attitude of Some Nigerian Science Students towards NECO and WAEC. Journal of Professional Science and Vocational Teachers Association of Nigeria 12 (1), 15-18
• Seyi, A. I., and Clement, A. A. (2012). A correlational analysis of students’ achievement in WAEC and NECO Mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice. 3 (1), 23-36
• Tomkowicz, J. T., and Wright, K. R. (2007). Investigation of the effect of test equating and scoring methods on item parameter estimates and student ability scores. A paper presented at the annual conference of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 10.
• Metibemu, M. A. (2016). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory frameworks in the development and equating of physics achievement tests in Ondo state, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Education University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
• Meyer, J. P., and Zhu, S. (2013). Fair and Equitable Measurement of Student Learning in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): An Introduction to item Response Theory, Scale Linking, and Score Equating. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 26-39
• Thorpe, G. L., and Favia, A. (2012). Data analysis using Item Response Theory methodology: An introduction to selected programmes and applications psychology faculty scholarship paper 20. Retreived 15th June, 2014 from http://digitalcommons. library.umaine.edu/psyfacupub/20.
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., and Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. London, Sage Publications.
• Okpala, P. N., Onocha, C. O., and Oyedeji, O. A. (1993). Measurement in Education. Jattu-Uzairue: Edo State, Stirling- Horden Publishers (Nig.) Ltd.