Comparison of experimental and numerical analysis of Quasi-Static punch shear test for stainless steel sheet material

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 306 - 312, 15.10.2022

Mehmet Şahbaz

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1002507

Abstract

In this study, Quasi-Static Punch Shear Test (QS-PST) for AISI-304 stainless steel sheet material with 0.5 mm thickness was performed experimentally and numerically, then the results were compared. QS-PST was designed non-standard according to the need and is especially used to determine the puncture resistance of composite plate materials against low-speed loading. Since the results obtained from QS-PST are similar to those from ballistic tests, this has attracted the attention of researchers. The experimental study was carried out by integrating the die and punch which were specially produced for this test, into an electromechanical tensile-compression test device with a capacity of 100 kN. In order to define the material properties correctly in numerical analysis, the tensile tests of the relevant material were also carried out with the same device. Then, the CAD model of the experimental system was generated and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was performed. In FEA, the mesh structure was determined as tetrahedral, since it gave closer results in such tests and the analyzes were performed by increasing the number of mesh from 16700 to 151800 elements. Finally, the experimentally and numerically obtained results were compared and it was observed that the result were very close depending on increasing the number of mesh.

Keywords

Sheet Metal, Finite Element Analysis, Punch Test

Thanks

I would like to thank KMU Mechanical Engineering Department Head Prof. Dr. Uğur Köklü and his management for the laboratory facilities. I would like to thank Ali İmran Ayten for mold supply and Dr. Bekir Güney and Teach.Asst. Hüseyin Kaya for material supply. I would like to thank the editors and referees for their contributions during the review and evaluation process of the article.

References

• Al-Bakri A A, Sajuri Z, Ariffin A K, Razzaq M A & Fafmin M S (2016). Tensile and fracture behaviour of very thin 304 stainless steel sheet. Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6–9), 45–50. doi: 10.11113/jt.v78.9146
• Aydın K & Karaağaç İ (2019). DP600 ve HSLA300 Sac Malzemelerde Geri Esneme Davranışlarına Proses Parametrelerinin Etkisinin Deneysel Araştırılması. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7(3), 1456–1465. doi: 10.29130/dubited.532628
• Ayten A İ, Ekici B & Taşdelen M A (2020). A numerical and experimental investigation on quasi-static punch shear test behavior of aramid/epoxy composites. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 28(6), 398–409. doi: 10.1177/0967391119881554
• Çağdaş I U & Taşkın M (2020). A modified analytical expression to determine the quasi-static pre-indentation loads of metal-faced sandwich beams. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 22(5), 1404–1425. doi: 10.1177/1099636218785829
• Çeliker S, Eşsiz E S & Oturakcı M (2021). Integrated AHP-FMEA risk assessment method to stainless tank production process. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 5(3), 118–122. doi:10.31127/TUJE.702369
• Emi̇rler B, Tolun M & Yıldız A (2019). Eğik Çekme Yükü Etkisindeki Tekil Kazığın Üç Boyutlu Sayısal Analizi. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture 34(2), 219-229. doi: 10.21605/cukurovaummfd.609235
• Hasçelik A & Aslantaş K (2021). Mikro tornalama işleminde kesme kuvveti katsayılarının mekanistik ve nümerik modelleme ile tespiti. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi.; 37(1): 235-246. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.794462
• Kaoumi D & Liu J (2018). Deformation induced martensitic transformation in 304 austenitic stainless steel: In-situ vs. ex-situ transmission electron microscopy characterization. Materials Science and Engineering A, 715, 73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.036
• Karajibani E, Hashemi R & Sedighi M (2017). Forming limit diagram of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets: numerical simulations and experimental verifications. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9–12), 2713–2722. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9585-1
• Kawano S, Kaminishi K, Yamashita M & Shimizu S (1988). Energy-absorbing capacity of ductile thin metal sheet under quasi-statical penetration by conical punch. JSME Int J Ser 1, 31(1), 108–116. doi: 10.1299/jsmea1988.31.1_108
• Köleoğlu Gürsoy Ö & Esener E (2019). Malzeme Modellerinin Sac Metal Sonlu Elemanlar Analizi Tahmin Performansına Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1). doi: 10.35193/bseufbd.549657
• Longère P & Dragon A (2015). Dynamic vs. quasi-static shear failure of high strength metallic alloys: Experimental issues. Mechanics of Materials, 80(PB), 203–218. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.05.001
• Öğüt S, Kaya H, Kentli A & Uçar M (2021). Applying hybrid equal channel angular pressing (HECAP) to pure copper using optimized Exp.-ECAP die. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 116(11–12), 3859–3876. doi:10.1007/s00170-021-07717-9
• Salman S D, Leman Z, Ishak M R, Sultan M T H & Cardona F (2018). Quasi-static penetration behavior of plain woven kenaf/aramid reinforced polyvinyl butyral hybrid laminates. Journal of Industrial Textiles, 47(7), 1427–1446. doi:10.1177/1528083717692593
• Seyedzavvar M, Seyedzavvar M, Olıaeı S N B & Abbasi H (2022). Numerical simulation and experimental investigation: Metal spinning process of stepped thin-walled cylindrical workpiece. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 6(1), 67–80. doi:10.31127/TUJE.824890
• Şahbaz M, Kentli A, Yilmaz M, Köten H & Yükselentürk Y (2013). Modeling and Thermal Analysis of High Power Led Armature. International Symposium on Computing in Science & Engineering. Proceedings, 164–168.
• Şahbaz M, Öğüt S & Kentli A (2016). Cadde Tipi Led Armatürün Isı Yayıcısında SEY ve YSA Modeli Kullanılarak Sıcaklık Tahmini Yapılması. Marmara Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(2). doi: 10.7240/mufbed.09519
• Şahbaz M, Kaya H, Kentli A, Uçar M, Öğüt S & Özbeyaz K (2019). Analytical and Numerical Analysis Comparison of Equal Channel Angular Pressing for Al5083 Alloy. Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, 11(11), 1100–1103. doi:10.1166/asem.2019.2461
• Şener B, Kılıçaslan E S & Firat M (2020). Modelling anisotropic behavior of AISI 304 stainless steel sheet using a fourth-order polynomial yield function. Procedia Manufacturing, 47, 1456–1461. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.320
• Türkoğlu T & Ay I (2021). Investigation of mechanical, kinetic and corrosion properties of borided AISI 304, AISI 420 and AISI 430. Surface Engineering. doi: 10.1080/02670844.2021.1884332
• Uçtu Ö, Sevim İ, Karataş B & Şahin B (2017). Determination of optimum mesh size to measure tooth root stress of spur gear using finite element analysis. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1(1), 37–43. doi:10.31127/TUJE.320047
• Vatansever H & Esener E (2019). Sonlu Elemanlar Hesaplama Parametrelerinin Sac Metal Şekillendirme Simülasyon Süresi ve Hassasiyetine Etkisinin Tespiti. European Journal of Science and Technology, 16, 92-108 doi: 10.31590/ejosat.555491