3-dimensional printing of PLA scaffolds for medical applications

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 262 - 267, 15.10.2022

Azade Yelten , Mehmet Halit Öztürk , Suat Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.958192

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Scaffolds encourage the new tissue formation through biological substitution of the damaged or lost tissues. Therefore, scaffold characteristics become more important and should be precisely controlled. Production of scaffolds using a three dimensional (3d) printer appears as a promising method in terms of enabling homogeneous pore distribution and uniform pore size arrangement. In this study, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffold structures were obtained through 3d printing, based on the design parameters such as the scaffold geometry, porosity (%), pore shape, pore size, and the pore interconnectivity. An open source computer-aided design (CAD) program (Interface Scaffold) was employed to design the PLA scaffolds. Scaffold structures with ~72% porosity were generated through a 3D Systems Cube 2nd Generation 3d printer. The design parameters have been optimized by the scaffold design software tool, which includes different unit cells, i.e. Schwartz P, Schwartz D, Gyroid, Skeletal (1-4), Neovius and W (iWP) for designing scaffold structures through mathematical formulations. It was found out that the mean pore size of the 3d-printed Gyroid unit cell scaffolds vary between 1.9 mm and ~4.54 mm according to the microstructural observations done by a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Keywords

3d printing, PLA, Scaffold, Porosity, Medical Applications

Thanks

The authors cordially thank to Dr. Rui B. Ruben (Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal) for providing the “Interface Scaffold” open source software tool.

References

• Bose S, Roy M & Bandyopadhyay A (2012). Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends in Biotechnology, 30(10), 546-554.
• Castro A P G, Ruben R B, Gonçalves S B, Pinheiro J, Guedes J M & Fernandes P R (2019) Numerical and experimental evaluation of TPMS Gyroid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 22(6), 567-573.
• Chantarapanich N, Puttawibul P, Sucharitpwatskul S, Jeamwatthanachai P, Inglam S & Sitthiseripratip K (2012). Scaffold library for tissue engineering: A geometric evaluation. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 407805.
• Cheung H Y, Lau K T, Lu T P & Hui D (2007). A critical review on polymer-based bio-engineered materials for scaffold development. Composites Part B: Engineering, 38(3), 291-300.
• Da Silva D, Kaduri M, Poley M, Adir O, Krinsky N, Shainsky-Roitman J & Schroeder A (2018). Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 15(340), 9-14.
• DeStefano V, Khan S & Tabada A (2020). Applications of PLA in modern medicine. Engineered Regeneration 1, 76-87.
• Dinis J C, Morais T F, Amorim P H J, Ruben R B, Almeida H A, Inforçati P N, Bartolo P J & Silva J V L (2014). Open source software for the automatic design of scaffold structures for tissue engineering applications. Procedia Technology, 16, 1542-1547.
• El-Hajje A, Kolos E C, Wang J K, Maleksaeedi S, He Z, Wiria F E, Choong C & Ruys A J (2014). Physical and mechanical characterization of 3D-printed porous titanium for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 25(11), 2471-2480.
• Felfel R M, Ahmed I, Parsons A J, Haque P, Walker G S & Rudd C D (2012). Investigation of crystallinity, molecular weight change, and mechanical properties of PLA/PBG bioresorbable composites as bone fracture fixation plates. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 26, 765-789.
• Gendviliene I, Simoliunas E, Rekstyte S, Malinauskas M, Zaleckas L, Jegelevicius D, Bukelskiene V & Rutkunas V (2020). Assessment of the morphology and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed PLA and PLA/HAp scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 104, 103616.
• Holzapfel B M, Reichert J C, Schantz J T, Gbureck U, Rackwitz L, Nörth U, Jakob F, Rudert M, Groll J & Hutmacher D W (2013). How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65(4), 581-603.
• Kang B H, Park M H & Lee K A (2017). Effect of strut thickness on room and high temperature compressive properties of block-type Ni-Cr-Al powder porous metals. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 62(2B), 1329-1334.
• Khang G (2017) Handbook of Intelligent Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2nd Edition. Jenny Stanford Publishing. ISBN: 9789814745123.
• Leong K F, Cheah C M & Chua C K (2003). Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biomaterials, 24(13), 2363-2378.
• Limmahakhun S, Oloyede A, Sitthiseripratip K, Xiao Y & Yan C (2017). 3d-printed cellular structures for bone biomimetic implants. Additive Manufacturing, 15, 93-101.
• Monkova K, Monka P, Zetkova I, Hanzl P & Mandulak D (2017). Three approaches to the gyroid structure modelling as a base of lightweight component produced by additive technology. 2nd International Conference on Computational Modeling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics (CMSAM 2017), DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering, 124-129, China.
• Naing M W, Chua C K, Leong K F & Wang Y. (2005). Fabrication of customized scaffolds using computer-aided design and rapid prototyping techniques. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 11(4), 249-259.
• Nam J, Starly B, Darling A & Sun W (2004). Computer aided tissue engineering for modeling and design of novel tissue scaffolds. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 1(1-4), 633-640.
• Navarro M, Ginebra M P, Planell J A, Barrias C C & Barbosa M A (2005). In vitro degradation behavior of a novel bioresorbable composite material based on PLA and a soluble CaP glass. Acta Biomaterialia, 1, 411-419.
• Ngo T D, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen K T Q & Hui D (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196.
• Papadimitropoulos A, Mastrogiacomo M, Peyrin F, Molinari E, Komlev V S, Rustichelli F & Cancedda R (2007). Kinetics of in vivo bone deposition by bone marrow stromal cells within a resorbable porous calcium phosphate scaffold: an x-ray computed microtomography study. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 98(1), 271-281.
• Ryan G E, Pandit A S & Apatsidis D P (2008). Porous titanium scaffolds fabricated using a rapid prototyping and powder metallurgy technique. Biomaterials, 29(27), 3625-3635.
• Senatov F S, Niaza K V, Zadorozhnyy M Yu, Maksimkin A V, Kaloshkin S D & Estrin Y Z (2016). Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 57, 139-148.
• Serra T, Mateos-Timoneda M A, Planell J A & Navarro M (2013). 3D printed PLA-based scaffolds: A versatile tool in regenerative medicine. Organogenesis, 9(4), 239-244.
• Stener S, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Rostgard-Christensen L & Kartus J (2010). A long-term, prospective, randomized study comparing biodegradable and metal interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: radiographic results and clinical outcome. The American Journal Sports Medicine, 38,1598-1605.
• Sudarmadji N, Chua C K & Leong K F (2012). The development of computer-aided system for tissue scaffolds (CASTS) system for functionally graded tissue-engineering scaffolds. Methods in Molecular Biology, 868, 111-123.
• Tarafder S, Balla V K, Davies N M, Bandyopadhyay A & Bose S (2013). Microwave sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 7(8), 631-641.
• Van Bael S, Kerckhofs G, Moesen M, Pyka G, Schrooten J & Kruth J P (2011). Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures. Materials Science and Engineering A, 528(24), 7423-7431.
• Wally Z J, Van Grunsven W, Claeyssens F, Goodall R & Reilly G C (2015). Porous titanium for dental implant applications. Metals, 5(4), 902-1920.
• Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M & Xie Y M (2016). Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials, 83, 127-141.
• Wang Y, Wang K, Li X, Wei Q, Chai W, Wang S, Che Y, Lu T & Zhang B (2017). 3D fabrication and characterization of phosphoric acid scaffold with a HA/β-TCP weight ratio of 60:40 for bone tissue engineering applications. PLoS One, 12(4), e0174870.
• Wu D, Spanou A, Diez-Escudero A & Persson C (2020). 3D-printed PLA/HA composite structures as synthetic trabecular bone: A feasibility study using fused deposition modeling. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 103, 103608.
• 3D Systems Cube 2nd generation 3d printer user manual (2014).