Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 27 - 37, 14.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1219472

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], with high oil and protein content, is one of the world's main nutritional sources and millions of hectares are given over to its cultivation. Intensive farming and producing multiple crops per year (such as second-crop soybean cultivation), can improve natural resource exploitation and productivity. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of some soybean cultivars on yield and yield components in lowland conditions in the Mardin province over the main-crop and second-crop seasons. This research was carried out in the lowland conditions of Mardin province in Türkiye in 2018 and 2019. The A-3127, Arısoy, Ataem-7, Blaze, Bravo, Cinsoy, Gapsoy-16, Lider, May-5312, Nova, SA-88, and Umut-2002 cultivars were used as plant material in this research. Since the region is suitable for growing double crops per year, soybean field trials were carried out both as a main crop and as a second-cropped. Sowing dates and 12 different soybean cultivars were taken as factors in the research. The first sowing took place on April 16, the second on April 25, the third on June 15, and the fourth on June 30 in both years of the research. Two sowings were the main crop, while the other two were second-crop. According to the results, the A-3127 (3700 kg ha-1) and Gapsoy-16 (3694 kg ha-1) cultivars produced the highest seed yield. The Arısoy (676 kg ha-1), Gapsoy-16 (676 kg ha-1), A-3127 (662 kg ha-1), and Cinsoy (662 kg ha-1) cultivars produced the most oil yield. The study determined that early sowing increases overall yield while late sowing decreases seed yield significantly (on average by 30%). For this region and in areas with similar agricultural environments where double-crop can be grown each year, early cultivars for a second crop may be recommended to reduce the vegetable food and oil deficit.

References

  • Anderson, L.R., Vasilas, B.L., 1985. Effects of planting date on two soybean cultivars: Seasonal dry matter accumulation and seed yield. Crop Science, 25(6): 999-1004.
  • Anonymous, 2019. Mardin Meteorology Directorate Data. Mardin, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
  • Anonymous, 2022. Food and Agriculture Data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/-data/QC), (Accessed: 10.10.2022).
  • Beaver, J.S., Johnson, R.R., 1981. Response of determinate and indeterminate soybeans to varying cultural practices in the Northern USA. Agronomy Journal, 73(5): 833-838.
  • Bellaloui, N., Bruns, H.A., Abbas, H.K., Mengistu, A., Fisher, D.K., Reddy, K.N., 2015. Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars, and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Frontiers of Plant Science, 6: 31.
  • Board, J.E., 1985. Yield components associated with soybean yield reductions at nonoptimal planting dates. Agronomy Journal, 77(1): 135-140.
  • Cai, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Yuan, S., Su, Q., Sun, S., Wu, C., Yao, W., Han, T., Hou, W., 2020. Target base editing in soybean using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(10): 1996.
  • Çalışkan, S., Arslan, M., Üremiş, İ., Çalışkan, M.E., 2007. The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31(3): 147-154.
  • Divito, G.A., Echeverría, H.E., Andrade, F.H., Sadras, V.O., 2016. Soybean shows an attenuated nitrogen dilution curve irrespective of maturity group and sowing date. Field Crops Research, 186: 1-9.
  • Egli, D., Guffy, R., Heitholt, J., 1987. Factors associated with reduced yields of delayed plantings of soybean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 159(3): 176-185.
  • El Toum, G.A., Khalifa, N.M., Sid Ahmed, A.M., Idris, H.A., 2020. Effect of planting date and sowing method on yield and grain quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) under North Sudan conditions. Moroccan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(2): 91-94.
  • Evans, L., 1993. Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • Grabau, L.J., Pfeiffer, T.W., 1989. Stubble Losses of Kentucky Soybeans. Agronomy Notes, 62.
  • Gulluoglu, L., Bakal, H., Arioglu, H., 2016. The effects of twin-row planting pattern and plant population on seed yield and yield components of soybean at late double-cropped planting in Cukurova region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1): 60-66.
  • Hu, M., Wiatrak, P., 2012. Effect of planting date on soybean growth, yield, and grain quality. Agronomy Journal, 104(3): 785-790.
  • Ibrahim, S., Mahmoud, S., 1985. Effect of inoculation on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of some soybean varieties. Egyptian Journal of Physiological Sciences, 12(2): 147-157.
  • Ilker, E., Kocaturk, M., Kadiroglu, A., Yildirim, A., Ozturk, G., Yildiz, H., Koken, I., 2018. Adaptation abilities and quality parameters of selected soybean lines under double cropping in the Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 23(1): 49-55.
  • Jarecki, W., Bobrecka-Jamro, D., 2021. Effect of sowing date on the yield and seed quality of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Journal of Elementology, 26(1): 7-18.
  • Johnson, H.W., Borthwick, H., Leffel, R., 1960. Effects of photoperiod and time of planting on rates of development of the soybean in various stages of the life cycle. Botanical Gazette, 122(2): 77-95.
  • Joshi, J.M., Nkumbula, S., Javaheri, F., 1986. Seed inoculation response for promiscuous soybean cultivars. Soybean Genetics Newsletter United States, Agricultural Research Service,13: 209-212.
  • Julio, M.F., 1986. Produção de Sementes de Soja. Fundação Cargill Campinas.
  • Kang, B.-K., Kim, H.-T., Choi, M.-S., Koo, S.-C., Seo, J.-H., Kim, H.-S., Shin, S.-O., Yun, H.-T., Oh, I.-S., Kulkarni, K.P., 2017. Genetic and environmental variation of first pod height in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, 5(1): 36-44.
  • Krishnan, H.B., 2005. Engineering soybean for enhanced sulfur amino acid content. Crop Science, 45(2): 454-461.
  • Kumlar Medida, S., Diwan, S., Surender, S., 2006. Effect of sowing dates on agrometeorological indices of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Annals of Biology, 22(1): 49-51.
  • Li, Y., Du, M., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., Jin, J., Herbert, S., Liu, X., 2014. Planting date influences fresh pod yield and seed chemical compositions of vegetable soybean. Hortscience, 49(11): 1376-1380.
  • Liu, X., Jin, J., Wang, G., Herbert, S., 2008. Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in Northeast China. Field Crops Research, 105(3): 157-171.
  • Mandić, V., Đorđević, S., Đorđević, N., Bijelić, Z., Krnjaja, V., Petričević, M., Brankov, M., 2020. Genotype and sowing time effects on soybean yield and quality. Agriculture, 10(11): 502.
  • Mayers, J., Lawn, R., Byth, D., 1991. Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in the dry season of the tropics. II. Interaction of sowing date and sowing density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42(7): 1093-1107.
  • Mourtzinis, S., Specht, J.E., Conley, S.P., 2019. Defining optimal soybean sowing dates across the US. Scientific Reports-UK, 9(1): 1-7.
  • Nico, M., Miralles, D.J., Kantolic, A.G., 2019. Natural post-flowering photoperiod and photoperiod sensitivity: Roles in yield-determining processes in soybean. Field Crops Research, 231: 141-152.
  • Okcu, M., 2020. Effects of different sowing times on some agricultural properties in soybean varieties. Gümüşhane University Journal of Science and Technology, 10(4): 972-982. (In Turkish).
  • Onat, B., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., Arioglu, H., 2017. The effects of high temperature at the growing period on yield and yield components of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] varieties. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(2): 178-186.
  • Pang, Q., Liu, H., 1986. The cause of acceleration of soybean development by short daylength after flowering. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis, 12: 101-105.
  • Park, K.-Y., Oh, S.-K., Jeong, B.-C., Rho, S.-P., Hong, E.-H., 1987. Effects of planting dates on dry matter production and ecological characteristics of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in southern region of Korea. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 32(4): 409-416.
  • Parker, M., Marchant, W., Mullinix Jr., B., 1981. Date of planting and row spacing effects on four soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 73(5): 759-762.
  • Pfeiffer, T., Pilcher, D., 1987. Effect of early and late flowering on agronomic traits of soybean at different planting dates. Crop Science, 27(1): 108-112.
  • Robinson, A.P., Conley, S.P., Volenec, J.J., Santini, J.B., 2009. Analysis of high yielding, early‐planted soybean in Indiana. Agronomy Journal, 101(1): 131-139.
  • Rod, K.S., Bradley, C.A., Shockley, J., Knott, C.A., 2021. Double‐crop soybean management practices for high yield and profitability. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 7(2): e20119.
  • Rotundo, J.L., Westgate, M.E., 2009. Meta-analysis of environmental effects on soybean seed composition. Field Crops Research, 110(2): 147-156.
  • Rowntree, S.C., Suhre, J.J., Weidenbenner, N.H., Wilson, E.W., Davis, V.M., Naeve, S.L., Casteel, S.N., Diers, B.W., Esker, P.D., Specht, J.E., 2013. Genetic gain× management interactions in soybean: I. Planting date. Crop Science, 53(3): 1128-1138.
  • Sahoo, N., Mahapatra, P., Dixit, R., Uttaray, S., 1991. Effect of sowing date on growth, yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max). The Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 61(9): 665-668.
  • Setiyono, T., Weiss, A., Specht, J., Bastidas, A., Cassman, K.G., Dobermann, A., 2007. Understanding and modeling the effect of temperature and daylength on soybean phenology under high-yield conditions. Field Crops Research, 100(2-3): 257-271.
  • Tyagi, S.D., Khan, M.H., Silva, J., 2011. Yield stability of some soybean genotypes across diverse environments. International Journal of Plant Breeding, 5(1): 37-41.
  • Umburanas, R.C., Yokoyama, A.H., Balena, L., Lenhani, G.C., Teixeira, Â.M., Krüger, R.L., Reichardt, K., Kawakami, J., 2018. Sowing dates and seeding rates affect soybean grain composition. International Journal of Plant Production, 12(3): 181-189.
  • Uslu, N., Esendal, E., 1998. Response to inoculation and sowing date of soybean under Bafra plain conditions in the northern region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 22(6): 525-532.
  • Whigham, D.K., Minor, H.C., 1987. Agronomic characteristics and environmental stress. In: A.G. Norman (Ed.), Soybean Physiology, Agronomy, and Utilization, Academic Press, London, Elsevier, pp. 77-118.
  • Yurtsever, N., 1984. Experimental Statistical Methods. T.R. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Rural Services, Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications, Ankara, Türkiye. (In Turkish).

Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 27 - 37, 14.04.2023
https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1219472

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], with high oil and protein content, is one of the world's main nutritional sources and millions of hectares are given over to its cultivation. Intensive farming and producing multiple crops per year (such as second-crop soybean cultivation), can improve natural resource exploitation and productivity. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of some soybean cultivars on yield and yield components in lowland conditions in the Mardin province over the main-crop and second-crop seasons. This research was carried out in the lowland conditions of Mardin province in Türkiye in 2018 and 2019. The A-3127, Arısoy, Ataem-7, Blaze, Bravo, Cinsoy, Gapsoy-16, Lider, May-5312, Nova, SA-88, and Umut-2002 cultivars were used as plant material in this research. Since the region is suitable for growing double crops per year, soybean field trials were carried out both as a main crop and as a second-cropped. Sowing dates and 12 different soybean cultivars were taken as factors in the research. The first sowing took place on April 16, the second on April 25, the third on June 15, and the fourth on June 30 in both years of the research. Two sowings were the main crop, while the other two were second-crop. According to the results, the A-3127 (3700 kg ha-1) and Gapsoy-16 (3694 kg ha-1) cultivars produced the highest seed yield. The Arısoy (676 kg ha-1), Gapsoy-16 (676 kg ha-1), A-3127 (662 kg ha-1), and Cinsoy (662 kg ha-1) cultivars produced the most oil yield. The study determined that early sowing increases overall yield while late sowing decreases seed yield significantly (on average by 30%). For this region and in areas with similar agricultural environments where double-crop can be grown each year, early cultivars for a second crop may be recommended to reduce the vegetable food and oil deficit.

References

  • Anderson, L.R., Vasilas, B.L., 1985. Effects of planting date on two soybean cultivars: Seasonal dry matter accumulation and seed yield. Crop Science, 25(6): 999-1004.
  • Anonymous, 2019. Mardin Meteorology Directorate Data. Mardin, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
  • Anonymous, 2022. Food and Agriculture Data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/-data/QC), (Accessed: 10.10.2022).
  • Beaver, J.S., Johnson, R.R., 1981. Response of determinate and indeterminate soybeans to varying cultural practices in the Northern USA. Agronomy Journal, 73(5): 833-838.
  • Bellaloui, N., Bruns, H.A., Abbas, H.K., Mengistu, A., Fisher, D.K., Reddy, K.N., 2015. Agricultural practices altered soybean seed protein, oil, fatty acids, sugars, and minerals in the Midsouth USA. Frontiers of Plant Science, 6: 31.
  • Board, J.E., 1985. Yield components associated with soybean yield reductions at nonoptimal planting dates. Agronomy Journal, 77(1): 135-140.
  • Cai, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Yuan, S., Su, Q., Sun, S., Wu, C., Yao, W., Han, T., Hou, W., 2020. Target base editing in soybean using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(10): 1996.
  • Çalışkan, S., Arslan, M., Üremiş, İ., Çalışkan, M.E., 2007. The effects of row spacing on yield and yield components of full season and double-cropped soybean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 31(3): 147-154.
  • Divito, G.A., Echeverría, H.E., Andrade, F.H., Sadras, V.O., 2016. Soybean shows an attenuated nitrogen dilution curve irrespective of maturity group and sowing date. Field Crops Research, 186: 1-9.
  • Egli, D., Guffy, R., Heitholt, J., 1987. Factors associated with reduced yields of delayed plantings of soybean. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 159(3): 176-185.
  • El Toum, G.A., Khalifa, N.M., Sid Ahmed, A.M., Idris, H.A., 2020. Effect of planting date and sowing method on yield and grain quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) under North Sudan conditions. Moroccan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(2): 91-94.
  • Evans, L., 1993. Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • Grabau, L.J., Pfeiffer, T.W., 1989. Stubble Losses of Kentucky Soybeans. Agronomy Notes, 62.
  • Gulluoglu, L., Bakal, H., Arioglu, H., 2016. The effects of twin-row planting pattern and plant population on seed yield and yield components of soybean at late double-cropped planting in Cukurova region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1): 60-66.
  • Hu, M., Wiatrak, P., 2012. Effect of planting date on soybean growth, yield, and grain quality. Agronomy Journal, 104(3): 785-790.
  • Ibrahim, S., Mahmoud, S., 1985. Effect of inoculation on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of some soybean varieties. Egyptian Journal of Physiological Sciences, 12(2): 147-157.
  • Ilker, E., Kocaturk, M., Kadiroglu, A., Yildirim, A., Ozturk, G., Yildiz, H., Koken, I., 2018. Adaptation abilities and quality parameters of selected soybean lines under double cropping in the Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 23(1): 49-55.
  • Jarecki, W., Bobrecka-Jamro, D., 2021. Effect of sowing date on the yield and seed quality of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Journal of Elementology, 26(1): 7-18.
  • Johnson, H.W., Borthwick, H., Leffel, R., 1960. Effects of photoperiod and time of planting on rates of development of the soybean in various stages of the life cycle. Botanical Gazette, 122(2): 77-95.
  • Joshi, J.M., Nkumbula, S., Javaheri, F., 1986. Seed inoculation response for promiscuous soybean cultivars. Soybean Genetics Newsletter United States, Agricultural Research Service,13: 209-212.
  • Julio, M.F., 1986. Produção de Sementes de Soja. Fundação Cargill Campinas.
  • Kang, B.-K., Kim, H.-T., Choi, M.-S., Koo, S.-C., Seo, J.-H., Kim, H.-S., Shin, S.-O., Yun, H.-T., Oh, I.-S., Kulkarni, K.P., 2017. Genetic and environmental variation of first pod height in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, 5(1): 36-44.
  • Krishnan, H.B., 2005. Engineering soybean for enhanced sulfur amino acid content. Crop Science, 45(2): 454-461.
  • Kumlar Medida, S., Diwan, S., Surender, S., 2006. Effect of sowing dates on agrometeorological indices of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Annals of Biology, 22(1): 49-51.
  • Li, Y., Du, M., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., Jin, J., Herbert, S., Liu, X., 2014. Planting date influences fresh pod yield and seed chemical compositions of vegetable soybean. Hortscience, 49(11): 1376-1380.
  • Liu, X., Jin, J., Wang, G., Herbert, S., 2008. Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in Northeast China. Field Crops Research, 105(3): 157-171.
  • Mandić, V., Đorđević, S., Đorđević, N., Bijelić, Z., Krnjaja, V., Petričević, M., Brankov, M., 2020. Genotype and sowing time effects on soybean yield and quality. Agriculture, 10(11): 502.
  • Mayers, J., Lawn, R., Byth, D., 1991. Agronomic studies on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) in the dry season of the tropics. II. Interaction of sowing date and sowing density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42(7): 1093-1107.
  • Mourtzinis, S., Specht, J.E., Conley, S.P., 2019. Defining optimal soybean sowing dates across the US. Scientific Reports-UK, 9(1): 1-7.
  • Nico, M., Miralles, D.J., Kantolic, A.G., 2019. Natural post-flowering photoperiod and photoperiod sensitivity: Roles in yield-determining processes in soybean. Field Crops Research, 231: 141-152.
  • Okcu, M., 2020. Effects of different sowing times on some agricultural properties in soybean varieties. Gümüşhane University Journal of Science and Technology, 10(4): 972-982. (In Turkish).
  • Onat, B., Bakal, H., Gulluoglu, L., Arioglu, H., 2017. The effects of high temperature at the growing period on yield and yield components of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] varieties. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(2): 178-186.
  • Pang, Q., Liu, H., 1986. The cause of acceleration of soybean development by short daylength after flowering. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis, 12: 101-105.
  • Park, K.-Y., Oh, S.-K., Jeong, B.-C., Rho, S.-P., Hong, E.-H., 1987. Effects of planting dates on dry matter production and ecological characteristics of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in southern region of Korea. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 32(4): 409-416.
  • Parker, M., Marchant, W., Mullinix Jr., B., 1981. Date of planting and row spacing effects on four soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 73(5): 759-762.
  • Pfeiffer, T., Pilcher, D., 1987. Effect of early and late flowering on agronomic traits of soybean at different planting dates. Crop Science, 27(1): 108-112.
  • Robinson, A.P., Conley, S.P., Volenec, J.J., Santini, J.B., 2009. Analysis of high yielding, early‐planted soybean in Indiana. Agronomy Journal, 101(1): 131-139.
  • Rod, K.S., Bradley, C.A., Shockley, J., Knott, C.A., 2021. Double‐crop soybean management practices for high yield and profitability. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management, 7(2): e20119.
  • Rotundo, J.L., Westgate, M.E., 2009. Meta-analysis of environmental effects on soybean seed composition. Field Crops Research, 110(2): 147-156.
  • Rowntree, S.C., Suhre, J.J., Weidenbenner, N.H., Wilson, E.W., Davis, V.M., Naeve, S.L., Casteel, S.N., Diers, B.W., Esker, P.D., Specht, J.E., 2013. Genetic gain× management interactions in soybean: I. Planting date. Crop Science, 53(3): 1128-1138.
  • Sahoo, N., Mahapatra, P., Dixit, R., Uttaray, S., 1991. Effect of sowing date on growth, yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max). The Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 61(9): 665-668.
  • Setiyono, T., Weiss, A., Specht, J., Bastidas, A., Cassman, K.G., Dobermann, A., 2007. Understanding and modeling the effect of temperature and daylength on soybean phenology under high-yield conditions. Field Crops Research, 100(2-3): 257-271.
  • Tyagi, S.D., Khan, M.H., Silva, J., 2011. Yield stability of some soybean genotypes across diverse environments. International Journal of Plant Breeding, 5(1): 37-41.
  • Umburanas, R.C., Yokoyama, A.H., Balena, L., Lenhani, G.C., Teixeira, Â.M., Krüger, R.L., Reichardt, K., Kawakami, J., 2018. Sowing dates and seeding rates affect soybean grain composition. International Journal of Plant Production, 12(3): 181-189.
  • Uslu, N., Esendal, E., 1998. Response to inoculation and sowing date of soybean under Bafra plain conditions in the northern region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 22(6): 525-532.
  • Whigham, D.K., Minor, H.C., 1987. Agronomic characteristics and environmental stress. In: A.G. Norman (Ed.), Soybean Physiology, Agronomy, and Utilization, Academic Press, London, Elsevier, pp. 77-118.
  • Yurtsever, N., 1984. Experimental Statistical Methods. T.R. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Rural Services, Soil and Fertilizer Research Institute Publications, Ankara, Türkiye. (In Turkish).
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

M. Necat Izgı 0000-0003-1657-1169

Publication Date April 14, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Izgı, M. N. (2023). Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1219472
AMA Izgı MN. Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates. TÜTAD. April 2023;10(1):27-37. doi:10.19159/tutad.1219472
Chicago Izgı, M. Necat. “Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 10, no. 1 (April 2023): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1219472.
EndNote Izgı MN (April 1, 2023) Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 10 1 27–37.
IEEE M. N. Izgı, “Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates”, TÜTAD, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2023, doi: 10.19159/tutad.1219472.
ISNAD Izgı, M. Necat. “Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 10/1 (April 2023), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.1219472.
JAMA Izgı MN. Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates. TÜTAD. 2023;10:27–37.
MLA Izgı, M. Necat. “Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, pp. 27-37, doi:10.19159/tutad.1219472.
Vancouver Izgı MN. Field Performance of Some Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] Cultivars Sown on Different Dates. TÜTAD. 2023;10(1):27-3.

TARANILAN DİZİNLER

14658    14659     14660   14661  14662  14663  14664        

14665      14667