Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

KİMYA LABORATUVARI DERSİNİ BİRLEŞTİRME YÖNTEMİNE GÖRE ÇALIŞAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN GÖRÜŞLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 156 - 159, 31.12.2017

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı kimya laboratuvarı dersini birleştirme yöntemine göre çalışan öğrencilerin görüşlerini incelemektir. Çalışma Fen

bilgisi eğitimi bölümünde öğrenim görmekte olan 23 öğrenciyle yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada doküman analizi yapılmıştır. Kodlamalar sorular

içerisinde temsil edilmiştir. Temalar öğrenci cevaplarının yeterince detaylı olmamasından ötürü belirlenememiştir. Çalışma sonucunda

dikkatli planlama ve öğretimin öğrencilerin bilişsel ve duyuşsal özelliklerinin gelişimine yardımcı olduğu ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Ancak

planlama ve öğretimde oluşacak hatalar tam tersi sonuçlara yol açacaktır.

References

  • Aksoy, G. ve Doymuş, K. (2011). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Uygulamalarında İşbirlikli Okuma-Yazma-Uygulama Tekniğinin Etkisi. GÜ, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (2), 381-397. Bear, G.G., Gaskins, C., Blank, J., and Chen, F.F. (2011). Delaware School Climate Survey- Student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology 49, 157-174. Çetin, A., Akkus, A. Effect of Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Academic Theoretical Knowledge. Caucasian Journal of Science, 1 (1), 1-6. Doymuş, K. (2007). Effects of a Cooperative Learning Strategy on Teaching and Learning Phases of Matter and One-Component Phase Diagrams, Chemical Education Research, 84 (11), 1857-1860. Daşdemir, İ. ve Doymuş, K. (2012a). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde Animasyon Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına, Öğrenilen Bilgilerin Kalıcılığına ve Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Etkisi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 2 (3), 33-42. Evcim, H., and İpek, Ö.F. (2013). Effects of Jigsaw II on academic achievement in English prep classes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1651-1659. Hedeen, T. (2003). The Reverse Jigsaw: A Process Of Cooperative Learning And Discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31,325-332. Metin, M., Acisli, S., ve Kolomuc, A. (2012). Attitude of elementary prospective teachers towards science teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2004-2008. Nilsson, P., and Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together- Primary science student teacher’s and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1309-1318. Okebukola, P.A., Owolabi, O., and Okebukola, F.O. (2013). Mother Tounge as Default Language of Instruction in Lower Primary Science Classes: Tension Between Policy Prescription and Practice in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 (1), 62-81. Troia, G.A., Harbaugh, A.G., Shankland, R.K., Wolbers, K.A., and Lawrence, A.M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26 (1), 17 -44. Uzun, N. (2012). A sample of active learning application in science education: the thema “cell” with educational games. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2932-2936. YÖRÜK, A. (2016). Effect of Jigsaw Method on Students Chemistry Laboratory Achievement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(3), 377–381. Wang, H-Y., Stocker, J.F., and Fu, D. (2012b). New concepts of science and medicine in science and technology studies and their relevance to science education. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 28, 2-7.

ANALYZING IDEAS OF STUDENTS WHO STUDIED CHEMISTRY LABORATORY WITH RESPECT TO JIGSAW TECHNIQUE

Year 2017, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 156 - 159, 31.12.2017

Abstract

Aim of this study is to reveal the opinion of prospective elementary science teachers who studied chemistry laboratory with respect to jigsaw

technique. Study is carried out with 23 students who are studying at elementary science education program. Study is carried out with respect

to document analysis. Codes are represented in question topics. Themes could not be determined due to lack of detail on answers. It is

revealed by the study careful planning and instruction will help students in development of both cognitive and affective skills. However

failure on planning and instruction may have reverse effect

References

  • Aksoy, G. ve Doymuş, K. (2011). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Uygulamalarında İşbirlikli Okuma-Yazma-Uygulama Tekniğinin Etkisi. GÜ, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (2), 381-397. Bear, G.G., Gaskins, C., Blank, J., and Chen, F.F. (2011). Delaware School Climate Survey- Student: Its factor structure, concurrent validity, and reliability. Journal of School Psychology 49, 157-174. Çetin, A., Akkus, A. Effect of Cooperative Learning Model on Students’ Academic Theoretical Knowledge. Caucasian Journal of Science, 1 (1), 1-6. Doymuş, K. (2007). Effects of a Cooperative Learning Strategy on Teaching and Learning Phases of Matter and One-Component Phase Diagrams, Chemical Education Research, 84 (11), 1857-1860. Daşdemir, İ. ve Doymuş, K. (2012a). Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde Animasyon Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına, Öğrenilen Bilgilerin Kalıcılığına ve Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Etkisi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 2 (3), 33-42. Evcim, H., and İpek, Ö.F. (2013). Effects of Jigsaw II on academic achievement in English prep classes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1651-1659. Hedeen, T. (2003). The Reverse Jigsaw: A Process Of Cooperative Learning And Discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31,325-332. Metin, M., Acisli, S., ve Kolomuc, A. (2012). Attitude of elementary prospective teachers towards science teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2004-2008. Nilsson, P., and Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together- Primary science student teacher’s and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1309-1318. Okebukola, P.A., Owolabi, O., and Okebukola, F.O. (2013). Mother Tounge as Default Language of Instruction in Lower Primary Science Classes: Tension Between Policy Prescription and Practice in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50 (1), 62-81. Troia, G.A., Harbaugh, A.G., Shankland, R.K., Wolbers, K.A., and Lawrence, A.M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing, 26 (1), 17 -44. Uzun, N. (2012). A sample of active learning application in science education: the thema “cell” with educational games. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2932-2936. YÖRÜK, A. (2016). Effect of Jigsaw Method on Students Chemistry Laboratory Achievement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(3), 377–381. Wang, H-Y., Stocker, J.F., and Fu, D. (2012b). New concepts of science and medicine in science and technology studies and their relevance to science education. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 28, 2-7.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section MAKALELER
Authors

Adem Akkuş

Adnan Çetin This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Akkuş, A., & Çetin, A. (2017). ANALYZING IDEAS OF STUDENTS WHO STUDIED CHEMISTRY LABORATORY WITH RESPECT TO JIGSAW TECHNIQUE. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(3), 156-159.
e-ISSN: 2458-8628