Relationship Between Skeletal and Dental Malocclusions in the Sagittal Direction in Turkish Orthodontic Patients: A Retrospective Study

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 142 - 148, 31.08.2022

Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim , Jamıl Bayzed , Gönül Öztürk , Fatih Kazancı , Hüseyin Melik Böyük , Helin Dursun

https://doi.org/10.52976/vansaglik.1084471

Cited By: 1

Öz

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the compatibility between skeletal and dental malocclusions in the sagittal direction.
Material and Methods: 230 patients (male, female) aged 11-18 years, who applied to Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Dentistry Orthodontic Clinic, had no craniofacial anomaly, had not received orthodontic treatment and had no history of trauma, were included in the study. Individuals were divided into groups according to their ANB angles. The molar relationships in different sagittal skeletal malocclusions were examined. Descriptive analysis and the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate the information. The obtained data were statistically analyzed at the 5% significance level.
Results: 230 individuals between the ages of 12-30 were divided into groups according to their ANB angles. In individuals with skeletal Class 1 malocclusion, the molar relationship was Angle Class II at most and Angle Class IV at most negligible. In individuals with skeletal Class 2 malocclusion, the molar relationship was determined as Angle Class II at most, while Angle Class III subdivision and no molar relationship were observed at least. In individuals with skeletal Class 3 malocclusion, the molar relation was Angle Class III at most, Angle Class IV at least, and no molar relation.
Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that there was a significant relationship between skeletal malocclusions and molar relationships. However, it is thought that the molar relationship may vary due to different factors other than skeletal malocclusion.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Molar relation, Skeletal Malocclusions, Sagittal Direction

Destekleyen Kurum

YYÜ

Türk Ortodonti Hastalarında Sagital Yönde İskeletsel ve Dental Maloklüzyonların İlişkisi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma iskeletsel ve dental maloklüzyonların sagital yönde uyumunu değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Kliniği'ne başvuran, kraniyofasiyal anomalisi olmayan, daha önce ortodontik tedavi görmemiş ve travma öyküsü olmayan 11-18 yaş arası 230 hasta (erkek, kadın) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bireyler ANB açılarına göre gruplara ayrıldı. Farklı sagital iskeletsel maloklüzyonlarda molar ilişkiler incelendi. Bilgileri değerlendirmek için tanımlayıcı analiz ve Pearson ki-kare testi kullanıldı. Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak %5 anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: 12-30 yaş arası 230 kişi ANB açılarına göre gruplara ayrıldı. İskeletsel Sınıf 1 maloklüzyonlu bireylerde molar ilişki en fazla Angle Class II olarak belirlenmiştir, Angle Class IV ise en az görülen ilişkidir. İskeletsel Sınıf 2 maloklüzyonu olan bireylerde molar ilişki en fazla Angle Sınıf II olarak belirlenirken, Angle Sınıf III subdivizyon en az görülen ilişkidir. İskeletsel Sınıf 3 maloklüzyonlu bireylerde molar ilişki en fazla Angle Class III olarak belirlenirken, en az Angle Class IV olarak belirlenmiştir.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmada iskeletsel maloklüzyonlar ile molar ilişkiler arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu gözlendi. Ancak molar ilişkinin iskeletsel maloklüzyon dışında farklı faktörlere bağlı olarak değişebileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İskeletsel Maloklüzyonlar, Molar ilişki, Sagital Yön

Kaynakça

• 1. Al-Hamlan N, Al-Eissa B, Al-Hiyasat AS, Albalawi FS, Ahmed AE. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, May 2015;16(5):353-359.
• 2. Behbehani F, Roy R, Al-Jame B. Prevalence of asymmetric molar and canine relationship. European Journal of Orthodontics 34 (2012) 686–692.
• 3. Ciuffolo F, Manzoli L, D'Attilio M, Tecco S, Muratore F, Festa F, et al. prevalence and distribution by gender of occlusal characteristics in a sample of Italian secondary school students: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:601-606.
• 4. Çınarsoy Ciğerim S, Kazancı F. Maksiller Orta Hat Diastemasının ve Dental Orta Hat Sapmasının Farklı İskeletsel Maloklüzyonlar ile İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2019;25(3):270-6.
• 5. Garner LD, Butt MH. Malocclusion in black Americans and Nyeri Kenyans. An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod 1985;55:139-146.
• 6. Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Ercan E. Prevalence of malocclusion among adolescents in central anatolia. Eur J Dent 2007;1:125-131.
• 7. Gomez Y, Zamora N, Tarazona B, Bellot-Arcís C, Paredes-Gallardo V. Cross-sectional human study of soft tissue chin (STC) thickness in adult patients in relation to sex, facial pattern and skeletal class. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:1205-1211.
• 8. Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:876-81.
• 9. Kerosuo H. Occlusion in the primary and early mixed dentitions in a group of Tanzanian and Finnish children. ASDC J Dent Child 1990;57:293-298.
• 10. Kozanecka A, Sarul M, Kawala B, AntoszewskaSmith J. Objectification of Orthodontic Treatment Needs: Does the Classification of Malocclusions or a History of Orthodontic Treatment Matter? Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016;25:1303-1312.
• 11. Maetevorakul S, Viteporn S. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:13.
• 12. Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA, Arowojolu MO. The pattern of malocclusion among orthodontic patients seen in Dental Centre, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci 2002;31:207-211.
• 13. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:153-167.
• 14. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Yoshino M, Miyazawa H, Inoue K. Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children. Forensic Sci Int 2010;199:109. e1-6.
• 15. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Yoshino M, Oohigashi S, Miyazawa H, et al. Pilot study of facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese females. Forensic Sci Int 2010;195:165.e1-5.
• 16. Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:449-56.
• 17. Ülgen M. Anomaliler, sefalometri, etioloji, büyüme ve gelişim, tanı. 8.baskı, Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları, Türkiye, 2015.
• 18. Vig KW, Fields HW. Facial growth and management of orthodontic problems. Pediatr Clin North Am 2000;47:1085-1123.
• 19. Zupancic S, Pohar M, Farcni kF, Ovsenik M. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30:269-273.