Van ve Yöresindeki Dermatofitozis Şüpheli Sığır, Koyun, Keçi ve Van Kedilerinden Dermatofitlerin İzolasyonu

Year 2015, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 01.04.2015

Ziya İlhan

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, klinik olarak dermatofitozis şüphesi görülen bazı evcil hayvan türlerinden dermatofitlerin
izolasyonu amaçlandı. Toplam 170 evcil hayvanın incelendiği projede, hayvanların 57’sinden (%33.5)
dermatofit türü izole edilirken, 113 (%66.5) hayvandan ise her hangi bir dermatofit türü izole edilmedi.
İncelenen 54 sığırın 18’ü (%33.3), 44 koyunun 8’i (%18.1), 21 keçinin 7’si (%33.3) ve 51 Van kedisinin 24’ü
(%47.1) dermatofit yönünden pozitif bulundu. Dermatofitozis etkeni olarak hayvanların 13’ünden (%22.8)
Trichophyton (T.) verrucosum, 13’ünden (%22.8) T. rubrum, 10’undan (%17.5) Microsporum (M.) gypseum,
9’undan (%15.7) T. tonsurans, 7’sinden (%12.2) M. mentagrophytes, 3’ünden (%5.2) M. canis ve 2’sinde
(%3.5) ise M. nanum üredi. Sonuç olarak, Van ve yöresindeki sığır, koyun, keçi ve Van kedilerinden en yüksek
oranda T. verrucosum and T. rubrum izole edildi.

Keywords

Dermatofitozis, İzolasyon, Keçi, Koyun, Sığır, Van Kedisi

Isolation of Dermatophytes from Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Van Cats in Van and its Around

Abstract

The goal of this research was to identify the causative agents of dermatophytes in different animal species in Van region. A total of 170 samples of skin scraping and hair obtained from 54 cattle, 44 sheep, 21 goats and 51 Van cats with suspected dermatophytosis were examined for dermatophytes. Of the 170 animals examined 57 (33.5%) were culture positive for dermatophytes. The isolation rates of dermatophyte species from cattle, sheep, goats and Van cats were 33.3% (n: 18), 18.1% (n: 8), 33.3% (n: 7) and 47.1% (n: 24), respectively. Out of 57 strains of dermatophytes isolated, 13 (22.8%) were identified as Trichophyton (T.) verrucosum, 13 (22.8%) were T. rubrum, 10 (17.5%) were Microsporum (M.) gypseum, 9 (15.7%) were T. tonsurans, 7 (12.2%) were M. mentagrophytes, 3 (5.2%) were M. canis and 2 (3.5%) were M. nanum. In conclusion, the most common isolates were T. verrucosum and T. rubrum from the cattle, sheep, goats and Van cats in Van and it’s around

Keywords

Cattle, Dermatophytosis, Goat, Isolation, Van Cats

References

• Aghamirian MR, Ghiasian SA (2009). Dermatophytes as a cause of epizoonoses in dairy cattle and humans in Iran: Epidemiological and clinical aspects. Mycoses. e52-e56.
• Alpun G, Özgür NY (2009). Mycological examination of Microsporum canis infection in suspected dermatophytosis of owned and ownerless cats its aseymptomatic carriage. J Anim Vet Adv. 8(4), 803-806.
• Arda M (2006). Temel Mikrobiyoloji, s: 315-367, Medisan Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Ateş A (2007). Trichophyton rubrum'un Trichophyton mentagrophytes'ten Ayırt Edilmesinde Kullanılan Tanı Testlerinin Karşılaştırılması. Doktora Tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Adana.
• Bernardo F, Lança A, Guerra MM, Martins HM (2005). Dermatophytes isolated from pet, dogs and cats, in Lisbon, Potugal (2000-2004). RPCV, 100, 85-88.
• Brilhante RSN, Cavalcante CSP, Soares-Junior FA, Cprdeiro RA, Sidrim JJC, Rochal MFG (2003). High rate of Microsporum canis feline and canine dermatophytoses in Northeast Brazil: Epidemiological and diagnostic features. Mycopathol. 156, 303-308.
• Cabañes FJ (2000). Dermatophytes in domestic animals. Micologia. 17, 104- 108.
• Chermette R, Ferreiro L, Guillot J (2008). Dermatophytoses in animals. Mycopathol. 166, 385-405.
• Chinelli PAV, Sofiatti AA, Nunes RS, Martins JEC (2003). Dermatophyte agents in the city of Sao Paulo, from 1992 to 2002. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo, 45(5), 259-263.
• Çiftci A, İça T, Sareyyüpoğlu B, Müştak HK (2005). Kedi ve köpek dermatofitozlarından izole edilen mantarların retrospektif değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 52, 45-48.
• English MP, Morris P (1969). Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. erinacei in hedgehog nests. Sabouraudia. 7, 118-121.
• Khosravi AR, Mahmoudi M (2003). Dermatophytes isolated from domestic animals in Iran. Mycoses. 46, 222-225.
• Larone DH (2011). Medically Important Fungi: A Guide to Identification, American Society for Microbiology. pp: 1-485, 5th Edit., ASM Press, Washington, USA.
• Mbata TI (2009). Dermatophytes and other skin mycoses found in featherless broiler toe webs. S J P H, 4(4), 339-342.
• Moriello KA (2004). Treatment of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats: Review of published studies. Vet Dermatol. 15, 99-107.
• OIE (2005). Dermatophytosis. http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu./Factsheets /pdfs/dermatop.pdf Erişim tarihi: 01.06.2013.
• Pandey A, Pandey M (2013). Isolation and characterisation dermatophytes with tinea infections at gwalior (m.p.), India. IJPI, 2(2), 5-8.
• Pier AC, Smith JMB, Alexious H, Ellis DH, Lund A, Pritchard RC (1994). Animal ringworm-its aetiology public health significance and control. J Med Vet Mycol 32 (1), 133-150.
• Prado MR, Brilhante RSN, Cordeiro RA, Monteiro AJ, Sidrim JJC, Rocha MFG (2008). Frequency of yeasts and dermatophytes from healthy and diseased dogs. J Vet Diagn Invest 20, 1997-2002.
• Ranganathan S, Balajee SAM, Raja SM (1998). A survey of dermatophytosis in animals in Madras, India. Mycopathol. 140, 137 140.
• Sargison ND, Thomson JR, Scott PR, Hopkins G (2002). Ringworm caused by Trichophyton verrucosum an emerging problem in sheep flocks. Vet Rec. 150, 755-756.
• Şeker E, Doğan N (2011). Isolation of dermatophytes from dogs and cats with suspected dermatophytosis in Western Turkey. Prev Vet Med. 98, 46-51.
• Tel OY, Akan M (2008). Kedi ve köpeklerden dermatofitlerin izolasyonu. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 55, 167-171.
• Thrusfield M (1986). Serological Epidemiology. In Veterinary Epidemiology. pp: 175-186, Butterworths Co. London, UK,
• Yahyaraeyat R, Shokri H, Khosravi AR, Soltani M, Erfanmanesh A, Nikain D (2009). Occurrence of animals dermatophytosis in Tehran, Iran. World J Zool 4 (3), 200-204.