Kaynak Temelli Yaklaşım Bileşenleri, Özümseme Kapasitesi ve Tedarik Zinciri Çevikliği Arasındaki Bağlantının Ortaya Çıkarılması

Year 2024, , 119 - 136, 31.01.2024

Hülya Meral , Erdinc Koc

https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1389270

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kaynak temelli yaklaşım bileşenleri ve tedarik zinciri çevikliği arasındaki ilişki araştırılmaktadır. Öğrenme yönelimi, teknoloji yönelimi, özümseme kapasitesi ve tedarik zinciri çevikliği birer boyut olarak ele alınarak bu çalışma kapsamında aralarındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir.
Yöntem: Anket yöntemi kullanılarak Türkiye’de imalat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 289 işletmenin üst ve orta düzey yöneticilerinden veriler elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler öncelikle güvenirlik ve geçerlilik testlerine tabi tutulmuş ve sonuçları paylaşılmıştır. Daha sonrasında ise araştırma hipotezleri test edilmiş ve ulaşılan sonuçlar sunulmuştur.
Bulgular: Öğrenme yönelimi, teknoloji yönelimi, özümseme kapasitesi ve tedarik zinciri çevikliği arasındaki doğrusal ilişkileri test eden hipotezler ile birlikte özümseme kapasitesinin aracılık etkisinin incelendiği hipotezler, yapılan analizler neticesinde kabul edilmiştir.
Özgünlük: Literatürde, çalışmada kullanılan kaynak temelli yaklaşım bileşenleri ile tedarik zinciri çevikliği arasındaki ilişkide özümseme kapasitesinin aracı rolünü inceleyen bir çalışmaya rastlanılmamıştır. Bu çalışmanın ulaştığı sonuçlar ile literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Kaynak Temelli Yaklaşım, Öğrenme Yönelimi, Teknoloji Yönelimi, Özümseme Kapasitesi, Tedarik Zinciri Çevikliği

Unveiling The Nexus among Resource-Based Approach Components, Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between resource-based approach components and supply chain agility. Learning orientation, technology orientation, absorptive capacity and supply chain agility are considered as dimensions and their relationships are examined in this study.
Methodology: Using the survey method, data were obtained from the top and middle level managers of 289 enterprises operating in the manufacturing sector in Türkiye. The data obtained were first subjected to reliability and validity tests and the results were shared. Afterwards, the research hypotheses were tested and the results were presented.
Findings: The hypotheses testing the linear relationships between learning orientation, technology orientation, absorptive capacity and supply chain agility and the hypotheses examining the mediating effect of absorptive capacity were accepted as a result of the analyses.
Originality: There is no study in the literature that examines the mediating role of absorptive capacity in the relationship between the resource-based approach components used in the study and supply chain agility. It is thought that this study will contribute to the literature with its results.

Keywords

Resource Based Approach, Learning Orientation, Technology Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, Supply Chain Agility

References

• Abdallah, A.B., ve Ayoub, H.F. (2020). “Information Technology Drivers of Supply Chain Agility: Implications for Market Performance”, International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 31(4), 547-573.
• Abourokbah S.H., Mashat R.M. ve Salam M.A. (2023). “Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance”, Sustainability, 15(4), 3636, DOI: 10.3390/su15043636.
• Acar, D. ve Ateş, B.A. (2011). "Tedarik Zinciri Faaliyetlerinin Maliyetleri ve Dış Kaynak Kullanımı İlişkisi", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 9-27.
• Avelar-Sosa, L., García-Alcaraz, J.L. ve Maldonado-Macías, A.A. (2019). "Evaluation of Supply Chain Performance- A Manufacturing Industry Approach", Springer International Publishing, New York.
• Bargshady, G., Zahraee, S.M., Ahmadi, M. ve Parto, A. (2016). "The Effect of Information Technology on the Agility of the Supply Chain in the Iranian Power Plant Industry", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(3), 427-442. DOI:10.1108/JMTM-11-2015-0093.
• Barney, J. (1991). "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120, DOI:10.1177/014920639101700108.
• Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI:10.3390/su13084349.
• Becker, W. ve Peters, J. (2006). "Technological Opportunities, Absorptive Capacities, and Innovation", Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics, Discussion Paper Series 195.
• Braunscheidel, M.J. ve Suresh, N.C. (2009). "The Organizational Antecedents of a Firm’s Supply Chain Agility for Risk Mtigation and Response", Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140, DOI:10.1016/J.JOM.2008.09.006.
• Breznik, L. (2012). "Can Information Technology be a Source of Competitive Advantage?", Economic and Business Review, 14(3), 251-269, DOI:10.15458/2335-4216.1232.
• Brusset, X. (2016). "Does Supply Chain Visibility Enhance Agility?", International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 46-59.
• Byrne, B.M. (2010). "Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS (Second Edition)", Routledge. New York.
• Cesur, Z. ve Memiş, S. (2021). "Algılanan Müşteri Değerinin Müşteri Memnuniyeti Üzerindeki Etkisinde Müşteri Katılımının Aracılık Etkisi: Gsm Operatörü Çağrı Merkezleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma", Balkan ve Yakın Doğu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, 135-143.
• Chamberlin, E.H. (1933). "The Theory of Monopolistic Competition", Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Christopher, M. (2000). "The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets", Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37-44, DOI:10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00110-8.
• Cohen, W.M. ve Levinthal, D.A. (1990). "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, 35(1), 128-152.
• Çankaya, S.Y. (2020). "Tedarik Zinciri Görünürlüğünün Çeviklik Üzerindeki Etkileri", Business, Economics and Management Research Journal, 3(1), 49-62.
• Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., ve Childe, S.J. (2018). "Supply Chain Agility, Adaptability and Alignment: Empirical Evidence from the Indian Auto Components Industry", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 129-148.
• Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D.F. (1981). "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50, DOI: 10.2307/3151312.
• Gligor, D.M. Holcomb, M.C. ve Feizabadi, J. (2016). "An Exploration of the Strategic Antecedents of Firm Supply Chain Agility: The Role of a Firm's Orientations", International Journal of Production Economics, 179, 24-34.
• Gürbüz, S ve Şahin, F. (2017). "Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri", Seçkin Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Irfan, M., Wang, M. ve Akhtar, N. (2020), "Enabling Supply Chain Agility through Process Integration and Supply Flexibility: Evidence from the Fashion Industry", Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(2), 519-547.
• Isfianadewi, D., ve Anindityo, M.H. (2022). "The Effect of Supply Chain Agility in Mediation of Absorptive Capacity and Competitive Advantage: A Case Study of Modern Cafes and Restaurants", International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(5), 545–555, DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i5.1836.
• Kamaşak, R. ve Yozgat, U. (2013). "Endüstriyel Faktörler, Benzersiz Kaynaklar ve Performans İlişkisi: İmalat ve Hizmet Sektörü İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma", Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 27, 114-136.
• Karacaoğlu, K. (2006). "İşletmelerin Rekabet Üstünlüğü Anlayışlarını Etkileyen Ögelerin Endüstri Temelli ve Kaynak Temelli Bakış Açısına Göre Belirlenmesi: Kayseri İlinde Bir Araştırma", Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 1-22.
• Kharabsheh, R., Ensour, W. ve Bogolybov, P. (2017). "Learning Orientation, Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Absorptive Capacity", Business and Economic Research, 7(1), 114-127.
• Kim, M. ve Chai, S. (2017). "The Impact of Supplier Innovativeness , Information Sharing and Strategic Sourcing on Improving Supply Chain Agility: Global Supply Chain Perspective", International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 42-52.
• Koç, E. (2021). "Tedarik Zi̇nci̇ri̇ Dış Entegrasyonunun Yeni̇ Ürün Geli̇şti̇rme Üzeri̇ndeki Etki̇si̇nde İç Entegrasyonun Aracılık Rolü", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 46, 197-213, DOI:10.30794/pausbed.867800.
• KOSGEB. (2023). "Türkiye'deki Kobilere İlişkin Bazı İstatistiki Göstergeler", https://webdosya.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Kurumsal/Raporlar/T%C3%BCrkiye'de_KOB%C4%B0'lere_%C4%B0li%C5%9Fkin_Baz%C4%B1_%C4%B0statistiki_G%C3%B6stergeler_May%C4%B1s_2023.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2024).
• Lane, P.J., Koka, B.R. ve Pathak, S. (2006). "The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct", Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863, DOI:10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456.
• Lichtenthaler, U. (2016). "Determinants of Absorptive Capacity: The Value of Technology and Market Orientation for External Knowledge Acquisition", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 600-610.
• Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K.K. ve Hua, Z. (2013). "The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility", Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462, DOI:10.1016/J.DSS.2012.12.016.
• Lonial, S.C. ve Carter, R.E. (2015). "The Impact of Organizational Orientations on Medium and Small Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective", Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 94-113.
• Martinez-Sanchez, A. ve Lahoz-Leo, F. (2018). "Supply Chain Agility: A Mediator for Absorptive Capacity", Baltic Journal of Management, 13(2), 264-278. DOI:10.1108/BJM-10-2017-0304.
• Masa’deh, R., Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A. ve Obeidat, B.Y. (2018). "The Associations Among Market Orientation, Technology Orientation, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Performance", Benchmarking, 25(8), 3117-3142, DOI:10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0024.
• Michalisin, M.D., Kline, D.M. ve Smith, R.D. (2000). "Intangible Strategic Assets and Firm Performance: a Multi-Industry Study of the Resource-Based View", Journal of Business Strategies, 17(2), 91-118.
• Nart, S., Çelik, C. ve Sima, N. (2020). "Çalışma Ortamı Özelliklerinin İşe Yabancılaşmaya Etkileri: Bigi Teknolojisi Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma", Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 1687-1720, DOI:10.15295/bmij.v8i2.1462.
• Ngai, E.W.T., Chau, D.C.K. ve Chan, T.L.A. (2011). "Information Technology, Operational, and Management Competencies for Supply Chain Agility: Findings From Case Studies", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 232-249, DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.11.002.
• Özer, A. ve Özer, N. (2014). "Kaynak Temelli Yaklaşım ve Paydaş Yaklaşımı Açısından Entelektüel Sermayenin BIST’deki Çokuluslu İşletmelerin Finansal Performansına Etkisi", BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar, 8(2), 119-149.
• Özgüner, Z. ve Cantaşdemir, E.V. (2021). "Çevik Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimindeki Operasyonların Entropi Tabanlı Topsis Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi", Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(14), 114-135.
• Rezazadeh, B., Karami, H. ve Karami, A. (2016). "Technology Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and SMEs Performance", Strategic Management Quaterly, 4(1), 41-60, DOI:10.15640/smq.v4n1a3.
• Riquelme-Medina, M., Stevenson, M., Barrales-Molina, V. ve Llorens-Montes, F.J. (2022). "Coopetition in Business Ecosystems: The key Role of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility", Journal of Business Research, 146(April), 464-476, DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.071.
• Robinson, J. (1933). "The Economics of Imperfect Competition", Macmillan Press, London.
• Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E. ve Noordewier, T. (1997). "A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Kowledge, and Behavior", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305-318, DOI:10.1177/0092070397254003.
• Stelmaszczyk, M. (2020). "How Absorptive Capacity and Organisational Learning Orientation Interact to Enable Innovation Capability? An Empirical Examination", Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1), 7-32, DOI:10.15678/EBER.2020.080101.
• Sugiyanto, L.B., Husin, Z., ve Wahyudi, A.S. (2019). "The Mediated Role of Absorptive Capacity in the Relationship between Technology, Learning, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Hotel Industry in Bali, Indonesia", The International Journal of Business & Management, 7(7), DOI:10.24940/theijbm/2019/v7/i7/BM1907-072.
• Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S. ve Murthy, N. (2008). "Achieving Supply Chain Agility Through IT İntegration and Flexibility", International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297, DOI:10.1016/J.IJPE.2008.09.002.
• Taber, K.S. (2018). "The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education", Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296, DOI:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
• Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. ve Shuen, A. (1997). "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509-533.
• Trevino, L.J. ve Grosse, R. (2002). "An Analysis of Firm-Specific Resources and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States", International Business Review, 11(4), 431-452, DOI:10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00018-5.
• Tse, Y.K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P. ve MacBryde, J. (2016). "Embracing Supply Chain Agility : An Investigation in the Electronics Industry", Supply Chain Management : An International Journal, 21(1), 140-156.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). "A Resource‐Based View of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Yang Y., Zheng Y., Xie G. ve Tian Y. (2022). "The Influence Mechanism of Learning Orientation on New Venture Performance: The Chain-Mediating Effect of Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Capacity", Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 818844, DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818844.
• Zhu, M. ve Gao, H. (2021). "The Antecedents of Supply Chain Agility and Their Effect on Business Performance: An Organizational Strategy Perspective", Operations Management Research, 14(1-2), 166-176. DOI:10.1007/s12063-020-00174-9.