Ekonomik Büyüme, Küreselleşme ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi İlişkisi: ASEAN-5 Ülkeleri Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz

Year 2023, Volume: 14 Issue: 37, 123 - 138, 25.02.2023

Sefa Özbek

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1144317

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Nüfus artışı, kentleşme, endüstrileşme ve teknolojik gelişmeler doğal kaynak tüketiminde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Söz konusu gelişmeler ülke ekonomilerinde ekonomik büyüme açısından temel dinamikler arasında yer almaktadır. Ancak ilgili gelişmeler ile birlikte çevresel bozulmalarda artışlar gözlemlenmiştir. Bu bozulmaların sebebinin belirlenmesi, çevresel kalitenin artması ve sürdürülebilir ekonomik kalkınmanın sağlanması için önemli görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada Malezya, Tayland, Endonezya, Singapur ve Filipinler’den oluşan ASEAN-5 ülkelerinde ekolojik ayak izinin belirleyicileri araştırılmaktadır. Ampirik yöntem olarak kesitler arası bağımlılığı göz önüne alan Westerlund (2006) panel eşbütünleşme testi kullanılmıştır. Örneklem dönemi olarak küreselleşme sürecinin genel olarak derinleştiği 1980-2018 dönemi seçilmiştir. ASEAN-5 ülkelerine ait genel küreselleşme endeksi, ekonomik büyüme, enerji tüketimi ve ekolojik ayak izi değişkenlerinden yararlanılmıştır. Ampirik sonuçlar, ASEAN-5 ülkelerinde söz konusu değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin varlığını ortaya koymuştur. Panel eşbütünleşme katsayı tahmincisi olarak Augmented Mean Group (AMG) uygulanmıştır. AMG bulguları ASEAN-5 ülkelerinde panel genelinde küreselleşmenin, ekonomik büyümenin ve enerji tüketiminin ekolojik ayak izini artırdığını göstermiştir.

Keywords

Küreselleşme, Ekonomik Büyüme, Ekolojik Ayak İzi, Çevre Kirliliği, ASEAN-5 Ülkeleri

The Relationship of Economic Growth, Globalization and Ecological Footprint: An Econometric Analysis on ASEAN-5 Countries

Abstract

Population growth, urbanization, industrialization and technological developments have an important place in natural resource consumption. These developments are among the main dynamics in terms of economic growth in national economies. However, with the related developments, an increase in environmental degradation has been observed. Determining the cause of these deteriorations is considered to be important for increasing environmental quality and ensuring sustainable economic development. In the study, the determinants of ecological footprint in ASEAN-5 countries consisting of Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore and the Philippines are investigated. Westerlund (2006) panel cointegration test is used as an empirical method, which considers cross-sectional dependence. The period of 1980-2018, in which the globalization process generally deepened, is chosen as the sample period. General globalization index, economic growth, energy consumption and ecological footprint variables of ASEAN-5 countries are used. Empirical results reveal the existence of a cointegration relationship between these variables in ASEAN-5 countries. Augmented Mean Group (AMG) is applied as the panel cointegration coefficient estimator. AMG findings show that globalization, economic growth and energy consumption increase the ecological footprint of ASEAN-5 countries across the panel.

Keywords

Globalization, Economic Growth, Ecological Footprint, Environmental Pollution, ASEAN-5 Countries.

References

• Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M. ve Ali, N. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 18565-18582.
• Akadiri, S.S., Alkawfi, M.M., Uğural, S. ve Akadiri, A.C. (2019) Towards achieving environmental sustainability target in Italy. The role of energy, real income and globalization. Sci Total Environ 671, 1293-1301.
• Apaydın, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayakizi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42.
• Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Forecasting with panel data. Journal of Forecasting, 27(2), 153-173.
• Banerjee, P., Arčabić, V. ve Lee, H. (2017). Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from crude oil market. Economic Modelling, 67, 114-124.
• Bilgili, F., Ulucak, R., Koçak, E., ve İlkay, S. Ç. (2020). Does globalization matter for environmental sustainability? Empirical investigation for Turkey by Markov regime switching models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(1), 1087-1100.
• Breusch, T. S. ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
• British Petroleum (BP). (2022). https://www.bp.com/ adresinden 23 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Brush, S. (1975). The concept of carrying capacity for systems of shifting cultivation. American Anthropologist, 77, 799-811.
• Bu, M., Lin, C. T., ve Zhang, B. (2016). Globalization and climate change: new empirical panel data evidence. J Econ Surv, 30(3), 577-595.
• Clarke, A. L. (2002). Assessing the carrying capacity of florida keys. Population and Environment, 23(4), 405-418.
• Çelik, G. ve Çam, H. (2022). Ekolojik ayak izini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir yapısal model önerisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 25(1), 201-215.
• Dreher, A, Gaston, N. ve Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalisation: Gauging its consequences. Springer Science and Business Media.
• Eberhardt, M. & Bond, S. (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: A novel estimator. MPRA Paper No. 17692, 1-26.
• Erden Özsoy, C. ve Dinç, A. (2016). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve ekolojik ayak izi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 53(619), 35-55.
• Figge, L., Oebeles, K. ve Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on ecological footprints: An emprical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 19(3), 863-876.
• Global Footprint Network. (2022). https://www.footprintnetwork.org/ adresinden 22 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Göktuğ, T. H., Demircioğlu Yıldız, N., Demir, M. ve Bulut, Y. (2015). Taşıma kapasitesi kuramının milli parklarda oluşum - gelişim ve modellenme süreci. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 195-206.
• Grossman, G. M., ve Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (No. 3914).
• Hadwen, S. ve Palmer, L. J. (1922). Reindeer in Alaska (No. 1089). US Department of Agriculture.
• Karasoy, A. (2021). Küreselleşme, sanayileşme ve şehirleşmenin Türkiye’nin ekolojik ayak izine etkisinin genişletilmiş ARDL yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(1), 208-231.
• Kassouri, Y. ve Altıntaş, H. (2020). Human well-being versus ecological footprint in MENA countries: A trade-off?. J Environ Manag, 263, 110405.
• Khan, D. ve Ullah, A. (2019). Testing the relationship between globalization and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan: does environmental Kuznets curve exist? Environ Sci Pollut, 1-15.
• Kitzes, J., Galli, A., Bagliani, M., Barrett, J., Dige, G., Ede, S., Erb, K., Giljum, S., Haberl, H., Hails, C., Jolia-Ferrier, L., Jungwirth, S., Lenzen, M., Lewis, K., Loh, J., Marchettini, N., Messinger, H., Milne, K., Moles, R., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Nakano, K., Pyhälä, A., Rees, W., Simmons, C., Wackernagel, M., Wada, Y., Walsh, C. ve Wiedmann, T. (2009). A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint accounts, Ecological Economics, 68(7), 1991-2007.
• KOF Swiss Economic Institute. (2022). https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html adresinden 20 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Ling, C. H., Ahmed, K., Binti Muhamad, R. ve Shahbaz, M. (2015). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: what do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 20131-20142.
• McCool, S.F. ve Lime, D.W., (2001). Tourism Carrying Capacity: Tempting Fantasy or Useful Reality?. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9(5), 372–88.
• McCoskey, S. ve Kao, C. (1998). A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data. Econometric Reviews, 17(1), 57-84.
• Mızık, E. T. ve Yiğit Avdan, Z. (2020). Sürdürülebilirliğin temel taşı: ekolojik ayak izi. Doğal Afetler ve Çevre Dergisi, 6(2), 451-467.
• Narayan, P. K. ve Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real gdp in G7 countries: New Evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30, 2331-2341.
• Nazlıoğlu, Ş. ve Karul, Ç. (2017). Panel LM unit root test with gradual structural shifts. International Panel Data Conference, (IPDC-2017), July 7-8, Thessaloniki-Grece.
• Özbek, S. ve Naimoğlu, M. (2022). Çevre kalitesi-ekonomik karmaşıklık ilişkisi: Türkiye ekonomisi üzerine fourier eşbütünleşme analizi. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 72(1), 407-431.
• Özcan, G. ve Özmen, İ. (2018). Küreselleşme yükselen ekonomilerde gelir dağılımını etkiler mi?. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 35-52.
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.
• Pesaran, M. H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias‐adjusted LM test of error cross‐section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105-127.
• Phong, L. H. (2019). Globalization, financial development, and environmental degradation in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from ASEAN-5 countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 40-50.
• Rudolph, A., ve Figge, L. (2017). Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization?. Ecological Indicators, 81, 348-361.
• Sabir, S. ve Gorus, M. S. (2019). The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(32), 33387-33398.
• Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., Ozturk, I. ve Sohag, K. (2018). The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2002-2010.
• Saud, S., Chen, S. ve Haseeb, A. (2020). The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119518.
• Shahbaz, M, Shahzad, SHJ. ve Mahalik, M.K. (2018). Is globalization detrimental to CO2 emissions in Japan? New threshold analysis. Environ Model Assess, 23(5), 557-568.
• Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A., ve Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(4), 929-957.
• Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M. K. ve Loganathan, N. (2015). Does globalization impede environmental quality in India?. Ecological Indicators, 52, 379-393.
• Sharif, A., Afshan, S., ve Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(11), 11191-11211.
• Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 311-323.
• WDI. (2022). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators# adresinden 20 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Westerlund, J. (2006). Testing for panel cointegration with multiple structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(1), 101-132.
• Whittaker, D., B. Shelby, R. Manning, D. Cole ve Haas, G. (2010). Capacity reconsidered: finding consensus and clarifying differences. National Association of Recreation Resource Planners, Marienville, Pennsylvania.
• WWF. (2012). Türkiye’nin ekolojik ayak izi raporu. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/content/images/article_uploads/Turkey_Ecological_Footprint_Report_Turkish.pdf adresinden 20 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Yağlıkara, A. (2022). Ekonomik, politik ve sosyal küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkileri: ASEAN-5 ülkeleri örneği. Fiscaoeconomia, 6(2), 656-676.
• Yilanci, V. ve Gorus, M. S. (2020). Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 40552-40562.
• You, W. ve Lv, Z. (2018). Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: A spatial panel approach. Energy Econ, 73, 248-257.