Transrektal prostat biyopsisinde anestezi seçimi: Rektal lidokain jel instillasyonu ve lidokainle periprostatik sinir blokajı karşılaştırması

Year 2014, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 17 - 21, 01.01.2014

Hasan Turgut Hasan Rıza Aydın Şenol Adanur Tevfik Ziypak Murat Bağcıoğlu Mansur Dağgülli

Abstract

Amaç: Prostat patolojilerinin benin ya da malin ayrımının kesin olarak yapılabilmesi için prostat biyopsisi altın standarttır. Ancak işlem sırasında duyulan ağrı ciddi bir sorun teşkil etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; iki farklı yöntemle transrektal ultrasonografi TRUS rehberliğinde, prostat biyopsisi sırasında duyulan ağrının derecesine etkili olabilecek anestezi tekniklerini karşılaştırmaktırGereç ve Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde prostat spesifik antijen PSA yüksekliği ve parmakla rektal muayenede şüpheli bulgusu olan toplam 92 hastaya prostat biyopsisi yapıldı. Hastaların duydukları ağrı vizüel analog ağrı skalası VAS şekil 1 ile değerlendirildi. İşlem, hastalara lateral dekübitis pozisyonunda 7 MHz transrektal ultrason probu eşliğinde, 18 G Tru-cut otomatik biyopsi ataçmanları kullanılarak yapıldı. Bir gruba TRUS probunun yerleştirilmesinden 5 dakika önce rektum içine 10 ml %2’ lik Lidokain HCL jel verildi. Diğer gruba yine işlem öncesi %2’lik lidokain HCL jel ve periprostatik sinir blokajı yapılmak üzere sağ ve sol lop için ayrı ayrı 5 cc lidokain enjeksiyonu yapıldı.Bulgular: Hiçbir hasta şiddetli veya dayanılmaz ağrı tarif etmedi. Gruplar VAS skorları dikkate alınarak karşılaştırıldığında sinir blokajı yapılan hastalar lehine anlamlı fark belirlendi p

Keywords

Prostat biopsisi , Rektal lidokain jel anestezisi , Periprostatik sinir blokajı

Anesthesia selection in transrectal prostate biopsy: Comparison with lidocaine periprostatic nerve blocka- de and rectal instillation of lidocaine gel

Abstract

Objectives: Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for distinction of benign or malign pathologies of the prostate with certainty. However, pain is a serious problem during the procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic techniques which may affect the degree of the pain during prostate biopsy, with two different methods guided with transrectal ultrasonography TRUS . Materials and Methods: Prostate biopsy was performed for a total of 92 patients with high prostate-specific antigen PSA and a spicious findings with rectal examination. The pain of the patients was evaluated with visual analog pain scale VAS . The process was made for the patients with lateral decubitus position with 7 MHz transrectal ultrasound probe, 18 G automatic Tru-cut biopsy attachments. In one group, 5 minutes before the TRUS probe insertion 10 mL of 2% lidocaine HCL gel was inserted into the rectum. For the other group, HCL 2% lidocaine gel before the procedure again, and for peri-prostatic nerve block 5 cc of lidocaine was injected separately for the left and right lobe. Results: None of the patients had described severe or excruciating pain. Significant differences was observed with patient streated with rectal lidocain gel for VAS pain score compared with peri-prostatic nerve blockade after rectal lidocain gel p

Keywords

Prostate biopsy , rectal lidocaine gel anesthesia , periprostatic nerve blockade

References

• Jemal A, tiwari RC, Murray t, Ghafoor A, samuels A, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54: 8–29.
• Sadeghi-Nejad H, Simmons M, Dakwar G, Dogra V. Cont- roversies in transrectal ultrasonography and Prostate Bi- opsy. Ultrasoun Quarterly 2006; 22: 169–75.
• Collins GN, Lloyd SN, H eh ir M, et al: Multiple transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies; true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993;71: 460–63.
• Clements R, A ideyan OU, G riffiths G J, et al: Side effects and patient acceptability of transrecta biopsy of then pros- tate. ClinRadiol 1993;47: 125–6.
• Eskew LA, B are RL, M cCullough DL: Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997;157: 199–202.
• Nova L, M ontors F, C onsanniP: Results o f a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ult- rasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with ele vated PSA, normal DRE and normal prostatic ultrasound. J Urol Supplement. 1997;157: 59.
• Chang S.S, A lberts G, W ells N, et al: Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: Results o f a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001;166: 2178–2180.
• Aus G, H ermansson CG, Hugosson J, et al: Transrectal ult- rasound examination of the prostate: Complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993;71: 457–9.
• Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS. Neuroana- tomy of themale rhabdo sphincter. Urology 1997; 49: 426- 434.
• Walker AE, Schelvan C, Rockall AG, et al. Does pericapsular lignocainereducepain during transrectal ultrasonography- guidedbiopsy of theprostate? Br J Urol 2002; 90: 883–886.
• Nash PA, Bruce JL. lndudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate nevre blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of theprostate. J Urol 1996; 155: 607–9.
• Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A, Teillac P, LeDuc A. Therectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsy of theprostate: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. BJU Int 1999; 83: 1007–1009.
• Stirling BA, Shockley KF, Carothers GG, Maatman TJ. Pain perception during transrektal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy, an objective analysis of lokal anesthesiause. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2002; 5: 209.
• Öbek C, Özkan B, Tunç B, et al. Comparison of 3 methods of anaesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: A prospec- tive randomized trial. J Urol 2004; 172: 502–505.
• Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol; 2000; 163: 172– 173.
• Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T et al. A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during trans- rectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol 2000; 164: 397–9.
• Saad, F, Sabbagh, R, Mc Cormack, M. And Peloquin, F: A prospective randomized trial comparing lidocaine and lub- ricating gel on pain level in patients undergo ingtrans rectal ultrasound prostate biopsy. Can J Urol 2002;9: 1592.
• Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, et al. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166: 2178–80.
• Pareek, G, Armenakas, N. A. andFracchia, J. A: Periprosta- tic nevre blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of theprostate: a randomized double blind, placebo control- led study. J Urol 2001, 166: 894.
• Leibovici, D, Zisman, A, Siegel, Y. I, Sella, A, Kleinman, J. andLindner, A: Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by pe- riprostatic lidocain einjection: a double blind placebo cont- rolled study. J Urol 2002;167: 563.
• Damiano, R, Cantiello, F, Sacco, R, Autorino, R, de Sio, M. And D’Armento, M: Randomized placebo-controlled study of periprostatic local anaesthesic for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2004;76: 163.
• Bodakçı M. N, Bozkurt Y, Atar M, Hatipoğlu N.K, Penbe- gül N, et al: 2012; 39: 238–241 Dicle Medical Journal doi: 10.5798/ diclemedj. 0921.2012.02.0134.
• Hollabaugh, R. S, Jr, Dmochowski, R. R. andSteiner, M. S: Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdo sphincter. Urology 1997;49: 426.