BibTex RIS Cite

Uluslararası Öğrenci Pazarını Bölümlendirme: Birleşik Krallık'ta Bir Araştırma

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 186 - 196, 01.12.2017

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı uluslararası öğrencilerin üniversiteye gitmelerinde etkili olan faktörleri belirlemek ve bu faktörler itibari ile uluslararası öğrencileri farklı pazar bölümlerine ayırmaktır. Bu çerçevede Birleşik Krallık'ta öğrenim gören uluslararası öğrencilere üniversiteye kayıt yaptırmalarında etkili olan motivasyon unsurları sorulmuştur. Araştırmanın evrenini Birleşik Krallık'ta bulunan uluslararası öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında 816 uluslararası öğrenciden veri toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, uluslararası öğrencilerin üniversiteye gitmelerinde; geleceğe ilişkin kariyer gelişimi hedefleri, sosyal yaşama yönelik beklentiler, üniversitelerin pazarlama faaliyetleri ve danışmanların yönlendirmesi, öğrencinin ailesinin yönlendirmesi ve öğrencinin geleceğe ilişkin kariyer belirsizliği faktörleri etkilidir. Kariyer gelişimine yönelik beklentiler ve aile yönlendirmesi üniversiteye kayıt yaptırmada en önemli motivasyon unsurlarıdır. Ayrıca, yükseköğretim kapsamında Birleşik Krallık'ı tercih eden uluslararası öğrenciler üç farklı pazar bölümüne ayrılabilir. Bu doğrultuda, daha fazla uluslararası öğrenciye ev sahipliği yapmak isteyen üniversitelere uluslararası öğrencilerden benzer özellik gösteren bir veya daha fazla grubu hedef kitle olarak belirlemeleri ve pazarlama stratejilerini bu kitleye yönelik geliştirmeleri yönünde tavsiyelerde bulunulmuştur.

References

  • Baruch, Y., Budhwar, P. S., and Khatri, N. (2007). Brain drain: Inclination to stay abroad after studies. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 99–112.
  • Beneke, J. (2010). Marketing the institution to prospective students: a review of brand (reputation) management in higher education. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 29–44.
  • Binsardi, A., and Ekwulugo, F. (2003). International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(5), 318–327.
  • BMRB. (1998). International student survey. Independent Research Company. London: BMRB for Habson.
  • Bourke, A. (2000). A model of the determinants of ınternational trade in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 20(1), 110–138.
  • British Council. (2002). Education UK. 15 Aralık 2016 tarihinde <www. britishcouncil.org/ecs/worldwide/index.htm> adresinden erişildi.
  • Chapleo, C. (2005). Do universities have successful brands? International Journal of Educational Advancement, 6(1), 54-64.
  • De Villé, P., Martou, F., and Vandenberghe, V. (1996). Cost benefit analy- sis and regulatory issues of student mobility in the EU. European Journal of Education, 31(2), 205–222.
  • Eagle, L., and Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and mar- keting perspectives. Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 15(1), 44–60.
  • Goodman, B., Jones, R., and Macias, M. S. (2007). An exploratory survey of Spanish and English nursing students’ views on studying or working abroad. Nurse Education Today, 28(3), 378–384.
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2004). Ideal jobs and ınternational student mobility in the enlarged European Union. European Management Journal, 22(6), 693–703.
  • Ivy, J. (2001). Higher education institution image: A correspondence analy- sis approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), 276–282.
  • Ivy, J. (2010). Choosing futures: Influence of ethnic origin in university choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(5), 391–403.
  • Joseph, M., and Joseph, B. (2000). Indonesian students’ perceptions of choice criteria in the selection of a tertiary institution: strategic impli- cations. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 40–44.
  • Kehm, B. M. (2005). The contribution of international student mobility to human development and global understanding. US-China Review, 2(1), 18–24.
  • Kethüda, Ö. (2015). Türkiye’deki uluslararası öğrenci hareketliliği üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksekögretim Dergisi, 5(3), 147–161
  • Marcottea, C., Desrochesb, J., and Poupart, I. (2007). Preparing interna- tionally minded business graduates: The role of international mobility programs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 655–668.
  • Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for posi- tioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466–479.
  • Maringe, F., and Carter, S. (2007). International students’ motivations for studying in UK HE: Insights into the choice and decision making of African students. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 459–475.
  • Mavondo, F. T., Tsarenko, Y., and Gabbott, M. (2004). International and local student satisfaction: Resources and capabilities perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(1), 41–60.
  • Mehtap-Smadi, S., and Hashemipour, M. (2010). In pursuit of an interna- tional education destination: Reflections from a university in a small island state. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 409–428.
  • Naidoo, V. (2006). International education: A tertiary-level industry update. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(3), 323–345.
  • OECD (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OEC indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Petruzzellis, L., and Romanazzi, S. (2010). Educational value: How stu- dents choose university: Evidence from an Italian university. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(2), 139–158.
  • Pyvis, D., and Chapman, A. (2007). Why university students choose an international education: A case study in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 235–246.
  • Sison, M. D., and Brennan, L. (2012). Students as global citizens: strategies for mobilizing studies abroad. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(2), 167–181.
  • Soo, K. T., and Elliott, C. (2010). Does price matter? Overseas students in UK higher education. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 553–565.
  • Townsend, P., and Poh, H. J. (2008). An exploratory study of ınternation- al students studying and living in a regional area. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(2), 37–41
  • UNESCO. (1999–2012). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 3 Mart 2015 tari- hinde <http://www.uis.unesco.org/DataCentre/Pages/BrowseEducation. aspx> adresinden erişildi.

Segmenting international student market: An investigation in the United Kingdom

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 186 - 196, 01.12.2017

Abstract

The aims of the paper are to determine the factors which motivate international students to enroll in a university and to divide international students market into different market segments by these factors. To this aims, international students studying in the United Kingdom were asked about the motivation factors that are effective in their decision to enroll in tertiary education. The population of this research consisted of international students in the UK. Data were collected from 816 international students. According to the results of the research, future career plans, social life environment, marketing activities of universities and counselor advice, parental guidance, and not-being ready for work life were found as the reasons for international students' enrolling in a university. In addition, the most influential factors in international students' enrolling in a university were found factors associated with the future career plans and the parental guidance. Furthermore, international students studying in the UK might be divided into three different market segments. In accordance with these results, some suggestions about targeting one or more segments and developing marketing strategy for the targets were made for the universities that intend to host more international students.

References

  • Baruch, Y., Budhwar, P. S., and Khatri, N. (2007). Brain drain: Inclination to stay abroad after studies. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 99–112.
  • Beneke, J. (2010). Marketing the institution to prospective students: a review of brand (reputation) management in higher education. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 29–44.
  • Binsardi, A., and Ekwulugo, F. (2003). International marketing of British education: Research on the students’ perception and the UK market penetration. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(5), 318–327.
  • BMRB. (1998). International student survey. Independent Research Company. London: BMRB for Habson.
  • Bourke, A. (2000). A model of the determinants of ınternational trade in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 20(1), 110–138.
  • British Council. (2002). Education UK. 15 Aralık 2016 tarihinde <www. britishcouncil.org/ecs/worldwide/index.htm> adresinden erişildi.
  • Chapleo, C. (2005). Do universities have successful brands? International Journal of Educational Advancement, 6(1), 54-64.
  • De Villé, P., Martou, F., and Vandenberghe, V. (1996). Cost benefit analy- sis and regulatory issues of student mobility in the EU. European Journal of Education, 31(2), 205–222.
  • Eagle, L., and Brennan, R. (2007). Are students customers? TQM and mar- keting perspectives. Quality Assurance in Higher Education, 15(1), 44–60.
  • Goodman, B., Jones, R., and Macias, M. S. (2007). An exploratory survey of Spanish and English nursing students’ views on studying or working abroad. Nurse Education Today, 28(3), 378–384.
  • Harzing, A.-W. (2004). Ideal jobs and ınternational student mobility in the enlarged European Union. European Management Journal, 22(6), 693–703.
  • Ivy, J. (2001). Higher education institution image: A correspondence analy- sis approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(6), 276–282.
  • Ivy, J. (2010). Choosing futures: Influence of ethnic origin in university choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(5), 391–403.
  • Joseph, M., and Joseph, B. (2000). Indonesian students’ perceptions of choice criteria in the selection of a tertiary institution: strategic impli- cations. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 40–44.
  • Kehm, B. M. (2005). The contribution of international student mobility to human development and global understanding. US-China Review, 2(1), 18–24.
  • Kethüda, Ö. (2015). Türkiye’deki uluslararası öğrenci hareketliliği üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksekögretim Dergisi, 5(3), 147–161
  • Marcottea, C., Desrochesb, J., and Poupart, I. (2007). Preparing interna- tionally minded business graduates: The role of international mobility programs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 655–668.
  • Maringe, F. (2006). University and course choice: Implications for posi- tioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 466–479.
  • Maringe, F., and Carter, S. (2007). International students’ motivations for studying in UK HE: Insights into the choice and decision making of African students. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 459–475.
  • Mavondo, F. T., Tsarenko, Y., and Gabbott, M. (2004). International and local student satisfaction: Resources and capabilities perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(1), 41–60.
  • Mehtap-Smadi, S., and Hashemipour, M. (2010). In pursuit of an interna- tional education destination: Reflections from a university in a small island state. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15(5), 409–428.
  • Naidoo, V. (2006). International education: A tertiary-level industry update. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(3), 323–345.
  • OECD (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OEC indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Petruzzellis, L., and Romanazzi, S. (2010). Educational value: How stu- dents choose university: Evidence from an Italian university. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(2), 139–158.
  • Pyvis, D., and Chapman, A. (2007). Why university students choose an international education: A case study in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 235–246.
  • Sison, M. D., and Brennan, L. (2012). Students as global citizens: strategies for mobilizing studies abroad. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 22(2), 167–181.
  • Soo, K. T., and Elliott, C. (2010). Does price matter? Overseas students in UK higher education. Economics of Education Review, 29(4), 553–565.
  • Townsend, P., and Poh, H. J. (2008). An exploratory study of ınternation- al students studying and living in a regional area. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(2), 37–41
  • UNESCO. (1999–2012). UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 3 Mart 2015 tari- hinde <http://www.uis.unesco.org/DataCentre/Pages/BrowseEducation. aspx> adresinden erişildi.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA29JP57HC
Journal Section Original Empirical Research
Authors

Önder Kethüda This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Kethüda, Ö. (2017). Uluslararası Öğrenci Pazarını Bölümlendirme: Birleşik Krallık’ta Bir Araştırma. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 7(3), 186-196.

TÜBA Higher Education Research / Review (TÜBA-HER) is indexed in ESCI, TR Dizin, EBSCO, and Google Scholar.

Publisher
34633
112 Vedat Dalokay Street, Çankaya , 06700 Ankara, Türkiye

3415434156  34153 34146 34148 34155 34157 3415834160

TÜBA-HER Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Higher Education Research/Review (TÜBA-HER) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication— including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights—are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permission regarding commercial use, please contact the publisher.