Effects of Foliar Amino Acid Applications on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L.) Cultivars

Year 2023, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 290 - 298, 30.04.2023

Arif Şanlı , Fatma Zehra Ok , Sabri Erbaş

https://doi.org/10.53433/yyufbed.1188512

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study was carried out in 2018-2019 to determine the effects of foliar amino acid applications made at different times on root yield and some quality characteristics of sugar beet cultivars. In the study, Danicia, Terranova, Indira, Orthega, Smart Djerba and Ernestina varieties were used as materials. In the study, plant origin amino acid (26% amino acid) was applied to sugar beet leaves in 3 different periods (30, 45 and 60 days after emergence). The reactions of sugar beet cultivars to amino acid applications differed significantly according to the application periods. Depending on the application period, the root yields of the cultivars varied between 6680-9745 kg/da, polar sugar ratios between 14.5-18.6%, brix values between 16.2-23.0%, α-amino nitrogen contents between 2.33-4.80 mg/100g, and raw sugar yields between 970-1808 kg/da. With the amino acid applications, an increase of approximately 7.1-10.6% and 6.5-12.4% occurred in the root and raw sugar yields of the cultivars, respectively. In the study, it was concluded that plant-based amino acids can be used in sugar beet agriculture, especially to increase tolerance to herbicides and heat stresses, and the production of root and sugar per unit area can be increased with amino acid applications, however, application periods should be chosen considering both the cultivar characteristics and the ecological conditions of the region.

Keywords

Amino acid, Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L, Polar sugar, Root yield, Sugar beet

Yapraktan Amino Asit Uygulamalarının Bazı Şeker Pancarı (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L.) Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalitesine Etkileri

Abstract

Bu çalışma, farklı zamanlardan yapılan amino asit uygulamalarının şeker pancarı çeşitlerinde kök gövde verimi ile bazı kalite özelliklerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla 2018-2019 yıllarında yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada Danicia, Terranowa, İndira, Ortega, Smart Djerba ve Ernestina çeşitleri materyal olarak kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada bitkisel kökenli amino asit (%26 amino asit) şeker pancarı yapraklarına 200 ml/da dozunda 3 farklı dönemde (çıkışlarda 30, 45 ve 60 gün sonra) uygulanmıştır. Şeker pancarı çeşitlerinin amino asit uygulamalarına tepkileri uygulama dönemlerine göre önemli farklılık göstermiştir. Çeşitlerin kök gövde verimleri uygulama dönemlerine bağlı olarak 6680-9745 kg/da, polar şeker oranları %14.5-18.6, briks değerleri %16.2-23.0, α-amino azot içerikleri 2.33-4.80 mg/100g, ham şeker verimleri ise 970-1808 kg/da arasında değişim göstermiştir. Amino asit uygulamaları ile çeşitlerin kök gövde ve ham şeker verimlerinde sırası ile yaklaşık %7.1-10.6 ve %6.5-12.4 arasında artış meydana gelmiştir. Çalışmada bitkisel kökenli amino asitlerin şeker pancarı tarımında özellikle herbisit ve sıcaklık streslerine karşı toleransın arttırılmasına kullanılabileceği ve amino asit uygulamaları ile birim alan kök gövde ve şeker üretiminin arttırılabileceği, bununla birlikte uygulama dönemlerinin gerek çeşit özelliği gerekse bölgenin ekolojik koşulları dikkate alınarak seçilmesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Keywords

Amino asit, Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera L, Kök gövde verimi, Polar şeker, Şeker pancarı

References

• Anonim. (2021). Türkiye şeker fabrikaları ekin ve üretim verileri. https://www.turkseker.gov.tr/data/dokumanlar/2021_Sektor_Raporu.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 12.09.2022.
• Abd El-Lateef, E. M., Abd El-Salam, M. S. Mekki, B. B. Yousef, R. M., & Hussein, H. -A. A. (2020). Response of sugar beet varieties to foliar treatments with bio stimulant growth substances under sandy soil conditions. Global Journal of Environmental Research 14(2), 29-36.
• Artyszak, A., & Gozdowski, D. (2021). Influence of various forms of foliar application on root yield and technological quality of sugar beet. Agriculture. 11(8), 693. doi:10.3390/agriculture11080693
• Bray, M., Driscoll, J., & Huggins, J. W. (2000). Treatment of lethal Ebola virus infection in mice with a single dose of an S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitor. Antiviral Research, 45(2), 135-147. doi:10.1016/S0166-3542(00)00066-8
• Bulgari, R., Cocetta, G., Trivellini, A., Vernieri, P., & Ferrante, A. (2015). Biostimulants and crop responses: A review. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 31(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/01448765.2014.964649
• Bulgari, R., Franzoni, G., & Ferrante, A. (2019). Biostimulants application in horticultural crops under abiotic stress conditions. Agronomy, 9(6), 306. doi:10.3390/agronomy9060306
• Castro, P. R. C., & Vieira, E. L. (2001). Aplicações de Reguladores Vegetais na Agricultura Tropical. Guaíba, Brasil: Livraria e Editora Agropecuária.
• Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Canaguier, R., Svecova, E., & Cardarelli, M. (2014). Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 1-6. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00448
• Denli, Z., & Arabacı, G. (2014). Kiwano (Cucumis metuliferus) bitkisindeki peroksidaz enzimleri üzerine amino asit etkisinin incelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2), 105-109. doi:10.16984/saufbed.61967
• Drobek, M., Frac, M., & Cybulska, J. (2019). Plant biostimulants: importance of the quality and yield of horticultural crops and the improvement of plant tolerance to abiotic stress- A review. Agronomy, 9(6), 335. doi:10.3390/agronomy9060335
• Du Jardin, P. (2015). Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
• El-Gamal, I. S., Abd El-Aal, M. M. M., El-Desouky, S. A., Khedr, Z. M., & Abo Shady, K. A. (2016). Effect of some growth substances on growth, chemical compositions and root yield productivity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plant. Middle East Journal of Agriculture, 5(2), 171-185. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.25978.85444
• El-Samad, H. A., Shaddad, M. A. K., & Barakat, N. (2011). Improvement of plants salt tolerance by exogenous application of amino acids. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5(24), 5692-5699.
• Forde, B. G., & Lea, P. J. (2007). Glutamate in plants: Metabolism, regulation, and signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(9), 2339-2358. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm121
• ICUMSA. (2007). ICUMSA Methods Book (Methods GS6-5). Determination of α-Amino Nitrogen in Sugar Beet by the Copper Method (Blue Number). Berlin, Germany: Bartens.
• Kavas, M. F., & Leblebici, M. J. (2004). Kalite ve İşletme Kontrol Laboratuvarları El Kitabı. Ankara, Türkiye: Türkiye Şeker Fabrikaları A.Ş. Genel Müdürlüğü Yayın No: 224.
• Noshad, H., Mohammadian, R., Khayamim, S., & Hamdi, F. (2015). Effect of amino acid containing organic fertilizers on nitrogen use efficiency and qualitative and quantitative properties of sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet, 30(2), 95-102. doi:10.22092/JSB.2015.11551
• Ober, E. S., & Rajabi, A. (2011). Abiotic Stress in Sugar Beet. Sugar Technology, 12, 294–298. doi:10.1007/s12355-010-0035-3
• Ok, F. Z., Şanlı, A., Cirit, Y. & Tosun, B. (2022). Uçucu yağ uygulamalarının depolama devresinde şeker pancarı (beta vulgaris l.) kalitesine etkileri. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 10(11), 2087-2095. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v10i11.2087-2095.4939
• Rasovsky, M., Paˇcuta, V., Ducsay, L., & Lenická, D. (2022). Quantity and quality changes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris Provar. Altissima Doel) induced by different sources of biostimulants. Plants, 11(17), 2222. doi:10.3390/plants11172222
• Roeb, J., Peteinatos, G. G., & Gerhards, R. (2015). Using sensors to assess herbicide stress in sugar beet. In J. V. Stafford (Ed.), Precision agriculture '15 (pp. 561-570). Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-814-8_70
• Sadeghian, S. Y., Mohammadian, R., Taleghani, D. F., & Noghabi, M. A. (2004). Relation between sugarbeet traits and water use efficiency in water stressed genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(7), 1236-2141. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2004.1236.1241
• Shan, H., Zhang, H., Cui, A., Wang, Y. and Zhang, J. (2018). Effect of exogenous growth regulator on seed germination of maize under salt stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Beijing), 20(8), 82-90.
• Sharma, S. S., & Dietz, K. J. (2006). The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(4), 711-726. doi:10.1093/jxb/erj073
• Sonnewald, U. (2001). Control of potato tuber sprouting. Trends in Plant Science, 6(8), 333-335. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02020-9
• Şanlı, A., Karadoğan, T., Tosun, B. (2015). The effects of sugar beet molasses applications on root yield and sugar content of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 24(2), 103-108. doi:10.21566/tbmaed.00450
• Vranova, V., Rejsek, K., Skene, K. R., & Formanek, P. (2011). Non-protein amino acids: Plant, soil and ecosystem interactions. Plant and Soil, 342, 31-48. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0673-y
• Wilson, R. G., Yonts, C. D., & Smith, J. A. (2002). Influence of glyphosate and glufosinate on weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) yield in herbicide-tolerant sugarbeet. Weed Technology, 16(1), 66-73. doi:10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0066:IOGAGO]2.0.CO;2