BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 39 - 87, 11.05.2015

Göktürk Tüysüzoğlu

Öz

Societal factors that legitimize the nationalist volition of Baloch people are evaluated in this study. Main reason for making this evaluation is the close relation between the rising nationalist volition among the Baloch people and the strategies of the global/regional actors. The approach of securitization that the Copenhagen School has provided is used in analyzing the Baloch nationalism. Assessing the societal factors, which are influential in consolidating the Baloch identity by using the approach of securitization, constitutes an important difference. This is because the nationalist attempts are generally interpreted via interstate relations and by implying on the theoretical frame of realism. The study has attained that the Baloch national identity possesses a societal justification that threatens the territorial integrity of Pakistan and Iran and also influences the regional balances

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • AKBAR, Malik Siraj, The Redefined Dimensions of Baloch Nationalist Movement, Washington, Xlibris Corporation, 2011.
  • BUTT, Iqbal Haider, Revisiting Student Politics in Pakistan, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Bargad, 2009.
  • BUZAN, Barry, Security: A New Framework For Analysis, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, London, 1998.
  • ELLING, Rasmus Christian, Minorities in Iran: Nationalism and Ethnicity After Khomeini, Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, London, 2013.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, Routledge Publishing, New York, 2006.
  • SCHIFFMAN, Harold, Language Policy and Language Conflict in Afghanistan and Its Neighbors: The Changing Politics of Language Choice, Brill Publishing, Leiden, 2011.
  • Makaleler “Balochis of Pakistan: On the Margins of History”, The Foreign Policy Centre, London, November 2006.
  • “Balochistan: Civil-Military Relations”, PILDAT Issue Paper, March 2012.
  • “Pakistan: The Militant Jihadi Challenge”, International Crisis Group Asia Report, 2009, No. 164.
  • “Pakistan: The Worsening Conflict in Balochistan”, International Crisis Group Asia Report, 2006, No. 119.
  • “Reqo Diq: Great Future Prospects”, Yaqeen, 2010, Vol: 1, No. 2. “The Baluch and the Brahui and Their Rebellions”, Tribal Analysis Center, September 2009.
  • Center, September 2009.
  • AÇIKMEŞE, Sinem Akgül, “Algı mı, Söylem mi? Kopenhag Okulu ve Yeni Klasik Gerçekçilikte Güvenlik Tehditleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, Vol: 8, No. 30.
  • AKHTAR, Aasim Sajjad, “Balochistan versus Pakistan”, Economic&Political Weekly, 2007, Vol: 42, No. 45-46.
  • ALI, Imtiaz, “The Balochistan Problem”, Pakistan Horizon, 2005, Vol: 58, No. 2.
  • ANWAR, Zahid, “Gwadar Deep Sea Port’s Emergence As Regional Trade and Transportation Hub: Prospects and Problems”, Journal of Political Studies, 2010, Vol: 1, No. 2.
  • ASLAM, Rabia, “Greed, Creed and Governance in Civil Conflicts: A Case Study of Balochistan”, Contemporary South Asia, 2011, Vol: 19, No. 2.
  • BANSAL, Alok, “Factors Leading to Insurgency in Balochistan”, Small Wars&Insurgencies, 2008, Vol:19, No. 2.
  • BHATNAGAR, Aryaman and JOHN, Divya, “Accessing Afghanistan and Central Asia: Importance of Chabahar to India”, Observer Research Foundation Special Report, October 2013, No. 4.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, “Making Turkey’s Transformation Possible: Claiming Security Speak, Not Securitization!”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2007, Vol: 7, No. 4
  • BOOTH, Ken, “Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist” Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams (ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, 1998.
  • BUZAN, Barry, “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century”, International Relations, 1991, Vol: 67, No. 3.,
  • ÇEVİK, Salim, “Pakistan Siyasetini Anlama Kılavuzu”, SETA Rapor, Mayıs 2013.
  • DELVOIE, Louis A., “Pakistan and China: An All-Weather Friendship”, The Kingston Whig-Standard, January 2014.
  • DRESSLER, Jeffrey and FORSBERG, Carl, “The Quetta Shura Taliban in Southern Afghanistan: Organization, Operations and Shadow Governance”, Institute For the Study of War Backgrounder, December 2009.
  • EL HAQ, Noor et al., “Balochistan: Facts and Fiction”, IPRI Factfile, 2012.
  • FANI, Muhammed Ishaque, “The Resurgence of Baluch Ethnicity and Nationalism in Baluchistan”, European Journal of Social Sciences, 2011, Vol: 20, No. 4.
  • FLOYD, Rita, “Human Security and the Copenhagen School’s Securitization Approach: Conceptualizing Human Security As a Securitizing Move”, Human Security Journal, 2007, No. 5.
  • GRARE, Frédéric, “Pakistan: The Resurgence of Baluch Nationalism”, Carnegie Papers, 2006, No. 65.
  • HAIDER, Zaglul, “A Revisit to the Indian Role in the Bangladesh Liberation War”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 2009, Vol: 44, No. 5.
  • HAIDER, Ziad, “Baluchis, Beijing and Pakistan’s Gwadar Port”, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Winter/Spring 2005. HAN, Mahrukh, “Balochistan: The Forgotten Frontier”, Strategic Studies, 2012, Vol: 32-33, No. 4/1.
  • HANSEN, Lene, “Theorizing the Image For Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis”, European Journal of International Relations, 2011, Vol: 20, No. 10.
  • IBRAHIMI, Niamatullah, “Shift and Drift in Hazara Ethnic Consciousness: The Impact of Conflict and Migration”, Crossroads Asia Working Paper, 2012, No. 5.
  • IQBAL, Khuram, “Counter Insurgency in Balochistan: Pakistan’s Strategy, Outcome and Future Implications”, PAK Institute for Peace Studies, 2008.
  • JABEEN, Mussarat, “Language Controversy: Impacts on National Politics and Secession of East Pakistan”, South Asian Studies, 2010, Vol: 25, No. 1.
  • JAEGER, David A. and SIDDIQUE, Zahra, “Are Drone Strikes Effective in Afghanistan and Pakistan? On the Dynamics of Violence Between the United States and the Taliban”, IZA Discussion Paper Series, December 2011, No. 6262.
  • JAHANI, Carina, “State Control and Its Impact on Language in Balochistan”, The Role of the State in West Asia, Annika Rabo and Bo Utas (ed.), Swedish Research Institute, Stockholm, 2004.
  • KABRAJI, Rosheen, “The China-Pakistan Alliance: Rhetoric and Limitations”, Chatham House Asia Programme Paper, 2012, No. 1.

Toplumsal Kimliğe Dayalı Güvenlikleştirmelerin Siyasal Sorunlar Bağlamında İrdelenmesi: Belucistan Örneği

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 39 - 87, 11.05.2015

Göktürk Tüysüzoğlu

Öz

Bu çalışmada Belucilerin ulusçu istemlerini meşrulaştıran toplumsal faktörler değerlendirilmiştir. Bu değerlendirmenin yapılmak istenmesinin esas nedeni, Pakistan ve İran topraklarında bölünmüş halde yaşayan bu halkın yükselen ulusçu istemleriyle küresel/bölgesel aktörlerin stratejileri arasında yakın bir ilişkinin olmasıdır. Beluci ulusçuluğunun değerlendirilmesi hususunda ise Kopenhag Okulu’nun öngördüğü güvenlikleştirme yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Ulusçuluk girişimleri genel itibarıyla devletler arası ilişkiler üzerinden ve realist kuram bağlamında anlamlandırıldığı için, Beluci kimliğinin konsolide olmasında etkili toplumsal faktörlerin sosyal inşacılık üzerine temellendirilmiş bir yaklaşım olan güvenlikleştirme çerçevesinde ele alınması önemli bir farklılık oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın vardığı sonuç ise, Beluci ulusal kimliğinin Pakistan ve İran’ın toprak bütünlüğünü tehdit edebilecek ve bölgesel dengelere etki edebilecek şekilde kullanılabilecek bir toplumsal meşruiyete sahip olduğudur.

Anahtar Sözcükler:

Pakistan, Beluci, Gwadar, Ole Waever, Güvenlikleştirme.

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • AKBAR, Malik Siraj, The Redefined Dimensions of Baloch Nationalist Movement, Washington, Xlibris Corporation, 2011.
  • BUTT, Iqbal Haider, Revisiting Student Politics in Pakistan, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Bargad, 2009.
  • BUZAN, Barry, Security: A New Framework For Analysis, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, London, 1998.
  • ELLING, Rasmus Christian, Minorities in Iran: Nationalism and Ethnicity After Khomeini, Palgrave Macmillan Publishing, London, 2013.
  • HUYSMANS, Jef, The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, Routledge Publishing, New York, 2006.
  • SCHIFFMAN, Harold, Language Policy and Language Conflict in Afghanistan and Its Neighbors: The Changing Politics of Language Choice, Brill Publishing, Leiden, 2011.
  • Makaleler “Balochis of Pakistan: On the Margins of History”, The Foreign Policy Centre, London, November 2006.
  • “Balochistan: Civil-Military Relations”, PILDAT Issue Paper, March 2012.
  • “Pakistan: The Militant Jihadi Challenge”, International Crisis Group Asia Report, 2009, No. 164.
  • “Pakistan: The Worsening Conflict in Balochistan”, International Crisis Group Asia Report, 2006, No. 119.
  • “Reqo Diq: Great Future Prospects”, Yaqeen, 2010, Vol: 1, No. 2. “The Baluch and the Brahui and Their Rebellions”, Tribal Analysis Center, September 2009.
  • Center, September 2009.
  • AÇIKMEŞE, Sinem Akgül, “Algı mı, Söylem mi? Kopenhag Okulu ve Yeni Klasik Gerçekçilikte Güvenlik Tehditleri”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2008, Vol: 8, No. 30.
  • AKHTAR, Aasim Sajjad, “Balochistan versus Pakistan”, Economic&Political Weekly, 2007, Vol: 42, No. 45-46.
  • ALI, Imtiaz, “The Balochistan Problem”, Pakistan Horizon, 2005, Vol: 58, No. 2.
  • ANWAR, Zahid, “Gwadar Deep Sea Port’s Emergence As Regional Trade and Transportation Hub: Prospects and Problems”, Journal of Political Studies, 2010, Vol: 1, No. 2.
  • ASLAM, Rabia, “Greed, Creed and Governance in Civil Conflicts: A Case Study of Balochistan”, Contemporary South Asia, 2011, Vol: 19, No. 2.
  • BANSAL, Alok, “Factors Leading to Insurgency in Balochistan”, Small Wars&Insurgencies, 2008, Vol:19, No. 2.
  • BHATNAGAR, Aryaman and JOHN, Divya, “Accessing Afghanistan and Central Asia: Importance of Chabahar to India”, Observer Research Foundation Special Report, October 2013, No. 4.
  • BİLGİN, Pınar, “Making Turkey’s Transformation Possible: Claiming Security Speak, Not Securitization!”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2007, Vol: 7, No. 4
  • BOOTH, Ken, “Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist” Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Keith Krause and Michael C. Williams (ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota, 1998.
  • BUZAN, Barry, “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century”, International Relations, 1991, Vol: 67, No. 3.,
  • ÇEVİK, Salim, “Pakistan Siyasetini Anlama Kılavuzu”, SETA Rapor, Mayıs 2013.
  • DELVOIE, Louis A., “Pakistan and China: An All-Weather Friendship”, The Kingston Whig-Standard, January 2014.
  • DRESSLER, Jeffrey and FORSBERG, Carl, “The Quetta Shura Taliban in Southern Afghanistan: Organization, Operations and Shadow Governance”, Institute For the Study of War Backgrounder, December 2009.
  • EL HAQ, Noor et al., “Balochistan: Facts and Fiction”, IPRI Factfile, 2012.
  • FANI, Muhammed Ishaque, “The Resurgence of Baluch Ethnicity and Nationalism in Baluchistan”, European Journal of Social Sciences, 2011, Vol: 20, No. 4.
  • FLOYD, Rita, “Human Security and the Copenhagen School’s Securitization Approach: Conceptualizing Human Security As a Securitizing Move”, Human Security Journal, 2007, No. 5.
  • GRARE, Frédéric, “Pakistan: The Resurgence of Baluch Nationalism”, Carnegie Papers, 2006, No. 65.
  • HAIDER, Zaglul, “A Revisit to the Indian Role in the Bangladesh Liberation War”, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 2009, Vol: 44, No. 5.
  • HAIDER, Ziad, “Baluchis, Beijing and Pakistan’s Gwadar Port”, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Winter/Spring 2005. HAN, Mahrukh, “Balochistan: The Forgotten Frontier”, Strategic Studies, 2012, Vol: 32-33, No. 4/1.
  • HANSEN, Lene, “Theorizing the Image For Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis”, European Journal of International Relations, 2011, Vol: 20, No. 10.
  • IBRAHIMI, Niamatullah, “Shift and Drift in Hazara Ethnic Consciousness: The Impact of Conflict and Migration”, Crossroads Asia Working Paper, 2012, No. 5.
  • IQBAL, Khuram, “Counter Insurgency in Balochistan: Pakistan’s Strategy, Outcome and Future Implications”, PAK Institute for Peace Studies, 2008.
  • JABEEN, Mussarat, “Language Controversy: Impacts on National Politics and Secession of East Pakistan”, South Asian Studies, 2010, Vol: 25, No. 1.
  • JAEGER, David A. and SIDDIQUE, Zahra, “Are Drone Strikes Effective in Afghanistan and Pakistan? On the Dynamics of Violence Between the United States and the Taliban”, IZA Discussion Paper Series, December 2011, No. 6262.
  • JAHANI, Carina, “State Control and Its Impact on Language in Balochistan”, The Role of the State in West Asia, Annika Rabo and Bo Utas (ed.), Swedish Research Institute, Stockholm, 2004.
  • KABRAJI, Rosheen, “The China-Pakistan Alliance: Rhetoric and Limitations”, Chatham House Asia Programme Paper, 2012, No. 1.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Göktürk Tüysüzoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 11 Mayıs 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Mayıs 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21

Kaynak Göster

Chicago Tüysüzoğlu, Göktürk. “Toplumsal Kimliğe Dayalı Güvenlikleştirmelerin Siyasal Sorunlar Bağlamında İrdelenmesi: Belucistan Örneği”. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi 11, sy. 21 (Mayıs 2015): 39-87.
 Kapak Resmi İndir