Feminist Bakış Açısı Kuramına Bir Model Olarak Gadamer Hermenötiği

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 34, 31 - 44, 30.12.2018

İsmail Demirezen

https://doi.org/10.14395/hititilahiyat.504973

Cited By: 1

Öz

Feminist bakış açısı kuramı için bir rehber olarak
Gadamer hermenötiğini yeniden yapılandıran bu çalışma beş bölümden oluşmaktadır.
İlk olarak, birkaç feminist bakış açısı kuramı ve bilginin hem konumsal hem de
hakikat olması konusunu ele almadaki başarısızlıkları incelenecektir. İkinci
olarak, Gadamer’in önerisi olarak hakikata ulaşmadaki tarihselliğin etkisi
incelenecektir. Üçüncü olarak, hakikate ulaşmada bir yol olarak Gadamer’in
kavramı ‘ufukların kaynaşması’ tartışılacaktır. Dördüncü olarak, Wasterling’in
Gadamer’e getirdiği eleştirilere ve Gadamer’in maskulen epistemolojinin yerine
feminist epistemolojiyi ikame ettiği iddialarına açıklık getirilecektir. Son
olarak, Gadamer’in önerdiği hermenötiğin feminist bakış açısı kuramı için uygun
olup olmadığı, uygun ise nasıl uygun olduğu değerlendirilecektir.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hans-George Gadamer, Sosyoloji, Feminist Bakış Açısı Kuramı, Feminizm, Bilgi.

Gadamer’s Hermeneutics as a Model For the Feminist Standpoint Theory

Öz

This
work which reconstructs Gadamer’s hermeneutics for guiding feminist standpoint
theory consists of five chapters. Firstly, several possible feminist standpoint
theories and their difficulties in addressing how knowledge is situated yet
true are clarified. Secondly, it will be examined that Gadamer’s proposal for
the relevance of the historicity on the reaching to truth. Thirdly, we will
discuss Gadamer’s notion of fusion of horizons as a way to reach to truth.
Fourthly, we will elaborate Wasterling’s critique against Gadamer and some
arguments that Gadamer’s hermeneutics substitutes feminist epistemology for
masculine epistemology.  Finally, this
paper will evaluate Gadamer’s proposal for hermeneutics is appropriate for
feminist standpoint theory, if so, how it is appropriate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sociology, Feminist Standpoint Theory, Hans-George Gadamer, Feminism, Knowledge.

Kaynakça

• Alcoff, Linda Martin. “Gadamer’s Feminist Epistemology”. Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lorraine Code. 231-259. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003. Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge, 2000.
• Detmer David. “Gadamer’s Critique of the Enlightenment”. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. 275-287. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.
• Gadamer, Hans-George. Truth and Method. Trans. Joel Weins Heimer and Donald G. Marshall. Newyork: Continuum, 1998.
• Hartsock, Nancy C.M. “Theoretical Bases for Coalition Building: An Assessment of Postmodernism”. Feminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice. Ed. Heidi Gottfried. 256-275. Illinoi: University of Illinois Press, 1996.
• Hartsock, Nancy C.M. “The Feminist Standpoint Revisited”. The Socialist Feminist Project: A Contemporary Reader in Theory and Politics. Ed. Nancy Holmstrom. 350-360. Michigan: Monthly Review Press, 2002.
• Hartsock, Nancy C.M. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism”. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Ed. Sandra G. Harding. 35-55. London: Routledge, 2004.
• Hartsock, Nancy C.M. “The Feminist Standpoint: Toward a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism”. Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives. Ed. Carole R. McCann, Seung-Kyung Kim. 368-384. London: Routledge, 2017.
• Hekman, Susan J. Gender and Knowledge Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990.
• Hekman, Susan J. “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited”, Signs 22/2 (1997): 341-365.
• Hekman, Susan J. “The Ontology and Change: Gadamer and Feminism”. Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. 181-203. Ed. Lorraine Code. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
• Hoffmann, Susan-Judith. “Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics and Feminist Projects”. Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lorraine Code. 81-109.
• Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
• Kimmerle, Heinz. “Hermeneutical Theory or Ontological Hermeneutics”. Journal for Theology and the Church 4 (1967): 107-121.
• Linge, David E. “Dilthey and Gadamer: Two Theories of Historical Understanding”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 41 (DEC. 1973): 536-553.
• Ramberg, Bjorn T. “The Source of the Subjective”. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. 459-472. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.
• Rosen, Stanley. “Horizontvershmelzung”. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.
• Sismondo, Sergio. “The Scientific Domains of Feminist Standpoints”. Perspective on Science 3/1(1995.): 49-65.
• Smith, Dorothy. The Everyday World As Problematic. Georgia: Northeastern University Press, 1987.
• Smith, Dorothy. “Comment on Hekman’s Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited.” Signs 22/2 (1997): 392-398.
• Vasterling, Veronica. “Postmodern Hermeneutics? Toward a Critical Hermeneutics”. Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ed. Lorraine Code. 149-181. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.