Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1, 169 - 188, 27.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.350375

Öz

Sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik,
sosyal hizmet terminolojisinde iki yeni kavram olarak anılmaya başlamıştır. Mesleğin
kuramsal yaklaşım ve uygulamalarından yararlanmak isteyen kişilerle yeni
bilgileri paylaşmak için geleneksel yöntemlerin dışına çıkılması gerekir. Sosyal
çalışmacıların incinebilir gruplarla çalışırken geçirdiği dönüşümü ve süreci
sosyal inovasyon, kullandığı yeni yöntem ve teknikleri ise sosyal girişimcilik
başlığı altında değerlendirmeliyiz. Bu makalenin amacı, sosyal inovasyonun ve
sosyal girişimciliğin genelde sosyal refah hizmetlerinde özelde sosyal hizmet
mesleğinin uygulamalarında oynayacağı rolü tartışmaya açmaktır. Sosyal
inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik sosyal sorunları ölçeklendirmede farklı bakış
açıları sunabilir. Dolayısıyla sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik; sosyal çalışmacıların
toplumsal sorunlara yönelik geliştirdiği bir dizi yeni strateji olarak teşvik
edilmelidir.

Kaynakça

  • Akbaş, E., T. Tuncay (2005), “Ortak Sorumluluk Zamanı”, Radikal İki, 27/11/2005.
  • Atkins, P., M. Frederico (2017), “Supporting Implementation of Innovative Social Work Practice: What Factors Really Matter?. British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1723-1744.
  • Austin, J., H. Stevenson, J. Wei‐Skillern (2006), “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
  • Bahar, O.S. (2017), “A Promising Partnership: Uncovering the Middle Ground Between Social Innovation and Social Work Response to Dr. Marilyn l. Flynn’s Remarks”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 131-133.
  • Baker, S., A. Mehmood (2015), “Social Innovation and the Governance of Sustainable Places”, Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334.
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), “Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
  • Choi, N., S. Majumdar (2014), “Social Entrepreneurship As An Essentially Contested Concept: Opening A New Avenue For Systematic Future Research”, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376.
  • Defourny, J., M. Nyssens (2010), “Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
  • Duyan, V. (2010), Sosyal Hizmet: Temelleri, Yaklaşımları, Müdahale Yöntemleri, (Birinci basım), Ankara: Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayınları.
  • Ersen, T.B., A. Ekmekçi (2013), "Sosyal Girişimcilik ve Türkiye", Stanford Social İnnovation Review Dergisi, 10.yıl Özel Sayısı, 6-8.
  • https://www.anadoluvakfi.org.tr/upload/publications/pdfs/567eb73599f045.70852149 pdf, E.T.: 21.09.2018.
  • Flynn, M.L. (2017), “Science, Innovation, and Social Work: Clash or Convergence?”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 123-128.
  • Germak, A. (2017), If Steve Jobs Had Been A Social Worker. http://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/if-steve-jobs-had-been-a-social-worker/, E.T.: 01.02.2017.
  • Halvorsen, C. J. (2016), “Bridging Social Innovation and Social Work Balancing Science, Values, and Speed”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 129-130.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizastions Across Nations, (2nd ed.), London: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011), “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context”. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), article 8.
  • Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight”, Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
  • Makarov, V., Y. Shimanovskaya, T. Tyapkina, M. Firsov, V. Sizikova, T. Rostovskaya, S. Kozlovskaya (2017), “Innovative Models of Social Activity and Their Adaptation to Social Work”, Espacios, 38(43), 30-41.
  • Manzini, E. (2014), “Making Things Happen: Social İnnovation and Design”, Design Issues, 30(1), 57-66.
  • Martin, C.J., P. Upham (2016), “Grassroots Social Innovation and the Mobilisation of Values in Collaborative Consumption: A Conceptual Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 204-213.
  • Minkov, M., G. Hofstede (2011), “The Evolution of Hofstede's Doctrine”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 10-20.
  • Mulgan, G. (2006), “The Process of Social Innovation”, Innovations, 1(2), 145-162.
  • Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, B. Sanders (2007), Social Innovation: What it is, why it Matters and how it can be Accelerated, (Birinci basım), London: Basingstoke Press.
  • Nandan, M., M. London, T. Bent-Goodley (2015), “Social Workers As Social Change Agents: Social Innovation, Social Intrapreneurship, and Social Entrepreneurship”, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 38-56.
  • Nandan, M., M. London, T. C. Blum (2014), “Community Practice Social Entrepreneurship: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Graduate Education”, International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(1), 51-70.
  • Okpych, N.J. (2017), “A Historical Perspective on the Future of Innovation in Social Work”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 150-153.
  • Özdemir, F., İ.M. Ar, (2015), “Sosyal Yenilik Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması”, Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(1), 17-43.
  • Özmete, E. , F. Akgül Gök (2015), “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma İçin Sosyal İnovasyon ve Sosyal Hizmet İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 26(2), 127-143.
  • Phillips, W., H. Lee, A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, P. James (2015), “Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review”, Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461.
  • Plotinsky, Y.M. (2012). Theoretical and Empirical Models of Social Pro-Processes: Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions, Moscow: Publishing House of Logos Corporation. Popescu, G. H. ve Gheorghe, H. (2015). “The Dynamics of Social Innovation Networks”, Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 3(2), 77-82.
  • Rodriguez, M.Y., L. Ostrow, S.P. Kemp (2016), “Scaling up Social Problems Strategies For Solving Social Work’s Grand Challenges”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 139-149.
  • Schmitz, B., T. Scheuerle (2012), “Founding or Transforming? Social Intrapreneurship in Three German Christian-Based NPOs”, ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 13-36.
  • Stringfellow, E.J. (2017), “Applying Structural Systems Thinking to Frame Perspectives on Social Work Innovation”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 154-162.
  • Thomas, E.J. (1978). Generating Innovation in Social Work: The Paradigm of Developmental Research”, Journal of Social Service Research, 2(1), 95-115.
  • Traube, D.E., S. Begun, N. Okpych, M. Choy-Brown (2017), “Catalyzing Innovation in Social Work Practice”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 134-138.
  • Voorberg, W.H., V.J. Bekkers, J.M. Tummers (2015), “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social İnnovation Journey”, Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357.
  • Weerawardena, J., G.S. Mort (2006), “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model”, Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
  • Zadek, S., S. Thake (1997), “Send in the Social Entrepreneurs”, New Statesman, 126(4339), 31-32.

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL INNOVATION AND SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE FUTURE OF SOCIAL WORK PROFESSION

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1, 169 - 188, 27.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.350375

Öz

Social innovation and social
entrepreneurship have begun to be
referred as two new concepts in social
work terminology. We must go beyond
the traditional methods to share new information
with those who want to benefit from the
theoretical approaches and practices of the
profession. The new transformation and practice
processes of social workers working with
vulnerable groups can be defined as social
innovation. The new methods and techniques used
by social workers can be defined as social
entrepreneurship. This article aims to discuss the
role of social innovation and social
entrepreneurship in social welfare services and
especially in the practice of the social work
profession. Social innovation and social
entrepreneurship can present different and
promising perspectives on scaling social problems.
Therefore, social innovation and social
entrepreneurship should be encouraged as a series
of new strategies developed by social workers for
social problems. 

Kaynakça

  • Akbaş, E., T. Tuncay (2005), “Ortak Sorumluluk Zamanı”, Radikal İki, 27/11/2005.
  • Atkins, P., M. Frederico (2017), “Supporting Implementation of Innovative Social Work Practice: What Factors Really Matter?. British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1723-1744.
  • Austin, J., H. Stevenson, J. Wei‐Skillern (2006), “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1-22.
  • Bahar, O.S. (2017), “A Promising Partnership: Uncovering the Middle Ground Between Social Innovation and Social Work Response to Dr. Marilyn l. Flynn’s Remarks”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 131-133.
  • Baker, S., A. Mehmood (2015), “Social Innovation and the Governance of Sustainable Places”, Local Environment, 20(3), 321-334.
  • Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), “Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
  • Choi, N., S. Majumdar (2014), “Social Entrepreneurship As An Essentially Contested Concept: Opening A New Avenue For Systematic Future Research”, Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363-376.
  • Defourny, J., M. Nyssens (2010), “Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences”, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
  • Duyan, V. (2010), Sosyal Hizmet: Temelleri, Yaklaşımları, Müdahale Yöntemleri, (Birinci basım), Ankara: Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Derneği Genel Merkezi Yayınları.
  • Ersen, T.B., A. Ekmekçi (2013), "Sosyal Girişimcilik ve Türkiye", Stanford Social İnnovation Review Dergisi, 10.yıl Özel Sayısı, 6-8.
  • https://www.anadoluvakfi.org.tr/upload/publications/pdfs/567eb73599f045.70852149 pdf, E.T.: 21.09.2018.
  • Flynn, M.L. (2017), “Science, Innovation, and Social Work: Clash or Convergence?”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 123-128.
  • Germak, A. (2017), If Steve Jobs Had Been A Social Worker. http://www.socialworker.com/feature-articles/practice/if-steve-jobs-had-been-a-social-worker/, E.T.: 01.02.2017.
  • Halvorsen, C. J. (2016), “Bridging Social Innovation and Social Work Balancing Science, Values, and Speed”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 129-130.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions and Organizastions Across Nations, (2nd ed.), London: Sage.
  • Hofstede, G. (2011), “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context”. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), article 8.
  • Mair, J. ve Marti, I. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight”, Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
  • Makarov, V., Y. Shimanovskaya, T. Tyapkina, M. Firsov, V. Sizikova, T. Rostovskaya, S. Kozlovskaya (2017), “Innovative Models of Social Activity and Their Adaptation to Social Work”, Espacios, 38(43), 30-41.
  • Manzini, E. (2014), “Making Things Happen: Social İnnovation and Design”, Design Issues, 30(1), 57-66.
  • Martin, C.J., P. Upham (2016), “Grassroots Social Innovation and the Mobilisation of Values in Collaborative Consumption: A Conceptual Model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 204-213.
  • Minkov, M., G. Hofstede (2011), “The Evolution of Hofstede's Doctrine”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 10-20.
  • Mulgan, G. (2006), “The Process of Social Innovation”, Innovations, 1(2), 145-162.
  • Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, B. Sanders (2007), Social Innovation: What it is, why it Matters and how it can be Accelerated, (Birinci basım), London: Basingstoke Press.
  • Nandan, M., M. London, T. Bent-Goodley (2015), “Social Workers As Social Change Agents: Social Innovation, Social Intrapreneurship, and Social Entrepreneurship”, Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 38-56.
  • Nandan, M., M. London, T. C. Blum (2014), “Community Practice Social Entrepreneurship: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Graduate Education”, International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3(1), 51-70.
  • Okpych, N.J. (2017), “A Historical Perspective on the Future of Innovation in Social Work”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 150-153.
  • Özdemir, F., İ.M. Ar, (2015), “Sosyal Yenilik Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması”, Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(1), 17-43.
  • Özmete, E. , F. Akgül Gök (2015), “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma İçin Sosyal İnovasyon ve Sosyal Hizmet İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 26(2), 127-143.
  • Phillips, W., H. Lee, A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, P. James (2015), “Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review”, Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461.
  • Plotinsky, Y.M. (2012). Theoretical and Empirical Models of Social Pro-Processes: Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions, Moscow: Publishing House of Logos Corporation. Popescu, G. H. ve Gheorghe, H. (2015). “The Dynamics of Social Innovation Networks”, Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 3(2), 77-82.
  • Rodriguez, M.Y., L. Ostrow, S.P. Kemp (2016), “Scaling up Social Problems Strategies For Solving Social Work’s Grand Challenges”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 139-149.
  • Schmitz, B., T. Scheuerle (2012), “Founding or Transforming? Social Intrapreneurship in Three German Christian-Based NPOs”, ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1), 13-36.
  • Stringfellow, E.J. (2017), “Applying Structural Systems Thinking to Frame Perspectives on Social Work Innovation”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 154-162.
  • Thomas, E.J. (1978). Generating Innovation in Social Work: The Paradigm of Developmental Research”, Journal of Social Service Research, 2(1), 95-115.
  • Traube, D.E., S. Begun, N. Okpych, M. Choy-Brown (2017), “Catalyzing Innovation in Social Work Practice”, Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 134-138.
  • Voorberg, W.H., V.J. Bekkers, J.M. Tummers (2015), “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social İnnovation Journey”, Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333-1357.
  • Weerawardena, J., G.S. Mort (2006), “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model”, Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
  • Zadek, S., S. Thake (1997), “Send in the Social Entrepreneurs”, New Statesman, 126(4339), 31-32.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Buğra Yıldırım 0000-0002-2840-3624

Tarık Tuncay 0000-0002-9447-6717

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Mart 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Kasım 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldırım, B., & Tuncay, T. (2019). SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.350375
AMA Yıldırım B, Tuncay T. SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Mart 2019;37(1):169-188. doi:10.17065/huniibf.350375
Chicago Yıldırım, Buğra, ve Tarık Tuncay. “SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 37, sy. 1 (Mart 2019): 169-88. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.350375.
EndNote Yıldırım B, Tuncay T (01 Mart 2019) SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 37 1 169–188.
IEEE B. Yıldırım ve T. Tuncay, “SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 37, sy. 1, ss. 169–188, 2019, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.350375.
ISNAD Yıldırım, Buğra - Tuncay, Tarık. “SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 37/1 (Mart 2019), 169-188. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.350375.
JAMA Yıldırım B, Tuncay T. SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;37:169–188.
MLA Yıldırım, Buğra ve Tarık Tuncay. “SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 37, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 169-88, doi:10.17065/huniibf.350375.
Vancouver Yıldırım B, Tuncay T. SOSYAL İNOVASYONUN VE SOSYAL GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN SOSYAL HİZMET MESLEĞİNİN GELECEĞİNDEKİ ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;37(1):169-88.

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.