Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation of the effects of leisure time constraints of the university students in physical education and sport scholls on their leisure time motivation: Bartın university sample

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 39 - 52, 20.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.490963

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the barriers to leisure time and motivation levels of university students, to compare them in terms of demographic variables and to determine the relationships between them. This study is a correlational survey model in which Leisure Time Motivation Scale and Barriers to Leisure Time Scale were used. The sample of the study consisted of 317 volunteers who study at Bartın University School of Physical Education and Sports. The statistical methods used for the evaluation of research data are frequency distributions, T-test for binary groups, ANOVA analysis for multiple groups and pearson correlation analysis for determining the relationship. The results of the study revealed that the perceptions of the participants about barriers to leisure time were above average and this was due to the perceptions of lack of relevant facilities and lack of sufficient time. Higher identification-introjection and knowing-succeeding dimensions were more significant in leisure time motivation levels. There was no relationship between barriers to leisure time and leisure time motivation levels. When the findings of the study were evaluated in terms of demographic variables, significant differences were determined for sex and age variables.

Kaynakça

  • Alexandris, K. & Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic differences in the perception of constraints on recreational sport participation: Results from a study in Greece. Leisure Studies, 16(2), 107-125.
  • Altergott, K. & McCreedy, C. C. (1993). Gender and family status across the life course: constraints on five types of leisure. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 16(1), 151-179.
  • Akyüz, H. & Türkmen, M. (2016). The Place and Importance of Sport Activities in Treating their Leisure Time for Potential Students of Physical Education and Sports School. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport. December 4 (SI:3) Doi : 10.14486/IntJSCS613
  • Akyüz, H. & Türkmen, M. (2016). Examination of university students' attitudes towards recreational activities: Case of Bartın University. (Master's thesis, Bartın University, Faculty of Educational Sciences).
  • Archer, J. & McDonald, M. (1990). Gender roles and sports in adolescent girls. Leisure Studies, 9(3), 225-240.
  • Aydın, E. (2012). Examining the relationship between students' use of their leisure time and social adaptation and communication skills. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.
  • Balcı, V., Demirtaş, M., Gürbüz, P., İlhan, A. & Ersöz, V. (2003). A Research on Participation of University Students in Ankara to Recreational Activities., 158, 161-173.
  • Barkın, E. (2016). A Research on Barriers to Participation of University Students to Physical Recreational Activities. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Muğla.
  • Chen, J. G., Wadhwa, N., Cha, Y. J., Durand, F., Freeman, W. T. & Buyukozturk, O. (2014). Structural modal identification through high speed camera video: Motion magnification. In Topics in Modal Analysis I, 7, 191-197. Springer, Cham.
  • Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent girls and outdoor recreation: A case study examining constraints and effective programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 356.
  • Dülger T., Handan, et al.(2009). Measuring Life Quality in İstanbul. İstanbul'da yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi. İtü Dergisi/A, 7.2.
  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
  • Demirel, M. & Harmandar, D. (2009). Determining the Potential Barriers to Participation of University Students to Recreational Activities, International Journal of Human Sciences.,6(1), 838-846.
  • Eroğlu, F. (2000). Behaviour Sciences., 5th Edition, İstanbul: Beta.
  • Gümüş, H., Özgül, S.A. & Karakılıç, M. (2017). Fiziksel Aktivite için Park ve Rekreasyon Alanlarına Gelen Kullanıcıların Mekân Seçimini ve Fiziksel Aktiviteye Katılımını Etkileyen Faktörler, Spormetre, 15(1), 31-38.
  • Gürbüz, M. & Aydın, A. H. (2012). The Concept of Time and Its Management. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2).
  • Henderson, K. A. (1995). Women's leisure: More truth than facts?. World Leisure Recreation, 37(1), 9-13.
  • Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., Shaw, S. M., & Freysinger, V. J. (1996). Both gains and gaps: Feminist perspectives on women’s leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Henderson, K. A. & Bialeschki, M. D. (1993). Negotiating constraints to women's physical recreation. Loisir et societe/Society and Leisure. 16(2), 389-411.
  • Kane, M. J. (1990). Female involvement in physical recreation—Gender role as a constraint. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61(1), 52-56.
  • Karaküçük, S. (2005). Recreation-Treating Leisure Time. 5th Edition. Ankara: Gazi.
  • Kaya, A. M. (2011). Investigation of University Students' Attitudes towards Recreational Activities and Leisure Time Motivations in Terms of Some Variables. Unpublished master’s thesis. Cumhuriyet University Institute of Health Sciences, Sivas
  • Mete, B. & Ağaoğlu, S. A. (2003). Studying participation and perspectives of academic and administrative staff of Ondokuz Mayıs University Kurupelit Campus. Physical Education and Sport in Social Fields Congress, Ankara, 421-426.
  • Moccia, F. D. (2000). Planning time: an emergent European practice. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 367-375.
  • Mutlu, İ. (2008). A Research on the Attitudes of People Doing Exercise toward Leisure Time (Case of Kayseri Province). (Unpublished master's thesis). Niğde University Institute of Social Sciences. Niğde.
  • Özkalp, E. (1997). Introduction to Behavioral Sciences, Publication Number: 1027, Eskişehir: Anadolu University
  • Soyer, F., Yıldız, N. O., Demirel, D. H., Serdar, E., Demirel, M., Ayhan, C. & Demirhan, O. (2017). Examining the relationship between the factors that hinder the participation of university students in recreational activities and the life satisfaction of the participants Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 2035-2046.
  • Tel, F. D. & Sarı, T. (2016). Self-sensitivity and life satisfaction of university students. University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 292-304.
  • Zengin, E., Sertbaş, K. & Kolayiş, H. (2006). Physical education and sports college students' leisure profiles and racket in Kocaeli University. Sports Management and Information Technologies, 1(1).s.17-28

Beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokullarında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin boş zaman engellerinin boş zaman motivasyonlarına etkisinin araştırılması: Bartın üniversitesi örneği

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 39 - 52, 20.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.490963

Öz

Bu araştırma, üniversite öğrencilerinin boş zaman engelleri ve motivasyon düzeylerinin tespit edilmesi, demografik değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması ve aralarındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. İlişkisel tarama modelindeki araştırmada, Boş Zaman Engelleri Ölçeği ve Boş Zaman Motivasyon Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Bartın Üniversitesi beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulunda Öğrenim Gören 317 gönüllü katılımcı oluşturmuştur. Araştırma verilerinin değerlendirilmesinde istatistiki yöntem olarak; frekans dağılımları, ikili gruplar için T-testi, çoklu gruplar için anova analizleri ve ilişkiyi belirlemek için pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde katılımcıların boş zaman engellerine yönelik algılarının ortalamanın üzerinde olduğu ve bu algının tesis eksikliği ile yeterli zaman bulma boyutlarından kaynaklandığı belirlenmiştir. Boş zaman motivasyon düzeylerinde yüksek özdeşim-içe atım ve bilmek-başarmak boyutlarının daha belirgin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Boş zaman engelleri ile boş zaman motivasyon düzeyleri arasında ilişki saptanamamıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular demografik değişkenler açısından değerlendirildiğinde her iki ölçek arasında cinsiyet ve yaş değişkenleri arasında anlamlı farklılıklar belirlenmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Alexandris, K. & Carroll, B. (1997). Demographic differences in the perception of constraints on recreational sport participation: Results from a study in Greece. Leisure Studies, 16(2), 107-125.
  • Altergott, K. & McCreedy, C. C. (1993). Gender and family status across the life course: constraints on five types of leisure. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure, 16(1), 151-179.
  • Akyüz, H. & Türkmen, M. (2016). The Place and Importance of Sport Activities in Treating their Leisure Time for Potential Students of Physical Education and Sports School. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport. December 4 (SI:3) Doi : 10.14486/IntJSCS613
  • Akyüz, H. & Türkmen, M. (2016). Examination of university students' attitudes towards recreational activities: Case of Bartın University. (Master's thesis, Bartın University, Faculty of Educational Sciences).
  • Archer, J. & McDonald, M. (1990). Gender roles and sports in adolescent girls. Leisure Studies, 9(3), 225-240.
  • Aydın, E. (2012). Examining the relationship between students' use of their leisure time and social adaptation and communication skills. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Trabzon.
  • Balcı, V., Demirtaş, M., Gürbüz, P., İlhan, A. & Ersöz, V. (2003). A Research on Participation of University Students in Ankara to Recreational Activities., 158, 161-173.
  • Barkın, E. (2016). A Research on Barriers to Participation of University Students to Physical Recreational Activities. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Muğla.
  • Chen, J. G., Wadhwa, N., Cha, Y. J., Durand, F., Freeman, W. T. & Buyukozturk, O. (2014). Structural modal identification through high speed camera video: Motion magnification. In Topics in Modal Analysis I, 7, 191-197. Springer, Cham.
  • Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent girls and outdoor recreation: A case study examining constraints and effective programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 356.
  • Dülger T., Handan, et al.(2009). Measuring Life Quality in İstanbul. İstanbul'da yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi. İtü Dergisi/A, 7.2.
  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G. & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
  • Demirel, M. & Harmandar, D. (2009). Determining the Potential Barriers to Participation of University Students to Recreational Activities, International Journal of Human Sciences.,6(1), 838-846.
  • Eroğlu, F. (2000). Behaviour Sciences., 5th Edition, İstanbul: Beta.
  • Gümüş, H., Özgül, S.A. & Karakılıç, M. (2017). Fiziksel Aktivite için Park ve Rekreasyon Alanlarına Gelen Kullanıcıların Mekân Seçimini ve Fiziksel Aktiviteye Katılımını Etkileyen Faktörler, Spormetre, 15(1), 31-38.
  • Gürbüz, M. & Aydın, A. H. (2012). The Concept of Time and Its Management. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2).
  • Henderson, K. A. (1995). Women's leisure: More truth than facts?. World Leisure Recreation, 37(1), 9-13.
  • Henderson, K. A., Bialeschki, M. D., Shaw, S. M., & Freysinger, V. J. (1996). Both gains and gaps: Feminist perspectives on women’s leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
  • Henderson, K. A. & Bialeschki, M. D. (1993). Negotiating constraints to women's physical recreation. Loisir et societe/Society and Leisure. 16(2), 389-411.
  • Kane, M. J. (1990). Female involvement in physical recreation—Gender role as a constraint. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 61(1), 52-56.
  • Karaküçük, S. (2005). Recreation-Treating Leisure Time. 5th Edition. Ankara: Gazi.
  • Kaya, A. M. (2011). Investigation of University Students' Attitudes towards Recreational Activities and Leisure Time Motivations in Terms of Some Variables. Unpublished master’s thesis. Cumhuriyet University Institute of Health Sciences, Sivas
  • Mete, B. & Ağaoğlu, S. A. (2003). Studying participation and perspectives of academic and administrative staff of Ondokuz Mayıs University Kurupelit Campus. Physical Education and Sport in Social Fields Congress, Ankara, 421-426.
  • Moccia, F. D. (2000). Planning time: an emergent European practice. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 367-375.
  • Mutlu, İ. (2008). A Research on the Attitudes of People Doing Exercise toward Leisure Time (Case of Kayseri Province). (Unpublished master's thesis). Niğde University Institute of Social Sciences. Niğde.
  • Özkalp, E. (1997). Introduction to Behavioral Sciences, Publication Number: 1027, Eskişehir: Anadolu University
  • Soyer, F., Yıldız, N. O., Demirel, D. H., Serdar, E., Demirel, M., Ayhan, C. & Demirhan, O. (2017). Examining the relationship between the factors that hinder the participation of university students in recreational activities and the life satisfaction of the participants Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 2035-2046.
  • Tel, F. D. & Sarı, T. (2016). Self-sensitivity and life satisfaction of university students. University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 292-304.
  • Zengin, E., Sertbaş, K. & Kolayiş, H. (2006). Physical education and sports college students' leisure profiles and racket in Kocaeli University. Sports Management and Information Technologies, 1(1).s.17-28
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Spor Hekimliği
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Hasan Güler

Mutlu Türkmen

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 30 Kasım 2018
Kabul Tarihi 20 Aralık 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Güler, H., & Türkmen, M. (2018). Investigation of the effects of leisure time constraints of the university students in physical education and sport scholls on their leisure time motivation: Bartın university sample. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 2(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.490963