Year 2014, Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 877 - 893 2014-06-13

HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK

Mathieu Deflem [1] , Ülker Yükselbaba [2]

271 2963

Reform: TRUBEK and HABERMAS v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission’, Dalhousie Law Journal 11, 1988; pp. 639-662), hukuki yorum , hukuki toplulukta profersoyen roller , ve yasama analazi ve anayasal düzenlemeler . HABERMAS’ın kuramının Latin Amerika’da etkisi, bkz.: BOTERO, ANDRÉS. ‘Aproximación al pensar filosófico de HABERMAS’, Revista Holística Jurídica: Facultad de Derecho USB. 2 (2003) ; pp. 7-36. Botero yakında HABERMAS’ın Latin Amerika’da etkisi üzerine başka bir eleştirel makale yayınlayacaktır. 2 Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1, Reason and Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984. Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, System and Lifeworld: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press 1987
  • ALEXY, ROBERT, ‘Justification and Application of Norms’, Ratio Juris 6, 1993; pp. 157-170. ALEXY, ROBERT, ‘On Necessary Relations Between Law and Morality’, Ratio Juris 2, 1989; pp. 167-183. ALEXY, ROBERT, Problems of Discursive Rationality in Law., In: W. MAIHOFER and G. SPRENGER (eds.). Law and the States in Modern Times. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1990. ALEXY, ROBERT, Epílogo a la teoría de los derechos fundamentales.. Trad. CARLOS BERNAL. Revista española de derecho constitucional, year 22, 66 (septiembre-diciembre de 2002) : pp. 13-64. 32; HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. ‘Morality, Society and Ethics: An Interview with TORBEN HVILD NIELSEN’, Acta Sociologica 33, 1990; pp. 93-114). Ayrıca Habermas’ın, hukuk teorisinde yeniden uyumlulaştırma beklentisi yaratan sivil itaatsizlik tartışmaları için bkz. (HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. ‘Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30, 1985; pp. 96-116; HABERMAS, JÜRGEN. ‘On Morality, Law, Civil Disobedience and Modernity’, In: P. DEWS (ed.). Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with JÜRGEN HABERMAS, revised edn. London: Verso, 1992). 29 Habermas, Remarks on …, Op.Cit., P.130. Habermas, Faktizitat und …, Op.Cit.; Habermas, Between Facts … Deflem, Mathieu (Ed.). Habermas, Modernity and Law. London: Sage, 1996.
  • ALEXY, ROBERT, “A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason”, Ratio Juris 5, 1992; pp. 231-51. ALEXY, ROBERT, A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. ALEXY, ROBERT, Begriff und Geltung des Rechts. FREIBURG und MNCHEN: ALBER, 1992. BELLIOTTI, RAYMOND A., “Radical Politics and Nonfoundational Morality”, International Philosophical Quarterly 29, 1989. BENHABIB, SEYLA and DALLAYR, FRED (eds.). The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. BENHABIB, SEYLA, “In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel: Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy”, in M. KELLY (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. BOTERO, ANDRÉS, “Aproximación al pensar filosófico de HABERMAS”, Revista Holística Jurídica: Facultad de Derecho USB. 2 (2003) ; pp. 7-36. BOTERO, ANDRÉS, “Recepción crítica (y parcial) de la concepción sobre sistema jurídico y razón práctica de Robert Alexy”, Conference in Buenos Aires University, March 31 2008; 24p. Unpublished text. BRAN, ARIE, “Ethical Rationalization and.Juridification.: HABERMAS”, Critical Legal Theory., Australian Journal of Law and Society 4, 1987, pp. 103-27. BRAN, ARIE, The Force of Reason: An Introduction to Habermas. Theory of Communicative Action. Sydney: ALLEN & UNWIN, 1990. COLE, DAVID, “Getting There: Reflections on Trashing from Feminist jurisprudence and Critical Theory”, Harvard Women.s Law journal 8, 1985; pp. 59- DAN -COHEN, MEIR, “Law, Community, and Communication”, Duke Law journal 6, 1989; pp. 1654-76. DEFLEM, MATHIEU (ed.), HABERMAS, Modernity and Law. London: Sage, 1996. DEFLEM, MATHIEU, “Introduction: Law in HABERMAS’s Theory of Communicative Action”, In: HABERMAS, Modernity and Law, edited by MATHIEU DEFLEM. London: Sage, 1996. DÖBERT, RAINER, “Against the Neglect of Content in the Moral Theories of KOHLBERG and HABERMAS”, In: T. E. WREN (ed.). The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. DWARS, INGRID, “Application Discourse and the Special Case-Thesis”, Ratio Juris 5, 1992; pp. 67-78. EDER, KLAUS, “Critique of HABERMAS’ Contribution to the Sociology of Law”, Law and Society Review 22, 1988; pp. 931-44. FELDMAN, STEPHEN M., “The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional jurisprudence: MICHELMAN, HABERMAS, and Civic Republicanism”, Georgetown Law journal 81, 1993; pp. 2243FELTS, ARTHUR A. and FIELDS, CHARLES B., “Technical and Symbolic Reasoning: An Application of Habermas. Ideological Analysis to the Legal Arena”, Quarterly Journal of Ideology 12, 1988; pp. 1-15. FERRARA, ALESSANDRO, “A Critique of HABERMAS. Diskursethik”, Telos 64, 1986; pp. 45-74. FITZPATRCK, PETER and HUNT, ALAN, Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. GÜNTHER, KLAUS, “A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal justification”, Ratio Juris 2, 1989; pp. 155-166. GÜNTHER, KLAUS, “Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy.s.Special-Case Thesis”, Ratio Juris 6, 1993; pp. 143-156. GÜNTHER, KLAUS, “Impartial Application of Moral and Legal Norms: A Contribution to Discourse Ethics”, In: D. M. RASMUSSEN (ed.) Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. HAASCHER, GUY, “PERELMAN and HABERMAS”, Law and Philosophy 5, 1986; pp. 331-342. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State”, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30, 1985; pp. 96- HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “Law and Morality”, In: S. M. MCMRRIN (ed.). The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Volume 8. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “Morality, Society and Ethics: An Interview with TORBEN HVILD NIELSEN”, Acta Sociologica 33, 1990; pp. 93-114. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “On Morality, Law, Civil Disobedience and Modernity”, In: P. DEWS (ed.). Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with JÜRGEN HABERMAS, revised edn. London: Verso, 1992. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “Remarks on the Discussion”, Theory, Culture and Society 7, 1990; pp. 127-32. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, “Towards a Communication-Concept of Rational Collective Will-Formation: A Thought-Experiment”, Ratio Juris 2, 1989; pp. 144HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 19 HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. pp. 43-115. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians. Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989. pp. 173-179. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984.
  • HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2, System and Lifeworld: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon HELLER, AGNES,.The Discourse Ethics of Habermas: Critique and Appraisal., Thesis Eleven 10/11, 1984-5; p. 5-17. HOLUB, ROBERT C., JÜRGEN HABERMAS: Critic in the Public Sphere. London: Routledge, 1991. HOY, DAVID C., “Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and Poststructuralist Perspectives, Southern California Law Review 58, 1985; pp. 135-1 HUSSON, CHRISTINE A. DESAN, “Expanding the Legal Vocabulary: The Challenge Posed by the Deconstruction and Defense of Law”, Yale Law Journal 95, 1986; pp. 969-991. INGRAM, DAVID, “Dworkin, Habermas, and the CLS Movement on Moral Criticism in Law”, Philosophy and Social Criticism 16, 1990; p. 237-268. INGRAM, DAVID, “HABERMAS and the Dialectic of Reason” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987. JAY, MARTIN, “The Debate over Performative Contradiction”, In: A. HORNEH, T. MCCARTHY, C. OFEE and A. WELLMER (eds.). Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992. KELLY, MICHAEL (ed.), Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. KELLY, MICHAEL, “Maclntyre, Habermas and Philosophical Ethics”, In: M. KELLY (ed.) Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. LEEDES, GARY C., “The Discourse Ethics Alternative to Rust v. Sullivan”, University of Richmond Law Review 26, 1991; pp. 87-143. LUHMANN, NIKLAS, “Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System”, Cardozo Law Review 13, 1992; pp. 1419-41. LUHMANN, NIKLAS, A Sociological Theory of Law. London: ROUTLEDGE & KEGAN PAUL, 1985. MCCARHY, THOMAS, The Critical Theory of JÜRGEN HABERMAS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978. MOOTZ, FRANCIS J., “The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry Based on the Work of Gadamer, HABERMAS, and RICOEUR”, Boston University Law Review 68, 1988; pp. 523-617. MULLEN, T., “Constitutional Protection of Human Rights”, In: T. CAMPBELL, D. GOLDBERG, S. MCLEAN and T. MULLEN (eds.), Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986. MURPHY, W. T., “The HABERMAS Effect: Critical Theory and Academic Law”, Current Legal Problems 42, 1989; pp. 135-165. NORTHEY, ROD, “Conflicting Principles of Canadian Environmental Reform: TRUBEK and HABERMAS v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission”, Dalhousie Law Journal 11, 1988; pp.639-662.
  • PETTIT, PHILIP, “HABERMAS on Truth and justice”, In: G. H. R. PARKINSON (ed.). MARX and Marxisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University PREUSS, ULRICH K., “Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative Rationality”, In: C. JOERGES and D. M. TRUBEK (eds). Critical Legal Thought: An American- German Debate. BadenBaden: Nomos, 1989. RAES, KOEN, “Legalisation, Communication and Strategy: A Critique of HABERMAS. Approach to Law”, Journal of Law and Society 13, 1986; pp. 183-206. RASMUSSEN, DAVID M. (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 1990. RASMUSSEN, DAVID M., “Communication Theory and the Critique of the Law: HABERMAS and UNGER on the Law”, Praxis International 8, 1988; pp. 155-170. RASMUSSEN, DAVID M., Reading Habermas. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990. RODERICK, RICK, HABERMAS and the Foundations of Critical Theory. London: Macmillan, 1986. SCHEUERMAN, BILL, “NEUMANN v. HABERMAS: The Frankfurt School and the Case of the Rule of Law”, Praxis International 13, 1993; pp. 50-67. SOLUM, LAWRENCE B., “Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech”, Northwestern University Law Review 83, 1989; pp. 54-135. TEUBNER, GÜNTHER, “How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law”, Law and Society Review, 23, 1989; pp. 727-757. TEUBNER, GÜNTHER, “Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law”, Law and Society Review 17, 1983; pp. 239-285. TUORI, KAARLO, “Discourse Ethics and the Legitimacy of Law”, Ratio Juris 2, 1989; pp. 125-43. UNGER, ROBERT M., The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986. VAN DER BURG, WIBREN, “JÜRGEN HABERMAS on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments”, Theory, Culture and Society 7, 1990; pp. 105-111.
Primary Language tr
Journal Section Translations
Authors

Author: Mathieu Deflem

Author: Ülker Yükselbaba

Bibtex @ { iuhfm115316, journal = {Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty}, issn = {1303-4375}, address = {Istanbul University}, year = {2014}, volume = {72}, pages = {877 - 893}, doi = {}, title = {HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK}, key = {cite}, author = {Deflem, Mathieu and Yükselbaba, Ülker} }
APA Deflem, M , Yükselbaba, Ü . (2014). HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK. Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty, 72 (1), 877-893. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/iuhfm/issue/9191/115316
MLA Deflem, M , Yükselbaba, Ü . "HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK". Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72 (2014): 877-893 <http://dergipark.org.tr/iuhfm/issue/9191/115316>
Chicago Deflem, M , Yükselbaba, Ü . "HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK". Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72 (2014): 877-893
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK AU - Mathieu Deflem , Ülker Yükselbaba Y1 - 2014 PY - 2014 N1 - DO - T2 - Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 877 EP - 893 VL - 72 IS - 1 SN - 1303-4375- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK %A Mathieu Deflem , Ülker Yükselbaba %T HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK %D 2014 %J Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty %P 1303-4375- %V 72 %N 1 %R %U
ISNAD Deflem, Mathieu , Yükselbaba, Ülker . "HABERMAS’IN İLETİŞİMSEL EYLEM KURAMI’NDA HUKUK". Journal of Istanbul University Law Faculty 72 / 1 (June 2014): 877-893.