What Does John W. Budd’s Theory of ‘Employment with A Human Face’ Say for 21st Century Employment Relations?

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 76, 1 - 27, 12.07.2019

Fuat Man

Öz

When we look at the 21st century in the context of
employment relations, we could not see a heart-warming scene. Roughly, it is
possible to say that the mechanisms that protect the working life have become
eroded or loosened and the working life has become increasingly insecure for
the employees. In such a case, is it possible to put the working life on a
basis with a human face? This paper tries to answer this question by John W.
Budd’s theory of ‘employment with a human face’. The paper begins with a section
on the frames of reference which is an important concept in employment
relations literature. The next section presents the main points of the Budd’s
theory and tries to answer the question. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

John W. Budd, employment with a human face, geometry of employment

John W. Budd’ın ‘İnsani Bir Çalışma İlişkisi’ Kuramı 21. Yüzyıl Çalışma İlişkileri İçin Neler Söylüyor?

Öz

21.
yüzyıla çalışma ilişkileri bağlamında baktığımızda gördüğümüz şey pek iç açıcı
değil. Kabaca çalışma hayatını koruyan mekanizmaların aşındığını veya
gevşediğini ve çalışma hayatının çalışanlar için gittikçe güvencesizleştiğini
söylemek mümkündür. Böyle bir durumda çalışma hayatının insani bir temele
oturtulması mümkün mü? Bu çalışma, bu soruyu John W. Budd’ın ‘insani bir
çalışma ilişkisi’ kuramı bağlamında cevaplandırmaya çalışmaktadır. Çalışmada
öncelikle çalışma ilişkileri literatüründeki temel referans çerçeveleri
sunulacak, daha sonra ise Budd’ın sözü edilen kuramının ana hatları ortaya
konularak soru cevaplandırılmaya çalışılacaktır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

John W. Budd, İnsani bir çalışma ilişkisi, İstihdam geometrisi

Kaynakça

• Adams, R. J. (2005). Efficiency, Equity, and Voice as Moral Imperatives. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(2), 111–117.
• Bamber, G. J. (2005). The Geometry of Comperative Industrial Relations: Efficiency, Equity and Voice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(2), 119–122.
• Bauman, Z. (2016). Cemaatler: Güvenli olmayan bir dünyada güvenlik arayışı. Çev. Nurdan Soysal, İstanbul: Say.
• Bauman, Z. (2017). Akışkan Modernite. Çev. Sinan Okan Çavuş, İstanbul: Can.
• Bingham, C. (2016). Employment Relations: Fairness and Trust in the Workplace. London: Sage.
• Budd, J. W. (2004). Employment With a Human Face. NY: ILR Press.
• Budd, J. W. (2005). Employment with a Human Face: The Author Responds. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 191–199.
• Budd, J. W. (2012). Labor Relations: Striking a Balance. New York: McGrowHill.
• Budd, J. W. (2016). Çalışma Düşüncesi. Çev. Fuat MAN, İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
• Budd, J. W. (2018). İnsani Bir Çalışma İlişkisi: Verimlilik, Hakkaniyet ve Söz Hakkını Dengelemek. Çev. Fuat MAN, İstanbul: Küre.
• Budd, J. W., & Bhave, D. (2008). Values, Ideologies and Frames of Reference in Industrial Relations. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito, & E. Heery (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations (pp. 92–112). London: Sage.
• Budd, J. W., & Bhave, D. (2009). The Employment Relationship. In A. Wilkinson, T. Redman, S. Snell, & N. Bacon (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Human Resource Management. London: Sage.
• Commons, J. R. (1919). Industrial Goodwill. New York: McGrowHill.
• Cradden, C. (2011). Unitarism, Pluralism, Radicalism... And The Rest? Why the Frames Of Reference Approach Is Still Relevant To the Study of Industrial Relations, But Why We Need Nine Frames Rather Than Just Three., (7), 12. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/ses/socio/publications/dernierespublications/sociograph10-1/sociograph_working_paper_7.pdf
• Craib, I. (1992). Modern Social Theory: From Parsons to Habermas. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
• Devinatz, V. G. (2005). Symposium on John W. Budd: Employment with a Human Face: Four Views on Efficiency, Equity, and Voice in the World of Work. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(2), 109–110.
• Dunlop, J. T. (1958). Industrial Reltions Systems. USA: Holt.
• Estreicher, S. (2005). Geometry Does Not a Theory of Emplyment Make. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(2), 123–126.
• Gennard, J., Judge, G., Bennett, T., & Saundry, R. (2016). Managing Employment Relations. London: CIPD.
• Heery, E. (2015). Frames of reference and worker participation. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations (pp. 21–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Heery, E. (2016). Framing Work: Unitary, Pluralist and Critical Perspectives in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hyman, R. (2005). Striking a Balance? Means, Ends and Ambiguities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(2), 127–130.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2004). Toward an Integrative Theory of Human Resource Management. In Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship (pp. 321–366). New York: Cornell University Press.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2007). The Development of HRM in Historical and International Perspective. In P. W. Peter Boxall, John Purcell (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management (pp. 19–47). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2008). Managing the Human Factor: The early years of human resource management in American industry. New York: Cornell University.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2009). Hired Hands or Human Resources? Case Studies of HRM Programs and Practices in Early American Industry. Ithaca: ILR Press.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2014). The historical ddevelopment of American HRM broadly viewed. Human Resource Management Review, 24(3), 196–218.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2015). The future of employee voice in the USA: Predictions from an employment relations model of voice. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations (pp. 278–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kellner, D., & Best, S. (2016). Postmodern Teori. Çev. Mehmet Küçük, İstanbul: Ayrıntı. Kundakçı, D. (2016). Max Weber. İstanbul: Say.
• Marchinton, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2002). People Management and Development: Human Resource Management at Work. London: CIPD.
• Müller-Jentsch, W. (2004). Theoretical Approaches to Industrial Relations. In B. E. Kaufman (Ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship (pp. 1–40). Champaign: IRRA.
• Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1894). The History of Trade Unionism. London: Longmans.