Publication Ethics

The publication process at JAD is the basis of the improvement and dissemination of information objectively and respectfully. Therefore, the procedures in this process improve the quality of the studies. Peer-reviewed studies are the ones that support and materialize the scientific method. At this point, it is of utmost importance that all parties included in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, reviewers and editors) comply with the standards of ethical considerations. 

JAD expects all parties to hold the following ethical responsibilities.

Authors

It is authors' responsibility to ensure that the submitted article is of a quality that contributes to the academic field.

The works must be original and based on research.

Although the plagiarism scan will be carried out by JAD, authors are responsible for academic consequences of plagiarism.

The articles should not be sent to different journals at the same time. Also, the articles must be unsent to the other journals before.

It should be made sure that other individuals shown as co-authors, have contributed to the research. It is contrary to the scientific ethics to add some, who are not academic contributors to the article, as co-authors or to put in order co-authors with non-academic criteria such as title, age, and gender regardless of the order of contribution.

It is assumed that authors who submit articles to the journal read and accept the publishing and writing principles of the journal and the writers are deemed to have committed themselves to these principles.

Citations and bibliography should be complete and realistic.

Authors should take into account the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive specified by the Higher Education Council.

 

Referees

Referees should act with the awareness that they are the most basic determinant of the academic quality of the article to be published in the journal and should evaluate it with a view increasing the academic quality.

Referees should only accept the articles that they have the expertise necessary to make an appropriate appraisal. Also, they should only accept the articles that they can adhere to the double-blind peer-review secrecy and they should keep the details of the article in every way confidential.

Any information about the article examined in the review process should not be shared with anyone in any way.

Referees should only evaluate the correctness of the content of the articles and the appropriateness of the academic criteria. The opinions put forth in the article by authors may differ from those of the referees. The differences should not affect the evaluation.

Referee reports should be objective and moderate. Defamatory, derogatory and accusatory statements must be avoided.

Referees should avoid superficial and ambiguous expressions in evaluation reports. For the evaluations that resulted negative, the missing points and imperfections of the article must be shown clearly and concretely.

Referees must evaluate the articles within the time-frame granted to them. If they will not evaluate the article, they must notify the journal within a reasonable time.

 

Editorial Board

Editors should accept the articles that may contribute to the relevant areas expressed in the scope of the Journal to the evaluation process.

Editors should not be in any conflict of interest with the accepted or rejected articles nor take advantage from them.

Editors have all the responsibility and authority to accept or reject a submission.

It is the responsibility of editors to keep the names of referees and authors confidential.

Editors should take the necessary effort to ensure that the articles submitted for publication will be scanned to prevent plagiarism that is an academic dishonesty.

It is the responsibility of editors to complete the review, refereeing, editing and publishing processes of the submitted articles in a timely and healthy manner.

Editors should give priority to academic concerns and criteria when accepting the articles to the journal

In addition;

Duties of the PublisherJAD is committed to ensuring that commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, JAD will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors. Finally, we are working closely with other publishers and industry associations to set standards for best practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions–and are prepared to provide specialized legal review and counsel if necessary. 

Policy of Screening for Plagiarism: JAD uses double-blind review fulfilled by at least two reviewers. All manuscripts submitted are checked for plagiarism programs to ensure the originality, and to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. JAD will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. The peer review process is at the heart of the success of scientific publishing. As part of our commitment to the protection and enhancement of the peer review process, JAD has an obligation to assist the scientific community in all aspects of publishing ethics, especially in cases of (suspected) duplicate submission or plagiarism. When a reader discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a paper published in JAD or have any other complaint about editorial content (plagiarism, duplicate papers, etc.), he/she should make a complaint by e-mail to: editorjand@gmail.com  We welcome complaints as they provide an opportunity for improvement, and we aim to respond quickly and constructively.