Rethinking Identity Politics

Yıl 2017, , 1135 - 1147, 07.11.2017

Fırat Mollaer

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.345100

Öz

Bu makale çağdaş
tanınma teorisi tartışmalarını analiz etmektedir. Çağdaş tanınma
tartışması Axel Honneth ve Nancy Fraser arasında geçen, kimlik ve tanınma
mücadelesi hakkında yapılmış bir dizi tartışmanın genel adıdır. Tartışmanın ana
fikri, Hegelci fenomenolojinin ‘tanınma mücadelesi’ gibi kavramlarının kimlik
politikalarını anlamak için uygun bir felsefi temel sunup sunmadığı sorunuyla
tanınma (recognition) ve bölüşüm (redistribution) gibi kategorilerin birbiriyle
nasıl uzlaştırılacağıdır. Bu makalenin amacı, bu tartışmanın çözümlenmesi
aracılığıyla kimlik politikaları ve tanınma mücadelesi sorunları üzerinde
yeniden düşünülmesini sağlamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kimlik, kimlik politikası, tanınma, tanınma mücadelesi, tanınma tartışması, bölüşüm, Hegelci fenomenoloji, Charles Taylor, Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser

Kimlik Politikasını Yeniden Düşünmek: Çağdaş Tanınma Tartışmasının Birikimi

Öz

This article examines contemporary recognition debate. ‘Recognition
debate’ is a term which refers to a political-philosophical exchange’ basically
took place between Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser. The main idea of the debate
is to examine if concepts of Hegelian phenomenology such as ‘struggle for
recognition’ is appropriate for understanding contemporary identity politics
and is possible to reconcile categories of recognition and redistribution. The
aim of the article, drawing on the debate between these theorists, is to provide
a new thinking for identity politics and struggle for recognition.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Identity, identity politics, recognition, struggle for recognition, recognition debate, redistribution, Hegel’s phenomenology, Charles Taylor, Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser

Kaynakça

• Abbey, R. (2004), “Introduction: Timely Meditations in an Untimely Mode-The Thought of Charles Taylor”, Charles Taylor, ed. Ruth Abbey, Cambridge University Press.
• Bernasconi, R. (2000), Irk Kavramını Kim İcat Etti? Felsefi Düşüncede Irk ve Irkçılık, çev. Z. Direk vd., İstanbul, Metis.
• Bewes, T (2008), Şeyleşme: Geç Kapitalizmde Endişe, çev. Deniz Soysal, İstanbul, Metis.
• Boucher, G. (2004), “Struggle for Recognition”, Hegel and Ethical Politics, Melbourne University, Summer School.
• Collins, A.&Lim, J. (2010), “Recognition, Redistribution, Liberty”, Journal of Economic Behaviour&Organisation, 74.
• Connoly, J.&Leach, M.&Walsh, L. (2007), “Introduction”, Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice, ed. J. Connoly&M. Leach&L. Walsh, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007.
• Cooke, M. (2009), “Beyond Dignity and Difference: Revisiting the Politics of Recognition”, European Journal of Political Theory, 8, 76.
• Deranty, J. P&Renault, E. (2007), “Politicising Honneth’s Ethics of Recognition”, Thesis Eleven, Number 88.
• Echols, A. (1994) “Nothing Distant about It: Women’s Liberation and Sixties Radicalism”, The Sixties: From Memory to History, ed. David Farber, The University of North Carolina Press.
• Fraser, N.&Honneth, A. (2003), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London, New York, Verso.
• Fraser, N. (2005), “Reframing Justice: In a Globalizing World”, New Left Review, 36, November-December.
• Fraser, N. (2014), “Tanınmayı Yeniden Düşünmek”, Kimlik Politikaları: Tanınma, Özdeşlik ve Farklılık, ed.&çev. Fırat Mollaer, Ankara, Doğu Batı.
• Garrett, M. (2010), “Recognizing the Limitations of the Political Theory of Recognition: Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser and Social Work”, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 7.
• Honneth, A. (1986), “Work and Instrumental Action: On the Normative Basis of Critical Theory”, trans. by Mitchell G. Ash, Thesis Eleven, 5-6.
• Honneth, A. (1995), “Domination and Moral Struggle: The Philosophical Heritage of Marxism Reviewed”, The Fragmanted World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. by Charles W. Wright, State University of New York.
• Honneth, A. (1995), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. by Joel Anderson, Polity Press.
• Honneth, A. (1997), The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory, trans. by Kenneth Baynes, MIT Press,.
• Honneth, A. (2005), Reification: A Recognition Theoretical View, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of California, Berkeley.
• Jay, M. (2008), “Introduction”, Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, Oxford Universty Press.
• Laitinen, A. (2009), “Recognition, Needs and Wrongness: Two Approaches”, European Journal of Political Theory, 8.
• Lash, S.&Featherstone, M. (2001), “Recogntion and Difference: Politics, Identity, Multiculture”, Theory Culture Society, 18.
• Marx, K.&Engels, F. (2013), Alman İdeolojisi, Cilt I, çev. Tonguç Ok&Olcay Geridönmez, İstanbul, Evrensel.
• Marx, K.&Engels, F. (1968), Alman İdeolojisi, çev. Selâhattin Hilav, İstanbul, Sosyal.
• McQuenn, P. (2011), “Recognition, Social and Political”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
• Nicholson, L. (1996), “to Be or Not to Be: Charles Taylor and the Politics of Recognition”, Constellations, Volume 3, Number 1.
• Taylor, C. (1976), “Hermeneutics and Politics”, Critical Sociology, ed. Paul Connerton, Penguin.
• Taylor, C. (1985), Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2: Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge.
• Taylor, C. (1996), “Tanınma Politikası”, Çokkültürcülük: Tanınma Politikası, haz. Amy Gutman, çev. Yurdanur Salman, İstanbul, Yapı ve Kredi.
• Thompson, E. P. (2004), İngiliz İşçi Sınıfının Oluşumu, çev. Uygur Kocabaşoğlu, İstanbul, Birikim.
• Thompson, S. (2006), The Political Theory of Recognition: A Critical Introduction, Polity Press.
• Yar, M. (2003), “Honneth and the Communiterians: Towards a Recognitive Critical Theory of Community”, Res Publica, 9.